I drink.
So link.
Then I can tell you what I was talking about.
Return to “Fire Emblem Draft Mafia [Game Over]”
No. I'm not picking one or the other. I suspect you.
He's pushing a civilian agenda because I've watched him do it in my BTSC.
I don't mind. I have been a donkey, so I don't mind:
Jokes.
That's cute.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:28 pmYour play reminds me of Soneji when he's bad and doesn't have time to supatown. He goes after stray suspicions he knows he won't be able to lynch, just to look like he's saying something.
You are not going to lynch me, because everyone and their dog is reading me as a civ. But you need to do something. So now you're digging this lynch on me which you had forgotten about since day 1, in order to appear to do something, since there is no delicious Jay wagon for you to eat.
Teammates.
You don't say.
Your gut could use more fruit.
I don't eat fruit.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:21 pmSorry teacher I'll give you an apple tomorrow to make up.Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:19 pmYou are trying to discredit sprityo's effort to work out what happened to MacDougall.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:38 pmThere are approximately 21742864823468 ways this kill could have ended on Mac.
Including the fact someone misdirected a misdirector (iirc someone said they did it on Quin) and made a random person hit a random person.
I do not approve.
Boo.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:43 pm Sprityo your time will be better spent if you explain why the hell you want to lynch Quin, instead of solving the night kill puzzle that we lack the information to.
You are trying to discredit sprityo's effort to work out what happened to MacDougall.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:38 pmThere are approximately 21742864823468 ways this kill could have ended on Mac.
Including the fact someone misdirected a misdirector (iirc someone said they did it on Quin) and made a random person hit a random person.
Yeah, no.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:42 pm My problem is that with Jay and Mac dead, the ratio of useful town players/useless load is at an all time low. This is how mafias win. Never mind that we also lost Dunya and got a less talkative player instead (no offense speed, but you don't lead the town the same way).
It was fun to tinfoil about Jay being bad, but now I wanna be more practical.
[VOTE: DDL] aubergineDragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:17 am9/10 times I say I'll ISO someone I procrastinate it until the end of timeMacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:32 amAny outcome?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:26 pm I'm more suspicious of Epi after today.
I might ISO him.![]()
sig wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:09 pm
I could go for this as well
Also I want us to think about Jay's death some more, the mafia had the most to gain through lynching him and I seem to recall MAc and Epi pushing his lynch.
Mac is imo seen as one of the best scum players as is Epi why wouldn't they be picked?
If someone who's been around the block before had anything to do with the mafia pick Mac would be high up he won the GoC in 2015 (?) as well as many other games as mafia. He's also seems to be leading us on a path of destruction.
IF we don't get results soon I suggest looking back over Epi, Nutella, and Mac. I wouldn't be surprised if we had one mafia within that group.
What does that mean?
Kiss my ass, MacDougall.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:10 pm Yeah cool story Luffy. Next time add more sex scenes please. Maybe some robots.
@Epignosis
Firstly, who said this was a lost cause? Pointing out that the situation is fucked doesn't mean it's a lost cause. When I raised the point that I felt it was a pseudo lylo I didn't imply that if we lynched a civ I was going to give up, nor did I imply anybody should. I was pointing out that it was a very important day to get right. We got it wrong. So tomorrow is worse.
Secondly, why are you refuting that the situation is dire? The situation IS dire. We need to be better moving forward. If we go around thinking it's fucking roses then half the town will phone in their shit again.
What is with the timing of raising the point though? I can't see anyone bemoaning that the civs are doomed? The timing of the post is fucking weird.
Mac, I know you can read. Read my original post again.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:48 pm
So you are saying that you are feeling like the civs in this game think it's a lost cause and are giving up?
