The Syndicate

Still kinda feeling the Jack/speedchuck w/w vibe.

colonialbob wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 12:32 amAs far as other reads I'd really prefer to wait for flips tonight, you know, in case somebody dies...

That's assuming we get to know the role of the nightkilled party

Eloh, check out my post here if similarity is your jam.

No, I took it as a joke, I'm suspicious of him from his ISO

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:08 pmQuin pulled this move on Day 0. I think it's decent on a couple fronts:

1) It's effective for content generation.
2) This notion of "I have a suspicion, everyone else should tell me what it is" strikes me as an atypical means for a mafioso to either smear or distance.

Catching up, but I wanna post right away on this - I thought this was a cool way to engage the thread. Kudos, Quin, did you make that up for this game?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 26, 2017 11:09 am Daaaaaang Eloh.

Daaaaang?

Does anyone know who any of the other Epi voters actually were?

Nice try, Jack, but you forgot that they're invisible!

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:45 pm Is Marmot okay?

I still remember how he looked the last time I saw him...

Yeah, "baddies" is British to me. But I Mafia-grew-up using Civvies and baddies, so I still often do. And I capitalize Civvies for some reason.

colonialbob wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:13 pm As of now I'm probably voting into jack/LC/speedchuck. But I've been relatively unplugged for a few days so I want to go back and do some rereading.

I'm pretty much with you except on the LC front.

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:14 pm...as Long Con was receiving a following

It's my best following ever!

aye

Ugh, this is LC-Epi all over again over again.

ready
let's get this over with

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:35 pm Yeah fuck it.

JACKOFHEARTS2005
NUTELLA
DRWILGY

Bad
Bad
Good

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:38 pm SPRITYO/DUNYA
SIG
EPIGNOSIS

Good
Good
Bad

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:40 pm SLOONEI
DRAGON D. LUFFY
COLONIALBOB

Good
Good
Good

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:42 pm MOVINGPICTURES07/JAGGEDJIMMYJAY
LONG CON
MESK514

Good
Good
Bad

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:47 pm ELOHCIN
KYLEMII
SPEEDCHUCK
QUIN

Bad
Good
Bad
Good

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:15 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:39 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:38 pm (inb4 Epi "you are. I know exactly where I'm shooting")

I read this as a sexual joke.

I was about to respond, "I'm shooting in the dark too."

I am twelve years old and what is this?

You are 30. OR was it 26?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 1:47 am @Long Con

Do you think this last post is a slip? Serious question.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:23 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:21 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:15 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:14 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:11 am @Quin what do you think of sprityo?

GTH bad. I haven't got time to go much deeper than that on him today though.

Will you trust me and vote for him?

Not off of this post alone.

why am i bad?

No, I do not.

There is nothing circular about the Epi case. The "circular" rebuttal is fake, and it makes me suspicious to see it called real.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:36 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:29 am There is nothing circular about the Epi case. The "circular" rebuttal is fake, and it makes me suspicious to see it called real.

Let's say, JaggedJimmyJay made a Crowded House reference in the thread Day 0, and you spotted it and called it out. Then he was like, you're cool LC, I'm not lynching you today.

Would you read that as scum JJJ immediately?

Are you not willing to admit a little bias and aggression in how hard you went after Epi for slightly mundane reasons? Didn't you feel you did better scum hunting when you didn't focus all posts on him?

I'm sorry, I didn't see a reference to circles there.

No, circular logic is logic that requires a belief that it's right in order to prove that it's right. Like "God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God, and thus is the truth."

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:53 am No, circular logic is logic that requires a belief that it's right in order to prove that it's right. Like "God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God, and thus is the truth."

Ah ok, circular logic. I understand now. Did Epi explain how your argument was circular? Because I don't see it. I don't see how it was and I also did not see his reasoning.

I did see you going around in circles, though.

Was I going around in circles or tunnelling? These mixed metaphors are just making me shake my head.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:03 amnevermind I found it.

So, was I using circular logic?

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:18 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:15 am

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:53 am No, circular logic is logic that requires a belief that it's right in order to prove that it's right. Like "God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God, and thus is the truth."

