The Syndicate

Quin voted Eloh.

Quin wrote:Been out and about all day, going out again after this post to buy a new desk fan because it's swelteringly hot and my fan finally kicked it today.

Voted Eloh. She's been jumping on existing wagons without an acceptable reason for doing so. She didn't suspect any of the people she voted the past two phases. She comes across as disingenuous in her dealings with me. Posts like this:

Elohcin wrote:

Quin wrote:Guess who I'm voting for?


Not Dom.

If Dom is bad, this is strike 2 for you.

She's quantifying reasons to point the finger at me without considering the quality of each aspect. Plus, this specific post is just blatantly illogical.

linki: Good thing you waited, huh?

Okay, from memory:

Everybody voted Dom Day 3 except Quin, who voted DDL again.

And Day 4 was the shitty lynch where our options were limited. About seven of us voted Snow Dog and three or four voted Eloh. I don't remember where Quin was on that one.

Does anyone believe our civilian lie detector had anything on Quin before he went down? It's off limits to ask Dom about it- I get that- but what's in the thread is in the thread, and I'm not interested in new Dom saying there wasn't a drumstick.

I'm talking strictly about old Dom. Did the lie detector find something on Quin? I never got back to my project of going through all his posts.

I'm going to look at Quin's votes only for now.

Quin voted DDL Day 1 and Day 2. That put him out of the Day 2 LC-Glorfindel issue.

And that's where we run out of polls for this game. Thanks DF, ya tease!

Let me look at the list if I take out people I have no reason to suspect or at least one positive reason to believe they are good.

Dom
Elo
Golden
Jack
MM
MP
Quin
Sorsha
Zebra

Still a longish list, but better.

I suppose I just did explain the process I took.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I didn't say I think you're independent either. I simply said that, at this point, I don't believe you are mafia.

Well, the easiest way you could know that is if I'm not on your team and you figure I'm not on the Troupe because of the awful way the Day 3 lynch played out for that team.

Epi: I never said I knew that, I said I believed it. There's a difference.

LC: Yeah yeah yeah. Stop trying to buddy me. Also, please don't kill me. Don't worry, everyone thinks I'm a crackpot usually.

That's actually funny to me.

But I really don't want to explain the process I took to arrive at the conclusion that you and DDL aren't bad. I think it would get people all aflutter and they wouldn't be able to talk about anything else. Nobody can do anything around here with INFO. OMG HE HAS TO HAVE INFO! HE'S GIVING A MYSTERIOUS OPINION! OMG I BET HE'S BAD WITH INFO.

No thanks. In one of Dom's nutshells, I'm digging through the posts of dead players with how they died in mind, and seeing how they interacted with other people. I found some nuggets. Anyone can do it. All you need to do is believe in yourself.

So, if you aren't bad, I'd rather we move on. If you are, please say so, and we can make this Day quick.

I didn't say I think you're independent either. I simply said that, at this point, I don't believe you are mafia.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I wish I knew the source material. I've got squirrels, meaty, beety, fixings, s'mores, stuffing, and nuts. I tried looking stuff up and got Lemony Snickey fan-fiction entitled, "I Kissed a Squirrel and I Liked it."

I'm not searching for another damn thing.

What? Dom is cursed to say a food in every post. What is this talk?

Squirrel? You guys in Canada eat squirrel? I'm in North Carolina and I don't eat squirrel.

Well, I did once.

Long Con wrote:And for that matter, what makes me seem Civ to you?

I never said you seem like a civilian. I said you aren't mafia.

Dom wrote:

Epignosis wrote:"More nuts in the tin."

Like I'm supposed to accept that.

You trying to cook my chicken, Epi?

I don't have a reason. Get off my ass.
Elo has given not a single reason to suspect me. My discussion with her is not one I would say made me feel better.

I voted because I don't want to be an ass and miss the vote again.

I don't trust Epi. I wouldn't say he's bad. I do not trust him.

Of course you don't trust me. Why would you? I had to ask you two questions several times. I don't trust you.

I wish I knew the source material. I've got squirrels, meaty, beety, fixings, s'mores, stuffing, and nuts. I tried looking stuff up and got Lemony Snickey fan-fiction entitled, "I Kissed a Squirrel and I Liked it."

