I'm just kidding.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
Return to “Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]”
thellama73 wrote:No one is familiar with Harry Stephen Keeler. He's the most obscure guy ever. But if you are smart, you will seek out and read his books because they are worth it.juliets wrote:I'm not familiar with Harry Stephen Keeler either so I'm hoping that won't matter.
S~V~S wrote:I don't like acronyms that are too long, although I am an acronym myself lol. I would go with something different were I to rename myself today, but it is what it is.
I Am thinking I'll call him what he wants to be called if he states a preference. Until then, Shep it is since that is the first part of the name.
I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.
And don't get me started on socks, you guysI really was excited for this becasue I was excited about socks, the works of HSK, not so much. I was sad to see that sabotage-eed. I already have an alarming lack of dignity for my age
bea wrote:He loves you too wabbit.I am sadly not drunk. *sigh*
bea wrote:I have missed my durnken wabbit! Play nice with the investers. You want their yen!!!
juliets wrote:I could threaten to pay you back for this but I know I never would. I am deeply hurt however.rabbit8 wrote:My two favorite ladies are awake, and here I am drunk in China about to go to dinner with some fuckers who I need to invest in my shit. I wish I could punch Diggs in the face....right now!!!!!
juliets wrote:Never would I want you to be flustered nor ruin your Rep! I think it just reinforces your big bad wabbitness. And congratulations on China - good to know all that traveling wasn't in vain much less all the imbibing with the chinese.
Epignosis wrote:Well, I was going to try to post using quotes, but all the profanity has now tripped my work's "Adult Material" filter. So now I can't read anything further on page 3. I am only able to post this from the quick reply feature on another page of the thread. Thanks rabbit!
Dom, I used the verb tense I did because it made the most sense. Why do you find it odd that there are fewer Day 0 choices than people?
S~V~S isn't an acronym unless you pronounce it "Svvvsss."
llama, I like moving things along.
fingersplints wrote:Epi works for a school rabbit. I'm ok with them being "anti swear"
thellama73 wrote:Speaking of reading the rules. It's a shame more of you didn't vote for "Nothing."
thellama73 wrote: Only the first person to vote for each item will receive it.
Golden wrote:@SVS
Would bf buddy up to me if he was civ? Yes. I know he gets confidence and energy from us seeing eye to eye. That part is absolute truth.
Would bf buddy up to me if he is bad? Yes. Bf is constantly aware that I am also the best at ratting out his baddie game, and I think he would be particularly aware of the fact I might be able to call him out.
The thing that makes me feel most comfortable about him? Our heads actually are in a very similar space, with eyes on the same people. This does give me some confidence. Also, why put such a big target on your back so early if you are bad?
The thing that makes me feel least comfortable about him? I don't like that I feel this drawn in to defending him so vehemently so early.
His posts still seem pretty - just normal bf to me. He isn't making me ping.
@epi - only when Phil Collins is in a gorilla suit. Hang on, I might be getting things confused there...
Golden wrote:OK Epi... but in that case... why come after me?
@rabbit - If Epi takes offence, my apologies. I don't think it is unreasonable for me to make reference to my alignment in that game given it is known. MP did this in Roger Rabbit about Aces, so I'm assuming it's in keeping with the rules of the site.
Dom wrote:how about nothing racist at all???thellama73 wrote:Hey everyone!
Since we have a little extra time today, let's have a fun game. The roles on the front page need pictures to go along with them. Please submit a picture of your role to me via PM by the end of Night 1. My favorite gets a prize. Please nothing too racist for the Celestials.
Offensive much? I take great pride in my ability to be a pain in the ass, thanks you very much.blindfaeth wrote:Lol he's worse than rabbit. I'd be down for an epig lynch personally. Or bullz.Golden wrote:Which is it. Do you suspect me or do you suspect blindfaeth???
I am quite literally tearing my hair out with you!
Golden wrote:You know how MP was feeling about MM's self-voting being anti-civilian, and it got him real mad?
That's exactly how I feel about the kind of thing epi is pulling right now. I'd lynch him day one every time until it stopped. It's utterly anti-civilian behaviour. I don't know why anyone would put up with it, honestly..
linki - TH, sorry its not a 'brand', its just a cop out.
I didn't find it ironic in the least.Golden wrote:Well, that post wasn't ironic at all, rabbit!![]()
I don't get to dictate to others how they play, but I can say I think it's anti-civilian and I can vote for them. And if I want to be the borg and make people assimilate, I'll damn well try. You have exactly the same rights when it comes to me, ok?
I think this game is real basic. If you want people to know you are civilian, you gotta adapt to how they take it in. I got some getting used to epi to do, but he also has some getting used to me to do.
I think it's a cop out, and I want him to shoot straight. If he doesn't, I see myself voting for him. Ok?
Golden wrote:Honestly, I don't really get the sus of MP at all.
@rabbit - I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just playing my game. I know you don't like being on the end of what you would call my self-righteous approach. And I do care. It would be easier if I didn't, but I do. I like everyone, and I don't want to hurt feelings or make people think I feel superior to them. Quite the opposite actually - I recognise that guys like you and Epi are a heck of a lot better than me at winning. But I gotta play my game.
People have all sorts of opinions in this game... the inevitable low poster discussion (people should come out and play), the info dumping discussion (it wrecks the game)... people also sometimes have the 'content' discussion (it's not volume, it's how much you contribute).
I'm having discussion number three. I don't think epi is contributing. Also, to me, epi seems like the kind of guy who can take what I'm dishing out. If Epi wants me to think he is contributing, he can be clear about whether or not he is considering each of me and bf for a vote. If he doesn't want to do it, I won't see him as contributing.
