speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:49 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:47 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:24 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:12 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:02 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:09 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:07 pm
Jay is town. Don't try lynch him.
Tell me more Dragomir. Tell me more.
Ew.
How dare you say “ew” to me.
Really tho what
Ooh yeah baby, call me town some more, that's the stuff
That’s one interpretation!
The translation I was going for is “why”.
My interpretation is funnier.
No serious problem with you asking why though.
speedchuck gave me this "ew" in response to my prod of Dragomir. As soon as I provided the most obvious translation available ("why"), speedchuck bailed on the ew entirely. Rather hard to buy that progression.
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:47 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:09 pm
Low-key wanna scum read Jay for being tryhard just cause it'd be funny.
That's a turnaround.
Just mentioned this. Meh.
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:48 pm
I read further and whoa Drago is SDing and it's only D0
"whoa"
"self-destructing"
Nah
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:53 pm
Oh wait it's D1.
Drago's obstinate refusal to explain his reads is baffling. For those who've seen normal scum drago, is he always really, really obvscum or is he just lolcatting right now?
linki: self-destructing and oh hey there's a post
Orange: sure it's goofy, but speedchuck knows well that goofy and evil are not equivalent.
Red: this just looks fake to me at face value. Even if Dragomir is mafia, it's not "obvscum", and "lolcatting" would be essentially the same thing anyway. "Is Dragomir always mafia, or is he just mafia?"
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:55 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:33 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:24 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:18 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:20 pm
Agreed with concern about Rej take. Potential TMI on Dragomir.
Why? What about it strikes as TMI?
I'll answer for him. Firstly, you have been actually pretty scummy. So for Rej to defend you is TMI. Rej has no reason to feel like you have been civvy enough to question the people casing him.
Rej is taking the opportunity to gain your trust by dismissing the case as incredulous, which is invariably how you would feel as a civ. In the event of a civilian flip of you he is distanced from the case making of a bad lynch, which is where people first look for wolves (even though it's usually never that simple).
Now, onto Fayt, who we have common ground on.
This post smells like a litter box. Paints quite a big picture of events. "Actually pretty scummy"? Mac is purring like a devil
IDK Mac always comes off overtly scummy to me.
I like you tho dawg
Non-read on Mac with a built-in suspicion-by-default clause -- not an ideal response to Turnip Head saying why Mac is a cat.
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:56 pm
Can drago and Rej both be bad?
Epi observed that speedchuck hadn't voted yet at this point. This then contributes to the negative environment for both players without meaningfully investigating their alignments. It's a question directed at everyone and by extension at nobody.
speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:30 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:27 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:20 amHe's banking all of his analysis on the one Persona game, which is fallacious as heck. "JJJ isn't doing things exactly like he did in P5" is not a case, it's a justification.
I agree that it's fallacious, though that's something I am thinking about. Rej has only played one game with me, and it was that one. So it makes some sense that he'd be inclined to assess me on that basis.
![Ponder :ponder:](./images/smilies/ponderous.gif)
I saw that he'd played a couple other games, but didn't notice specifically that.
Small point in his favor. Someone approaching a game in a different way doesn't mean much unless there's a scum motive for the new approach, but Rej might not read that way
"small point in his favor" is meh. chuck's vote is still there with so sign of moving.