The Syndicate

Hugh Jass

I've used meh a lot this game lol

Hugh Jass

Kind of describe the game state : meh

Hugh Jass

Mr. Burns wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:27 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:09 pm @Mr. Burns Thoughts on Alison and Bart?
I wouldn't go after Allison without a smoking gun...like she clearly pushed a townie OVER a wolf. Her pushes always reek of certainty, even when she's wrong and really seems like she should be considering the possibility that she might be. This is part of why I want to know for sure on Lisa. But she's just really hard to read and unless we get into a situation where I have to just yolo the game on trying to read her I'm not gonna go either way without some sort of info.

I think in this game state Bart has given us enough to read them as town. So Bart I think is town unless they are one of the great wolves of our time. That's a critical difference. Bart might be one of the great wolves of our time...Allison just is.

If Bart is who I think it is, they might just be. Have you ever played with a wolf alison?

Hugh Jass

Nah it's almost certainly not Michelle unless she just decided to play like a different person

Hugh Jass

Wait is she? lool

Hugh Jass

You might onto something here. I just read the early posts with it in mind

Hugh Jass

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:02 pm what is The Math for PoE at this point?

It's 8 v 3 right now so 5. 3 wolves and 2 free mischops.

Hugh Jass

Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:48 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:26 am Do you not think it is time to start getting into that territory and reassess? There are 3 wolves alive. I feel like you've been going at the game one target at a time each phase. I don't think it's inherently a bad thing especially if someone is confident in their reads, but you don't give off that vibe. And it also stands in stark contrast with your earlier assessment on the state of the game.
Okay, I saw this bandied about a bit as a discussion point. I think I did reassess on a bunch of people. A few of my read movements (which you can track if you go through my ISO and see) - I had Gramps as scum early on for a bad entrance and interaction with Flanders, but he's been trending up over the course of D2 and D3. I snap read Lisa as town for her first post, but I suspect her now. I had my doubts about Hugh at first but now he's a confident townread.

When I reassess the game it doesn't mean that I flip all my reads, throw out my towncore and start sucking up to the people I used to scumread. It just means that - I look at the game afresh, with an eye to shaking off possible confbias and viewing past posts with more knowledge of people's alignments.

I'm not talking about reassessment in specific read, although most of the examples here have been early in the game. It's more about what I feel is a narrow view on the game. Like I'm not sure what your thoughts on the game look past your current target at any given time. If that makes sense. It's not inherently bad as I mentioned but in the case of this game and with the earlier concerns you voiced, it doesn't fit really.

I don't think anyone in their right mind would do that lol. Say Lisa flips, where do you go for them? Depending on her alignment.

Hugh Jass

Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:25 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:23 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:22 pm What is the concern with Lisa? She's always been a top notch student.
Read her posts. She's made a remarkable contribution this RD, 1 post! Top marks, fo sho
I read them. The concern is that Lisa has one post this phase and that means she's a bad student? I find that less than compelling evidence.

She was the second wagon and has been suspected before her absence this phase. Being inactive isn't really one of the reasons.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Hugh Jass

Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:39 pmOtto

Why him?

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.

I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.

What's yours?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.

Lol thank you.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:04 pm 2 hours before Eod and activity still is low

Be the change you want to see in the world.

Hugh Jass

[VOTE: Burns] aubergine

Hugh Jass

Marge where ya at

Get in

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.
Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:09 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.
I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.
What's yours?
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.
Lol thank you.
What's my take about what?

The interaction you asked me about.

Hugh Jass

Lead one now, there are a few people

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol
Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.
Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.
Not before a scum flip anyway.

I didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.

You've played against me as a wolf before I think

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol
Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.
Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?

I don't follow

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:33 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol
Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.
Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?
I don't follow
All inactives until now flipped town and were either MLed or NKed. Is obvious Lisa lynch is an inactive lynch, but you consider her a mislynch?

Are we talking past each other?

We are. She's a scum read of mine, and I'm the one who cased her lol. The inactive lynch angle is what I told you her absence might be if she's scum, like she decided to not show up so that we might think this is a bad lynch like the previous one.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:36 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:30 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.
Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.
Not before a scum flip anyway.
I didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.

You've played against me as a wolf before I think
You say i don't have progression, i would say i kept the tunnel.
Are you affraid of pressure?

I'm not. Do I come off as someone afraid of it? Lol.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:37 pm Spoiler that a little please if you quote it again

Missed this, sorry

Hugh Jass

I'll be back in a few, dinner time.

Hugh Jass

back like we never left

Hugh Jass

Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:53 pm That isn't the reason Krusty gave. Krusty says Lisa should be dead for making only one post today. I disagree with that, and it's lazier than when Homer came dressed up as John Belushi to the children's Halloween party. *shudders*

Fair.

Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:53 pm Being suspected before her absence this phase isn't a reason either.

No one is saying it is genius. Wanted to let you know that it's suspicion carrying over the previous phases. Here's the gist of how I felt about her in a few posts. Included Grampa's post which was noice.