And he himself has essentially given me permission to take the line that 'thats just epi' isn't good enough. Wasn't his cautionary tale about him and elo a pretty good signal that he wouldn't buy that argument himself?
rabbit8 wrote:Golden wrote:Honestly, I don't really get the sus of MP at all.
@rabbit - I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just playing my game. I know you don't like being on the end of what you would call my self-righteous approach. And I do care. It would be easier if I didn't, but I do. I like everyone, and I don't want to hurt feelings or make people think I feel superior to them. Quite the opposite actually - I recognise that guys like you and Epi are a heck of a lot better than me at winning. But I gotta play my game.
People have all sorts of opinions in this game... the inevitable low poster discussion (people should come out and play), the info dumping discussion (it wrecks the game)... people also sometimes have the 'content' discussion (it's not volume, it's how much you contribute).
I'm having discussion number three. I don't think epi is contributing. Also, to me, epi seems like the kind of guy who can take what I'm dishing out. If Epi wants me to think he is contributing, he can be clear about whether or not he is considering each of me and bf for a vote. If he doesn't want to do it, I won't see him as contributing.
And he himself has essentially given me permission to take the line that 'thats just epi' isn't good enough. Wasn't his cautionary tale about him and elo a pretty good signal that he wouldn't buy that argument himself?
Oh Golden, you're a real fun time.
Golden wrote:And I'm sorta sorry I voted for you, but I think I needed to.
Lets just move on, eh?
Golden wrote:It was ME rabbitrabbit8 wrote:I'm waiting to see what BF does with this information he has. I don't having this said info makes him good or bad. I think the calling players out and saying I as expecting that kind of reply is a little odd. It just comes across wrong. The using the reply to point to guilt. I don't know...........
I want to look more into the votes for items. I need to reread the roles and see if there is anything in there that could make what someone voted for have any meaning. I think some brought up this point about some votes for items. I can't remember off the top of my head who, but I had the exact same feeling. Maybe I'm biased though since I got, NOTHING!![]()
I said the key + safe is one thing I had an eye on, and also people who went for papers, because the baddies have a paper-storing vault.
Long Con wrote:Oh yeah! MM also has my eye for his opportunistic self-vote.Dom wrote:I might vote one of them tbh.Black Rock wrote:I'm going to start slapping these early self voters.
Long Con wrote:Ongoing experiment.rabbit8 wrote:Long Con wrote:Oh yeah! MM also has my eye for his opportunistic self-vote.Dom wrote:I might vote one of them tbh.Black Rock wrote:I'm going to start slapping these early self voters.
Behavior modification? Does it work? Ever?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why does Golden think you will self-vote.
Ooh, just noticed. Post #4,000 incoming.
Sarcasm? I just skipped it.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden wrote:Somewhere in there Vompatti self-voted.
If everyone else just follows suit, rabbit would be lynched. Rabbit, you'd be ok voting for yourself to clinch your lynch, right?
Given the baddie role that has been talked about - the one who gains strength from votes that don't lynch him - I think we ought to be uber-wary about self-voting in this game.
Long Con wrote:Ok, so I had a plan here. My plan was to try and bolster the BF suspicion a little in order to make it seem like a BF lynch is a possibility. The next step was to watch and see who voted FIRST for BF, my logic being that IF BF has an item that could identify a baddie, the baddies would want to get a hold of it. Even if it's not pointing to The Millionaire, the baddies might want to grab it just because they aren't sure.
So S~V~S has voted for BF now, and she has been one of BF's biggest detractors all along. I'm not so sure if this plan of mine is credible, but I wanted to share it anyways.
In the beginning, I was "after" BF just for the plan, but now I'm actually suspicious of him. And if he's a baddie, then S~V~S deserves no suspicion for being the first voter.
I was feeling the Dom vote, but actually his explanation (that he saw juliets as buddying up to Civs with the "us" comment) makes sense to me.
My other likely vote then, is Metalmarsh, for his self-vote. Still deciding between him and BF right now.
S~V~S wrote:Also, I did receive the will. All it says is that if Zomba dies, whoever holds the will will get everything she has. It does NOT say she is wealthy. Just becasue she has a will does not mean she is rich. Normally I would not even post this, but since her name was already out there, I just want to confirm that BF was not lying, but that there is nothing that indicates a specific role holds the will. I thought BF might have been witholding something, but he was not.
Long Con wrote:We both know that you already know the answer to this, so saying you can't recall it is a lie. Why don't you just get to the point you're trying to make, I'm not playing an Epig mind-game.Epignosis wrote:Nah, not lying. You're being evasive.Long Con wrote:You are lying about what you can recall. Why?Epignosis wrote:Question for Mr. Con and Mme. JC:
Both of you voted for MM after he voted himself and after bf had five votes. Correct me if I am wrong about this, but I can't recall anytime you two have ever voted someone because of chronic self-voting. I understand the reasoning, sure, but why now? Why today?
How about you go ahead and answer the implied question: Have you ever voted someone because of chronic self-voting?
Epignosis wrote:Loaded questions are for children who hit their siblings and need something stronger than a yes/no question to be tricked.rabbit8 wrote:Why the accusations on LC then in your posts?
If you don't get my meaning, then please point me to these accusations in my posts.
Epignosis wrote:Posting this here in case rabbit is playing the fun card to get people to forget about the business card.
Epignosis wrote:I have a vote that says otherwise.rabbit8 wrote:Violence is never the answer.