The Syndicate

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:39 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:32 pm So, first of all, FZ.

I want to talk about this post.

FZ. wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:06 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:56 pm Daisy, Dave, Dizzy, FZ, NVN, I have almost no impression at all of any of these players yet

I'm here, I'm trying to catch up but it's not working for me very well.
I'm on page 8 so things can change. At the moment, I find myself agreeing with JJJ on Epi. Something there feels not genuine. I haven't played for a while, but I think civ Epi is more careful, and what he's doing now, is acting like he's going full force after what he believes. Sloonei said he wouldn't be this blunt on day 1, but if people are going to say that, then Epi has no problem acting just like that.

Kyle is really defending himself and making sense, so I do feel better about him. That being said, I like to trust my initial instincts, and even though no one seemed to agree with me, the post I talked about did feel to me like a frustrated baddie who doesn't like the civvies' powers.

"I find myself" is a hedge phrase. Moreover, with what exactly does FZ. agree? Instead of being specific, she says something there feels not genuine. What is this something? This statement baffles me. Not because of whether it's a correct perception or not, but because of what she accuses me of doing now: Acting like I'm going full force after what I believe. If I am bad, then I don't truly believe in what I'm saying. In FZ.'s mind, how can I be bad if I'm going full force after what I (genuinely) believe? This sentence is supposed to buttress FZ.'s previous commentary about me, but it weakens it: Was my perceived bluntness (i.e., going full-force after what I believe) the product of me drawing a mafia role, which is what the blue statement implies, or was it a product of what I believed other people would say about me?

And this is where FZ. gives herself the luxury of voting Kylemii or defending Kylemii- whichever suits her purpose.

There's so much hedge in this post, I could block the neighbors' view of the roof.

When you speak of hedging... is that like a general wishy-washiness, leaving both sides open, kind of thing?

It could be.

So, first of all, FZ.

I want to talk about this post.

FZ. wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:06 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:56 pm Daisy, Dave, Dizzy, FZ, NVN, I have almost no impression at all of any of these players yet

I'm here, I'm trying to catch up but it's not working for me very well.
I'm on page 8 so things can change. At the moment, I find myself agreeing with JJJ on Epi. Something there feels not genuine. I haven't played for a while, but I think civ Epi is more careful, and what he's doing now, is acting like he's going full force after what he believes. Sloonei said he wouldn't be this blunt on day 1, but if people are going to say that, then Epi has no problem acting just like that.

Kyle is really defending himself and making sense, so I do feel better about him. That being said, I like to trust my initial instincts, and even though no one seemed to agree with me, the post I talked about did feel to me like a frustrated baddie who doesn't like the civvies' powers.

"I find myself" is a hedge phrase. Moreover, with what exactly does FZ. agree? Instead of being specific, she says something there feels not genuine. What is this something? This statement baffles me. Not because of whether it's a correct perception or not, but because of what she accuses me of doing now: Acting like I'm going full force after what I believe. If I am bad, then I don't truly believe in what I'm saying. In FZ.'s mind, how can I be bad if I'm going full force after what I (genuinely) believe? This sentence is supposed to buttress FZ.'s previous commentary about me, but it weakens it: Was my perceived bluntness (i.e., going full-force after what I believe) the product of me drawing a mafia role, which is what the blue statement implies, or was it a product of what I believed other people would say about me?

And this is where FZ. gives herself the luxury of voting Kylemii or defending Kylemii- whichever suits her purpose.

There's so much hedge in this post, I could block the neighbors' view of the roof.

To everyone else who cares about the roof:

I have Sloonei, JJJ, nutella, Lorab, FZ., probably Marmot and the ghost of Spacedaisy coming in here to lynch me tomorrow.

They can't all be bad.

When I am lynched, grill them. Don't let them make excuses. Grill them on a grill that does not contain both meat and dairy.

I said that "You failed me," because you of ALL people should know what I was doing Day 1. You keep trying to string me up instead.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:38 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:37 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:35 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:32 pm That was already your decision coming in here. I had nothing to gain from this exchange.

You feel that way because you're mafia. You know as well as anyone that I can be foaming at the mouth about a person and then completely drop my suspicion at the drop of a hat if I find a good reason.

I opened the door and you slammed it in my face.

"It's not about ego"

No dude. If you are a civilian, I feel like you failed me.