Spoiler: show

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:54 am Not a big fan of Lisa's little contribution. Feels like she's hunting some easy posts to go off of, and then just share some bland takes. She's kind of using them to appear as if contributing. It's not the lack of reasoning that is off to me, it's more like they seem to be random as hell. There is no train of thoughts or contuinity to them, she's not like quoting different posts about a same discussion trying to give her thoughts about them or add to the discussion. She's more putting her hand into a lot of different discussion to I guess appear more visible, and broaden her reach.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:48 pm That's not exactly what I was talking about. I'm not holding against her thoughts consistency stuff in general, it's not really a scum tell for me. My gripe with how she's contributing. It feels like she's mostly picking out post to quote and piggy back off, she's not really adding to discussion in a way that's game solving or advancing the game. Like there isn't really pertinent points or reaching conclusions, and it's a cheap way to milk interaction and visibility.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:09 pm
Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:59 pm I fail to see how it's got a civilian mindset behind it.
i'm not really thinking it's anything explicitly civvie-motivated rather than just...not wolf motivated.

i struggle to find a wolf faking that type of read and for what reasons. not sure if as a wolf you'd go to that length?

i mean, who would have ever thought about that type of stuff?

maybe you're right but ime I'd say that stuff is kinda hard to fake as a wolf unless it's w/w
I get the angle of thoughts that usually don't pop in the heads of wolves but like here it's pretty tame I feel since the drop off in activity and Grumple's many questions were pretty noticeable imo. It's the kind of stuff that I love to point out as scum because they're at a very superficial level. There is also like a lack of attachment to it and progression from her which usually happen when a townie gets pinged by something that no one has comment and especially when it results in an immediate read. Like an eureka moment that feels genuine lol. Here it comes off more as her wanting to put it lights I guess.

Your take is alright though and I might be wrong

Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:31 am
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:07 pm Grampa's EoD2 looked pretty good. I liked our interactions and he did seems genuine in his thoughts and considering the different cases I had. Would like to hear more from him since his 2 main suspects just flipped civ. He's been trending up.
Trying to ISO Lisa with an unforgiving perspective admittedly does make her look worse than null

okay I had a whole post written out but it was word soup and I would've been guilty of that "so many paragraphs just to say a sentence worth of content" push that was used against you (inaccurately, IMO, but still)

I was going to try and argue against your "hand in every jar" argument, and propose a "she mostly town-read the dominant wagons before dipping" alternative, but when I really got down to it, her commentary about the wagons is about equal to her commentary about chopping slankers, Marge shading, and then D2 Allison shading. She's maintained a Burns scum-lean D1 and D2, voted him D2. I can't tell if she scum-leans Marge or not. I think so? She voted Marge D1 and shaded her D2, so... probably? There's just very little to work with. She doesn't say more than one or two things about any subject. Your "hand in every jar" argument is bang on.

From what I can glean, her POE is Bart, Marge, Burns, Allison, with Burns being her strongest(?) lean

Her town is... CBG? She sided with me on D1 but in a really indirect way, so can't say I'm there, especially since she called me desperate because of a bad sentence in my D2 entrance. Town-read Grumple D1 and switched that D2, but didn't commit to calling him wolf-y. Still, probably not a town-lean. And... that's it.

her only town read was the D2 wagon, and she only revealed that a few hours before the chop

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
That wasn't the case last phase. What changed?
come on...

lolol what

Hugh Jass

I missed you Burns sama

Hugh Jass

I think the host mentioned being absent, he probably told a mod to close the thread. But If it doesn't happen, we should stop posting at 58

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:08 am i wanted to look at the votes and a conclusion from them is that Hugh never voted for a mislynch, not even for Lisa about whom he was convinced she is scum. Why was this @Hugh Jass

Mill and CBC were town reads of mine. I was on Lisa earlier and made it the leading wagon, moved off when it took a considerable lead to keep things not too far and see how other things felt.

Hugh Jass

I'm so exhausted lol

Hugh Jass

I think Doc should come out if they have expanded both shots. Gets us 2 confirmed peeps that can help lead the conversation or at least be some sort of stabilizer. And we'll have at least 1 of them the following phase

Also forces mafia to commit to a CC early if they're doing it which is a good trade since we get another chop before an and/or solution.

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:33 am
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:21 am
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:08 am i wanted to look at the votes and a conclusion from them is that Hugh never voted for a mislynch, not even for Lisa about whom he was convinced she is scum. Why was this @Hugh Jass
Mill and CBC were town reads of mine. I was on Lisa earlier and made it the leading wagon, moved off when it took a considerable lead to keep things not too far and see how other things felt.
how these other things felt?

Meh overall, there were no movement and nothing caught traction. Marge didn't come back to wagonize Burns which could have been interesting and Krusty who called for it didn't switch there to make it happen. Suspicions on you kind of hit a wall when I got told the identity lol, a lot of reservations there.

