The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun May 31, 2020 10:09 pm This game will be the best game in the history of mafia. People keep saying to me, "Escape From Trump Tower" is the best game.

That post is huge. Huge! The left-wing media will probably try to turn it on you.

Went with Door #12 because it felt powerful. Sloonei was already there. Hi Sloon! Why'd you pick 12?

Scirrus wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2020 11:43 pm I missed the opportunity to say "fair enough". Much sad.

Why did you want to say that?

Go for it bro.

'Scuse me: Go for it, sis.

I'll take the last slot.

I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:36 am Moving my vote to long con

So familiar... I get shout outs to post more. I make one post with an opinion. Vote comes in for me unqualified. *kisses fingertips like Chef Boy-ar-dee* Magnifique.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:38 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why do we think this? It would be an easy move.

112 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:42 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why not?

The likelihood that a 3P is not a threat to the wolf team. Why waste wolfy energy going after a 3P?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:52 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:50 am
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:47 am I would vote Dizzy over Sloonei, but that's not saying much. I'd rather pressure some other folks before we lynch Dizzy if we're going to do that.
Can I interest you in a long con
Sure, I'm down. Not feeling a Wilgy vote much anymore.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Really?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:04 pm Updated MP7 reads list thingy

Town for now -- [would never lynch right now]
112
Epignosis
juliets
Nanook
Scirrus

Let's give X another day here -- [would prefer not to lynch]
Funnygurl
Jack
MacDougall
Sloonei

Upper POE -- [would passively consider lynch]
Soneji
TSP / nova

Lower POE -- [would actively consider lynch]
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
Long Con

So I was orange until I made a content post and Nanook decided for you that it's bad, so suddenly I'm in your red zone. Suyre.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:07 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:03 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:48 pm MP, I'm starting to dislike your lines here.

I feel that you are drawing and encouraging lines of agreement and suspicion that aren't necessarily your own, but more so assist a narrative that is in your favor. I.e. you leave me in the null stating you don't know how you feel but at the same time leaving me at would lynch.

Your LC vote also piggy backing off Nanook.
I don't understand, what's the scum strategy I'm employing exactly?
Not sure if there's a term for it, but the encouragement of genuine town thoughts that give a scum benefit.

Linki: I think he's right re sloonei and his suspicion feels genuine.
I'm not sure I understand still, so let me elaborate. The players in my POE are people I feel OK lynching. If I have someone at a null read, I'm essentially OK with them being in the POE, especially if I have town leans or reads for everyone else. I think the reasons I've placed everyone in the tiers that I have are substantiated somewhere in my ISO, but if you're ever confused about any of them, feel free to ask me.

Also, I'm voting LC to support Nanook, and LC is in my three-person lower POE. I do that all the time as town. If someone else wants support with a wagon, I see that person who wants my support as town, and I support pressure on that wagon, I will often add to that wagon.

Why is that scum agenda and not town agenda?

Calling absolute bullshit here. I wasn't in your lower POE until you decided to "support" Nanook's unqualified vote.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:23 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:41 am
Scirrus wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:55 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:29 am I forgot to say hi to Scirrus (I normally greet players I haven’t played with before) but he’s posted so much it feels awkward to do it now.
Hi Jack! I'm Scirrus. I like pina coladas, long walks on the beach, and killing mafia! Wbu?
Hi, Scirrus.

I like Total Warhammer and making fun of libertarians.
And he's pretty bad at both...

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:55 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:24 pm Even for those players who do think they've caught scum Sloonei, who are his teammates then? There's more work to be done. A static gamestate actively hurts our faction.
That's a Day 2 problem.

This MP quote reminded me of this MP quote:

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:03 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:48 pm MP, I'm starting to dislike your lines here.

I feel that you are drawing and encouraging lines of agreement and suspicion that aren't necessarily your own, but more so assist a narrative that is in your favor. I.e. you leave me in the null stating you don't know how you feel but at the same time leaving me at would lynch.

Your LC vote also piggy backing off Nanook.
I don't understand, what's the scum strategy I'm employing exactly?