Ah ok, circular logic. I understand now. Did Epi explain how your argument was circular? Because I don't see it. I don't see how it was and I also did not see his reasoning.

I did see you going around in circles, though.

Was I going around in circles or tunnelling? These mixed metaphors are just making me shake my head.

BOTH. You were tunneling and refused to do anything else

FALSE. I also discussed other players and interactions.

, despite him counterclaiming your accusations and going back and forth, and back and forth.

MISLEADING. I didn't post "despite" his counterclaims, I posting BECAUSE his counterclaims were all so bullshitty. Like saying that I knew Mesk and bob were Civvies, or saying that I claimed he "magically chose" who would respond to his Bob Dylan thing.

If I accuse you of something, and all you have to counter it are ridiculous arguments, then it's going to make me suspect you more. Every time. I don't really understand why most of the thread just smile and nod when reading some of this crap, but hey, everyone has to play their own way.

If I didn't have to laboriously point that kind of stuff out, then there wouldn't have been so much focus. Don't blame me. It's like blaming outraged Native Americans for getting upset about Trump's "Pocahontas" comment. Like, "shut up you guys, you're going around in circles and tunnelling about this!"

To go around in circles is basically talk about Epi all day/night long without achieving anything new. I wasted a lot of effort on you and Epi's bromance.

Just ignore my posts then, if that's how you feel. It's a Syndicate tradition.

I'm more into Alt Rock kind of stuff so I didn't get the joke... but I did just do some research and found out Taylor Swift has a song called 'Blank Space'. So, I didn't laugh, but I did learn. That's good too.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:57 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:36 am

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:18 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:15 am

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:53 am No, circular logic is logic that requires a belief that it's right in order to prove that it's right. Like "God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God, and thus is the truth."

Ah ok, circular logic. I understand now. Did Epi explain how your argument was circular? Because I don't see it. I don't see how it was and I also did not see his reasoning.

I did see you going around in circles, though.

Was I going around in circles or tunnelling? These mixed metaphors are just making me shake my head.

BOTH. You were tunneling and refused to do anything else

FALSE. I also discussed other players and interactions.

you did, as a sideline, but my post was meant to amplify the fact that your main objective and clear focus was on Epi. Please tell me I'm wrong.

You were wrong when you said that I refused to do anything else. You were right when you said my main objective on Day 1 was Epi. I don't think hyperbole is necessary.

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:36 am

, despite him counterclaiming your accusations and going back and forth, and back and forth.

MISLEADING. I didn't post "despite" his counterclaims, I posting BECAUSE his counterclaims were all so bullshitty. Like saying that I knew Mesk and bob were Civvies, or saying that I claimed he "magically chose" who would respond to his Bob Dylan thing.

If I accuse you of something, and all you have to counter it are ridiculous arguments, then it's going to make me suspect you more. Every time. I don't really understand why most of the thread just smile and nod when reading some of this crap, but hey, everyone has to play their own way.

One could argue here that your accusations were ridiculous in the first place.

One could, but the proper response to an argument that one thinks is ridiculous should be to say "That's ridiculous, and here's why...", not to invent ridiculous counterarguments. The ridiculous counterarguments were the main reason for my focus on the subject. If Epignosis, or you, or anyone else didn't like the way that played out, there's a really good piece of advice for you. Inventing several way-more-ridiculous counterarguments is not useful, and wastes time.

Unless causing distractions and wasting time is useful to one's plans in whatever alignment one might be, of course. I might try to use that next time I'm bad, actually, I think it can be pretty effective.

The way I saw this pan out was Epi made a tongueincheek comment after Bob played along with him. I've done many of these before. Someone makes a hilarious post on Day 1, ok dude, I won't look your way on Day 1, there's three other anti town players I can be concentrating on so why not. You really blew that one way out of proportion by calling it buddying on Day 1. Do you think if there was a solid case against Bob, Epi would have turned the other cheek? I mean, let's be real.

I'm all too real. No, I don't think that Epi would shy away from a solid case on a Civvie he has buddied at some point. I don't think that's how buddying works - it's not a vow to protect and save the player you're buddying, it's a subtle buildup of showing a similar mindset, cultivating that into a mutual Civ acknowledgement on some level.

