novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:49 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 3:59 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 3:43 pm
Juliets I think I remember why I suspect you lol. I hated your EoD3 and you seemed anxious and evasive. Not town!juliets stuff
Hmm...can you tell me what seemed evasive? I was defending myself against Jack so I was addressing everything that he was saying. Could it be that you didn't like my tone instead? I got spicy with Jack because I felt like I was being unfairly accused to the point that he seemed bad. That might have made me seem anxious - actually I was angry and frustrated.
I was reminded in my look-back that you were suspicious of Long Con. You didn't vote for him though. Are you still suspicious of him today?
I guess how you ended the interaction, and when the lynch on Drago started taking some steam you seemed to take a backseat. What frustrated you about his push? Also do you suspect him because of it?
I was, still am. I had my vote on him before Drago, I believe. I started this phase on you 'cause I felt stronger about that EoD impression I got and its more recent.
What frustrated me about Jack's push was for one, my perception that he wasn't listening to me. He hated my Creature vote but when I showed him where I had talked about Creature twice he didn't let it go. He instead said that my vote post didn't have enough information, yet he never asked me for more information. People here vote without giving ANY information for Pete's sake. He also said he didn't believe I was suspicious of Creature or Drago which is a state of mind and I never did quite understand why he held that opinion. And then there was the fact that he did this to me in another game, tunneled me like crazy and he was bad that game. It felt exactly like I felt back then. Off the top of my head those were the main reasons I was frustrated with him. And I did think he was bad because imo his suspicions were not well founded and that's what he did to me before when he was bad.
With all that said though he did acknowledge today that he did not perceive me the same as he did yesterday and even argued a bit with Long Con about it. His vote remains on me but I'm not sure why though I'm no longer angry or frustrated. I feel vindicated, and if I do get lynched I don't think anyone can say I didn't fight hard enough or I quit trying to solve the game. You won't be happy if that happens if you're a civ but at least no one can say those things. Is Jack bad? I really don't know, it seemed that way yesterday but I wouldn't vote for him today unless something came to the forefront that I considered excellent evidence.
Will I find the reasons you suspected Long Con, or still do, in your iso?