civ
civ
civ
Return to “Steely Dan Mafia [ENDGAME]”
bad
bad
Not really. I liked her in Day 0. Then kind of stopped thinking about her. Didn't like her Mac vote too much. She has been kind of a blur since then. I guess OMGUS turned the meter a little into the scum side.
At least one is very likely. Two is possible but there could be a deepwolf.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2019 6:45 pm We have like what? 2/3 bad left?
The consensus suspects are Luna, Niju, Eloh, Leetic and Neverwhere. 3 out of them have like less than 10 posts and no participation whatsoever. Luna dropped off the face of the earth a while back, and she wasn't exactly a paragon of activity and contribution prior to that. Eloh is faring a bit betting than them, but nothing impressive.
Do we believe that the remaining baddies are amongst these 5? It'd be something.
This is how a meme is born.dunya wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2019 8:03 pmSpoiler: show
dunya wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:17 pm Spacedaisy had some real emotions in her responses to Jack. Not teammate stuff. But real real frustration and passion. Likewise, elochin's eod1 outburst and anger oozed sincerity and while I try to say it's nai, I just can't see bad eloh drawing that much attention to herself when she knows exactly what the flip was gonna bring. She would have bitched about it in btsc maybe. She's like won the most mafia games on this site. Girl knows how to be mafia. And that just doesn't feel right for me. Coupled with the fact Jack used her for his stolen role cop check, I'm not buying they were bad together.
I'm with Jay here, the blooper vote was atrocious and it must be punished.dunya wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:31 pm You might be sarcastic DDL but I am not opposed to that for the first time in my mafia life
My low posters would include Kites and Lunalee.
Kites
Lunalee
Niju
Neverwhere
ReyWas
I hope kites can engage us more. Just knowing his thoughts helps us figure him out like I've managed to do with Matahari (I think)
Pretty sure Epi is looking for a replacement.
Yes.dunya wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:02 pmis this a hard claim?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:00 pm Alright folks
When I told you we were lynching low posters.
That wasn't a suggestion.
I figured you maybe wouldn't but if I tried to predict what you would do I would be feeling from my objective criterium which was "5 lowest posters".Lunalee wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:18 pmYeah, looking at niju I kinda agree with you.Matahari wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:08 pmI reread the lowposters earlier today, and I came away thinking that neverwhere seemed ok too. I did not get the best feeling from Niju. I also tend to suspect Rey is bad every time he doesn’t show up. That’s an old school bias that I haven’t been able to shake, but I also would hate to lynch someone who is a no show. He’s not exactly doing any harm so I’m not sure whether he’s worth thinking about.
She was here for the mac lynch, and voted nutella. The reason was based on what the rest of the thread was doing, instead of a personal choice.
She also wasn't keeping up with the Jack suspicion and asked "people are voting Jack?" I'm assuming that means she wasn't a fan of the Jack lynch either.
reywaS should be mod-killed for inactivity or replaced. I'm not okay with lynching someone with zero posts, and I don't like that DDL thought we would be open to lynching someone with zero posts.
- Look at the GTH we just did. It's probably a low poster.
Sorry I have a role PM that says I can revoke your democracy when I want to.juliets wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:47 pmOh my gosh yes I remember that!Matahari wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:24 pmHe doesn’t. They could both/neither be bad. The os bias is that anyone who is a no show, or early disappearance, and doesn’t get replaced, is probably bad. This is how it would go: I would say “ I think the missing X should be lynched today since we aren’t sure about anyone else. Everyone says “no that’s awful. We can’t do that” finally X gets replaced. Two days later, everyone lynches him. Most times he was bad, but not always.dunya wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:06 pmCan you explain the old school bias? Why does rey have to be bad over leetic for example?Matahari wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:08 pmI reread the lowposters earlier today, and I came away thinking that neverwhere seemed ok too. I did not get the best feeling from Niju. I also tend to suspect Rey is bad every time he doesn’t show up. That’s an old school bias that I haven’t been able to shake, but I also would hate to lynch someone who is a no show. He’s not exactly doing any harm so I’m not sure whether he’s worth thinking about.
That, plus I recall Rey saying he hated being mafia. That has probably changed too.
Juliet’s might remember a game at RevMaf, where a guy named spaghetti (I think), never showed up after the first day or two. At end game, he effin won as a mafia.
I will shake this bias eventually.
I have seen it happen on this site too and it is SOO annoying.
I have to say I agree with dunya about DDL. I'm not convinced it was a townie thing to do to restrict the poll to inactive. I think we were doing pretty damn well with an unrestricted poll. (LC probably doesn't like that vulgarity, lol). If enough people agreed that we should lynch an inactive we would have lynched one.
Dont remember seeing a bad version of it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:40 amCitation needed.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:43 am - Confirming my role, which historically is a civ one.
I disagree. Generally abilities hitting people at random results in revealed baddies and vigged baddies, which means much more for the baddies than the civs. I've lost count of how many games I hosted where I gave the mafia the ability to randomize someone's actions and it ended up backfiring on them. While in terms of thread, a game where town is constantly attacking different people and not following predictable patterns means more things for mafia to react to. Mafia likes a game that follows a smooth lynch order which they can control.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 1:32 pm Jay, I’m not sure I buythat this is a civ move on DDL’s part. But I don’t see why he would claim it so willingly as a baddie either.
Someone said mafia hate randomness, I don’t recall who it was, but I completely disagree with that idea. Methodical discussion and eliminating people as suspects is what gets civs the win, so random is the opposite of good for civs generally speaking.
