The Syndicate

Malakim's "Janitor?" comment has no alignment relevance for a few reasons:

1. It's not a part of the scum roles.
2. Genuine confusion is a great way to seem town, but if given the opportunity, mafia can use it. This was an opportunity.
3. Malakim thought that maybe the 3P role janitored the kill.

Heck, I also didn't know if the nightkills would be janitored until one happened. I suspected, but I didn't scour the OP. I respect Malakim enough to assume that, when replacing in as scum, he can fake confusion well enough. Especially when it is applied to mechanics that genuinely hasn't looked at.

I wouldn't say it's a scumtell either. Just a big ol' nothing

linki: I'll get to that

dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:21 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:14 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:24 pm do you feel bad about placing a vote on malakim, speedchuck? why or why not?

Nah. He's been here what, 2 in-game days? That's long enough.

Oh, sorry, I didn't call it. Malakim.

do you feel his lack of contributions aren't more along the lines of of overwhelmed townie?

What are your reasons for voting for malakim?

He's one of my suspects too, so if no one else wants to park on Wilgy, I may be inclined to follow you with a malakim vote but I didnt want to rush into it without giving him a chance to get settled and tell us stuff so we can judge him more fairly. His contributions so far haven't sat well with me. I was in the same boat but felt it necessary to share my thoughts on everything as I went along. He was a lot more reserved.

I'm voting him for lack of contributions? News to me. I thought I was voting him based on vote placement. His contributions aren't really lackluster, it's the direction that bothers me.
"That's long enough" is referring to me not feeling bad about lynching someone who just replaced in.

Granted, it's daystart, my vote is prone to move. We'll see.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:23 pm Imo if our killer role is alive and active he should be shooting the likes of INH and Sig. And Malakim, should he not come back.

I probably would have shot Dunya. "STOP POSTING SO MUCH I'M TRYING TO HUNT."

But no really, if you're out there, pls kill INH. We can't read anything whatsoever into a missing player. Sig at least has some posts, same for Malakim.

dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:30 pm Have you played with malakim before, speedchuck?

Once, in SF2 mafia. He was scum. I correctly suspected him for a lot of the early game and a couple of the other scum members later, but I was on top of my town game in that game. Then inactivity happened, town never got anywhere, and I got killed.

I could feel Malakim, Kylemii, and an inactive. Buuuut I'm still not doing in-depth stuff like Sloon and Dunya are doing. And Kylemii.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:18 pm INH

I could definitely follow this by dayend. I have no reason not to.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:18 pm INH

Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?

linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:35 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:18 pm INH

Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?

linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?

A variant of #3. I think INH is a perfectly valid suspect given that he has 0 posts and I counted the same number of direct references to him in Jay's ISO. But plopping votes on him early when there's plenty more substantive suspects to go after isn't my desired method of scum hunting, and I was hoping a harsh stance would provoke a strong reaction of Epi because he's a whirlwind of content when he gets going and it's fun.

I'm sure Epi will join us. I'm just trying to ward off a semantic discussion of whether scumhunting is stifled by early votes on inactives or not. I am pretty sure Epi would be happy to oblige, but this thread is long enough.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 pm Care to reflect on this?

I suppose I already have. Just haven't posted anything.

It doesn't rule them out as teammates, but when I read it, it didn't seem like distancing. Cbob seems honest here in his question, and it doesn't really make JJJ look good at the time. I sense no planning or anything BTSC. Even if they were scum, this seems like an honest interaction. More likely if Cbob is town.

I'd certainly rather focus elsewhere today. Cbob is maybe my 5th or 6th most likely scumspect.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.

He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.

It's probably the best point for Malakim, unless the kill was locked in early. With Jack's legacy post as is, in Malakim's spot, I wouldn't want the last thing an engaged and confirmed town said to be suspecting of me. WIFOM though, as well as the timing of the nightkill getting sent in. Malakim hasn't even been around. Just a thought.

I do remember jack being the only one after Quin. I should probably ISO jack's most recent day.

linki: I still think Dunya's town though.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:54 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.

He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.

Long history of calling out dunya as well.

Also was after me. So obviously he could be wrong.

[mention]Sloonei[/mention] Would you vote malakim with me please? You don't have to stay or anything. Just vote him for a while.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:07 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:01 pm @Sloonei Would you vote malakim with me please? You don't have to stay or anything. Just vote him for a while.

Why?