Wilgy was pretty clear in what he was saying, and MP tries to deflect it... it's straw-mannish. "If you can't define my *scum strategy* in a way that I accept, your accusation isn't valid." Dislike.

Twice?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:32 pm Look, I'm not saying that Long Con is scum, I don't think he is.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:34 pm Long Con has made a post reading Wilgy as town, so I'm holding him to a higher standard of reads ever since he made it evident that he's here and paying attention.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:37 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:36 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:34 pm Long Con has made a post reading Wilgy as town, so I'm holding him to a higher standard of reads ever since he made it evident that he's here and paying attention.

I imagine I'll catch up and see, but what other reads do you have?

My usual amount of Day 1 reads.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:43 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:09 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:36 am Moving my vote to long con
So familiar... I get shout outs to post more. I make one post with an opinion. Vote comes in for me unqualified. *kisses fingertips like Chef Boy-ar-dee* Magnifique.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:38 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why do we think this? It would be an easy move.

112 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:42 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why not?
The likelihood that a 3P is not a threat to the wolf team. Why waste wolfy energy going after a 3P?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:52 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:50 am
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:47 am I would vote Dizzy over Sloonei, but that's not saying much. I'd rather pressure some other folks before we lynch Dizzy if we're going to do that.
Can I interest you in a long con
Sure, I'm down. Not feeling a Wilgy vote much anymore.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine
Really?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:04 pm Updated MP7 reads list thingy

Town for now -- [would never lynch right now]
112
Epignosis
juliets
Nanook
Scirrus

Let's give X another day here -- [would prefer not to lynch]
Funnygurl
Jack
MacDougall
Sloonei

Upper POE -- [would passively consider lynch]
Soneji
TSP / nova

Lower POE -- [would actively consider lynch]
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
Long Con
So I was orange until I made a content post and Nanook decided for you that it's bad, so suddenly I'm in your red zone. Suyre.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:07 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:03 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:48 pm MP, I'm starting to dislike your lines here.

I feel that you are drawing and encouraging lines of agreement and suspicion that aren't necessarily your own, but more so assist a narrative that is in your favor. I.e. you leave me in the null stating you don't know how you feel but at the same time leaving me at would lynch.

Your LC vote also piggy backing off Nanook.
I don't understand, what's the scum strategy I'm employing exactly?
Not sure if there's a term for it, but the encouragement of genuine town thoughts that give a scum benefit.

Linki: I think he's right re sloonei and his suspicion feels genuine.
I'm not sure I understand still, so let me elaborate. The players in my POE are people I feel OK lynching. If I have someone at a null read, I'm essentially OK with them being in the POE, especially if I have town leans or reads for everyone else. I think the reasons I've placed everyone in the tiers that I have are substantiated somewhere in my ISO, but if you're ever confused about any of them, feel free to ask me.

Also, I'm voting LC to support Nanook, and LC is in my three-person lower POE. I do that all the time as town. If someone else wants support with a wagon, I see that person who wants my support as town, and I support pressure on that wagon, I will often add to that wagon.

Why is that scum agenda and not town agenda?
Calling absolute bullshit here. I wasn't in your lower POE until you decided to "support" Nanook's unqualified vote.

Jeeze, this is one hell of an OMGUS. Do you believe this, Long Con? If so, why aren't you voting for me?

I don't get it. Am I OMGUSing you, or not? Am I not allowed to call something bullshit when I see it now? Are my opinions not valid without a vote?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:46 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:43 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:09 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:36 am Moving my vote to long con
So familiar... I get shout outs to post more. I make one post with an opinion. Vote comes in for me unqualified. *kisses fingertips like Chef Boy-ar-dee* Magnifique.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:38 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why do we think this? It would be an easy move.