"You failed me"

You just shoved a "no" in my face when I tried to talk with you.

If you're a civilian, visit your nearest mirror.

All you do every time we interact is show your ignorance as to how I operate.

If you lynch me tomorrow, and I am a civilian, how will you reconcile that with what you have said about me?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:35 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:32 pm That was already your decision coming in here. I had nothing to gain from this exchange.

You feel that way because you're mafia. You know as well as anyone that I can be foaming at the mouth about a person and then completely drop my suspicion at the drop of a hat if I find a good reason.

I opened the door and you slammed it in my face.

"It's not about ego"

No dude. If you are a civilian, I feel like you failed me.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:29 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:28 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:27 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:25 pm That's not my claim. Every game of mine is completely different. That isn't the same thing as saying "My civilian and mafia games are the same." That's your assumption. So my question stands.

Your play in this game reminded me so much of RED vs. BLUE that I was able to pinpoint a single moment of you spewing the same bullshit then that you spewed here. Your question is not applicable.

Answer my question.

No.

Then die. You don't give two shits about the roof.

That was already your decision coming in here. I had nothing to gain from this exchange.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:27 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:25 pm That's not my claim. Every game of mine is completely different. That isn't the same thing as saying "My civilian and mafia games are the same." That's your assumption. So my question stands.

Your play in this game reminded me so much of RED vs. BLUE that I was able to pinpoint a single moment of you spewing the same bullshit then that you spewed here. Your question is not applicable.

Answer my question.

No.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:21 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:19 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:16 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:13 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:58 pm
Do you suggest that your play in this thread is incompatible with a mafia Epignosis?

That more or less was the point of the exercise.

You often claim to be a player without "meta", one whose civilian and mafia games look the same. What is it about your play in this game that you don't believe would exist in a mafia version of your play?

If my civilian and mafia games look the same, why do you want to lynch me? What makes this different?

It's your claim, not mine. I don't think they look the same.

That's not my claim. Every game of mine is completely different. That isn't the same thing as saying "My civilian and mafia games are the same." That's your assumption. So my question stands.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:16 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:13 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:58 pm
Do you suggest that your play in this thread is incompatible with a mafia Epignosis?

That more or less was the point of the exercise.

You often claim to be a player without "meta", one whose civilian and mafia games look the same. What is it about your play in this game that you don't believe would exist in a mafia version of your play?

If my civilian and mafia games look the same, why do you want to lynch me? What makes this different?

Which must guide you to a more important question, but I'm going to let people ask that one themselves.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:58 pm
Do you suggest that your play in this thread is incompatible with a mafia Epignosis?

That more or less was the point of the exercise.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:14 pm (Basically I remember Epi vanishing when he had lost hope in that game and Epi here still seems to think he can turn some positive scumhunting out of this situation. He could still be evil, not disputing that, but I'm willing to look around as well.
Hopefully I'm remembering Night Vale correctly. Epi was bad, when people suspected him and said his goose was cooked, he just left. Because at that point, the aggro of the town wasn't worth making posts that weren't going to do him any good.
Granted, he has other teammates to help in this game, but him talking is just going to create WIFOMy links to other players.)

Why is Epi still here, still trying, when nobody wants to defend him?

But speedchuck

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:50 pm But I still want to know what the purpose of asking that question is because talking about what could be said in BTSC doesn't sound like a useful scum-hunting strategy.

If people are going to accuse me of being bad, then I want them to tell me what my purpose was. Where was I going with it? What was my endgame strategy? The lynch mob has already decided to end me Day 2. nutella alluded to this being about my ego. It isn't. I am one of the humblest people you'll ever meet in real life ( How's that for irony? ). This is about making people think about what is going on in the mafia chat room.

When I am a civilian, I do not know who the mafia are. However, I can make predictions on what they will do given what is in the thread. This has served me well, and I think other civilians should at least consider that.

I am dismayed at people deciding I am the automatic lynch for Day 2. If that is the case, then they at least owe it to me to answer the questions I raised first.

If "Get rid of Epi" is all they want, fine.

If finding mafia is what they want, they need to do better.

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:46 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:43 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:40 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

How is this exercise productive?

How are you productive?

Good point.

Shutting up now.

I'm sorry.

