Upon perusing Rondo's iso, it's very towny.
Creature is extremely towny, you can't just have the same exact worldview as me and be wolf.
Search found 286 matches
Return to “Cartomancy [Game Over]”
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:08 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:14 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
I will take the L on not calling Roxy obvious mafia; upon reshoring Creature, Rondo, Porscha as stronger townreads, there literally isn't much room and Roxy has been L0 wolfy. Roxy disappeared because of IRL, and as such could not play to the best of their abilities.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:27 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 1]
Ala Jack, *thonk*sig wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:11 pmLol![]()
Okay lemme find someone else to vote for I guess![]()
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:29 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 1]
I'm wrong, sig defended Kate, not Roxy.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:32 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 1]
The most wolf-agendaed post in this game is this one.sig wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:44 pm I’m definitely eyeing Allison and rondo right now the most.
Mac is a hazy read he’s playing a bit weird, but not ready to commit to a read either way.
Jack, falcon, Sean, Porsche, and Lucy, are all people I’d not want to vote off today.
I think Roxy looked very good with her responses and I see where she’s coming from. However, she just tricked me last game and civ reading Kate after she just said she hard protects teammates doesn’t mean a lot. They were just mafia together though so the odds are in our favor they’re not both mafia.
I’ll add for those not familiar Roxy is old school from the TS era where you need to be alive to win games as a civ. That’ll change her approach a bit and make her do some stuff that might come across as weird.
Stay positive and tuutuu are both posting but I’ve got zero reads on them which I don’t like
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:33 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Look at that beatiful posturing on Roxy/Kate.
Look at that beatiful casting of doubt on Mac/Alison/Rondo/SPF/Tutuu.
Look at that beatiful casting of doubt on Mac/Alison/Rondo/SPF/Tutuu.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:45 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Weak argument.
What attempts? From which people? The wagons remained tightly clustered around ABC wagons this entire time.sig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 3:11 pm I think Alison ane Creatuee both look bad. Creature is jumping from wagon to wagon with very little actual posts to back it up. While Alison keeps coming out with really bad takes that at the very least don’t seem pro civ. The big 3 I heavily dislike is her back and forth with Roxy, trying to let Lucy decide who we’re voting, and being so pro voting off lower posters.
I also think we’re seeing some attempts to shift focus by the mafia team away from the leading wagons.
More discrediting.
This literally just states "no matter what Alison flips, me and my buddies Roxy and Jack always look dandy".sig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:34 pmWell I’ll say it’s possible for us all to be civ unless mafia is also up to be voted off. However, I’d eye Falcon or Splints the most of us.RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:23 pm @sig
@Jackofhearts2005
@Roxy
@fingersplints
@falcon45ca
Alison flips town > who are the wolves on your wagon? Who are the town?
Alison flips wolf > who bussed? who is pure?
If she flips mafia then Myself and Jack are town for sure and I’d say roxy looks very good. But, given the game State I think it would depend on Indy player style whether they’d bus or even vote for a top wagon.
Realistically I’d say the players voting off major wagons should be eyed closely if Alison doesn’t flip mafia and we aren’t thinking the counter wagons are mafia either
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:48 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
You guys wanted wolf agenda? I present to you, wolf agenda. Jack waan't acting alone in pushing Alison, I think Jack thought they would get away with it, and that is why I cant trust Alison's last townread on the slot.
Sig happens to be heavily unpartnered with Dennis.
Sig happens to be heavily unpartnered with Dennis.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:57 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Yeah Im not dooming either, I'm currently in glee, the spell is broken town has control back over the game.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 12:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
The only piece that doesn't fit in my analysis is Wilgy. But I think that's because Wilgy is the Zealot.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
I don't know of a satisfactory way that does not require a dissertation length post, or at least something that would cause me a great deal of intellectual labor to come across as being appropriately convincing since it seems that you're really in the weeds with this.Seanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:34 pm I think there is something very important going on between Mac and SPF.
tl;dr: SPF townreads Mac starting on Page 4, never gives a reason, not a single time, and it never wavers in the least. There are many w/w interactions between them. Mac looks like Mac wants to distance, but SPF is not doing a good job of showing critical thought on Mac. There is a small chance this is SPF/Mac w/t, but I think w/w powerwolfing is more likely here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So SPF has given me the heebee jeebees a few times, and Mac I think is playing like scum!Mac. SPF's most recent post where SPF said I was town for my case on Mac, and Mac questioned SPF's read on Mac, and SPF just said "I townread you" got my curious. I ISO'd SPF and ctrl+f'd the word "Mac". Here are the relevant posts I found, with my interpretations:
Spoiler: show
I'd really like some input on this. The game does not feel like it is a bunch of polarized people and slankers wolfing. I think with 5 wolves in a 20 person setup, powerwolfing makes sense. Please someone talk to me.