112 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:42 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 am I like Wilgy as Civ. I don't think Wolf Wilgy would jab at 3P-claimed Dizzy.
Why not?
The likelihood that a 3P is not a threat to the wolf team. Why waste wolfy energy going after a 3P?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:52 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:50 am
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:47 am I would vote Dizzy over Sloonei, but that's not saying much. I'd rather pressure some other folks before we lynch Dizzy if we're going to do that.
Can I interest you in a long con
Sure, I'm down. Not feeling a Wilgy vote much anymore.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine
Really?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:04 pm Updated MP7 reads list thingy

Town for now -- [would never lynch right now]
112
Epignosis
juliets
Nanook
Scirrus

Let's give X another day here -- [would prefer not to lynch]
Funnygurl
Jack
MacDougall
Sloonei

Upper POE -- [would passively consider lynch]
Soneji
TSP / nova

Lower POE -- [would actively consider lynch]
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
Long Con
So I was orange until I made a content post and Nanook decided for you that it's bad, so suddenly I'm in your red zone. Suyre.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:07 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:03 pm

I don't understand, what's the scum strategy I'm employing exactly?
Not sure if there's a term for it, but the encouragement of genuine town thoughts that give a scum benefit.

Linki: I think he's right re sloonei and his suspicion feels genuine.
I'm not sure I understand still, so let me elaborate. The players in my POE are people I feel OK lynching. If I have someone at a null read, I'm essentially OK with them being in the POE, especially if I have town leans or reads for everyone else. I think the reasons I've placed everyone in the tiers that I have are substantiated somewhere in my ISO, but if you're ever confused about any of them, feel free to ask me.

Also, I'm voting LC to support Nanook, and LC is in my three-person lower POE. I do that all the time as town. If someone else wants support with a wagon, I see that person who wants my support as town, and I support pressure on that wagon, I will often add to that wagon.

Why is that scum agenda and not town agenda?
Calling absolute bullshit here. I wasn't in your lower POE until you decided to "support" Nanook's unqualified vote.

Jeeze, this is one hell of an OMGUS. Do you believe this, Long Con? If so, why aren't you voting for me?
I don't get it. Am I OMGUSing you, or not? Am I not allowed to call something bullshit when I see it now? Are my opinions not valid without a vote?
...yeah, it's still an OMGUS. Answer my question please.

I don't understand the question.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:49 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:48 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:46 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:43 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:09 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:36 am Moving my vote to long con
So familiar... I get shout outs to post more. I make one post with an opinion. Vote comes in for me unqualified. *kisses fingertips like Chef Boy-ar-dee* Magnifique.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:38 am

Why do we think this? It would be an easy move.

112 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:42 am

Why not?
The likelihood that a 3P is not a threat to the wolf team. Why waste wolfy energy going after a 3P?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:52 am

Sure, I'm down. Not feeling a Wilgy vote much anymore.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine
Really?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:04 pm Updated MP7 reads list thingy

Town for now -- [would never lynch right now]
112
Epignosis
juliets
Nanook
Scirrus

Let's give X another day here -- [would prefer not to lynch]
Funnygurl
Jack
MacDougall
Sloonei

Upper POE -- [would passively consider lynch]
Soneji
TSP / nova

Lower POE -- [would actively consider lynch]
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
Long Con
So I was orange until I made a content post and Nanook decided for you that it's bad, so suddenly I'm in your red zone. Suyre.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 pm

I'm not sure I understand still, so let me elaborate. The players in my POE are people I feel OK lynching. If I have someone at a null read, I'm essentially OK with them being in the POE, especially if I have town leans or reads for everyone else. I think the reasons I've placed everyone in the tiers that I have are substantiated somewhere in my ISO, but if you're ever confused about any of them, feel free to ask me.

Also, I'm voting LC to support Nanook, and LC is in my three-person lower POE. I do that all the time as town. If someone else wants support with a wagon, I see that person who wants my support as town, and I support pressure on that wagon, I will often add to that wagon.

Why is that scum agenda and not town agenda?
Calling absolute bullshit here. I wasn't in your lower POE until you decided to "support" Nanook's unqualified vote.

Jeeze, this is one hell of an OMGUS. Do you believe this, Long Con? If so, why aren't you voting for me?
I don't get it. Am I OMGUSing you, or not? Am I not allowed to call something bullshit when I see it now? Are my opinions not valid without a vote?
...yeah, it's still an OMGUS. Answer my question please.
I don't understand the question.
I'm just asking why you are not voting for me, primarily. If you think I'm bullshitting, then aren't you effectively saying I'm scum? I haven't seen you call anything else bullshit.