I didn't mean to be rude to you. That was callous; I interpreted your question as callous, and if I had applied the same "I know Kylemii's voice" to your posts (substituting your voice for Kyle's, of course), I would not have read it that way.

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:40 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

How is this exercise productive?

How are you productive?

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:09 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:45 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:23 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

I would be saying nothing. I can't access chatzy at work. But if I were in chat, it's not like I'd be coaching you. I'm not that arrogant.

Apparently not great. Performance is about results, and half the game wishes they lynched you yesterday.

I mean, sure. All I expect my teammates to do is not implicate me if they self-destruct. If they all go out in a blaze of glory, I'd be fine with playing LMS.

That's buyer's remorse. If Spacedaisy had been bad, that wish would not exist so strongly.

Well I didn't buy Spacedaisy. I wanted either Sloonei or you to be lynched yesterday and it's not my fault everyone else screwed up.

It's going to be your fault Day 2.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:23 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

I would be saying nothing. I can't access chatzy at work. But if I were in chat, it's not like I'd be coaching you. I'm not that arrogant.

Apparently not great. Performance is about results, and half the game wishes they lynched you yesterday.

I mean, sure. All I expect my teammates to do is not implicate me if they self-destruct. If they all go out in a blaze of glory, I'd be fine with playing LMS.

That's buyer's remorse. If Spacedaisy had been bad, that wish would not exist so strongly.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:21 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

I wouldn't be telling you what to do, because no one tells Epi what to do. I have no expectations to meet as a baddie teammate, because I'm the bottom-of-the-barrel most awful baddie there is most of the time, so I have no right to disdain the play of others in that way.

We won't believe that for a second.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:16 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 pm Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

1. I wouldn't speak to you any more than necessary for gameplay.
2. I'd figure you were acting brazen for the wifom, and you got caught, and you're posting this "exercise" in a last-ditch attempt to mitigate the damage.
3. Yes. I'm not here to babysit your ego.

You're not here to win as a civilian either.

Let me offer an exercise for you stiff-necked people (that's from the Torah, by the way):

You are my mafia teammate. You are witnessing the things I am saying in the thread.

What would you be saying to me in BTSC? How would you evaluate my performance so far? Would I have met your expectations as a teammate?

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:04 pm Epignosis is the devil. He has a fiddle of gold. He will steal your soul if you're not wary. Fire flies from his fingertips as he sits on the roof and shreds that fiddle.

Epignosis does not care about the roof.

That's stupid.

A gold fiddle wouldn't even sound good.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:44 pm Bleh. I think Epignosis looks awful and I want him hanged. I allowed myself out of the tunnel and ended up taking part in a lame Daisy lynch as a result, and in the immediate aftermath Epignosis continued posting garbage.

I don't care if it looks like I'm setting up a lynch. Epignosis doesn't get lynched when people weenie around it. I'm done with that shit. Fucking kill him.

You sound more like you'd be more satisfied lynching me than you would seeing the civilians win.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:46 am Epi has leapfrogged kyle as my top suspect, if that was unclear.

That's because you don't care about the roof.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:04 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:38 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:30 pm nutella voters, please tell me what you think of LoRab.

Lorab is someone I've wrongly accused more times than I can count. I think I've been right about her once. I have no opinion on her today. Nothing stands out.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:47 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:45 pm I generally read Lorab wrong and I am reading her town so take that fwiw.

On what basis?

Interesting. I don't recall my answer having received any follow up. Epi can you share why you asked me this question. I hadn't noticed that you had made the same claim less than an hour prior to me saying that.

I wanted to know why you believed she was good.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:51 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:48 am I didn't register that he faulted me for not reading kyle's posts that way. Yuck. Also he's accusing me of "doint nothing except pound Kyle into the ground" without having read the post in which I pounded kyle into the ground. Yuck.
Sorry Daisy. we should have lynched Epi.

And now that we both want him dead, his agenda has shifted back to "Jay saved Sloonei" and a bunch of meaningless "they're in love" jokes.

I'll vote for him the moment Day 2 starts.

You going to keep it on me this time around?

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 am I suppose my rainbow has the opposite problem from what I called out earlier; that is, a bit too orange-heavy, especially considering there are only 3 baddies (plus 1 indie). Perhaps I should try to narrow down POE more. I know I want to lynch Epi though so I figure I'll go from there (and Mac's teammate-compatibility analysis should help).

You'll do no such thing.