Because mal is bad. And I'm doing a thing.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:14 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:09 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:07 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:01 pm @Sloonei Would you vote malakim with me please? You don't have to stay or anything. Just vote him for a while.

Why?

Because mal is bad. And I'm doing a thing.

I like my vote where it is for now.

linki: huh well that settles that I guess

dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:16 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:13 pm I agree that there's merit to the theory that they were taking a guess at Jack's role. My first thought, however, was that he was removed to frame one or two of his suspects. I expected me or Epi to die. There's been every bit as much speculation about what role I might have as there was for Jack.

I don't think people actually still do that?

I do. When I'm scum, I'm fricken Light Yagami. I'll select a kill for the wine, or gives someone an insanity curse that implicates a group of people because it references a game of a bygone age.

We're out there.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:24 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:15 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:14 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:09 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:07 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:01 pm @Sloonei Would you vote malakim with me please? You don't have to stay or anything. Just vote him for a while.

Why?

Because mal is bad. And I'm doing a thing.

I like my vote where it is for now.

linki: huh well that settles that I guess

would telling me what the Thing that you are doing defeat the purpose of said Thing?

It would have, but the purpose is already defeated now. Basically, I'm tinfoiling you.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:05 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:20 pm Also I am a suspect to you because you believe I bussed Jay. How can you treat my line of suspicion as illegitimate? We're looking for the same thing; it's just our results that are different.

No. You're a suspect to me because

1) I believe Jimmy and Dom/Mal are w/w and you voted to save Dom/Mal. Worse, you did so with no reasoning or conviction.

2) You voted Wilgy with all my other suspects instead of Jimmy or Speed, which no explanation, creating a scenario where the only town read of mine between the three of them was more likely to be lynched as of an hour before EOD.

3) You keep handwaiving the incredibly strong cases against Mal (obviously saved by Jimmy) and Quin (obviously trying to save Mal and then Jimmy and refuses to say why).

I don't actually care one way or another about your vote for Jimmy. If you hadn't voted or said anything at all, the outcome would be the same.

This bothers me, because I'm prone to find a few townreads and stick to my guns REALLY HARD on them. You're one of those townreads. You still read town. But it bothers me that you haven't moved against malakim in any substantial way. (I know you already probably responded to this somewhere. This game has too many posts.)

If there's a high-posting mafia member, it might be sloonei.

Was it you who first brought up the "Jay being bussed" theory? (I honestly can't remember, and the game is getting too big for me to want to look.) Introducing that after JJJ got lynched took the focus completely away from you. Could be an interesting gambit for you OR a scummate. As for killing Jack, you're the one scumread he had that nobody else was following. The most likely to slip through the cracks if Jack just disappeared, as everyone else has a townread on you and was basically ignoring Jack.

I was testing in a silly childish way to see if you'd even put a single vote on Malakim for kicks. You refused. You probably refused because my request was silly, but it doesn't give me good feels. Thus, .

Of course that also mostly dependent on Malakim being scum, sooooooooo

dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:41 pm @speedchuck

"Was it you who first brought up the "Jay being bussed" theory? (I honestly can't remember, and the game is getting too big for me"

I believe it was colonialbob if memory serves right. I'll check.

I don't think Sloonei is scum though.

Fair enough. I'm lazy. And, if it needed saying, Sloonei and Cbob not w/w, so that part of my tinfoil has a wrinkle in it.

[mention]Sloonei[/mention] I ruined it, didn't I? Me and you were buddies, and I screwed it up with my paranoia.

linki: it's early in the day, and I'm looking for reactions for kicks. Gimme a break, Dunya. I'm allowed to throw shade where I want, and I have to continue Jack's legacy.

Haha I'm not going to be around at all for the last 7-8 hours of day 5. Gonna be very iffy after the next 3.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:00 pm "poll runs til 2:43 am" well I guess I'll.... probably be up for that

West coast, huh? Us eastern folks have it a bit later.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:30 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:50 pm For future reference, is replacing back into a game a thing? I've done it several times on another site. I was vanilla town or some passive role (with no non-public night actions) and died early. Then I replaced a non-poster, with no more knowledge than I had with my other role. Is that a thing here?
I haven't seen it yet.

Not that I want to die and replace INH, or that anyone else can. Just wondering.

Yes, but it's more rare here since kills are janitored. Mesk is the only one I could see replacing back in, and she was inactive to begin with so she might be unavailable. Well, we can always ask her.