I'll vote when I decide who I want to vote for. It might be you. You are acting suspiciously.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:50 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:00 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:55 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:24 pm Even for those players who do think they've caught scum Sloonei, who are his teammates then? There's more work to be done. A static gamestate actively hurts our faction.
That's a Day 2 problem.
This MP quote reminded me of this MP quote:

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:03 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:48 pm MP, I'm starting to dislike your lines here.

I feel that you are drawing and encouraging lines of agreement and suspicion that aren't necessarily your own, but more so assist a narrative that is in your favor. I.e. you leave me in the null stating you don't know how you feel but at the same time leaving me at would lynch.

Your LC vote also piggy backing off Nanook.
I don't understand, what's the scum strategy I'm employing exactly?
Wilgy was pretty clear in what he was saying, and MP tries to deflect it... it's straw-mannish. "If you can't define my *scum strategy* in a way that I accept, your accusation isn't valid." Dislike.
This is more shade.

Yes, that's right, that is another time I found something you did suspicious.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:53 pm LC, why are you being cagey with me?

I don't know what you're talking about. You're being weirdly aggressive against my suspicion of you.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:52 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:51 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:49 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:48 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:46 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:43 pm
Spoiler: show

Jeeze, this is one hell of an OMGUS. Do you believe this, Long Con? If so, why aren't you voting for me?
I don't get it. Am I OMGUSing you, or not? Am I not allowed to call something bullshit when I see it now? Are my opinions not valid without a vote?
...yeah, it's still an OMGUS. Answer my question please.
I don't understand the question.
I'm just asking why you are not voting for me, primarily. If you think I'm bullshitting, then aren't you effectively saying I'm scum? I haven't seen you call anything else bullshit.
I'll vote when I decide who I want to vote for. It might be you. You are acting suspiciously.
Who else do you suspect?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:53 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:53 pm LC, why are you being cagey with me?
I don't know what you're talking about. You're being weirdly aggressive against my suspicion of you.
I am? I'm not trying to be. I'm just trying to get inside your head, that's all.

It's frikkin' weird to have someone bring you up in a suspicion, and immediately jump to "THEN WHY AREN'T YOU VOTING ME HMMMMMMMM?" Chill out.

Ok, best of luck.

Soneji wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:13 pmLong Con has more bite in his pushback against MP7, but the lack of a vote onto MP7 is concerning.

MP has no votes. My vote will more likely go to whichever actual Lynch candidate I find most suspicious.

Scirrus wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:25 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:24 pm
Scirrus wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:21 pm Anything anyone want we to specifically look at? I'm running on little sleep and a lotta caffeine so my reading comprehension is not the best rn
Can you talk about your vote for LC? Just a simple answer to "why" will be sufficient.
Yes, I voted to make it a tie between Sloonei and LC to make things more...interesting I guess. So then we could see who would then break the tie from one way to the other for whatever reason

I actually have no read on LC other than the slight suspicion I had on him yesterday. GTH I would rather lynch Sloonei though, if i'm being honest

That's really decent of you to say.

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:26 pm
Soneji wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:20 pm For those more familiar, is LC one of those people allergic to voting in general?
I don't remember him being that way in past games but I don't trust my memory completely.

@Scirrus thanks!

My vote tends to be much more stable, compared to those whose votes jump around 20 times a day.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:30 pm @Long Con who should I be voting for today if not you?

Obviously MP comes to mind. How do you feel about Epignosis' case on Soneji?

Soneji wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:38 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:34 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:33 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:30 pm @Long Con who should I be voting for today if not you?
Obviously MP comes to mind. How do you feel about Epignosis' case on Soneji?
I didn't know Epignosis had a case on soneji.

Slooneji strikes again!

sorry guys, it's true, Slooneji strikes again.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:46 pm
Soneji wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:38 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:34 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:33 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:30 pm @Long Con who should I be voting for today if not you?
Obviously MP comes to mind. How do you feel about Epignosis' case on Soneji?
I didn't know Epignosis had a case on soneji.