Anyway, the snow melted and I have to go back to work tomorrow.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:18 am Epignosis, I have nearly no idea why you suspect Sloonei and you’ve spent the last two hours telling me about it.

Get to the fucking point. Show me something.

He looks fucking PHONY.

That will never mean anything to you because you two believe in holding each others hands.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:46 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:36 am To look like a civilian.

This is such weak shit for you.

Kiss my ass. Lynching spacedaisy was weak shit for anybody, and guess what?


Daisy
7
39%


Voters: JaggedJimmyJay

There's Mr. Weak Shit.

Sorry I listened to your bullshit to save Sloonei. Will not happen again.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:38 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:36 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:32 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:24 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:22 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:17 am I don't think 3J knows what the fuck he is talking about when it comes to Sloonei.

I'm open to hearing you out here, but if you think I am going to reverse on a civilian read at the very end of a day phase with minimal time to process and no answer to the question I kept stabbing into your face, then we're not playing the same game.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:47 am Why does a mafia Sloonei need to go to that much trouble to attack one dude? What's the agenda? Recall that Sloonei himself faced no significant pressure in this thread prior to that case.

I can't believe I need to answer this.

"Why does a mafia need."

He doesn't.

what was my motivation for building that case against kyle?

To look like a civilian.

Is there more to your suspicion than that?

Yes.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:28 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:23 am 3J, since you are fond of demands- link me to any huge case Sloonei has made on someone Day 1.

GY!BE, Day 0

Okay. A case against you. Which he never perused. And quickly admitted it was "pressure."

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:15 am

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Marmot: right now I am arguably under the most pressure in the thread. I would assert that this alone is reason to doubt that your vote is truly just a random goofball "I'll follow Sloonei" maneuver.

Couple it with the fact that it was you he voted for, and you have my entire reason right there.

What if I told you it's more of a pressure vote than anything?

3J and Sloonei are in love and will never lynch one another the end.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:32 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:24 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:22 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:17 am I don't think 3J knows what the fuck he is talking about when it comes to Sloonei.

I'm open to hearing you out here, but if you think I am going to reverse on a civilian read at the very end of a day phase with minimal time to process and no answer to the question I kept stabbing into your face, then we're not playing the same game.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:47 am Why does a mafia Sloonei need to go to that much trouble to attack one dude? What's the agenda? Recall that Sloonei himself faced no significant pressure in this thread prior to that case.

I can't believe I need to answer this.

"Why does a mafia need."

He doesn't.

what was my motivation for building that case against kyle?

To look like a civilian.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:22 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:17 am I don't think 3J knows what the fuck he is talking about when it comes to Sloonei.

I'm open to hearing you out here, but if you think I am going to reverse on a civilian read at the very end of a day phase with minimal time to process and no answer to the question I kept stabbing into your face, then we're not playing the same game.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:47 am Why does a mafia Sloonei need to go to that much trouble to attack one dude? What's the agenda? Recall that Sloonei himself faced no significant pressure in this thread prior to that case.

I can't believe I need to answer this.

"Why does a mafia need."

He doesn't.

3J, since you are fond of demands- link me to any huge case Sloonei has made on someone Day 1.

"Hey guys he's like my best friend I've known him since I was a teddy"

I don't think 3J knows what the fuck he is talking about when it comes to Sloonei.

GOD SAVE SLOONEI

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:13 am Was it self preservation, because I will forgive that. but I won't forgive you saying you voted me because I sat here and watched my own lynch. That id the most outrageous thing I've ever heard you say.

I never just go down in a lynch. I didn't post because I wasn't here to post.

It was self-preservation.

After I "broke the tie" a slew of people had moved, so that was moot, and then the vote ended.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:10 am I don't buy it Sloonei, I just don't. Where were the civilian torch bearers when this travesty was going down? Who let's a lynch go down on someone based on three posts when there was 19 pages of shit to analyze? I trust Kyle that's about it. And I am super disappointed he moved. I thought I trusted Epi too, but now I'm not so sure. How did YOU not see through that bullshit?

When have I ever silently sat back and let myself get lynched without saying anything?

Bullshit.

linki: Exactly Epi, why the fuck would I have just watched myself get lynched. I posted the fastest I could.

So ask yourselves, if I was honest about my not having time and being at work, why would it not raise any questions about why you all would lynch someone who is absent?

