The Syndicate

probably not w/w with marmot

spf
michelle
boknows
hally

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:52 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:08 am probably not w/w with marmot

spf
michelle
boknows
hally

Thats all?

it's a start, calmez-vous

@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

i have not forgotten about you

not enough info but dom looks pretty =rand

why was he a point of interest for you though?

Hally wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:57 pm 2. Tedextr - kill

meanie

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:35 pm Hey @tedxtr why did you elect to ISO Marmot in the first place?

i don't believe there was any reason, just happened

Hally wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:47 pm tfw you just spontaneously start shielding a wolf for no reason

there was nobody to shield them from

Hally wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:01 pm you kept saying nobody had a good reason to suspect marmot. wdym “no one to shield him from”

that was ages after i've initially iso'd them randomly

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:09 pm In GoC 2019, Ted purposefully went out of his way to hard defend one of our teammates purely for the sake of wifom. ftr

that 2 years old read

and with that one i stuck throughout the entirety of the push, exactly like i said earlier in some other post that i would've stuck to it

Hally wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:15 pm ted is a better wolf now than he was two years ago

idk i kinda slapped in the GoC 2019

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:15 pm Well that's fun! Thanks Bo. I laughed when ted stood out again.

it's the charts that are wrong

tomorrow i can put in work but i assume i'm getting vig'd or something

gl

BoKnows wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:16 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:15 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:15 pm Well that's fun! Thanks Bo. I laughed when ted stood out again.

it's the charts that are wrong

Numbers don't lie.

then how do you explain this video?

i'm so relaxed i'm posting from a spa rn, getting a massage

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:32 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:31 pm i'm so relaxed i'm posting from a spa rn, getting a massage

Do you want to go steady with me bikkboiiiii

let's do it

the only way to play mafia is on a computer

BoKnows wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:49 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:49 pm the only way to play mafia is on a computer

Did you bring your computer to the salon?

they gave me one, they're very kind

they gave it to me so i could have my 10 minutes of shitposting

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:53 pm how many deaths we about to get?

i think 3

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:54 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:53 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:53 pm how many deaths we about to get?

i think 3

What makes you think 3?

2 wolf factional kills and a town vigi, maybe

mom, mac is doing the thing again

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:56 pm I don't want to be vigged.

no it's going to be me!

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:57 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:56 pm mom, mac is doing the thing again

bai

i was close

i promised to put in work so i will

it's 1 am, however

Alison wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:15 pm I'm probably going to votepark ted until I see more from Hally about their TSP case.

[VOTE: tedxtr] aubergine

always a safe choice

Super killed sounds like strongman to me

what do you mean by mortal enemies?

why do people have a hard on for claiming anything related to their role on D2

To be honest idk how soup kills would work in multiball

Alison wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:29 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:26 pm why do people have a hard on for claiming anything related to their role on D2

In this case I have a strong reason to believe I won't survive the night and it is more productive to have info out early rather than late.

was moreso talking about the roleblock thing

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:15 pm "Apart from that one argument I willfully ignored, why are you all voting for this mafioso?"

she said it was because of an interaction, which i guess is fine, but it's not strong enough

unless you disagree

here for the usual defence but will get to doing stuff in a few

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:23 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:22 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:15 pm "Apart from that one argument I willfully ignored, why are you all voting for this mafioso?"

she said it was because of an interaction, which i guess is fine, but it's not strong enough

unless you disagree

what

alison's reason was "he had a w/w post with kza"

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:31 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:23 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:22 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:15 pm "Apart from that one argument I willfully ignored, why are you all voting for this mafioso?"

she said it was because of an interaction, which i guess is fine, but it's not strong enough

unless you disagree

what

alison's reason was "he had a w/w post with kza"

Okay. And your response to that was "I can vote KZA." It was not "I can vote for Marmot" or even "I can vote for either Marmot or KZA." You said you could vote for KZA but made no mention of Marmot even though he was the original topic of conversation. Do you understand why I think this looks weird?

tbh it looks like i misunderstood what you were trying to say altogether

and i do not understand why it looks weird for you. i asked for the reason alison was sussing marmot. i felt it was weak, but kza was mentioned and then i remembered about my earlier read of kza and said "sure, i could vote for them"

my thought process didn't emerge from that interaction at all, alison just kinda brought up kza and i remembered about that reason i had plus a few other people mentioning kza being potentially scummy

i believe before that post i've already made a post on kza, asking canucksians to weigh in with thoughts there - it was because i had that reason to think he was scum and nothing too villagery for him that i've seen

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 4:12 pm can a canucksian look over KZA's posts and give some thoughts?