---------------------------------------
After going through and commenting on all the posts in the above spoiler, a new line of thinking came to me, included below. Spoilered because I am not super confident about it and it is not fully fleshed out and I don't want it to detract from what I have above about Mac/SPF (even though some if it leaked into the thoughts about the posts I've quoted)Spoiler: show
I believe that Mac is a polarized player, and that it is easy to distinguish their ranges as long as you pay attention to the right things, and the only problem is that everyone pays attention to the wrong things and over level themselves because Mac is all powerful and can apparently do anything as wolf and can only destroy wolves as town.
If you want to scumread all of the stronger players for having this exact same opinion on Mac, then that is a worldview one can construct (have you considered Lucy yet for diving a locktown Mac out of thin air?, oh wait I forgot they're the oracle, so it would just be me and SPF), but I would only ask that you elaborate on why exactly the gamestate points to the obvious pool of wolves not containing enough of them. You claim that the POE consists of the polarized players and slankers and that it "doesn't feel that why". Firstly, who are the polarized players being misread? Mac already admitted that their Falcon scumread was heavily OMGUS based and should not be trusted. Are there other people who are obv town by meta that are being scumread? Because I cannot seem to find any, and if you'd read my coldlist you'd know that I pay a great deal attention to claims of alignment based on meta. Secondly, I understand that uncovering Mac powerwolfing with SPF and Bereft is glamorous, but I don't even understand what vibes would lead you to think that is especially likely. Do you think Creature is mafia? Because if not, the D1 wagons were all on town and all of us, (Mac/SPF/me) stated pretty clearly that we thought the wagons were awful in tandem with baudib. (note that SPF scumread creature but I would think this to be a minor point)
This is also coincidentally why I most want sig dead if possible, because it would pretty much expose what's been happening all along FMPOV.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
B. If you hadn't noticed I have Creature as solid town, falcon as lean town, and Porscha as town, and Mac/SPF may have some deviations here but none of us are put bulldozing these players.
C. Actually I simply think town got off to a horrible start D1. I say this from the simple fact of the Baudib's wagon existence. I know you don't agree that Baudib was obvious town but as far as I'm concerned there was at minimum some number of town pursuing things that I would label inadvisable and there were definitely tensions that grew from the fact that Alison/Mac/Lucy/Baudib were telling people to "shut up and stop doing stupid things because we said so", and so these people never got around the fact that they think Mac's controlling the game in an evil direction simply from the fact he told them to stop wagoning their pet scumreads. That's a very nice story and all, but my point is that I don't actually current think you need that much control over the game to get a successful Moon use to cause an Alison chop. The recipe was right there, in D1, no one trusted Alison, and you want to know who pushed Alison and added to the boiling pot? Spoiler alert, its some of the people I'm suspecting.
The obvious counterargument is "but what about Mac's D2, he told everyone to vote for Alison for however long" to which I will simply state that I understand the concern but actually here's how to read Mac, so we segue into:
A. The first point about reading Mac, is that you can get a good idea just entirely based on Mac's stated reads, not their accuracy, but his stated explanations and read development. Mac's great at spinning BS and bussing, but the point is that he's not great at faking reasonable reads or for that matter reevaluating. I'm not going to bother explaining why I think Mac's D1 reads are reasonable since you obviously don't think they are and I will only come off as even more a snob. However, Mac's ... breakdown D2 is as far as I'm concerned a v!Mac. Do you think w!Mac bothers faking vulnerability? Not well, not in any way thats grounded. He stated clearly why he suddenly pivoted onto Alison, and thats because of a breakdown in confidence of worldview. Why was there a breadown in confidence of worldview? Because certain of his scumreads were showing town entitlement, these were Falcon and (Dr.Wilgy? I cant remember and I might be biased) and he had never expressed townreading Alison that confidently. Then he switches to actually I change my mind, I haven't a clue, and actually don't kill Alison. This is a massive amount of flexibility and whether you like it or not, its not easy to pull of convincingly as wolf, nor does it give him any benefit of wolf when everyone will be going "bro wtf was that". I am not going to talk about Mac's D3 and attempt to justify that its genuine frustration on Mac's part, but that is what I think.