Not to mention that we don't know who she used her insanifying role on.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:43 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:29 pm It has been a while since we heard from Quin.

What are thoughts on speedchuck's tinfoil theory about me, kyle?

I'm looking for it... Do you mean the tinfoil theory that you're a high posting big mountain? I couldn't find any explanation for it beyond that.

It's based on Sloonei's voting patterns (with JJ and Malakim) and Jack's death.
It ignores Sloonei's early scumread of Jack and Sloon's town contributions.

I am also curious what you think of it. Post #3972.

We need a tinfoil hat smiley

linki: Sloonei didn't vote for Malakim on a different day. I was just checking his reaction if I asked him to vote for a bit. If he had voted, that would have meant something. His refusal doesn't mean much, as it was an unusual request.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:50 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:38 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:24 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:15 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:14 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:09 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:07 pm
Why?

Because mal is bad. And I'm doing a thing.

I like my vote where it is for now.

linki: huh well that settles that I guess

would telling me what the Thing that you are doing defeat the purpose of said Thing?

It would have, but the purpose is already defeated now. Basically, I'm tinfoiling you.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:05 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:20 pm Also I am a suspect to you because you believe I bussed Jay. How can you treat my line of suspicion as illegitimate? We're looking for the same thing; it's just our results that are different.

No. You're a suspect to me because

1) I believe Jimmy and Dom/Mal are w/w and you voted to save Dom/Mal. Worse, you did so with no reasoning or conviction.

2) You voted Wilgy with all my other suspects instead of Jimmy or Speed, which no explanation, creating a scenario where the only town read of mine between the three of them was more likely to be lynched as of an hour before EOD.

3) You keep handwaiving the incredibly strong cases against Mal (obviously saved by Jimmy) and Quin (obviously trying to save Mal and then Jimmy and refuses to say why).

I don't actually care one way or another about your vote for Jimmy. If you hadn't voted or said anything at all, the outcome would be the same.

This bothers me, because I'm prone to find a few townreads and stick to my guns REALLY HARD on them. You're one of those townreads. You still read town. But it bothers me that you haven't moved against malakim in any substantial way. (I know you already probably responded to this somewhere. This game has too many posts.)

If there's a high-posting mafia member, it might be sloonei.

Was it you who first brought up the "Jay being bussed" theory? (I honestly can't remember, and the game is getting too big for me to want to look.) Introducing that after JJJ got lynched took the focus completely away from you. Could be an interesting gambit for you OR a scummate. As for killing Jack, you're the one scumread he had that nobody else was following. The most likely to slip through the cracks if Jack just disappeared, as everyone else has a townread on you and was basically ignoring Jack.

I was testing in a silly childish way to see if you'd even put a single vote on Malakim for kicks. You refused. You probably refused because my request was silly, but it doesn't give me good feels. Thus, .

Of course that also mostly dependent on Malakim being scum, sooooooooo

Tbh I buy Jack's theory.

It's just that my current view on Sloonei is that his votes look so bad I find it hard to believe a scum Sloonei would make them.

IKR? If his hard bussing and good reads were an act, why didn't he seal the deal with good votes?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:53 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:48 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:43 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:29 pm It has been a while since we heard from Quin.

What are thoughts on speedchuck's tinfoil theory about me, kyle?

I'm looking for it... Do you mean the tinfoil theory that you're a high posting big mountain? I couldn't find any explanation for it beyond that.

It's based on Sloonei's voting patterns (with JJ and Malakim) and Jack's death.
It ignores Sloonei's early scumread of Jack and Sloon's town contributions.

I am also curious what you think of it. Post #3972.

We need a tinfoil hat smiley

linki: Sloonei didn't vote for Malakim on a different day. I was just checking his reaction if I asked him to vote for a bit. If he had voted, that would have meant something. His refusal doesn't mean much, as it was an unusual request.

Post numbers aren't displayed on mobile... At least I don't think so. Can you link it?

Maybe

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:35 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:27 pm
Okay. And why is that scummy again?

It's scummy because a scum quin following a lynch of teammate jay, in a game where his teammates may already under fire, and so many players are difficult to accuse because of the general civvie-trust vibes of the thread, when being asked what his suspects are, might quickly respond with listing two suspected players who aren't on his team.

Why me and Eloh? Why not Cbob or speedchuck or sog or LC. Why specifically list those two players? You weren't specifically asked for 2 suspects.