I'm not searching for another damn thing.

"More nuts in the tin."

Like I'm supposed to accept that.

Dom wrote:I have enumerated both suspicions. There's more nuts in the tin for Eloh than there is Quin.

I will not be mislynched easily again. Do not imply that I didn't answer your questions.

I'm not implying anything. I'm going to say it explicitly: You did not answer them.

Why did you vote so early?

I'm not asking Dom about information. I don't care about info.

Asking Dom what he thought of Quin was the very first thing I asked him.

Epignosis wrote:Hey Dom, what do you think of Quin?

That was Dec. 30. Today is Jan 2. I don't have a clear answer on this.

So very well, I'll revise my questions if need be.

Dom, what makes you more suspicious of Elohcin than Quin, and why did you vote so early?

Dom wrote:I never had a drumstick of info on Quin, if that's what you're trying to get at.

You didn't answer my questions.

Dom wrote:I also feel it is very unfair for me to talk about that past life. That is a turkey of another feather.

You didn't answer my questions.

What has changed, and why did you vote as early as you did?

Dom #1 went to his shallow grave with a stern finger at Quin.

Dom #2 votes early for Eloh (I saw you had voted some time this afternoon).

What has changed?

To be clear, I'm not really interested in, "Well I think Eloh is more suspicious now." What made you less suspicious of Quin, and why did you vote as early as you did?

Lie detector Dom:

Dom wrote:NO ONE thinks it's weird that i didn't post for four fucking days?

No one?!


Look at who led you here.

Look at Quin for not voting me. He's trying to avoid looking bad.

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:this is the biggest load of bullshit

Hey, at least I'm on your side

No you're not.

New Dom:

Elo
1
Dom (7)
14%

I won't be voting for DDL or Long Con today. After doing some reading and looking at the polls, I am satisfied that in the very least, neither one is evil. That could always change, but probably won't change today.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Awesome. So everyone should just let me be the only person to vote each Day phase. Boom.

Are you Esma?

*Checks role list*

I don't see that role.

DFaraday wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Esme Squalor – Esme is obsessed with fashion and high society. She won't allow herself to be lynched unless she gets at least two-thirds of the votes. SECRET

I don't have a big problem with runaway trains.

In general or because of this specific role?

Part of the reasoning against Dom 1.0 was his response to the Glor train, meaning he was not suspected of being Esme.

I mean because of that role.

Hey DF, do missing votes count in the two-thirds equation or not? For example, if there are fifteen people alive, and Esme gets three votes and somebody else gets one, does Esme get lynched?

It's two-thirds of the votes cast. So in your scenario, she would be lynched.

Awesome. So everyone should just let me be the only person to vote each Day phase. Boom.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Oh wait maybe its a post restriction.

Ok I'll catch up first.

Lucky for you, I don't think you are bad.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Esme Squalor – Esme is obsessed with fashion and high society. She won't allow herself to be lynched unless she gets at least two-thirds of the votes. SECRET

I don't have a big problem with runaway trains.

In general or because of this specific role?

Part of the reasoning against Dom 1.0 was his response to the Glor train, meaning he was not suspected of being Esme.

I mean because of that role.

Hey DF, do missing votes count in the two-thirds equation or not? For example, if there are fifteen people alive, and Esme gets three votes and somebody else gets one, does Esme get lynched?

DFaraday wrote:Esme Squalor – Esme is obsessed with fashion and high society. She won't allow herself to be lynched unless she gets at least two-thirds of the votes. SECRET

I don't have a big problem with runaway trains.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hey Epignosis, why don't we lynch Soneji?

I'm sorry Dave- I'm afraid I can't do that.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:I haven't even seen that your case exists. No, I was not 'around'. But you just keep going with that.

How did you miss it? You commented on many other things that Day.

Because I wasn't around, epi! For fucks sake. It's not that hard to understand. If I posted sometime around there, I probably responded to one of the five most recent posts while taking a pee or something. I'm doing my best to contribute what I've got.

Let's not say I'm a crap civilian when I haven't managed to get a single one of my suspects lynched yet... once again you are just having a go at the amount of time I have to contribute and not the substance of those contributions.