In any case, it is much easier for me to say "oh I townread Mac", because I can follow basically all of his stated thought processes while others have not.
X. I strongly believe in my own ability to read Mac to speculate on the w/w nature of the interactions you cited. Besides the fact that I think most preflip claimed w/w interactions are in general weak, I do think SPF could have come to a similar assessment as I have, and this is just based on SPF being a stronger player and they've already echoed my general thrust that the reason Mac is town is that "actually Mac is polarized". And lastly, the point where Mac doubles around and asks SPF "so why don't you scumread me" is emblematic of Mac's townplay in that he will ask pointed questions out of the blue to the people he townreads for paranoia reasons. Theoretically SPF can be a wolf in all of this but these are not interactions w/w with Mac. Mac as a wolf would've likely theatred more with SPF as a partner, this interaction is pretty tame.
Why did I do this to myself.
C. Actually I simply think town got off to a horrible start D1. I say this from the simple fact of the Baudib's wagon existence. I know you don't agree that Baudib was obvious town but as far as I'm concerned there was at minimum some number of town pursuing things that I would label inadvisable and there were definitely tensions that grew from the fact that Alison/Mac/Lucy/Baudib were telling people to "shut up and stop doing stupid things because we said so", and so these people never got around the fact that they think Mac's controlling the game in an evil direction simply from the fact he told them to stop wagoning their pet scumreads. That's a very nice story and all, but my point is that I don't actually current think you need that much control over the game to get a successful Moon use to cause an Alison chop. The recipe was right there, in D1, no one trusted Alison, and you want to know who pushed Alison and added to the boiling pot? Spoiler alert, its some of the people I'm suspecting.
The obvious counterargument is "but what about Mac's D2, he told everyone to vote for Alison for however long" to which I will simply state that I understand the concern but actually here's how to read Mac, so we segue into:
A. The first point about reading Mac, is that you can get a good idea just entirely based on Mac's stated reads, not their accuracy, but his stated explanations and read development. Mac's great at spinning BS and bussing, but the point is that he's not great at faking reasonable reads or for that matter reevaluating. I'm not going to bother explaining why I think Mac's D1 reads are reasonable since you obviously don't think they are and I will only come off as even more a snob. However, Mac's ... breakdown D2 is as far as I'm concerned a v!Mac. Do you think w!Mac bothers faking vulnerability? Not well, not in any way thats grounded. He stated clearly why he suddenly pivoted onto Alison, and thats because of a breakdown in confidence of worldview. Why was there a breadown in confidence of worldview? Because certain of his scumreads were showing town entitlement, these were Falcon and (Dr.Wilgy? I cant remember and I might be biased) and he had never expressed townreading Alison that confidently. Then he switches to actually I change my mind, I haven't a clue, and actually don't kill Alison. This is a massive amount of flexibility and whether you like it or not, its not easy to pull of convincingly as wolf, nor does it give him any benefit of wolf when everyone will be going "bro wtf was that". I am not going to talk about Mac's D3 and attempt to justify that its genuine frustration on Mac's part, but that is what I think.
In any case, it is much easier for me to say "oh I townread Mac", because I can follow basically all of his stated thought processes while others have not.
X. I strongly believe in my own ability to read Mac to speculate on the w/w nature of the interactions you cited. Besides the fact that I think most preflip claimed w/w interactions are in general weak, I do think SPF could have come to a similar assessment as I have, and this is just based on SPF being a stronger player and they've already echoed my general thrust that the reason Mac is town is that "actually Mac is polarized". And lastly, the point where Mac doubles around and asks SPF "so why don't you scumread me" is emblematic of Mac's townplay in that he will ask pointed questions out of the blue to the people he townreads for paranoia reasons. Theoretically SPF can be a wolf in all of this but these are not interactions w/w with Mac. Mac as a wolf would've likely theatred more with SPF as a partner, this interaction is pretty tame.
Why did I do this to myself.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
@Seanzie
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Rondo, the reason you're towny is exactly for your first callout. "You can't just effortlessly townread me! Scummy" Town exhibit a selfobsession and this tracks with at least my observations of your reactions at a least a few other points in your iso, and no I'm not going to find them and point them out to you because I just made a wallpost.