Yeah, fuck it.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:24 pmOne of us provided an example, and it wasn't you. More civilians doesn't equal more chances to win because there are also more Mafia. And the Mafia MO is to make for a difficult thread environment to catch them in. With more of them doing that, the thread is a much harder place to find Mafia.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:20 pmYou disagree? It isn't a matter of agreement. You are wrong. More civilians equals more chances to win.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:18 pmI disagree. If anything I think it's easier in small games to come back against a shitty early game because the percentage of people spewing bullshit into the thread is lower so the power of POE is higher. Tree Mafia is good example. The Mafia team having to exist in the thread together for as long as they did made it easier to see the connections towards the end of the game. In a game of this complexity the connections are much more muddied.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:15 pmHow large is the field? If you're talking 13 players, civilians are done, sure. In something of this size, with a plethora of powers in play, fatalism is bullshit.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:12 pmI'd love the figures of how many times civs have won the game having not killed a Mafia by Day 4. Mafia wins the game most of the time as it is, let alone when we don't get one early. I'd say it'd be in the realms of 1/100.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:54 pm May this donkey bray and ask this much though?
Why are people bemoaning how doomed the civilians are? It's been three phases. This started with more people than Mortal Kombat, the same number of mafia, no independents (MK had two), and the first mafia member in MK wasn't lynched until Day 5. Granted the civilians lost ultimately, but it was a toss-up until the end.
I don't get the fatalism.
As an aside, what is your intention for making this statement exactly?
What statement did I make?
What is there to be gained from you trying to pacify our pessimism here? Why did you feel the need to make a stand against the thought that we are in a dire situation? What is the inspiration? What posts caused you to go on this tangent?
You disagree? It isn't a matter of agreement. You are wrong. More civilians equals more chances to win.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:18 pmI disagree. If anything I think it's easier in small games to come back against a shitty early game because the percentage of people spewing bullshit into the thread is lower so the power of POE is higher. Tree Mafia is good example. The Mafia team having to exist in the thread together for as long as they did made it easier to see the connections towards the end of the game. In a game of this complexity the connections are much more muddied.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:15 pmHow large is the field? If you're talking 13 players, civilians are done, sure. In something of this size, with a plethora of powers in play, fatalism is bullshit.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:12 pmI'd love the figures of how many times civs have won the game having not killed a Mafia by Day 4. Mafia wins the game most of the time as it is, let alone when we don't get one early. I'd say it'd be in the realms of 1/100.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:54 pm May this donkey bray and ask this much though?
Why are people bemoaning how doomed the civilians are? It's been three phases. This started with more people than Mortal Kombat, the same number of mafia, no independents (MK had two), and the first mafia member in MK wasn't lynched until Day 5. Granted the civilians lost ultimately, but it was a toss-up until the end.
I don't get the fatalism.
As an aside, what is your intention for making this statement exactly?
How large is the field? If you're talking 13 players, civilians are done, sure. In something of this size, with a plethora of powers in play, fatalism is bullshit.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:12 pmI'd love the figures of how many times civs have won the game having not killed a Mafia by Day 4. Mafia wins the game most of the time as it is, let alone when we don't get one early. I'd say it'd be in the realms of 1/100.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:54 pm May this donkey bray and ask this much though?
Why are people bemoaning how doomed the civilians are? It's been three phases. This started with more people than Mortal Kombat, the same number of mafia, no independents (MK had two), and the first mafia member in MK wasn't lynched until Day 5. Granted the civilians lost ultimately, but it was a toss-up until the end.
I don't get the fatalism.
Go ahead. I'm a donkey.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:26 pm I'm more suspicious of Epi after today.
I might ISO him.
That was a joke on how long it takes to tabulate votes and stuff.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:11 pmI already gave a pile of them. If you want specific reads substantiated more, say the names.
Lynch this man.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:56 pmYes, you did it once. Congratulations, bravo.
It will remain once this time. I can understand why you'd overestimate your ability to read me with Mountains in mind. You'll learn.
