The Syndicate

Jack has a dismissive tone whenever he talks or asks about INH, as though the INH voters were taken in by flawed reasoning. That's a subtle defense of INH, and the sudden urgency to lynch the INH voters reeks of an agenda.

I believe INH and Jack are teammates.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:43 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:32 pm No, I didn't.

Didn't or don't?

Am I supposed to read it again or am I supposed to "hunt?"

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:52 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:43 pm Jack has a dismissive tone whenever he talks or asks about INH, as though the INH voters were taken in by flawed reasoning. That's a subtle defense of INH, and the sudden urgency to lynch the INH voters reeks of an agenda.

I believe INH and Jack are teammates.

And your desire to save the non LC voters just makes you more LC's buddy.

Save the non-LC voters? There's fifteen of them.

Why didn't I vote Dom, Jack?

Hey Jack, what's your opinion on INH?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:16 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:07 pm Hey Jack, what's your opinion on INH?

Null on his own merits.

I'm shit at reading INH. He always dies before I figure him out and seems to be playing with cards close to his vest.

I didn't play in the Poppy game so "INH would have used a Poppy curse" doesn't sway me, at least not without more consensus. (Two, three people weighed in on it?) Is there further reason behind suspicion of him?

I don't think he's w/w with any of the players who voted for him yesterday. I feel you and Tony wanted him dead over LC and Rico hasn't backed off either.

You feel like Tony and I wanted him dead over LC?

News flash: I did want INH dead over LC.

I voted for him.

No, I didn't know that already. I can't read your mind.

And if I could, I would hear, "Hey guys, who are we killing tonight?"

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:56 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:30 pm No, I didn't know that already. I can't read your mind.

And if I could, I would hear, "Hey guys, who are we killing tonight?"

So you've never heard of distancing?

Like I said, faker, you're the best at pretending not to understand.

I am not pretending not to understand.

You are just bad at communicating. I took you to mean that I voted INH as a means of saving LC rather than as a deliberate means to remove INH from the game.

I looked at the votes with the alternate view that Long Con was being thrown under the bus. I don't think that happened either. speedchuck voted first, as he did with Made. I don't think Lorab is the type to shell a teammate like that (although I don't know what she meant about ties- I don't recall it being a tie when she voted). sprityo's reasons for voting LC look organic enough. INH voted to save his own ass.

No, Long Con's team stayed on the sidelines.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:35 pm Epi, for the second time, can you verbalize your stance on me? I asked you yesterday, and you completely brushed me off.

I'd extend that question to everyone who has bandied about my name. Give me a case or some substance to respond to at least.

Imma gonna ISO Epi.

I think you and your team cursed Ricochet. I know people want to write off the Poppy business, but I came in here at one point to say exactly what Ricochet had already said regarding the curse. Someone who played Blue Velvet is on the cursing team. I sure as hell didn't curse Rico with that nonsense, and Long Con didn't. I think you did. It's that simple. Is it a sexy case? No. But it doesn't have to be sexy to be right.

Protip: Next time pick a curse nobody can link you to. Ask your teammate Jack for suggestions.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:48 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:40 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:35 pm Epi, for the second time, can you verbalize your stance on me? I asked you yesterday, and you completely brushed me off.

I'd extend that question to everyone who has bandied about my name. Give me a case or some substance to respond to at least.

Imma gonna ISO Epi.

I think you and your team cursed Ricochet. I know people want to write off the Poppy business, but I came in here at one point to say exactly what Ricochet had already said regarding the curse. Someone who played Blue Velvet is on the cursing team. I sure as hell didn't curse Rico with that nonsense, and Long Con didn't. I think you did. It's that simple. Is it a sexy case? No. But it doesn't have to be sexy to be right.

Protip: Next time pick a curse nobody can link you to. Ask your teammate Jack for suggestions.

So, you think someone who was in BV must be on the cursing team. LC was in Blue Velvet. So was Speedchuck, Wilgy, Timmer, Sprityo, and of course Ricochet.

Assuming that LC wasn't the one who told Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with, why does it have to be me and not one of the many other people involved in that game?

I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.

Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:03 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:59 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.

Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.

So now we're just full-on insinuating that I lack creativity compared to others, therefore I must be the one who cursed Rico?

Because I've been having the sinking feeling that's been the underlying sentiment behind this entire thing.

I don't think that's it. You revel in self-incriminating shit.

Who do you think cursed Ricochet?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:04 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:59 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:53 pm I will once you explain to me how Long Con told the Faceless Old Lady what to curse Rico with.