This is just so much nonsense i can't believe you all fell for it.

Sloonei I absolutely DO believe you are bad.

My vote on Sloonei wouldn't have made any difference. I moved at the very last minute to break a tie.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:06 am Epi or Kyle is bad.

Kiss my ass daisy dun said you bad

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:59 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:58 am

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:56 am Seriously you guys. I just got lynched whenI flat out said I had no time. Lynch SLoonei for sure.

You were here though. I saw you hanging out. Sloonei was building the roof. You were watching.

No I was not here. I literally just got on the site. I may have had a browser page open on my phone or something. But I was not here

This is some straight up bullshit. You guys screwed the pooch

Spacedaisy, your defense post was at 11:55. The Day ended at 11:55. Nobody could do anything for you if they wanted to.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:56 am Seriously you guys. I just got lynched whenI flat out said I had no time. Lynch SLoonei for sure.

You were here though. I saw you hanging out. Sloonei was building the roof. You were watching.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:41 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:39 am I have literally never seen you gun this hard for someone on Day 1.

It looks like bullshit to me. I'm calling it.

My vote stays. I don't care if I get lynched.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:39 am I have literally never seen you gun this hard for someone on Day 1.

It looks like bullshit to me. I'm calling it.

My vote stays. I don't care if I get lynched.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:39 am I have literally never seen you gun this hard for someone on Day 1.

It looks like bullshit to me. I'm calling it.

My vote stays. I don't care if I get lynched.

You really should get your mouse fixed. You made a word I used correctly three times bigger than it needs to be.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:38 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:31 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:28 am Epignosis gave me a pass because I'm a shitty Day 1 lynch.

"Because if I'm good, then that's an active, vocal, passionate mafia-hunter gone, one who didn't even get a real chance to catch somebody."

So instead we lynch Sloonei.

My clone.

Moved my vote.

Your clone.

Jesus.

Jesus is Jay's clone?

Makes sense.

Water into WIFOM.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:34 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:31 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:28 am Epignosis gave me a pass because I'm a shitty Day 1 lynch.

"Because if I'm good, then that's an active, vocal, passionate mafia-hunter gone, one who didn't even get a real chance to catch somebody."

So instead we lynch Sloonei.

My clone.

Moved my vote.

Your clone.

Jesus.

I do not see how you can really believe in that statement for my sake and not also believe in it for his. That statement doesn't even refer to this game. It's a broad reference to the effort I am likely to give when civilian. Sloonei doesn't have to be my identical clone, but if he's a civilian he's certainly an "active, vocal, passionate mafia hunter", is he not?

I have zero reasons to believe Sloonei is good. You planted a target on Kylemii that Sloonei would have no way of pursuing had you not done so. He's followed it up with a mighty meaty case. Did you read it? What did it make you think of Kyle? Are you two married? What are you guys, ika and Silverwolf?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:22 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:18 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:25 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:20 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:17 pm I mean, look at this contradiction. Zero people have commented on this:

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:14 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:08 pm

"pretty sure this particular lie was just a standard mafia ploy" again that's false. I said I was pretty sure he was lying cus factually speaking there were no consistencies between this game and sc2. The reasoning was still unknown.

Hmmmmm?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:19 pm i actually kinda assumed you were lying for standard day zero jay-prod purposes?

Does no one else see why I feel bad about this?

I am out of context and don't know what the problem here is.

On Day 0 Kyle made the statement that "Jay was lying for standard day zero prod purposes." A couple of hours ago he denied this and claimed that he thought Jay was lying because there were "no consistencies" in his argument.

"Civilians never contradict themselves."

Kyle appeared to be denying a thing he verifiably did say when I used it in an accusation against him. That's shady.
Tell me what my mafia motivation for any of the things I've done is.

I have literally never seen you gun this hard for someone on Day 1.

It looks like bullshit to me. I'm calling it.

My vote stays. I don't care if I get lynched.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:18 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:17 pmWho is Dave?

He's Dave.

dave's not here right now

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:28 am Epignosis gave me a pass because I'm a shitty Day 1 lynch.

"Because if I'm good, then that's an active, vocal, passionate mafia-hunter gone, one who didn't even get a real chance to catch somebody."

So instead we lynch Sloonei.

My clone.

Moved my vote.

Your clone.

Jesus.