Reaching

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:54 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:52 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:35 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:27 pm
Okay. And why is that scummy again?

It's scummy because a scum quin following a lynch of teammate jay, in a game where his teammates may already under fire, and so many players are difficult to accuse because of the general civvie-trust vibes of the thread, when being asked what his suspects are, might quickly respond with listing two suspected players who aren't on his team.

Why me and Eloh? Why not Cbob or speedchuck or sig or LC. Why specifically list those two players? You weren't specifically asked for 2 suspects.

Reaching

Do you think that Quin is a civ?

I think it's very possible, if not probable. 60% chance of civ. Around the same as you. But I do need to reread at some point.

Has nothing to do with that post I quoted, though. Even if Quin is scum, that post is a stretch.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:58 pm Sorry, I guess it's reaching to point out Quin being reserved about listing suspects and to speculate about why he might be doing so. My mistake.

Oh, don't do this. Don't be that guy. I'm not even suspecting you for this in particular, but if you're going to be that guy, I'll break it down.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:35 pm It's scummy because a scum quin following a lynch of teammate jay, in a game where his teammates may already under fire, and so many players are difficult to accuse because of the general civvie-trust vibes of the thread, when being asked what his suspects are, might quickly respond with listing two suspected players who aren't on his team.

Why me and Eloh? Why not Cbob or speedchuck or sog or LC. Why specifically list those two players? You weren't specifically asked for 2 suspects.

The first paragraph is reasoning through Quin's motives. That's fine. I mean, if you were to ask me who I suspected at this particular point in the game, I could respond in 5 seconds with my top 2 scum reads. Easy. So while your reasoning for motive might be correct, it is at least equally likely that the opposite motive is correct.

But rather than add extra evidence to support your read of Quin's inner thoughts and motives, you double down in paragraph 2.
"Why me and eloh?" Fair question.
"Why not Cbob or speedchuck or sog or LC?" I dunno, why WOULD he suspect those out of the blue? What are you expecting?
"Why specifically list those two players?" Either they are his two prime suspects, or he's listing them out of convenience. Again, what are you expecting?
"You weren't specifically asked for 2 suspects." And now you're acting like the number matters. If you wanted a rainbow, you should have asked.

I don't read this line of questioning as scummy, necessarily. Townies can tunnel too. But don't get sarcastic with me when I say that your argument is reaching. Find some substance somewhere else.

Speculating Quin's motives is fine. Questioning Quin about being reserved is fine. But that second line of questions, based off of a couple of innocuous reads, is reaching. Or, at least, it is until Epi comes in here and tells me there's a more accurate word for what you're doing with that second paragraph.

I considered for a second labeling this as off-topic, but IDK. Others might find your reaching questions to be a scum indicator. So long as you're buzzing Quin, though, do you have any other evidences to support this Quin mindset? Preferably from another post?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:30 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:24 pm*a bunch of stuff you said*

My sarcasm was in response to your "reaching". It added nothing.

Neither did your sarcasm.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:36 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:30 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:24 pm*a bunch of stuff you said*

My sarcasm was in response to your "reaching". It added nothing.

The questions at the end of that post also weren't evidence? They were questions for Quin to answer.

My bad, I guess. I assumed those were rhetorical, seeing as how you ended with a statement and not a question.
[mention]Quin[/mention], you should answer this dudes questions.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:51 pm please don't point out my grammar or syntax mistakes, i already have a D in this online class and if Epi notices I might get an F

ok

So does anyone NOT want to lynch malakim?

Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:13 pm I'm okay with a mal vote. I always thought he could have replaced in as mafia. I know someone said it was disrespectful to marmot to look into the mechanics like that, but I don't think it is.

It was me, and I think there was something different in the context.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:38 pm Mal's been under lynch pressure since he was born into this thread. Has anyone played a game with Mal under similar conditions?

Yeah man. I used to be the replacement king.

My games didn't have this many posts though.

Malakim is suspected for more than one reason. To not lynch him because of guilt is ridiculous. But sure, talk about someone else.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:40 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:32 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:38 pm Mal's been under lynch pressure since he was born into this thread. Has anyone played a game with Mal under similar conditions?

Yeah man. I used to be the replacement king.

My games didn't have this many posts though.

How does this Mal compare to the previous Mal's?