Beside the point.

Of the remaining players who played in that game, why is INH the one most likely to use that curse?

Keep in mind that some of us didn't play in Blue Velvet and only know what you and Rico are on about through context clues.

Since LC was clearly bad, explain how you are so sure INH is the curser that you were willing to lynch INH instead of LC?

(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

I don't think LC would curse someone with that. LC is far more creative.

And all the others who aren't LC or INH? How did you know they weren't the curser?

Refuses to lay out his case. Makes getting further details feel like pulling teeth. Accuses anyone who doesn't agree with his unstated logic of being teamed with INH, who, again, is bad for reasons Epi refuses to state. Yet Epi was the one trying to prevent an LC lynch and we know LC is bad.

Epi. Check yer role pm. Cause you're bad.

Did I say I knew they were the cursing person?

You have such an agenda.

I hope if I get lynched, people wake up and take you down right behind me.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.

Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.

INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.

Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:14 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:12 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.

Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.

INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.

Citation needed. I've never seen this.

You've probably never seen a naked woman, but I promise you they exist.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:18 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:12 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:11 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:05 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:57 pm
(Expected response: LC was clearly bad?

Preemptive answer: Yes, which you would know if you'd stop pretending to not understand Golden's case on him. Answer the question.)

And do me a favor- lay off the snotty bullshit please. I didn't understand Golden's case on LC. Apparently a dozen other people didn't either. I get you think I'm bad. You don't have to be snotty about it. Ask your questions and move on.

Of all the players who played in Blue Velvet, why is INH the most likely curser?

Not just more likely than LC. More likely than all of them to the point where he should be lynch target priority #1.

INH revels in self-incriminating schemes. I just said this.

The literal only thing I can think of that you could possibly be referring to is the Game of Champions where I lied and said I developed a program which could tell me whether or not someone was bad by analyzing their word choice compared to other games. I was an independent role who got more power the more their name was mentioned. This was also like four years ago.

Not really comparable to this.

I also recall one I didn't play in which you made a bold, open plan to get everybody a win.

Let's do this: I didn't curse Ricochet, and let's say you didn't. Who do you think did?

I'm going to step back from this exchange. I think a lot of Mafia games get burned to the ground because people are sold on their own pet theories and the outliers don't get any scrutiny.

Get ready outliers. Scrutiny's a comin.

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.

What if Dom is also lcs teammate? I don't like this straw man. The idea that some inh voters were aiming to save lc is a fundamentally sound line of enquiry, whether it's ultimately right or wrong. I don't believe jack is lying about it being a genuine hunt.

I considered this, but I don't think Dom is Long Con's teammate. Dom voted for himself. Do you think Dom is Long Con's teammate?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.

Nice attempt to change the subject.

This is one of the most annoying things in mafia to me.

Someone gets suspected for weak reasons. But, simply due to their name being thrown around, and a large part of the thread detailed to discussing them, they become legitimate targets for the lynch, mostly out of the other players' laziness.

Epi doesn't want to engage, because the more everyone talks about me, the easier it's gonna be to lynch me. It's in his best interest to prolong and prolong as long as humanly possible, and hope that sheer momentum pokes players into not reading the exchanges and instead assume that there's logic-based reasoning there. As long as he makes me into an option, that's one more option that's not him or his teammates.

I would love to change the subject. I just commented about that in a recent post.

Yes, I think you are bad, but my mind is open.

The hell?

Lorab, I was going off memory. I was not tracking the votes. I read back through people's reasons for voting LC, saw your comment about a tie, and remembered reading it without seeing a tie in the poll.

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:45 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:29 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.

Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.

What if Dom is also lcs teammate? I don't like this straw man. The idea that some inh voters were aiming to save lc is a fundamentally sound line of enquiry, whether it's ultimately right or wrong. I don't believe jack is lying about it being a genuine hunt.

I considered this, but I don't think Dom is Long Con's teammate. Dom voted for himself. Do you think Dom is Long Con's teammate?

Dom meant to vote for me.

I'm leaning town on Dom, so no I don't particularly, but if he is bad I think it more likely he is lcs teammate than him being a politician based on their interactions with each other and me and the Nutella kill.

How does that happen? Your name is five places below his.

LoRab wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:46 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:41 pm Lorab, I was going off memory. I was not tracking the votes. I read back through people's reasons for voting LC, saw your comment about a tie, and remembered reading it without seeing a tie in the poll.

