The Syndicate

therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:25 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:22 am
therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:16 am
bad as in evil or bad as in no skill
Given that I'd rather you not disparage anyone's ability, I am interested in the former.
yeah ik but you never know

the only person id realistically want lynched without having some doubt in myself is you or macdougall

And what have I and MacDougall done to warrant that?

therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:16 am
bad as in evil or bad as in no skill

Given that I'd rather you not disparage anyone's ability, I am interested in the former.

therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:03 am
Spoiler: show
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:44 am
therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:43 pm you all are missing a glaring situation here about my possible role
i expected to be hanged no matter what so i gave up trying
We're missing a glaring situation about your possible role?

Or your actual role?

That wording.

But okay.

Since you have declared that all of us are missing a glaring situation, I will painstakingly go through every situation imaginable, omitting instances in which "secrets" are involved since that could be anything and doesn't constitute a "glaring situation."

1. Calculon

The star of the show, Calculon is virtually untouchable on set. He will survive the first fatal action against him, whether via a lynch or a nightkill. *(Secrets)*

In my experience, "survive" means no death happens. If Calculon got Night killed, the mafia faction would not get to pick another target. It stands to reason that if Calculon got lynched (for the first time, not having been a Night kill target previously), there would be no lynch.

We didn't have a "no lynch." We had a cop lynch.

2. Sleazy Martinez

Calculon’s identical twin. If a tie occurs, the town will look to Calculon for a decision but Sleazy will interfere, allowing him to decide which player is lynched. *(Secrets)*

Given the close spread of the votes and the delay in the post, I am inclined to believe that Martinez had a hand in the result. This only happens if there's a tie.

You are not Sleazy Martinez, because you would not know how you survived having three votes (at least not enough to call it a "glaring situation").

3. Bender

TV’s coolest robot. Bender is allegedly a terrible influence on impressionable youth, but he’s just so darn cool. His influence spreads everywhere. Twice during the game, Bender can cast two votes in the poll. He may cast two votes for the same player, or he may cast votes on two separate players. He’s Bender, baby. In addition, Bender can steal the ability of player he votes for once during the game. He will be granted access to that player’s night abilities the following night.

Bender influencing the votes would mean that Bender's action is available during the Day phase, which is unusual but not unheard of.

I would be surprised if Bender used extra votes during the least informed juncture.

You are not Bender, because you didn't even vote to save yourself the ordinary way.

4. Network President

The Network President has final say over all things, and nobody can stop him. Twice during the game, the Network President can modify the mafia team kill to be unblockabkle. As long as the Execubots remain alive, the President begins each Day with -1 vote and his alignment cannot be checked (he will be ID’d as town). *(Secrets)*

Someone with three votes got lynched to someone who had two votes. That's what happened. This is the most glaring situation.
well 'that wording' is me loosely treading the line of rule breaking

yall need to spoiler massive walls dawg

Who's bad?

...dawg.

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:43 pm you all are missing a glaring situation here about my possible role
i expected to be hanged no matter what so i gave up trying

We're missing a glaring situation about your possible role?

Or your actual role?

That wording.

But okay.

Since you have declared that all of us are missing a glaring situation, I will painstakingly go through every situation imaginable, omitting instances in which "secrets" are involved since that could be anything and doesn't constitute a "glaring situation."

1. Calculon

The star of the show, Calculon is virtually untouchable on set. He will survive the first fatal action against him, whether via a lynch or a nightkill. *(Secrets)*

In my experience, "survive" means no death happens. If Calculon got Night killed, the mafia faction would not get to pick another target. It stands to reason that if Calculon got lynched (for the first time, not having been a Night kill target previously), there would be no lynch.

We didn't have a "no lynch." We had a cop lynch.

2. Sleazy Martinez

Calculon’s identical twin. If a tie occurs, the town will look to Calculon for a decision but Sleazy will interfere, allowing him to decide which player is lynched. *(Secrets)*

Given the close spread of the votes and the delay in the post, I am inclined to believe that Martinez had a hand in the result. This only happens if there's a tie.

You are not Sleazy Martinez, because you would not know how you survived having three votes (at least not enough to call it a "glaring situation").

3. Bender

TV’s coolest robot. Bender is allegedly a terrible influence on impressionable youth, but he’s just so darn cool. His influence spreads everywhere. Twice during the game, Bender can cast two votes in the poll. He may cast two votes for the same player, or he may cast votes on two separate players. He’s Bender, baby. In addition, Bender can steal the ability of player he votes for once during the game. He will be granted access to that player’s night abilities the following night.