Mesk -- I saw what Epi was seeing. Is it groundbreaking and completely ethical and fool proof? No. But is any Day 1 lynch 100% fool proof? No. His response to narrowing his suspect pool on the grounds of a townie-ping he got from Mesk was not at all "ridiculous". You completely dismissing it was rather over the top though.

Sounded fake to me, so I pursued it. Don't conflate my dogged debunking of Epi's ridiculous counterarguments with an insistence that this was a sure thing.

Again, I do view you as townie, and as such, I really think you're playing a dangerous game here. If Epi was lynched and he flipped town against your better judgement, would you have done an "ooopsie, this happens every game, sorry guyzzzz but Epi is soooo scummy".

Danger is my middle name. If Epi is lynched and he flips bad against your better judgement, will you praise my instincts, or brush it off as a lucky break? We don't need to play this What If game, really, since this happens every game. Let's find one where I got Civ Epi lynched!

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:36 amIf I didn't have to laboriously point that kind of stuff out, then there wouldn't have been so much focus. Don't blame me. It's like blaming outraged Native Americans for getting upset about Trump's "Pocahontas" comment. Like, "shut up you guys, you're going around in circles and tunnelling about this!"

I find your comparison here hilarious and very reflective of the kind of player you are.

Well I would hope so.

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:36 am

To go around in circles is basically talk about Epi all day/night long without achieving anything new. I wasted a lot of effort on you and Epi's bromance.

Just ignore my posts then, if that's how you feel. It's a Syndicate tradition.

don't be salty.

I'm not salty anymore, these days it just provides me with bewildered amusement.

You do realize you've done this a lot in the past (I mean, I've witnessed it several times and I haven't even played 5 games on this forum) and it was misdirected in the past, right? How many times have you successfully targeted a scum based on Day 0+ tunneling? How many times was it misguided?

Pirates was pretty recent, and it went really well for me. Too well, really, they killed me early. Twice. Targeted me Night 1, and then Night 2 again when I proved to be too awesome to kill the first time.

I've done things like go after a player that everyone else saw as town, but at least I've been honest with myself and the thread, that it's intuition-based and I didn't have any solid ground to stand on. Your grounded stubbornness, on the other hand, is pretty dangerous to town imo. No one should be that sure of themselves at this point, except scummers when they call another player townie.

That is a reasonable opinion.

There are facets to my gameplay that you are not considering, ones you are not aware of, so you couldn't consider them. I don't really want to peel away the layers and expose my every strategy here, because the game's not over.

also sorry, I speak four languages and am a master of none. Instead of shaking your head or face palming at my mistakes, perhaps you could tell me what you think I misconstrued so it doesn't happen again. No sarcasm intended.

I thought I was pretty clear if there were any instances that I thought you misconstrued something. Like giving a Circular Logic example, for instance. If there's somewhere I've failed to do that, let me knwo and I'll correct my oversight.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 1:27 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:53 am No, circular logic is logic that requires a belief that it's right in order to prove that it's right. Like "God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God, and thus is the truth."

Ah ok, circular logic. I understand now. Did Epi explain how your argument was circular? Because I don't see it. I don't see how it was and I also did not see his reasoning.

I did see you going around in circles, though.

Spoiler: show

colonialbob, Mesk, and Sloonei are good because Epignosis is buddying / intimidating them
Epignosis is bad because he is buddying / intimidating colonialbob, Mesk, Sloonei

As circular as a fake boob.

Yes, that is well-restated illogic. Did you post it in order to point out the great flaw we discussed earlier?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:14 pm I want to bring home the thought I had about LC during the GTH.... My civ reading towards him was because of the way he pursued his gut read on Epi, but then when I had to make a split second decision I tried hard to think of anything specific he's contributed to the thread recently and I couldn't.

Aaaww, again?

I'm reading more than writing at this time.

If Jack is bad, then he has slipped twice.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:17 pm

colonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:49 pm @dunya it was in fact crossover, where Jack was mafia.