I've been repping a Wilgy scumread since midD1 so all of that concern about my treatment of Wilgy is based on wrong facts, and if you think I as scum would have such a sloppy progression on Roxy that I know someone's probably going to point out, [complete the rest].
But sure.
This also segues to the thought I had earlier, that I actually like the players who bother to express suspicion on me (Porscha/Seanzie/Rondo), I do feel that wolves have been hesitant to do touch me and have literally just been TMI'ing town (yes this ties in to my earlier point about why Rondo is town)
I don't know why I'm spilling so much ink but I guess I decided I felt like talking alot..
I've been repping a Wilgy scumread since midD1 so all of that concern about my treatment of Wilgy is based on wrong facts, and if you think I as scum would have such a sloppy progression on Roxy that I know someone's probably going to point out, [complete the rest].
But sure.
This also segues to the thought I had earlier, that I actually like the players who bother to express suspicion on me (Porscha/Seanzie/Rondo), I do feel that wolves have been hesitant to do touch me and have literally just been TMI'ing town (yes this ties in to my earlier point about why Rondo is town)
I don't know why I'm spilling so much ink but I guess I decided I felt like talking alot..
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Lucy express a proper read on Bereft challenge.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 10:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
With?
I obviously would rather not share who my identity is. But I've played with lucy/Mac/Porscha/SPF, one of whom knows my identity, the others of whom will probably start guessing after this and probably figure out, and I've also played with some others here but not to any extent that I'm going to pretend to a know meta well enough.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 10:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
you fall in the latter category as well.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 10:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Spxce.
- Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Why is sig selfvoting?
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Should I assume I was dropped upwards from the pile?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:29 pm @everyone
Talk to me about my closer to null players. Who has a strong opinion on Sabi/Porscha/Wilgy/Seanzie/Sig/Rondo? Who should I be smart enough to townread and take out of this pile?
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 4:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
This game confuses me currently but I haven't been able to articulate why.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Roxy was never not going over today unless something earthshattering happened.
It is abundantly clear that wolves haven't cared all day.
It is abundantly clear that wolves haven't cared all day.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Wait roxy literally defends their partners as wolf, why would Creature be Roxy's partner.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
I'm baffled the recent spate of shade on Dennis/Rondo but I couldn't keep track of the people doing this.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Dennis said they think you're likely town in their readlist.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Also Seanzie did that Twist thing earlier where they expressed Roxy's exact concern about Dennis and then voted Kate.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:30 amI almost always feel you are town when we play together. You aren’t shining, here.RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:24 amHahaha, got more than caveman speak on why I am bad?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:58 am
I also wanna yeet Rondo but it’s not the ideal play today. I’m just saying. Rondo bad.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Oh come on. You know nobody else believes in this logic except you.RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:13 pmyeah but not as town as the other oracle so I see that as a sus
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Roxy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 8:42 amFu Rondo for making me want to help youRondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 8:35 amIf you wont highlight how its obvious on Dennis I wont vote him or rally on your behalf
Every game, 2 so far, he finds his own suspicions he did it in his own fashion, this game feels like he is being led in the thread by whatever bad town play is in action. No questions just doing what he told. He did not do this before in either game. It feels like a mafia member told him here's how to be bad. And it's obv bc It does not fit with his play from the other games.
Ps this ploy will no longer work and will self destruct when I hit submit.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 1]
I don't understand Roxy's incentive to say this as a wolf.
This post gets made because Roxy is tilted at any claims that they left.
I'll go and peruse this section to check.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
But "bad look"/"odd". This is so weird.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
No I'm not.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:30 pmAre you…confusing Rondo and Seanzie?Bereft wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:10 pmAlso Seanzie did that Twist thing earlier where they expressed Roxy's exact concern about Dennis and then voted Kate.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:30 amI almost always feel you are town when we play together. You aren’t shining, here.RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:24 amHahaha, got more than caveman speak on why I am bad?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:58 am
I also wanna yeet Rondo but it’s not the ideal play today. I’m just saying. Rondo bad.
When I’m talking to Rondo about Rondo, you chime in about 3 other players and idk what that has to do with the post you quoted lol.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Hmmm? Jack shaded Rondo; Seanzie shaded Dennis
I was looking for all such instances of shade of Dennis/Rondo and deciding how much I liked any of it.