Previous Mal was a low poster, but didn't disappear. Don't remember much else though. Been a while, short game.

hrm

I agree that cBob's posts looked overly defensive concerning Malakim for no reason.

Epi is joining the tinfoil sloonei train. Keikaku doori. Does anyoe have experience with scum!sloonei? (JJJ probably does, but he scum and dead)

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:28 am
Can we lynch bob now?

Does malakim's flip affect your read of bob at all?

Why were you so against voting Malakim?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:52 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:48 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:28 am
Can we lynch bob now?

Does malakim's flip affect your read of bob at all?

Why were you so against voting Malakim?

Bob is my strongest suspect independent of all players without 3 J's in their name.

I supported the lynch by the end of the day, but I opposed it initially for two reasons: malakim's reaction to the janitored nightkills looked like authentic surprise which I did not think made sense coming from a player who would have had a hand in the killings. And the argument that "Jay lynched Mesk to save Dom/mal" on Day 3 was stupid.

But you still wouldn't vote for him.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:02 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:58 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:52 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:48 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:28 am
Can we lynch bob now?

Does malakim's flip affect your read of bob at all?

Why were you so against voting Malakim?

Bob is my strongest suspect independent of all players without 3 J's in their name.

I supported the lynch by the end of the day, but I opposed it initially for two reasons: malakim's reaction to the janitored nightkills looked like authentic surprise which I did not think made sense coming from a player who would have had a hand in the killings. And the argument that "Jay lynched Mesk to save Dom/mal" on Day 3 was stupid.

But you still wouldn't vote for him.

Indeed. I did not need to. I made a post about this.

linki: I know, I saw it. I don't like it. Looking at your other mafia game that I was in with you, you're still meta-town, but I dislike that post.

Say, if cbob is town, who will you suspect next?
How about if he's scum?

I don't like independent suspects. Our baddies are not bad in a vacuum.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:10 pm What do you not like about my post?

There was no reason for you to vote malakim.
There was no reason for you NOT to vote malakim.
Because the post exists, you clearly considered voting malakim. It was on your plate.
Then you decided against it and thought it was important enough to note.
Why?

The only reason that makes sense to me is that you suspected (or KNEW ) that Malakim would flip town, and didn't want your vote record to look even worse. So you made a note of it and kept the vote off.

But that's just the way I would logically process the situation. You might be different. But if you were going to leave your vote alone, why notify us? IDGI.

linki: this game is cool. I come from a place with 120/48 Day/Night phases. With no talking at night. Full week per day. Yep. This game is trucking along, and you're being a very responsible host.

linki2: IKR? I'm not quite ready to agree.

Please do

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:06 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:04 pmPlease do

I'll do it after Why I Think Speed is Scum. You're not getting rid of me that quickly.

Ooh, yeah, do that too

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:08 pm I'd say I'm only about 87.65% certain you're bad right now.

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:23 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:16 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:15 pm Meh. Sorry malakim.

I was having a feeling he would be a civ with his ragequit and all.

But like... how am I supposed to deal with a player who just quits at the first sign of pressure?

Idk, let's ask sig and inh.

do you think sig rage-quit?

Heck, INH didn't ragequit. He has 0 posts.

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:39 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:34 pm

INH probably had a fallout from CC123. He seemed mega stressed in that game. Which is completely NAI.

what's NAI?

Not alignment indicative.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:40 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:33 pm(talking about LC) I know you're townie and all,

I have a question, dunya.

Pretty sure I was about to ask the same question.

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:50 pm so I think I'm going to start with my reassessment of colonialbob, as I promised Sloonei to give him my full perspective (when I isod him previously, it was 2am and I finished at 3am). I'll take notes this time and try to go through your 5000 word essays on him with a neutral mind.

You said you were doing me first!

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:46 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:43 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:40 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:33 pm(talking about LC) I know you're townie and all,

I have a question, dunya.

what

I was wondering which parts of LC's play have led you to "known townie" status for him

LC is not at the chopping block for now. Keep looking.

For the record, this isn't my favorite answer ever. I'll let Kyle pursue it if he wishes.

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:03 pm LC isn't a primary suspect for anyone, let's not get sidetracked and waste time.

Last I checked this wasn't true, but I'm more interested in what you're doing right now than that.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:09 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:56 pmFor the record, this isn't my favorite answer ever. I'll let Kyle pursue it if he wishes.

you're not my real dad, i can do what i want

Back me up here DDL.