Bender influencing the votes would mean that Bender's action is available during the Day phase, which is unusual but not unheard of.

I would be surprised if Bender used extra votes during the least informed juncture.

You are not Bender, because you didn't even vote to save yourself the ordinary way.

4. Network President

The Network President has final say over all things, and nobody can stop him. Twice during the game, the Network President can modify the mafia team kill to be unblockabkle. As long as the Execubots remain alive, the President begins each Day with -1 vote and his alignment cannot be checked (he will be ID’d as town). *(Secrets)*

Someone with three votes got lynched to someone who had two votes. That's what happened. This is the most glaring situation.

therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:08 am i was wolfread off a tinfoil and someone with tunnel vision figuring out how scum!me can make a post and turning everything i say against me
and you want to call me bad

Who has tunnel vision?

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:50 pm before you read my tone now
dont get me wrong i am still violently angry, im trying not to have an aneurysm tho

Why are you violently angry?

I'll tell you why therealet also isn't a civilian.

This was his last post made at 1:00 am EST this morning. It was a tantrum railing against the very foundation of the institution of Mafia:

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:00 am i dont think you get how absolutely fucking frustrating and wim killing it is to have the most active players other than me pick on every fucking word i say, no matter what that is

you all have such fucking awful tunnel vision that im genuinely completely astounded

therealet did absolutely nothing else the rest of the phase. No concern with finding mafia. No concern with being lynched (!).

"genuinely completely astounded"

And most of you will know what I think of that right there.

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:23 pm Therealet is either hypnotoad or calculon or one of the secret roles, yeah? So probably don’t want to take them to LYLO, but uh, definitely not killing them tomorrow

Eh?

sig wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:21 pm So this is where I'm at, ET is the Network President who starts each phase with minus 1 vote. Ergo it was a 3 way tie and sleazy decided on LC over the other two.

Now there could've been other vote manipulation that went on, but I find it very unlikely that any civ would choice to do that D1.

linki: missed one Epi.

I did.

That makes more sense.

And makes me more encouraged that Bender has more restraint.

Also, Protip: When I have a role in charge of breaking ties (and I almost always do, as that prevents me from having to interfere as a Host), I always ask for a list Day 0 of most suspicious to least suspicious. Update as many times as desired. If the tiebreaker dies, the final list submitted is permanent.

Calculon
The star of the show, Calculon is virtually untouchable on set. He will survive the first fatal action against him, whether via a lynch or a nightkill. *(Secrets)*

Doubtful.

Sleazy Martinez
Calculon’s identical twin. If a tie occurs, the town will look to Calculon for a decision but Sleazy will interfere, allowing him to decide which player is lynched. *(Secrets)*

Possible

Priest
*(Secrets)*

Possible, if...

Bender
TV’s coolest robot. Bender is allegedly a terrible influence on impressionable youth, but he’s just so darn cool. His influence spreads everywhere. Twice during the game, Bender can cast two votes in the poll. He may cast two votes for the same player, or he may cast votes on two separate players. He’s Bender, baby. In addition, Bender can steal the ability of player he votes for once during the game. He will be granted access to that player’s night abilities the following night.

Possible.

F.A.R.T.
Fathers Against Rude Television takes a strong stance against indecent content on the boob-tube. Once during the game, F.A.R.T may seek to rid a player’s smut from the game by stripping them of their right to vote the following day phase. And if that doesn’t work, there’s always the option of resorting to violence: four times during the game, the FARTers can rough a player up at night, preventing them from performing their night action that phase.

The wording here says "following day phase," implying that this must be used as a Night action. As such, this couldn't be in play Day 1.

++++

It looks like Bender got a little too trigger happy Day 1 and the twin had to make a decision.

Given Sloonei's reputation for punctuality and the fact that the host post was three hours later than the poll's deadline, I'd say this was the most likely scenario.

Very unfortunate.

Who gives a damn?

I think tedexter is a civilian.

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:51 am
Dom wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:49 am I have so many jokes to make, but very few old Lostpedia people to enjoy them with : (
Heh

I'll leave you both alone

I wasn't around Lostpedia.

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:44 am Still feeling like we're ignoring Long Con

What needs done about him?

