The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote:Voting for Epignsosis because I feel like being a part of this action.

sig wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

sig wrote:The last minute vote drive onto BWT is suspicious, he hasn't even seen his role PM yet four people are voting for him? Including Elohcin to save you even though she could have voted for someone else. This is suspicious.

I'm also looking at Sloonie. So my day 1 mafia team prediction is. Epi, Elohcin, and Sloonie.

You ignored my question, sig.

If I'm mafia, and this is a push to save me, how many people on my team would know I was bad? Go ahead and count them. I'll wait.

It sounds like Fearless Leader knows who is on his team and even if he doesn't you're sharing BTSC with someone.

sig wrote:I think that someone is Elohcin and she voted to save you. The other two votes on bwt have been there for awhile unlike your vote. I think we should get five votes on Epi just in case there is shenanigan at work.

Elohcin wrote:I didn't want to vote bwt b/c he hasn't even shown. And if he's civ it will stink. BUT.....I gotta try to save Epi for now as I see no suspicions in him and he is actually active when BWT is not.

sig wrote:The last minute vote drive onto BWT is suspicious, he hasn't even seen his role PM yet four people are voting for him? Including Elohcin to save you even though she could have voted for someone else. This is suspicious.

I'm also looking at Sloonie. So my day 1 mafia team prediction is. Epi, Elohcin, and Sloonie.

Epignosis wrote:

sig wrote:I'm here and ready to vote and just for the hell of it I'm going to make this a three way. I'll be voting for indiglo. I'd rather vote for Zebra at this point, but I want to make it a three way tie so I won't. I should have more activity tomorrow unless someone night kills me then I won't have more activity.

linki: Ignore what I just said entirely I changed my mind, I don't like this last minute save of Epi, and the fact everyone is voting for a player who hasn't even made a post yet. I don't like this at all. I'll be voting for Epi. However, I'll be willing to switch to someone else I just very much disagree with voting for a player who hasn't even posted yet or apparently logged on.

Look at the roles. If I am bad, how many people are on my team?

sig wrote:I'm here and ready to vote and just for the hell of it I'm going to make this a three way. I'll be voting for indiglo. I'd rather vote for Zebra at this point, but I want to make it a three way tie so I won't. I should have more activity tomorrow unless someone night kills me then I won't have more activity.

linki: Ignore what I just said entirely I changed my mind, I don't like this last minute save of Epi, and the fact everyone is voting for a player who hasn't even made a post yet. I don't like this at all. I'll be voting for Epi. However, I'll be willing to switch to someone else I just very much disagree with voting for a player who hasn't even posted yet or apparently logged on.

Elohcin wrote:I didn't want to vote bwt b/c he hasn't even shown. And if he's civ it will stink. BUT.....I gotta try to save Epi for now as I see no suspicions in him and he is actually active when BWT is not.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm taking my vote off Zebra. The way the votes were distributed, Zebra would be compelled to vote for me as an act of self-preservation, and I don't think Zebra would taste very good on toast.

This post was less than an hour ago, and now zebra has no votes. Explain the self-preservation??

Also, who is Gus?

indiglo wrote: I'm not 100% clear on how baddies would use them to manipulate the thread/lynches, but maybe that will become more clear to me as game play continues.

indiglo wrote:Epignosis mafia

I don't know if I'll have time to log on in the AM before the poll closes,

a2thezebra wrote:In your opinion, what are S~V~S' baddie tells?

a2thezebra wrote:Here are the contradictions that S~V~S presented that bothered me:

Saying that RVS just leads to people forgetting to move their votes, and then going on to immediately participate in RVS.

Saying that voting for no reason just for lulz is her least favorite thing, despite that she voted for no reason just for lulz.

Saying that voting for people for no reason just goes against the grain in games with changeable votes...because of previous experience with games without changeable votes.

Saying that she voted for me as a poke because I was lecturing her, even though I had yet to say anything directly to her when she voted.

Saying that her vote was ironic because I was the one promoting RVS so I was the one who got the vote. Fine, so why criticize RVS at the same time?

Elohcin wrote:putting son to bed. I'll answer soon.

Elohcin wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Get it, because you're contradicting yourself Eloh?

I get that you think I'm contradicting myself.

Do you not see how saying that overreactions are a baddie tell as if it were a fact while also saying that S~V~S seems like a civ in this game could be seen as contradictory?

linki @ sig - Well this got kinky out of nowhere.

Did Charlie Brown's teacher join us tonight?

nijuukyugou wrote:Well, there's no beer tonight, as it's a school night

Elohcin wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Get it, because you're contradicting yourself Eloh?

I get that you think I'm contradicting myself.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:Hey, Epi, trying to fit in with a bold second vote on an active player? You Boris with your antics, and that's Badanov to get my vote. Epignosis

Do you know how long it took me to write that? I wasn't about to waste it for some stupidity like "Zebra already has one vote."

I think you should have ended it with Drac saying "Vell, I guess we should try the B-positive!" I don't know if your heart was really in it, or if you are just an opportunistic baddie looking for a Pundora's Box of rewards to open wide.

Long Con wrote:Hey, Epi, trying to fit in with a bold second vote on an active player? You Boris with your antics, and that's Badanov to get my vote. Epignosis

Elohcin wrote:I actually cracked up at Epi's pun, Blooper. But the 'ol lug could always make me laugh.

Long Con wrote:

Natasha Fatale - BTSC with Boris, Can seduce another player into voting as she chooses.

If someone gets seduced, how much obligation is there? Do they need to make a case and believably vote for the player? Or can they be like "Uh, I'd really like to vote for Epignosis, but something is making me feel like an Elohcin vote. "? Orrr... somewhere in between?

Elohcin wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I feel compelled to tell everyone that I will be living out my normal (real life) routine throughout the entirety of this game.

What's the sigh for? Don't you get enough? I'm a good wife.

Elohcin wrote:I feel compelled to tell everyone that I will be living out my normal (real life) routine throughout the entirety of this game.

thellama73 wrote:8. Epignosis isn't allowed to complain about civilian BTSC.