I will say it is a risk as a baddie to make a smaller pool unless you are certain that your team won’t be in it.
He said it was the lowest four posters at the time he used the power. Did Luna have less posts than kites though?
I remember seeing versions of it, and if my memory doesn't betray me they were good.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:20 pmDo you remember seeing a good version?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 10:57 amDont remember seeing a bad version of it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:40 amCitation needed.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:43 am - Confirming my role, which historically is a civ one.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:20 pm Those were the 5 lowest posters the moment I sent the ability.
Sorry, teacher. Please do not let me fail this module.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:24 pmSure, sure.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:22 pmI remember seeing versions of it, and if my memory doesn't betray me they were good.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:20 pmDo you remember seeing a good version?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 10:57 amDont remember seeing a bad version of it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:40 amCitation needed.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:43 am - Confirming my role, which historically is a civ one.
That's not a citation though.
I did have a choice.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:26 pm Dragon D. Luffy Did you have a choice in who would be on the poll, or was the choice literally "put 5 lowest posters on or do not use this role"
I bet the mafia thought it was random.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:26 pmIs there anything random about what you've done?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:21 pm I disagree. Generally abilities hitting people at random results in revealed baddies and vigged baddies, which means much more for the baddies than the civs. I've lost count of how many games I hosted where I gave the mafia the ability to randomize someone's actions and it ended up backfiring on them. While in terms of thread, a game where town is constantly attacking different people and not following predictable patterns means more things for mafia to react to. Mafia likes a game that follows a smooth lynch order which they can control.
dunyaJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:23 pm I just had myself do a sort of POE/GTH hybrid where I forced myself to pick six top suspects period without concern for tinfoils or cases on the rest:
DDL
Elohcin
leetic
Lunalee
speedchuck
Neverwhere
No particular order.
I think her interactions with Macjack were civ-like.juliets wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:14 pmyikes - I have no idea what you want me to share. Also, I'm missing what leetic has to do with this.speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:32 pm Lunalee experience at BTSC Night A: Wonderful. Juliets can choose to share Luna gold indeed, fine. Leetic less gold than Luna.
speed try again to tell me what I should share.
linki DDL: looks like you think Luna is good?
dunyaJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:26 am Splitting time between two games now, so forgive my slowed pace here. I note that many of us seem to be gravitating toward a consistent POE set. So we should talk about the people not in that set.
For the general public: if you had to name one or two players who most perturb you as tinfoil suspects, who would they be?
Pocketing = mafioso trying to make friends with a townieMatahari wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:34 pmDunya has made some conflicting comments about night 2, and I’m curious about her question for you, when she asked if you thought Nova was pocketing you. What does pocketing mean? (Can’t find it on mafiascum)Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:24 pm As for dunya I'm kind of tiptoeing around her because I've been wrong on her recently but man I just don't have huge reasons to read her as civ and most of the time I do.
You look authentic.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 12:21 amWhy not me?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:20 pm Hmm good point on Daisy vs. Jack being hard to fake.
dunya
Kites
leetic
Matahari
Neverwhere
speedchuck
This post.dunya wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:33 pmdo you remember which post looked genuine against jack? you give her credit for voting mac, but she was the last vote on mac. does that mean anything to you?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:00 am Luna looked fishy early but she made a post against Jack that looked genuine. Voted Mac too. Unlikely mafia.
I just like it. It's real shade on Jack, and probably a good argument.Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:54 pmThis makes me cringe. It reads like you know I'm town, and feel bad joining in on the lynch.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:06 pm I wanna vote Luna but I’m secretly a huge softy and feel bad about her getting lynched a lot D1.
Kites is still neutral because that kind of effort is perfectly reasonable for a scum to make. I've done it as scum myself.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:29 pm Matahari and Kites entered this phase as players on the fringe -- possible POE candidates but not definitely. Where do people stand on them now? If they can be resolved, the suspect pool becomes considerably clearer.
I think Matahari looks quite genuine in her suspicion of dunya.
Kites's big vote tracker thing is a good shiny object, but not something that moves me (and he granted that much himself to his credit). I do still think he looks generally authentic though.
Eh not really just the nagging feeling from all game that I'm not really seeing civ dunya.juliets wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:47 pmSo DDL, do you have any other behavior to cite in the case against dunya that Mata did not bring up? Any of your own observations?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:42 pmKites is still neutral because that kind of effort is perfectly reasonable for a scum to make. I've done it as scum myself.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:29 pm Matahari and Kites entered this phase as players on the fringe -- possible POE candidates but not definitely. Where do people stand on them now? If they can be resolved, the suspect pool becomes considerably clearer.
I think Matahari looks quite genuine in her suspicion of dunya.
Kites's big vote tracker thing is a good shiny object, but not something that moves me (and he granted that much himself to his credit). I do still think he looks generally authentic though.
I like Mata's tone. She's tunneling on dunya for reasonable things.
[VOTE: Dunya] aubergine
Let's see what happens when I follow it. I'm getting the feeling leetic is too easy and I don't wanna lynch Luna. Lynching dunya is so crazy it could work.
Not very useful now, but I just wanted to add: someone being genuinely too busy to play is not alignment indicative. Actually that's the problem with reading low posters. Someone can make the most honest and heatfelt post about how they are mega busy even if they are bad.Kites wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:02 pm not gonna join the leetic lynch
i was okay with niju lynch but i had my doubts about it
this is similar case
i think leetic is genuinely too busy to play, and had the other more interesting game going on (so not mafia here) he would rather concentrate on
it just feels too easy