Re: 727 {DISCUSSION THREAD}
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:51 pm
DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
It can't be answered, so it has no answer.DharmaHelper wrote:Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
You assume the only possible answers are "yes" and "no"thellama73 wrote:It can't be answered, so it has no answer.DharmaHelper wrote:Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
Cannot compute [input error]. Please try again.DharmaHelper wrote:You assume the only possible answers are "yes" and "no"thellama73 wrote:It can't be answered, so it has no answer.DharmaHelper wrote:Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
I make no such assumption. There are zero possible answers.DharmaHelper wrote:You assume the only possible answers are "yes" and "no"thellama73 wrote:It can't be answered, so it has no answer.DharmaHelper wrote:Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
The question is unanswerable. Therefore no answer is possible.DharmaHelper wrote:There are infinite possible answers. Whether or not any of them are correct or even coherent, completely different story.
No, I do not.DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is?
That's not an answer. It's a non-sequitur.Metalmarsh89 wrote:No, I do not.DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is?
Oh look what I found, an answer.
The answer to this question is not the word "no". Nor is it any combination of the letters "n" and "o".DharmaHelper wrote:Is the answer to this question no?thellama73 wrote:Don't ask questions that can't be answered.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
Are you telling me I don't make sense?thellama73 wrote:That's not an answer. It's a non-sequitur.Metalmarsh89 wrote:No, I do not.DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is?
Oh look what I found, an answer.
DH's question is like asking "how many sides does green have?" or "what's the square root of vanilla?" Anything you pose as an answer doesn't make sense because the question is unanswerable.
Why for? Back in school?MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm boned.
No.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why for? Back in school?MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm boned.
Why do any of us exist?Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
Because we're here. Roll the bones.DharmaHelper wrote:Why do any of us exist?Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
Finally an easy question from DH.DharmaHelper wrote:Why do any of us exist?Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
This question is unanswerable.MovingPictures07 wrote:Do socks have bones?
I beg to differ.DharmaHelper wrote:This question is unanswerable.MovingPictures07 wrote:Do socks have bones?
I defer to your begging.MovingPictures07 wrote:I beg to differ.DharmaHelper wrote:This question is unanswerable.MovingPictures07 wrote:Do socks have bones?
Why does it happen?Epignosis wrote:Because we're here. Roll the bones.DharmaHelper wrote:Why do any of us exist?Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
I have no use for a packard goose or an English cigar.thellama73 wrote:I have no house in the country. I have no motorcar.
Check the Main Thread.DharmaHelper wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone know an indirect/direct way of asking the host where the main thread objective is? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
I just disproved your theory, Llama. Check the Main Thread.thellama73 wrote:The question is unanswerable. Therefore no answer is possible.DharmaHelper wrote:There are infinite possible answers. Whether or not any of them are correct or even coherent, completely different story.
You can discuss the game mechanics, and ask me questions about them, and also chat amongst yourselves.Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
Sex.DharmaHelper wrote:Why do any of us exist?Snow Dog wrote:Can we not mention anything about the game here? If not why does this thread exist?
Rats.insertnamehere wrote: I just disproved your theory, Llama.
thellama73 wrote:I think if people miss their actions, they simply do nothing that round. No sense letting them hold the rest of us hostage (oops! Bad metaphor for this game!) while we wait for them.
I don't disagree with this.thellama73 wrote:I think if people miss their actions, they simply do nothing that round. No sense letting them hold the rest of us hostage (oops! Bad metaphor for this game!) while we wait for them.