Slooneji strikes again!

Yeah i just did a quick search of Epi's posts. It appears that LC literally read Epi's case against me as a case against Soneji.

... which, if that's the case, I have to question whether LC really paid attention because that case is very clearly tailored for me and me alone, name similarities notwithstanding.

Soneji is a Lynch candidate in the concurrent game I'm going back and forth between from this one. Cut me a little slack, please.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:45 pm sorry guys, it's true, Slooneji strikes again.
What do you think of Epi's case on Soneji Sloonei?

I take it with a grain of salt, it could just as easily be a wolf Epignosis doing a proactive Town Act.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:51 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:49 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:45 pm sorry guys, it's true, Slooneji strikes again.
What do you think of Epi's case on Soneji Sloonei?
I take it with a grain of salt, it could just as easily be a wolf Epignosis doing a proactive Town Act.
That tells me nothing. Anything that anyone does could be "a proactive Town Act." That's not a real answer.

It is my real answer. I'm not a very heavy day one player because I don't have a handle on who's bullshiting and who's not yet. I'm usually one of the lower posters in the early game. What I said was the actual way I feel and the reason I make my decisions. It's as real an answer as I can give you.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:55 pm I honestly liked when LC was like “good luck.”

I know that’s stupid but whatever.

I honestly didn't intend to come back to the thread after that. Then I got over my snit and saw something I should reasonably respond to.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:01 pm
Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:59 pm i don't like the wagons
My very limited view of LC is that he just tried to question me on something that he clearly had not read himself, which was odd. I don't know if that oddity makes him bad. I know that I should not be getting lynched right now.

Throw other names at us, Carrotgurl.

I did read it. I couldn't honestly pinpoint his reasons by memory. Went back and reread it, and it's extremely thin, practically a semantic argument with a higher-posting expectation that he denies.

If the deadline were still a few hours away, I would expect Epi to come in and reveal that his case was a trap, to see who would opportunistically jump on. But with less than half an hour, seems he was just serious.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:09 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:07 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:01 pm
Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:59 pm i don't like the wagons
My very limited view of LC is that he just tried to question me on something that he clearly had not read himself, which was odd. I don't know if that oddity makes him bad. I know that I should not be getting lynched right now.

Throw other names at us, Carrotgurl.
I did read it. I couldn't honestly pinpoint his reasons by memory. Went back and reread it, and it's extremely thin, practically a semantic argument with a higher-posting expectation that he denies.
Yeah but you thought it was about soneji at first.

So, I see you have denied to cut the slack I requested. I have some issues with same-lettered folk. I used to do it all the time with Tranq, Turnip Head, and ... who was the third? Can't think now, nutella, juliets, who was it? Too close to lynch to look it up. Doesn't matter. It was just a genuine name slip. It's a flaw I have. It doesn't mean I was just scrolling my way through the game with my eyes glazed over. I have read every page of this game, some more skimmy than others, but not too bad on that front.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:00 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:56 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:49 pmCause she’s mechanically correct.
I'm a fucking tree stump. Vote me and be mechanically correct.
I mean like it’s mechanically correct to lynch a D1 3P claim.

Suppose you are lying. We only catch you by lynching you.

Suppose you are actually a neutral that doesn’t hurt the town. You can be strong armed into siding with scum at endgame. You’re essentially a lost wolf.

That said, I don’t like burning D1, I don’t think you’re lying and if we lynch all but one wolf, they can’t strongarm you cause then you can just lynch them ftw. Plus sometimes 3P players can’t help themselves and townside out of habit/being town irl.

I’m just never gonna get onto anyone for voting a claimed 3P day 1. Or maybe I will but not today.

You will if the endgame tells us she's lying and is scum and just beat us.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:16 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:09 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:07 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:01 pm
Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:59 pm i don't like the wagons
My very limited view of LC is that he just tried to question me on something that he clearly had not read himself, which was odd. I don't know if that oddity makes him bad. I know that I should not be getting lynched right now.