Regardless, still reading you as bad. And not sure I believe you.

If I wanted to save LC, all I had to do was vote Dom again. I didn't. I wanted to lynch INH.

Thanatopsis
By William Cullen Bryant
To him who in the love of Nature holds
Communion with her visible forms, she speaks
A various language; for his gayer hours
She has a voice of gladness, and a smile
And eloquence of beauty, and she glides
Into his darker musings, with a mild
And healing sympathy, that steals away
Their sharpness, ere he is aware. When thoughts
Of the last bitter hour come like a blight
Over thy spirit, and sad images
Of the stern agony, and shroud, and pall,
And breathless darkness, and the narrow house,
Make thee to shudder, and grow sick at heart;—
Go forth, under the open sky, and list
To Nature’s teachings, while from all around—
Earth and her waters, and the depths of air—
Comes a still voice—
Yet a few days, and thee
The all-beholding sun shall see no more
In all his course; nor yet in the cold ground,
Where thy pale form was laid, with many tears,
Nor in the embrace of ocean, shall exist
Thy image. Earth, that nourished thee, shall claim
Thy growth, to be resolved to earth again,
And, lost each human trace, surrendering up
Thine individual being, shalt thou go
To mix for ever with the elements,
To be a brother to the insensible rock
And to the sluggish clod, which the rude swain
Turns with his share, and treads upon. The oak
Shall send his roots abroad, and pierce thy mould.
Yet not to thine eternal resting-place
Shalt thou retire alone, nor couldst thou wish
Couch more magnificent. Thou shalt lie down
With patriarchs of the infant world—with kings,
The powerful of the earth—the wise, the good,
Fair forms, and hoary seers of ages past,
All in one mighty sepulchre. The hills
Rock-ribbed and ancient as the sun,—the vales
Stretching in pensive quietness between;
The venerable woods—rivers that move
In majesty, and the complaining brooks
That make the meadows green; and, poured round all,
Old Ocean’s gray and melancholy waste,—
Are but the solemn decorations all
Of the great tomb of man. The golden sun,
The planets, all the infinite host of heaven,
Are shining on the sad abodes of death,
Through the still lapse of ages. All that tread
The globe are but a handful to the tribes
That slumber in its bosom.—Take the wings
Of morning, pierce the Barcan wilderness,
Or lose thyself in the continuous woods
Where rolls the Oregon, and hears no sound,
Save his own dashings—yet the dead are there:
And millions in those solitudes, since first
The flight of years began, have laid them down
In their last sleep—the dead reign there alone.
So shalt thou rest, and what if thou withdraw
In silence from the living, and no friend
Take note of thy departure? All that breathe
Will share thy destiny. The gay will laugh
When thou art gone, the solemn brood of care
Plod on, and each one as before will chase
His favorite phantom; yet all these shall leave
Their mirth and their employments, and shall come
And make their bed with thee. As the long train
Of ages glide away, the sons of men,
The youth in life’s green spring, and he who goes
In the full strength of years, matron and maid,
The speechless babe, and the gray-headed man—
Shall one by one be gathered to thy side,
By those, who in their turn shall follow them.
So live, that when thy summons comes to join
The innumerable caravan, which moves
To that mysterious realm, where each shall take
His chamber in the silent halls of death,
Thou go not, like the quarry-slave at night,
Scourged to his dungeon, but, sustained and soothed
By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave,
Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch
About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams.

I adore Dorothy Parker.

glean

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:50 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:46 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:39 pm That's an outright lie considering I've tried to engage with INH (he all but ignored me), have made multiple points of contact with Tony, and just probed Eloh.

But cute.


You can't say you were suspicious of me since day 1 AND also say that my Night 1 rebuke of you is teh source of your suspicion, Golden. Which is it? I've asked this question before, and you've ignored it because you have no answer. Sad !

*Sad!*

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:28 pm is something Donald Trump would say about critics
Be better than Donald Trump.

:cheeky:

Was the point.
But you also didn't play the game where I parodied Donald Trump for most of it.

Dom parodied Trump in a game. What game was that?

Dom, in what game did you impersonate Trump?

LoRab wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:42 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:33 pm Dom, in what game did you impersonate Trump?

Wow. Holy good mafia memory, batman!

I looked back. Romance of Three Kingdoms.

How'd you find that so quickly? You didn't play Romance of the Three Kingdoms, did you?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:46 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:42 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:33 pm Dom, in what game did you impersonate Trump?