Hugh Jass

I'll be back later, gonna enjoy my sunday morning

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:03 pm i refuse any meta read, hope you understand, if you will expand the suspicions/reservations game related i will answer at them.

It helped me contextualize your tinfoil on me and the reactions to suspicions on you, feels familiar. It's not solely meta since we continued interacting last phase and that kinda shot the argument of you not trying to figure me out.

Hugh Jass

That was a long morning

Hugh Jass

Otto Mann wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:39 pm Earlier in the game I posted about seeing a world where Burns and Allison are w/w and you guys gave me shit for "associative reads" or something.
Well I'm seeing that world again and don't care that you guys hate me exploring worlds.
Also, I'll have to ISO to confirm, but I don't think Krusty has questioned Allison or Burns and by this point in the game Krusty would have normally questioned everyone and gone back for some follow up.
Now he didn't get salty the last time I circled back on him, but I think he's learned not to lash out when scum.
Another thing with Krusty is that when hes town his reads are never this bad, however I have seen him go full on open wolf and just jump on any convenient town wagon night after night.
Hes bold like that.

Think that was me meme-ing lol. The quote and emoji should have made it obvious, I wanted the thought behind it

Hugh Jass

I could see that world

Hugh Jass

Why Krusty over one of them right now?

Hugh Jass

Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:10 pm
Otto Mann wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:05 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 3:59 pm
Otto Mann wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:59 pm As it stands I dont see myself moving off Krusty for any reason.
Worst post of your entire life.

I get it. Feeling a lil drained, bleh.

Town core of Alison, Hugh, Otto, Burns, Grampa are rotten. 2 minimum wolf methinks. I'll bet my flapping dicky

So between Allison, Burns, Hugh and Grandpa who are your strongest SR's?
Hugh and Grandpa, gut feels. My game is absolute trash so far, so fuck it.

Come on now, I'm obv town lol. What happened to the gut scum read on Alison? And wanting Burns to compete with Lisa last phase?

Hugh Jass

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:26 am I think Doc should come out if they have expanded both shots. Gets us 2 confirmed peeps that can help lead the conversation or at least be some sort of stabilizer. And we'll have at least 1 of them the following phase

Also forces mafia to commit to a CC early if they're doing it which is a good trade since we get another chop before an and/or solution.

Guess not everyone has checked in so far, but a reminder nonetheless.

DO IT!

Hugh Jass

Also since when is Gramps part of any towncore lmao? The dude has been non stop suspected, same with me and Burns to a degree.

Hugh Jass

[VOTE: Burns] aubergine

Hugh Jass

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:02 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:55 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:03 pm i refuse any meta read, hope you understand, if you will expand the suspicions/reservations game related i will answer at them.
It helped me contextualize your tinfoil on me and the reactions to suspicions on you, feels familiar. It's not solely meta since we continued interacting last phase and that kinda shot the argument of you not trying to figure me out.
I have to admit, my tinfoil changed a bit, i think your day was better after we talked, but what bothers me is your calm, is like you are waiting the game moving forward by itself. Maybe is just my wrong perception and if it is please help me to see this.
Can you reevaluate Mr. Burns (because you already have that huge analysis on him) and make short reads for everyone?
I will do this myself in few hours, to not say i may be inspired/influenced by your ideas, i would suggest you to post these things in the same time, i will @ you when i am ready.

That's a pretty fair take, I think it's because of how I've been solving more globally rather than hard committing on one target at times even though I cased and have several suspects. Mentioned earlier how the flow of the game and the dynamic of the sockpuppets was throwing me off, like being shy with my votes which is not a me thing no matter my alignment. It's just been a weird game and I'm emotionally exhausted a bit so that's seeping in.

I have no energy to do that right now, and it's sleepy time in a few hours. Will do that in the morning tomorrow, was planning on re-read some stuff.

Hugh Jass

Where are the wonder twins?

Hugh Jass

Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:19 pm Why the fuck does scum Krusty not shoot Skinner? Skinner is a claimed Tracker and was suspicious of Krusty. If you're Krusty there you just shoot Skinner, everyone assumes it's because he's a PR, and you get rid of someone pointing a finger at you without drawing any attention.

Skinner might have been left alive because his Krusty suspicion is wrong and wolves want him to rampage after the wrong guy.

If he's bad, he's not a lone wolf. Avoiding Krusty again might have been another doc dodge to be safe. Not that impossible for a Doctor to have foregone using a shot one of the first two night banking on assumed protection to then clutch an N3 save.

Hugh Jass

Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:07 pm There is probably 1 scum between Otto and Krusty. I don't see how two people who know each other well here can be so sure that the other is scum if it's V/V. Wolves have no reason to bus like this given the gamestate, so occam's razor is that it's just one town and one wolf.

Which is which?

Hugh Jass

Back like we never left

I have a little bit more energy today so that's noice

Search found 523 matches