Spoiler: show

colonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:29 pm Voting Jack for aforementioned reasons, plus he's responded to lots of other folks but not my posts about him. Avoiding the subject?

Dizzy, I've got to run, but I'll come back to address your post about me.

Sorry. I was too busy catching opposing baddies LC, Epi, Dizzy and Silver to deal with you.

I was Indy.

I do recall that DFaraday was my scum team's killer in Flash Mafia, and he was locked up since Phase 1. It was a difficult game, being a scum team without a kill, or starting BTSC/knowledge of our scum team. But we pulled it off!

Dammit epi, you inspired me.

vote dom

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:52 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:07 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:43 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:53 pm

YET ANOTHER IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

8


insertnamehere has replaced Glorfindel.

INH replaced in with time to submit a kill for Night 1.

Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:53 pm

insertnamehere posted elsewhere at 11:36pm EST this same evening.

And dunya said that she thinks there is more of a team kill rather than a specific role that can send in the kill because if it were a specific role then marmot would have replaced her there.

So if only the killer mafia role is allowed to send in a kill, then I think it has to velong toneither INH or dunya. Most likely INH since he replaced in first. @Marmot can the team send in the kill as a group pm? (Hey... doesn't hurt to ask, right?)

Sure!

This reads like he's responding to a baddie asking in BTSC.

Quin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:13 pm I have a grievance with the amount of times Kyle has used his Pirate Mafia performance as a way to fend off suspicion. He played games somewhere else that he's also talked about but I didn't quote them. No, I don't care that most of these are direct accusations about his Pirates performance. I think he's using meta as a shield.

Only the last two examples seem meaningful to me. All the others were in response to someone throwing Pirates at Kyle.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:14 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:10 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:05 pm I'm done listening to Jack and Dunya. You two hit the showers. I want people talking about other people.

Who do you want to talk about?

I don't want to talk about anyone. I want people talking about other people:

"Jack and Dunya are dead. Who gets your vote and why?"

Speedchuck, perhaps. He's my next suspect besides Jack.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:49 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:49 pm The issue I'm running into is that at this point I suspect both dunya and jack, but they can't both be bad, dunya is voting for Jack, Jack is being irregularly difficult at all times.

I'd be up for a dunya lynch. I keep having this nagging voice in the back of my head that says, "She's bad, Tasha. B. A. D." But part of me feels bad because she does aeem to be really on top of things and very helpful, especially for a replacement.

There are a number of people doing fuck all, and people seriously want to lynch someone who, in my opinion, breathed life into a stagnant thread?

If Dunya is bad, let her keep talking.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:23 pmRegardless of his alignment, I respect a guy who takes a principled stance and refuses to answer a question in good conscience.

So I'll take this stance:

I'm not voting for Jack today. Four mafia out there. Jack may well be one, but I'm not voting for him today. Maybe tomorrow if the fancy strikes. I don't believe anybody will believe we're teammates even if he is bad, so I don't even care on that front.

This almost had me voting for Dom, then,

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:49 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:49 pm The issue I'm running into is that at this point I suspect both dunya and jack, but they can't both be bad, dunya is voting for Jack, Jack is being irregularly difficult at all times.

I'd be up for a dunya lynch. I keep having this nagging voice in the back of my head that says, "She's bad, Tasha. B. A. D." But part of me feels bad because she does aeem to be really on top of things and very helpful, especially for a replacement.

There are a number of people doing fuck all, and people seriously want to lynch someone who, in my opinion, breathed life into a stagnant thread?

I like the sound of that.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:41 pm I read through Jack's responses to my onslaught of bullshit earlier and it occurs to me that there is a non-0 chance that maybe I was being the asshole in that situation??

With my head cleared now I can see that his answers are fairly clear and decisive and not as smug and evasive as I was viewing them to be.

Also i noticed how warm I am right now and i realized I haven't been drinking water today which is pretty much a don't do when you've been transformed into a fountain of mucus by the gods of pestilence. I think I let some of my dehydrated grumpiness leak into the thread and I apologize.