Then don't tell me you literally weren't on the site.

I posted a case at 2:12pm EST. You posted ten times and more after that.

Don't act like you didn't see it.

Golden wrote:I haven't even seen that your case exists. No, I was not 'around'. But you just keep going with that.

How did you miss it? You commented on many other things that Day.

I'm just asking you questions, Golden, and you're being a heel. That's fine. But if you're good as you pretend to be, it'd be nice to know why you were around (and you were) and yet you said nothing about what I had to say about Snow Dog.

You literally said you don't give a rat's ass about my opinion the first time I ask you about it.

Some civilian you are if you are one.

Golden wrote:I did say something in defence of snow dog. I quoted it. You just chose to interpret it your own way.

I was in bed when you posted what you did. Almost everyone had voted. My interpretation of your post didn't exist because I had voted and gone to bed. It was after midnight here. Your defense came ten hours after I posted my offense. Why was that?

Golden wrote:I'm not engaging in defending myself against your 'proof'. I've been honest in all things, and today I'm wasting away my holiday to look at whatever you've said against me now. None of it makes you right that I'm bad because you're wrong. You think I couldn't do a point by point rebuttal if I were bad? Of course I could.

You telling me when I was here based on posts and time stamps is ludicrous. It's not hard to pop in for a minute here or there. I know when I was here. I'm me. The 'bean dip' thing isn't mere mockery - it's you once again telling someone else that you know more about their schedule than they themself do. You don't.

Once again, I don't care about your schedule. You said you "literally" weren't here. I showed you posting ten times. You literally were here. Stop lying Golden.

Golden wrote:It doesn't matter how many ways you go around this, it amounts to the same thing. I came on half an hour before the lynch, and that's the first I ever expected snow dog to be lynched and it was a runaway, and I did what I could with what I had to push it in a different direction. Nothing you say or do changes that this is a fact. It's the truth - I don't have to spend time engaging you in time stamps to prove something I already know is true.

If you want to vote me, vote me.

Why didn't you ever comment on my case? Third or fourth time I'm asking.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Anyway, seriously done this time. Hold me to whatever standard you like, think whatever you like. Vote for me if you want, you've not yet done it once despite suspecting me since day one. I'll continue to think that your suspicion is false.

The standard I'm holding you to is this one: Speak up about lynches you don't like before they happen, not after.

Oh, but golden, it's not about your schedule. I don't care that you weren't there. I expect you to talk about in the middle anyway.

False. Bullshit. You don't care to listen.

You were there an hour after I posted my case. And many times after. Stop saying you weren't there. You were. I have shown it.

You are a master logician epi. Let us all bow before your proof, bean dip man.

"Bean dip man." Now it's mockery.

You said that you "literally" hadn't been on the site.

I showed that you were.

Are the time stamps wrong or something?

I'm not stooping to mockery. You were here. You said nothing in defense of Snow Dog. Why was that?

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm not accusing Golden of half-assing anything.

I'm accusing him of not really caring that Snow Dog got lynched.

No, you aren't even taking into account me half-assing things. You are accusing me of the exact opposite.

I'm certainly not accusing you of full-assing anything. So I don't know what this means.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm not accusing Golden of half-assing anything.

I'm accusing him of not really caring that Snow Dog got lynched.

No, you aren't even taking into account me half-assing things. You are accusing me of the exact opposite.

Golden, why didn't you ever address my case on Snow Dog?

Also, fuck you LaMarcus Aldridge.

I'm not accusing Golden of half-assing anything.

I'm accusing him of not really caring that Snow Dog got lynched.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Anyway, seriously done this time. Hold me to whatever standard you like, think whatever you like. Vote for me if you want, you've not yet done it once despite suspecting me since day one. I'll continue to think that your suspicion is false.

The standard I'm holding you to is this one: Speak up about lynches you don't like before they happen, not after.

Oh, but golden, it's not about your schedule. I don't care that you weren't there. I expect you to talk about in the middle anyway.

False. Bullshit. You don't care to listen.

You were there an hour after I posted my case. And many times after. Stop saying you weren't there. You were. I have shown it.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:

Golden wrote:Another runaway. I like the people on it but not the fact of it. Pretty hard to keep it close now though.