I was looking for all such instances of shade of Dennis/Rondo and deciding how much I liked any of it.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
It boils down to, I do not think the interactions I've observed line up with how I or even others understand the game.staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:42 pmcan you try to? it would be helpful to hear right now
I'm trying to collect what I'm seeing but its taking forever.
Whats your opinion on Roxy/Creature being partnered?
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:43 pm just a random thought but it occurred to me that i think the odds of tutuu being mafia are particularly higher than rondo or seanzie being mafia even though i have them lower in my list of townreads
Agree to both.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
How about Jack/Creature, do people think they can be partnered.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 2]
This is a fascinating post.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:16 amThis post feels very teammate indicative if Creature flips W.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:53 amI’d throw creature down as a scum lean, there response to me have been off for most of the game (I guess this falls more into the gut read camp) and he seems to be more actively pushing wagons than civ creature does.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:43 amIs Creature weaving a false narrative in your mind? What's your read on them?sig wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 9:26 pmWhy was I the sketchiest vote? This narrative makes no sense .
Can’t comment on forced D1 it’s how I always come in I was joking it’s whatever.
I am/was LHF and used to be frequently misvoted, this is a very odd take. Plus my name keeps getting brought up meaning I’m still in the mix/LHF this game
I’d be curious to see if this Roxy flip is current since he’s been pushing it, but if she flips civ he’d be someone I’m eyeing a lot more.
He’s also on my ISO list so I’ll have more infor here soon
I've discovered that Dr. Wigly has been dropping off hard this game.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 1]
Eh, circumstantially with Creature being a competing wagon D1, I'm hesitant but I understand the opposition.staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:51 pm @Bereft -
there is a somewhat awkward shift between creature shotgun townreading roxy early on:
to creature capitulating to the threadstate consensus that roxy is wolfy and pushing on her and calling her one of his top townreads
creature did not form a real scumread on roxy until roxy was being widely suspected, and prior to that point, he tried to defend her. roxy made a point of throwing out creature's name as a point of suspicion a few times but never really pursued the read further. i see no reason why they are incompatible
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
My point is that I don't think you're partnered.
What's your read on me anyways, thanks for reminding me, and not just like, "oh town".
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 7:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
The post being fascinating had nothing to do with me justifying a wolfread on you.
If you want data, then respond to the fact that you've made barely any posts today like I said.
If you want data, then respond to the fact that you've made barely any posts today like I said.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Is this supposed to be problematic?staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:04 pmi am struggling to come to a world where roxy/sig/jack/sabi/tutuu does not contain the majority of the wolfteamCreature wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:01 pmDo you agree both Roxy and sig are wolves? Where would you go next excluding me?staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 7:57 pm i dont really have a lot to say before the day ends
im here while multitasking at work if anyone wants to talk to me i guess
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
If one puts:
Bereft
lucy
RondoDimBuckle
MacDougall
Porscha
Seanzie
staypositivefriend
falcon45ca
as town, then the game is near locked so I don't quite see the issue here.
Bereft
lucy
RondoDimBuckle
MacDougall
Porscha
Seanzie
staypositivefriend
falcon45ca
as town, then the game is near locked so I don't quite see the issue here.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
How did I forget Dennis
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Thanks.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:15 pm We are in the midgame so I am just going to force myself not to weathervane cuz if I'm wrong we probably are going to lose and if I'm right we will lose unless I stop playing badly.
@falcon45ca @Seanzie @RondoDimBuckle @DrWilgy
I believe you four are town. I need you to find me town or I am going to be nothing but a distraction and it will continue to cyclically frustrate me all game. Whatever suspicion you have towards me needs to die now or this game will be a loss for town imo.
@staypositivefriend @Bereft I am choosing to disregard tinfoil towards you both. I am willing to just mason with you ride or die.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
I do.
I think Rondo is about as near IC status as lucy is. You're literally an IC. Porscha feels great. Seanzie feels grounded even if insane and seems obviously confbiased. SPF just feels like v!SPF. Falcon I'm going on a meta read that no one to this point actually disagrees with.
I'm willing to bet
lucy
Rondo
Mac
Dennis
Porscha
town with my life and expect max 1 w in
Seanzie
SPF
Falcon
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Mac you don't need to publish my thoughts.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
How about Roxy/Kate/Jack/Wilgy/Tutuu .
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
Im not.
- Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Cartomancy [Game Over]
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 74094
Re: Cartomancy [Day 3]
If Wilgy is town, I don't know who I'm replacing them with.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:53 pmI don't think Wilgy is mafia.