Ew.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:04 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:51 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:49 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:49 pm The issue I'm running into is that at this point I suspect both dunya and jack, but they can't both be bad, dunya is voting for Jack, Jack is being irregularly difficult at all times.

I'd be up for a dunya lynch. I keep having this nagging voice in the back of my head that says, "She's bad, Tasha. B. A. D." But part of me feels bad because she does aeem to be really on top of things and very helpful, especially for a replacement.

There are a number of people doing fuck all, and people seriously want to lynch someone who, in my opinion, breathed life into a stagnant thread?

If Dunya is bad, let her keep talking.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:23 pmRegardless of his alignment, I respect a guy who takes a principled stance and refuses to answer a question in good conscience.

So I'll take this stance:

I'm not voting for Jack today. Four mafia out there. Jack may well be one, but I'm not voting for him today. Maybe tomorrow if the fancy strikes. I don't believe anybody will believe we're teammates even if he is bad, so I don't even care on that front.

This almost had me voting for Dom, then,

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:49 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:49 pm The issue I'm running into is that at this point I suspect both dunya and jack, but they can't both be bad, dunya is voting for Jack, Jack is being irregularly difficult at all times.

I'd be up for a dunya lynch. I keep having this nagging voice in the back of my head that says, "She's bad, Tasha. B. A. D." But part of me feels bad because she does aeem to be really on top of things and very helpful, especially for a replacement.

There are a number of people doing fuck all, and people seriously want to lynch someone who, in my opinion, breathed life into a stagnant thread?

I like the sound of that.

I buy that.

That is not all that surprising.

Yeah, the Dom lynch will give zero info. I'll go Mesk.

*vote Mesk*

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:50 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:48 pm
That is not all that surprising.

I don't care about surprising you.

Rude!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:50 pm I care about getting you to make good decisions.

Cross-page two-parter... nice.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:27 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:23 am Feels way different from ME Epi, which is the last bad Epi I can remember. So that makes him look better.

I was not bad in that game. I was an independent who ultimately chose to side with a bad team.

I'm going to rip your arms off and beat Long Con to death with them because of this failure to understand simple independent mechanics.

Yeah, my Indy role could win with the Civvies, and Epi's Indy role was designed to become a baddie. Please don't group us together.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:24 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:22 am Yeah, the Dom lynch will give zero info. I'll go Mesk.

*vote Mesk*

So much for inspiration.

Dom, as a choice, was never that inspiring.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:27 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:23 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:50 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:48 pm
That is not all that surprising.

I don't care about surprising you.

Rude!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:50 pm I care about getting you to make good decisions.

Cross-page two-parter... nice.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:27 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:23 am Feels way different from ME Epi, which is the last bad Epi I can remember. So that makes him look better.

I was not bad in that game. I was an independent who ultimately chose to side with a bad team.

I'm going to rip your arms off and beat Long Con to death with them because of this failure to understand simple independent mechanics.

Yeah, my Indy role could win with the Civvies, and Epi's Indy role was designed to become a baddie. Please don't group us together.

My role was designed to become bad? You are clueless. I chose to-

Never mind. You think I chose who responded to Elton John lyrics. I don't have to try to understand you.

Oh yeah, Elton John, not Bob Dylan.

Linki: 'Ella...... come on

Just felt right.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:33 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:27 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:24 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:22 am Yeah, the Dom lynch will give zero info. I'll go Mesk.

*vote Mesk*

So much for inspiration.

Dom, as a choice, was never that inspiring.

I'm voting Dom?

No. I'm voting 3J. You're voting Mesk.

Why can't we communicate?

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:34 am come on LC (or kyle or quin or wilgy) join usss

This is pretty convincing.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:39 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:35 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:33 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:27 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:24 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:22 am Yeah, the Dom lynch will give zero info. I'll go Mesk.

*vote Mesk*

So much for inspiration.

Dom, as a choice, was never that inspiring.

I'm voting Dom?

No. I'm voting 3J. You're voting Mesk.

Why can't we communicate?

Because you insist on saying stupid shit about me. That isn't conducive to communication. It's conducive to me thinking you just want to try to get one over on me.

But you don't understand.