What do you call this epi? Not an objection?

No. It's an observation followed by what you like followed by another observation.

No objection.

So I heard you like to argue semantics

I put the "man" in "semantics."

Golden wrote:Anyway, seriously done this time. Hold me to whatever standard you like, think whatever you like. Vote for me if you want, you've not yet done it once despite suspecting me since day one. I'll continue to think that your suspicion is false.

The standard I'm holding you to is this one: Speak up about lynches you don't like before they happen, not after.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:

Golden wrote:Another runaway. I like the people on it but not the fact of it. Pretty hard to keep it close now though.

What do you call this epi? Not an objection?

No. It's an observation followed by what you like followed by another observation.

No objection.

And regardless, the fact that it took it becoming a "runaway" before you saw fit to comment on it shows you had no objection when it really mattered.

I literally did not visit the site 'when it really mattered' to know there was something to comment on. I thought we had another 24 hours. Which I said at the time.

Let us count the ways you literally did not visit the site to know I had posted a large case against Snow Dog.

One.
Two.
Three..
Four.
Five.
Six.
Seven.
Eight.
Nine.
Ten.

That's literally ten posts you made since I said why Snow Dog was the best lynch. Then you gave this:

Golden wrote:The reason for suspicion of snow dog has eluded me (my phone wanted to call him snow god)

The reason for the Snow Dog suspicion eluded you? How? My post was the largest post of the Day.

Golden wrote:Another runaway. I like the people on it but not the fact of it. Pretty hard to keep it close now though.

If you genuinely wanted Snow Dog alive, you would not have left your objections until right before the deadline (if you consider this an objection). "Pretty hard to keep it close now though." Well, why didn't you try harder throughout those other posts to keep it closer?

I don't care about your schedule. It has no bearing on the role you have.

Stop pretending like I find your schedule a reason to suspect you. This makes three times now.

"Also, if I were bad, epi would be dead by now."

3J said the same thing last time. He was bad.

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:

Golden wrote:Another runaway. I like the people on it but not the fact of it. Pretty hard to keep it close now though.

What do you call this epi? Not an objection?

No. It's an observation followed by what you like followed by another observation.

No objection.

And regardless, the fact that it took it becoming a "runaway" before you saw fit to comment on it shows you had no objection when it really mattered.

Golden wrote:

Golden wrote:Another runaway. I like the people on it but not the fact of it. Pretty hard to keep it close now though.

What do you call this epi? Not an objection?

No. It's an observation followed by what you like followed by another observation.

No objection.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:I'm done with you epi. Lynch me if you wish.

You haven't even started with me.

You ignored anything I had to say about Snow Dog Day 4. Then after the fact you act like we should have all known better despite not saying a word in Snowy's defense.

When I raise this point, you get snooty.

"I don't give a rats ass about your opinions in this game epi."

Which is funny, because you cared a lot about my opinion regarding Eloh.

ok, that's fair. I do give a rats ass about figuring out if you are genuine or not, and in that sense I care about your opinions.

I just don't care about your opinion that I'm bad. Go on, lynch me! I dare you. I've given you a simple reason that ought to be sufficient for you and the fact it's not means you are choosing to ignore a large chunk of evidence, dismiss it outright without thought in fact. When you refuse to examine evidence that you know to be accurate, why should your opinion be trusted?

Golden wrote:My quietness is all the evidence he should need that I am not bad.

Well damn. That's pretty airtight stuff.

Golden wrote:And yes, snow dogs first post was sufficient for me to disagree with the case on him on day four (along with the fact that the case seemed limited at best).

Huh. You never objected to his lynch Day 4.

Golden wrote:I'm mostly, though, sick of being treated like I'm your keeper. I'm not bad because I don't interact with you in the manner in which you wish. And the idea that I felt good about snow dog 'because he's not on my team' is laughable. Why should that matter in the slightest? There is another team out there that I'd be hunting for even if I wasn't bad, there's no reason for me to think that he is good merely because he's not on my team.

You're not a keeper. You're a killer.

Golden wrote:I'm beginning to think more and more that you are bad. Rethink eloh based on ???? But rigid on me despite the fact you've literally never seen me phone it in as a baddie because I never do.

