The Syndicate

Ugh, I may already need a replacement. It's not quite year end close yet and I'm already swamped at work

We would like 5 more to start. So we are going to recanvass the no replies this weekend, then recheck in with the replacements & the "No"s.

Someone called the doctor? I'm in!

Three more please

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Matt

Yeah, I kind of slipped in here by wins that I really had nothing to do with and if I had my way, the civs would've lost those games most likely.

But please don't lynch me Day one

Matt wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Matt

Yeah, I kind of slipped in here by wins that I really had nothing to do with and if I had my way, the civs would've lost those games most likely.

But please don't lynch me Day one

Only if you are bad.

Matt wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Matt

Yeah, I kind of slipped in here by wins that I really had nothing to do with and if I had my way, the civs would've lost those games most likely.

But please don't lynch me Day one

I was going for the Day 0 lynch.

Matt wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Matt

Yeah, I kind of slipped in here by wins that I really had nothing to do with and if I had my way, the civs would've lost those games most likely.

But please don't lynch me Day one

Read. My. Signature.

Turnip Head wrote:Three more please

This is how I feel about this, except the opposite of what the title says.

Ricochet wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Three more please

This is how I feel about this, except the opposite of what the title says.

This is an intimidating line up, but I'm really looking forward to playing.

sig wrote:This is an intimidating line up, but I'm really looking forward to playing.

TRAITOOOOOOR

Every little boy who watches Star Wars wanted Luke to turn evil and rule the world, I just fulfilled my childhood desires. :P

Ooh! Are we allowed to post star wars memes now?

sig wrote:Every little boy who watches Star Wars wanted Luke to turn evil and rule the world, I just fulfilled my childhood desires. :P

"Every little boy"

not me. (also sexist? :small p:)

"my childhood desires"

ah, that's better


The irony I like is that
this game delivered that.

DrWilgy wrote:Ooh! Are we allowed to post star wars memes now?

So did you shoot first? Oh wait, wrong Hutt.

I should've known better then to click on a spoiler tag in a post that revolves around Star Wars.

Matt wrote:I should've known better then to click on a spoiler tag in a post that revolves around Star Wars.

It wasn't that spoilery.

You should see the SW dedicated thread.

Or, rather, not.

Ricochet wrote:

Matt wrote:I should've known better then to click on a spoiler tag in a post that revolves around Star Wars.

It wasn't that spoilery.

You should see the SW dedicated thread.

Or, rather, not.

Oh no worries, I'm not trippin' lol. I should be caught up with the rest of the world, goin' to see Star Wars tonight.

"Yippee" - Anakin Skywalker

With three players away from starting and my vacation nearly over, I'm only at Epignosis with my meta cliff notes and, of course, since Golden follows afterwards, it only makes me contemplate crying.

Ricochet wrote:With three players away from starting and my vacation nearly over, I'm only at Epignosis with my meta cliff notes and, of course, since Golden follows afterwards, it only makes me contemplate crying.

And what have you discovered?

Epignosis wrote:

Ricochet wrote:With three players away from starting and my vacation nearly over, I'm only at Epignosis with my meta cliff notes and, of course, since Golden follows afterwards, it only makes me contemplate crying.

And what have you discovered?

Nothing I can use, most likely, because I can hardly ever read into your intentions in a game.

I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Yeah, me too. I just play whatever whimsical way the butterflies tell me to.

Everyone should self-vote on Day 1.

Thoughts?

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

What is this Meta? How do I obtain one?

I am the Anti-Meta. I wouldn't know. Rely on meta near me at your own peril.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

I misread "Omerta" as "Misfits".

Anyway, I wouldn't categorize Omerta as me being "top civvie" I just happened to be playing a game that most people weren't.

DrWilgy wrote:What is this Meta? How do I obtain one?

You must slay the Sock.

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

I misread "Omerta" as "Misfits".

Anyway, I wouldn't categorize Omerta as me being "top civvie" I just happened to be playing a game that most people weren't.

Lol, I was just ready to go pull the "Lies! Lies!" Arcade Fire song.

It doesn't matter how you would categorize yourself, it matters how it comes off looking. You took the reins, you bussed a teammate at the right time for safe measure and, as far as I detected, you only had a few doubters (like LC, I think) which were somehow removed without spreading the doubt further.

Anyway, it's all subjective rather then set in stone - but for me, despite (in your own words) "having done dick" in that game (intentionally), I really thought you were genuine whilst spectating and was shocked to see the outcome and have had issues trusting your good intentions since. You and boo probably the most, but boo's apparently not playing (or able to?).

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

I misread "Omerta" as "Misfits".

Anyway, I wouldn't categorize Omerta as me being "top civvie" I just happened to be playing a game that most people weren't.

Lol, I was just ready to go pull the "Lies! Lies!" Arcade Fire song.

It doesn't matter how you would categorize yourself, it matters how it comes off looking. You took the reins, you bussed a teammate at the right time for safe measure and, as far as I detected, you only had a few doubters (like LC, I think) which were somehow removed without spreading the doubt further.

Anyway, it's all subjective rather then set in stone - but for me, despite (in your own words) "having done dick" in that game (intentionally), I really thought you were genuine whilst spectating and was shocked to see the outcome and have had issues trusting your good intentions since. You and boo probably the most, but boo's apparently not playing (or able to?).

I'm a very good player. One of the best. if you doubt me, you're doing the right thing.

I'm one of the lousiest. So damn lucky to be in this tournament. If you trust me, you're doing the right thing.

Even now I don't even know my role yet and I'm already posting as if the game is afoot.

Switching from replacement to yes.

Me too. I'm not going to be able to post as much as usual. Roll your eyes if you wish, but it's the truth.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Me too. I'm not going to be able to post as much as usual. Roll your eyes if you wish, but it's the truth.

Yay

I am waiting on a PM from Zebra verifying what she posted, and then we need only 1

Come on!

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Me too. I'm not going to be able to post as much as usual. Roll your eyes if you wish, but it's the truth.

Welp, throwing the towel on any meta-reading, then.
Just gonna play the damn game, as always.

So ready for this epic game.

We can most likely start tomorrow evening if we get one more by then

I'd do it, but I am apparently bad at winning

Sign you up Scotty

MacDougall wrote:Sign you up Scotty

If you were the winner of either a Job (Full Game) or a Side Mission (Speed Game) during 2015, you are eligible to participate in our 2015 Game of Champions!

I am 0/7 in all games played here, unfortunately. One day that will change!

QUICK! Super speed Mafia game. Scotty, Rico, Golden!

Day 1, time to vote!

Long Con wrote:QUICK! Super speed Mafia game. Scotty, Rico, Golden!

Day 1, time to vote!

Who's mafia?

Long Con wrote:QUICK! Super speed Mafia game. Scotty, Rico, Golden!

Day 1, time to vote!

Long Con has been lynched. He was A TINY PLEB.
It is now Day 2.