Wow. Holy good mafia memory, batman!

I looked back. Romance of Three Kingdoms.

How'd you find that so quickly? You didn't play Romance of the Three Kingdoms, did you?

Ah, I see you did.

timmer, I'm looking at the votes. You've missed both Day phase votes, but voted in the Night phase. I know you said you weren't aware anything had started for the first vote, but did you say why you missed the second vote? If you had voted Day 1 and 2, who would you have voted for and why?

timmer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:19 pm Yeah, conversation is def. good, I had forgotten howfast these speed games move.

@Epi, I don't think I covered it, but I wasn't present in the game for the first vote, and the second vote I hadn't yet caught up, so I didn't see how randomly throwing out a vote would help. As for the night poll, it seemed like a typical night poll, so I just grabbed a spot, I don't even remember what my opition was.

Reading back, day 1 I would have essentially randomed my vote if I were here, there was nothing in my read that would have caught my attention. As for yesterday? I'm not sure. I don't think I'd have voted LC, so good on those who did.

For today, I'm still unsure. I ended up reading damn fast, and I'm at work. I won't be leading any charges today, for sure, but once others do, I'll find the time to ISO their suspicions and make a udgment.

I'm sure you can guess my concern. A Day 1 missed vote, fine- but missing the Day 2 vote when LC got lynched just because you hadn't read everything looks like hiding to me.

timmer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:10 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:50 pm
I'm sure you can guess my concern. A Day 1 missed vote, fine- but missing the Day 2 vote when LC got lynched just because you hadn't read everything looks like hiding to me.

It also would suggest I'm not on that baddie team, which is more useful pro-civ info than I think is available for a number of players. But I totes get why you are asking.

How so?

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear

no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something

Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP

this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well

mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO

I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.

"shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:34 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear

no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something

Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP

this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well

mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO

I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.

I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

Apparently I'm supposed to save Tony though because we're bad together. I can't do that though. Too bad.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:46 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:42 pm I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

Apparently I'm supposed to save Tony though because we're bad together. I can't do that though. Too bad.

Oh that lovable contrarian epigonsis

what a card

But seriously, you still think I'm the Faceless Old Woman?

Do you want me to repost my rebuttals so you can read and maybe respond to them?

Or would you just like to continue to ignore every point I make in favor of sitting in silence instead of engaging people about your suspicions?

You suspect me. Great, whoop-de-doo. Would you like to talk about it, and maybe be constructive?

I will admit the evidence against you is circumstantial.

I find it easy to lynch you because you are blatant in your schemes.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:56 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:53 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.

Huh. I thought you thought I was bad, and were just not pursuing it for some reason. That would have been atypical play for you, I think.

Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?

Poll ends soon. Voting INH to piss of spirtyo.

I am displeased that timmer has not voted. If he does not vote, I will likely be voting him next.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:01 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:57 pm Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:49 pm I am also not enthusiastic about speedchuck's vote for Long Con, followed up by someone he apparently suspects. I am hoping to hear more from speedchuck before I vote.

This bit.

Granted, that was before he flipped. But it was never really followed up on.

I thought your vote on Made sucked, so your vote on Long Con looked like more of the same- voting first out of the blue to escape accountability.

This displeases me.

Neverwhere is Pamela. Nobody has been off the poll.

Pamela Winchell
The former mayor of Night Vale and current Director of Emergency Press Conferences. Pamela may hold a press conference to remove someone from the lynch poll on three occasions.

Tony could be:

Tamika Flynn
The 13-year-old renowned destroyer of librarians and commander of an army of child soldiers, Tamika has amazing strength of will under duress. Tamika blocks a player on even nights. *Secrets*

Secrets there.

Kevin
Kevin is the host of Desert Bluffs Community Radio. He uses his dark, soulless eyes to silence a player each night. *Secrets*

Secrets there.

Hiram McDaniels
Literally a five-headed dragon; who cares? *Secrets*

Secrets there.

The Man in the Tan Jacket
Countless residents have seen him, but no one can seem to remember exactly what he looks like - just that he has a tan jacket and a deerskin suitcase, and he has been spotted all over town. *Secrets*

Secrets there.

That's three of four secrets that don't belong to civilians.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:42 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:31 pm Neverwhere is Pamela.

I have never seen anybody off the poll. Neverwhere is never there.

I feel like I'm piecing this all together. Can anyone else speak? Tony? What say you?

I want to hear from Tony about what happened.