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:42 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:41 am
Creature wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:38 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:33 am Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.
Moving a wagon to three votes looks more entertaining than parking on a vanity wagon
That's not what I hoped you would say, but it sounds honest.
we b vibin, rob

How weird are we these days?

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:38 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:33 am Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.
Moving a wagon to three votes looks more entertaining than parking on a vanity wagon

That's not what I hoped you would say, but it sounds honest.

Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.

Spoiler: show

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:30 am Wtf thought the poll closed

Oh you did, did you?

Good- Dom, nova, Tedexter

Bad - Enrique, therealet

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:16 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:14 am
i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

first post is a bad phrasing referring to you voting enrique to retain yourself seeing the poll

If it's bad phrasing on your part, then why accuse me of having an agenda and "cherry picking?"

Can't you accept some responsibility for your own communication?

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:13 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:11 am
therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:09 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:03 am
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:59 pm a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts
Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.
ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in
I don't even know what I just read.

im genuinely not enjoying talking to you when you cherrypick information you want to respond to and just grab those that help your agenda
its not fun
and im not going to continue

You don't mean what you say, so you're no fun to talk to either.

Bye.

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:09 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:03 am
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:59 pm a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts
Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.
ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

I don't even know what I just read.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:59 pm a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

And what's more:

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

That isn't what happened. That's revisionism.

I voted LC to see the poll.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:06 am [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show
Just to see the poll.

You said nothing.

I changed my vote not because I needed to "See the poll a second time" (what a silly accusation, since I could already see it), but because:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

You didn't "point it out."

You gave me unnecessary advice while my vote was on Enrique:

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.
or you can put it on host/non

You are mafia.

There were no humongous egos here. Sorry. This was nothing. I read this in half an hour and digested it in half an hour and saw you for the mafia member you are in that span. And caught your teammate because you went out of your way for him.

That the game was a pain to read? That's the factor I'm missing?

Missing what factor?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:06 am [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show
Just to see the poll.

This was at 12:06am EST.

therealet made nine posts after that.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

I made that post at 1:11am.

Now there's a lull.

I'm in bed.

Nothing is going on.

At 4:26pm EST:

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.
or you can put it on host/non

The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.

More horseshit:

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:36 am this game is a pain to read because of how much people think theyre right above others
myself included

This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.

Phony frustration.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:36 am partially voting creature for a policy lynch if im being entirely honest

therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:38 am im hesitant to reread because of how painfully bad everybody was misunderstanding everybody else

Horseshit.

If everybody was misunderstanding everyone else, then you have a conclusion from the first read. The second reading should be to ensure you haven't missed anything.

"Painfully" is an adverb. Adverbs are qualifiers.

That you used "painfully bad" means have a clear conclusion that means you have no need to reread anyway.

You are mafia.

I'll stop there.

[VOTE: therealet] aubergine

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:09 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:45 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:08 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:22 pm
fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here
This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:53 am every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance
This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am

or you can put it on host/non

even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.

youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok

just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
So you don't mean the things you say.

That must come in handy when you're mafia.

youre strawmanning

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:32 pm
Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:02 pmEpi's town.
hes not towny at all
Never am.

I'm going to vote for Enrique.

How do you feel about that?

[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine
i dont have a read on then so its not an issue really

Yeah, it's an issue.

You two are teammates.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:08 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:22 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:19 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pm

youre arguing over an emote
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
GTH stance on both of us.
fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here
This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:53 am every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance
This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.
or you can put it on host/non

even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.

youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok

just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
So you don't mean the things you say.

That must come in handy when you're mafia.

youre strawmanning

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:32 pm
Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:02 pmEpi's town.
hes not towny at all
Never am.

I'm going to vote for Enrique.

How do you feel about that?

[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:22 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:19 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pm
Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pm

I don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.

To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
You seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?
youre arguing over an emote
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
GTH stance on both of us.
fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here
This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:53 am every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance
This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.
or you can put it on host/non

even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy

Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.

just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

So you don't mean the things you say.

That must come in handy when you're mafia.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:32 pm
Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:02 pmEpi's town.
hes not towny at all

Never am.

[VOTE: therealet] aubergine

therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:22 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:19 pm
therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pm
Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
I don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.

To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
You seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?
youre arguing over an emote
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
GTH stance on both of us.
fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here

This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:53 am every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance

This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.

therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:26 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:11 am Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.
or you can put it on host/non

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show

Dom wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 10:41 pm guys.... i have a confession...

I'm....

gay.

I am too right now.

Search found 190 matches