Throw other names at us, Carrotgurl.
I did read it. I couldn't honestly pinpoint his reasons by memory. Went back and reread it, and it's extremely thin, practically a semantic argument with a higher-posting expectation that he denies.
Yeah but you thought it was about soneji at first.
So, I see you have denied to cut the slack I requested. I have some issues with same-lettered folk. I used to do it all the time with Tranq, Turnip Head, and ... who was the third? Can't think now, nutella, juliets, who was it? Too close to lynch to look it up. Doesn't matter. It was just a genuine name slip. It's a flaw I have. It doesn't mean I was just scrolling my way through the game with my eyes glazed over. I have read every page of this game, some more skimmy than others, but not too bad on that front.
timmer, maybe?

I can't cut you slack entirely, but I'm definitely not prepared to base my vote off of this. I think it was a curious thing, but I don't really see what the baddie motivation would be there. Why would mafia Long Con be so careless to ask a question without fact-checking himself? There's nothing in that which immediately suggests dishonesty. It was just an odd thing that I'm struggling to place.

What reads do you have, if any?

Timmer! Yes, thank you.

Being careless is my best-known trait. Fact-checking?? I wrote the wrong, similar name. I didn't "fact-check" my mistake because I didn't know it was a mistake.

Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
seriously what are you even doing my man, how the fuck could I post all this shit as wolf?

Don't you do this every game?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
I believe I already asked why on earth I would do this and I never got an answer.

It would be because you suspect him.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:27 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
seriously what are you even doing my man, how the fuck could I post all this shit as wolf?
Don't you do this every game?
Do what? How could I force this exact tone and content?

I just see this as "how MP plays". Good or bad.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:28 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
I believe I already asked why on earth I would do this and I never got an answer.
It would be because you suspect him.
So why would A Player in Escape From Trump Tower suspect M Plus 7 on Day 1 of this game?

I can only speak for myself. I suspect him because of the couple of little suspect anomalies I indicated earlier in my posts. I don't have a case for you.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:28 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:27 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:27 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
seriously what are you even doing my man, how the fuck could I post all this shit as wolf?
Don't you do this every game?
Do what? How could I force this exact tone and content?
I just see this as "how MP plays". Good or bad.
You are truly insane, my friend, but fwiw I don't think you're making it up.

I've never known you to be obviously bad when bad... am I behind the curve on this one?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:30 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:29 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:28 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm Ok, things are still fluid. MP vote anyone? [VOTE: MP] aubergine
I believe I already asked why on earth I would do this and I never got an answer.
It would be because you suspect him.
So why would A Player in Escape From Trump Tower suspect M Plus 7 on Day 1 of this game?
I can only speak for myself. I suspect him because of the couple of little suspect anomalies I indicated earlier in my posts. I don't have a case for you.
Dude I've posted nearly 200 times, if you get pinged only like twice, that's only 1% of my content

Those statistics don't factor into my decision.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:31 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:30 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:28 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:27 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:27 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:26 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:25 pm

seriously what are you even doing my man, how the fuck could I post all this shit as wolf?
Don't you do this every game?
Do what? How could I force this exact tone and content?
I just see this as "how MP plays". Good or bad.
You are truly insane, my friend, but fwiw I don't think you're making it up.
I've never known you to be obviously bad when bad... am I behind the curve on this one?
That's not a reason to vote for a player, especially on Day 1.

I don't want to discuss this anymore, I think it's silly.

WOW, ok, I vote Sloonei. I like Wilgy as town.

[VOTE: sloonei] aubergine for the records

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:35 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:33 pm WOW, ok, I vote Sloonei. I like Wilgy as town.
why?

You can find why I like Wilgy in my ISO. I'm not researching right now. Sorry Sloonei, I like you too.

Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:37 pm back to sloonei for more CHAOS

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:37 pm How could any reasonable person suspect me in this game right now is something, I swear people think my wolf game is x100 better than it actually is on this site

I already talked about this. Give me proof your wolf game is drastically different.

Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:38 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:37 pm
Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:37 pm back to sloonei for more CHAOS

IT WAS TRULY THE WORST MOVE I'M SO SORRY

This... isn't what you wanted?

Search found 111 matches