"I'm beginning to think."

No the hell you're not.

I gave reasons why I was careful in my treatment of Eloh this phase. You disregarded those too and now you're reducing it to "???"

I don't care about you phoning anything in. I don't care about how quiet you are. That has nothing to do with why I suspect you, and you've mentioned it twice now.

Golden wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Golden wrote:I cannot see how anyone such as epi could legitimately associate my quietness with me being bad. I wouldn't mind if he died. His suspicion of me shouldn't be trusted.

His suspicion of you doesn't come from you being quiet though, it was from your suspicion of Soneji. You've got that part incorrect.

It doesn't matter. My quietness is all the evidence he should need that I am not bad.

I would happily have voted soneji again yesterday, but no one else ever does. Perhaps I'll vote epi instead...

I'll take back the bit about his sprit vote, though, since it proved correct - but I did not like anyone's sprit vote at that time. It just so happened that my chief suspect was among them.

Golden wrote:I'm done with you epi. Lynch me if you wish.

You haven't even started with me.

You ignored anything I had to say about Snow Dog Day 4. Then after the fact you act like we should have all known better despite not saying a word in Snowy's defense.

When I raise this point, you get snooty.

"I don't give a rats ass about your opinions in this game epi."

Which is funny, because you cared a lot about my opinion regarding Eloh.

Golden wrote:I talked about snow dog plenty. I didn't know snow dog was looking likely to be lynched until half an hour before the lynch, at which point I immediately tried to get it to go another way but it was too late.

I'm not omnipresent, epi. Stop treating me as though I should be. But if you want words about snow dog, ISO me and look at day one.

I'm not interested in Day 1. Did you seriously clear someone Day 1 because he said he didn't read his role PM? And Snow Dog wouldn't do that?

Please. You didn't clear him. You knew he wasn't on your team.

Here's every post you had with the word "snow" in it for Day 4.

Golden wrote:I think the right question for epi is - do you disagree with jacks assessment about how that statement is able to be checkable, and that it could only be checked if ddl or snow was Quinn teammate?

I agree with Daisy's point on quin. I wouldn't have a clue if I've made any ld statements, but I certainly wouldn't have been trying to avoid making them - quite the opposite, putting a whole lot of stakes in the sand maximises the chance that an ld can find something to check me with.

Golden wrote:The reason for suspicion of snow dog has eluded me (my phone wanted to call him snow god)

Golden wrote:

Quin wrote:

Nachomamma8 wrote:I kill Sboq sig!!

what

Snow dog. Sboq sig is snow dog. I think.

And that's it.

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Golden wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I feel like there's something up between Epi and Eloh, I commented on this last night too but I'll go through it again.

Epi called out Golden, Quin and Eloh as bad. Talked about wanting to lynch Eloh even. Then night happened. Quin and Golden aren't lynch options and so Epi backs off the Eloh suspicion today. Sorry I'm on my phone right now or I'd pull quotes for this.

But I think it's a weird situation.

I could vote for either Epi or Eloh and probably will.

Good observation. Comment, epi or eloh?

I have no comments. I don't knwo why he backed off. Perhaps he got some info on me?

Golden wrote:
The only thing is, what epi does isn't elohs fault...

And yet you voted me. Why?

-------------

Well, that lynch stinks. But I couldn't vote for anyone I wanted to because they weren't on the poll. And there were a lot of quiet people. Hopefully since the holidays are over we will have more activity in the thread and be able to make better decisions. And Yay.....Epi is just Epi again.

Because you are suspicious in your own right - like your constant insistence in reading into doms replacement which is very dangerous. I usually feel very trusting in you but in this game I don't at all.

And also because I didn't see any strength in or agree with the case on snow dog. He was an easy mark from the beginning.

It's really time people start looking at the manipulators - people like soneji, for instance.

But I don't hold out much hope for the town in this game. There were so many genuinely suspicious people in that lynch, and we ended up lynching one of the least suspicious in my eyes. There's no way a baddie snow dog draws attention to himself the way he did with his first post.

I posted an opinion about every person who was eligible to be lynched. Snow Dog drew the short stick in my analysis. That was at 2:12pm my time. That left plenty of time for people to raise objections.