I don't care who claimed what. I recall a few people claimed stuff regarding their votes counting or not counting depending on this or that. That is enough for me to believe that, in a game this size, given that they probably aren't lying, other people have vote manipulations one way or the other, and that, given the nature of this setup, mafia have some action in that regard as well.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:49 pmThis seems important. I hope we can get some more solid facts on that. If we're going to side with you on this, then facts are what counts.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:45 pmI don't know who claimed them. I remember reading about them.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:44 pmWho claimed vote-altering powers? A number of people?Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:40 pm2. This is not pointless conjecture. There are votes that count. Votes that count twice. Votes that don't count if this or that. That isn't conjecture. Those things or variants of them exist. If they don't, a number of people are lying. That you think you will advance the civilian win condition by mindlessly setting up a tie because of one role makes me think you want a tie for evil reasons.
Oh?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:49 pm
~ I think read this guy as a civilian, but he has nonetheless done what I perceive to be a lot of damage to the game. This is not some petulant gripe, this is serious: he has contributed to the worsening climate for dunya, who was an obvious civilian (speedchuck carries on that credit). He has been rigidly confident in his read on me without having lynched a separate mafioso first, meaning he thinks he can snag me without interactive clues. He still hasn't done shit with his exercise. These don't have to make him bad, but if y'all fail to press him on these issues and any other you identify, then you are asking for it.
Tell me:
I don't know who claimed them. I remember reading about them.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:44 pmWho claimed vote-altering powers? A number of people?Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:40 pm2. This is not pointless conjecture. There are votes that count. Votes that count twice. Votes that don't count if this or that. That isn't conjecture. Those things or variants of them exist. If they don't, a number of people are lying. That you think you will advance the civilian win condition by mindlessly setting up a tie because of one role makes me think you want a tie for evil reasons.
1. I am not making an incorrect perception of what you would do under whatever conditions. I am calling your cases weak and poorly thought out. I don't care about your post count or your burn out. What you have posted, in my own judgment, is phony to me. That doens't require circumstance or conditions- it's my judgment, and that's how this thing works. I am but one vote, however.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:30 pmNo. One thing civilian JJJ doesn't give two shits about is pointless conjecture. You are making two bad decisions at the same time:Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:25 pm If you are a civilian, you would have acknowledged that other forces are likely at work, and that a civilian could be lynched, nobody is cleared, and even worse, people may make untrue assumptions. You would not have conceded so easily that a tie is in the civilians' best interest.
1. Read JJJ with iron confidence given an incorrect perception of how he'd play under whatever conditions.
2. Refuse to acknowledge the validity of a strategy because of conditions which have no objective existence in this game. They are cans and coulds. It's also possible one of the mafia members is a fig newton. Who cares.
Defend your logic if you want. You'll know soon enough at least that I really believe what I am saying to you. Nobody can tell me I didn't try.
You are encouraging this lynch to hinge on the nature of a single role. You are even throwing an all-caps battle cry KEEP THE TIE out there.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:17 pmIf the mafia team has some extra vote and they want to waste it on Day 3, then they be my guest.
I recognize the role.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:14 pmWhat you do when you're bad is this:DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:13 pmFuck your tie madness. That's what I do when I'm bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:10 pmI don't know. There could be. I have no reason to assume that. I don't have time for maybemongering.
WEEEE TIES ARE FUN.![]()
I am trying to use gwilly's role to its fullest potential. If y'all can't even recognize that opportunity then please bloody lynch me. Get me out of this headache.
I've wasted so much of my time regardless due to poor personal life decisions.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:02 pmIf you're a civilian you have wasted so much of your own time. Jesus.
So the mafia have absolutely no secret ability to affect the lynch vote total, you're saying?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:56 pmWhat’s the problem? You either lynch a mafioso, or you eliminate one suspect while clearing another.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:53 pm Guys please. Can you just fucking pick who you think is a werewolf and vote for them and then stop with the shenanigans. You should all be policy lynched for this garbage.
That’s not a bad situation.
I was amusing myself on the timing of your post. I'm self-centered.