i'm assuming kza is from canucks obviously - if that is wrong then forget it

with hindsight i can see how it looks weird, but my thought process didn't emerge from that one post - hope that makes sense

i believe your entire argument is flawed

me not reacting to it = the argument wasn't enough to change my mind with a previous stated town lean on marmot

and then kza is mentioned again, i say "i could go there"

you're blowing it out of proportion for no reason and i don't see how you think the behaviour is questionable at all.

your line was reasonable up to a point but this last post doesn't make much sense to me / i don't see how you don't understand what i'm saying

it's not to say i think you're a wolf for it

i clearly disagreed and then offered to vote for kza - it doesn't mean that i thought kza was scum off of that interaction alone / i had to be agreeing with alison's point that the post is w/w, my point is that his name was brought up and then i offered to vote for him.

if I didn't question / elaborate on my discussion with alison and on her point - doesn't that entail I disagreed?

that seems like a rudimentary thing

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:04 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:57 am i believe your entire argument is flawed

me not reacting to it = the argument wasn't enough to change my mind with a previous stated town lean on marmot

and then kza is mentioned again, i say "i could go there"

you're blowing it out of proportion for no reason and i don't see how you think the behaviour is questionable at all.

First of all RE: the bolded and underlined:

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:41 am with hindsight i can see how it looks weird, but my thought process didn't emerge from that one post - hope that makes sense

So,

Why did you not say any of this at the time? You initiated a conversation about Marmot, specifically requested information about a read on him, and then did nothing when you got a response. Later on you downplayed the case against Marmot and then repeatedly complained that no one was giving you clear reasons to suspect Marmot. But when you got that first argument for Marmot to be scum you did nothing. You didn't argue with Alison to try to sway her off her read, despite having just ISO'd Marmot and come to a town read, as you say. I question your entire progression on Marmot because it does not actually look like you were invested in reading him or challenging the reads that other people had on him.

i didn't think it was a strong argument

how is this unreasonable? you think that argument holds any water after i've just finished an iso on him?

idgi

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:04 am You didn't argue with Alison to try to sway her off her read, despite having just ISO'd Marmot and come to a town read, as you say.

Alison is as tough as a rock and I believed it was futile to change her view when she had a singular reason for marmot being scum, i didn't feel like it needed attention

your problem being i didn't attempt to tell everyone "no, Marmot is town!"

i think you're making a lot of assumptions that just don't work:

>for me
>in this context

I still don't get how my progression is unreasonable / what you don't understand about it

hindsight is 20/20 so maybe your thoughts are influenced

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:11 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:07 am if I didn't question / elaborate on my discussion with alison and on her point - doesn't that entail I disagreed?

that seems like a rudimentary thing

I have a hard time believing this. You had just finished ISOing Marmot. You came to an apparently firm conclusion that he was town. If I'm reading the progression correctly, this ISO is what inspired you to ask Alison for her case in the first place. So up to this point, it looks like you have a read on Marmot that you believe in, and you want to test it out against the reads of those who feel differently than you do.

But then when you asked Alison to explain her read, instead of engaging in a constructive dialogue with her about your reads on Marmot and what differences you saw, you said "got it." What part of "Got it" am I supposed to interpret as "I disagree with this read, Alison"?

Alison is tough to move and it felt like the case was weak, it was a singular reason and it's tough to engage on a point of "this is w/w"

i didn't feel like it needed attention, period. if you can't see it then you're probably pretty tunneled

i don't think in your experience you've NEVER asked someone for their reason, got a weak response (even though you town read that person) and you felt the need to bash on them and change their mind when the case is thin anyway instead of just saying "whatever, moving on"

Sloonei, in this entire time you've been playing mafia, have you never

>had a different read from someone
>ask them for their read on someone
>they reply with an underwhelming reason / hard to talk about / useless to talk about
>you moved on because it is an underwhelming reason and there's nothing to talk about, you agree to disagree

like what?

Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:59 am I read Ted's Iso, and looking at the confidence he told me he deserves a town read I think he is town, except I am wrong but I don't want to tinfoil.

with the risk of changing your mind, why do you think I wouldn't do this as a mafia?

"so the reason marmot is wolf is because this interaction is w/w"

like wtf do you expect me to say to that

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:22 am

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:24 pm If you aren't voring ted today I will scum read you

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:21 am [VOTE: TonyStarkPrime] aubergine

caught one

he changed his read because i'm town

u mad?

[VOTE: TSP ] aubergine

bad move to vote for me br0

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:24 am terrible fake distancing attempt I'm already cleared from the team you're on

i'm a villager

you've played yourself