Please, show me one post of yours from that time onward until before the deadline in which you attempted to dispute anything I had to say about Snow Dog (which, by the way, had nothing to do with the Day 0 role PM business, which is the only thing you cite above).

I don't give a rats ass about your opinions in this game epi. I'm not around a lot and using my time on you would be a waste. It's not on me that you were wrong.

I didn't say it was.

Your words about Snow Dog after the lynch are hollow and worthless. You were here beforehand. You didn't talk about Snow Dog. So don't give me some bullshit about not being around a lot. You were here. You talked about other things. Snow Dog wasn't one of them.

You are evil. I am coming for you.

Golden wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Golden wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I feel like there's something up between Epi and Eloh, I commented on this last night too but I'll go through it again.

Epi called out Golden, Quin and Eloh as bad. Talked about wanting to lynch Eloh even. Then night happened. Quin and Golden aren't lynch options and so Epi backs off the Eloh suspicion today. Sorry I'm on my phone right now or I'd pull quotes for this.

But I think it's a weird situation.

I could vote for either Epi or Eloh and probably will.

Good observation. Comment, epi or eloh?

I have no comments. I don't knwo why he backed off. Perhaps he got some info on me?

Golden wrote:
The only thing is, what epi does isn't elohs fault...

And yet you voted me. Why?

-------------

Well, that lynch stinks. But I couldn't vote for anyone I wanted to because they weren't on the poll. And there were a lot of quiet people. Hopefully since the holidays are over we will have more activity in the thread and be able to make better decisions. And Yay.....Epi is just Epi again.

Because you are suspicious in your own right - like your constant insistence in reading into doms replacement which is very dangerous. I usually feel very trusting in you but in this game I don't at all.

And also because I didn't see any strength in or agree with the case on snow dog. He was an easy mark from the beginning.

It's really time people start looking at the manipulators - people like soneji, for instance.

But I don't hold out much hope for the town in this game. There were so many genuinely suspicious people in that lynch, and we ended up lynching one of the least suspicious in my eyes. There's no way a baddie snow dog draws attention to himself the way he did with his first post.

I posted an opinion about every person who was eligible to be lynched. Snow Dog drew the short stick in my analysis. That was at 2:12pm my time. That left plenty of time for people to raise objections.

Please, show me one post of yours from that time onward until before the deadline in which you attempted to dispute anything I had to say about Snow Dog (which, by the way, had nothing to do with the Day 0 role PM business, which is the only thing you cite above).

He's not catching up.

Golden wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I feel like there's something up between Epi and Eloh, I commented on this last night too but I'll go through it again.

Epi called out Golden, Quin and Eloh as bad. Talked about wanting to lynch Eloh even. Then night happened. Quin and Golden aren't lynch options and so Epi backs off the Eloh suspicion today. Sorry I'm on my phone right now or I'd pull quotes for this.

But I think it's a weird situation.

I could vote for either Epi or Eloh and probably will.

Good observation. Comment, epi or eloh?

It's not a good observation. It's a poor one.

Sorsha's theory is that one of us recruited the other. That would be foolish on my part. I would never press someone's lynch the same Night I'm trying to recruit him or her- especially her of all people. That's moronic. As for the other way around, I doubt Eloh would recruit me. She likes gabbing with people. If she wants to talk to me, she can holler across the house.

But let's assume Sorsha is right. Why is Sorsha interested in lynching independents? What's wrong with good old fashioned mafia members? You know, the ones civilians need dead to win? The entirety of Sorsha's effort Day 4 was to talk about me and Eloh. The only things she had to say about anybody else was at the tail end of the Day phase and didn't really say anything.

She ultimately voted for one of us because "it's a weird situation." Right. The idea that someone would be hesitant to lynch his wife, given that she voted for Glorfindel and got cursed by the other mafia, and then have to deal with the backlash in the thread if he is wrong is such an unfathomable concept.

I added my vote to Snow Dog. Sorry mate, but you didn't even comment on this Day.

I would take a Snow Dog lynch over a Marcodom one.

Elohcin wrote:Dude, Sir, Dom isn't even on the poll. Do y'all see something I don't?

Christ.

Are you this ignorant or merely pretending to be this ignorant?