Not when I do it.
![shifty :shifty:](./images/smilies/shifty.gif)
Return to “Welcome to Night Vale Mafia [ENDGAME]”
That wasn't my intention at all. I was just listening to the song.
LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:24 pmI didn't say you did suck. And you were right to kill me. Besides, I'd have gone after you strong, as it became more and more clear to me that you were bad.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:07 pmWe didn't suck. We only killed you because LC found you could only stop our kill. That wasn't good.LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:58 pm Great game. Go civvies!!!!
So frustrating being deaded in a game where I had so much to say!!!! Although I was convinced that Elo was Hiram and I would have entirely messed with that whole theory. On the show, Hiram's Violet Head bought Cecil in an auction and used him to protect Dana several times (before returning Cecil to himself). Alas.
Fun game to play and to follow from the grave.
We didn't suck. We only killed you because LC found you could only stop our kill. That wasn't good.LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:58 pm Great game. Go civvies!!!!
So frustrating being deaded in a game where I had so much to say!!!! Although I was convinced that Elo was Hiram and I would have entirely messed with that whole theory. On the show, Hiram's Violet Head bought Cecil in an auction and used him to protect Dana several times (before returning Cecil to himself). Alas.
Fun game to play and to follow from the grave.
I didn't read the posts you quoted.
Eloh wasn't in Blue Velvet. She was in Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
Eloh and timmer were teammates. I'm satisfied on that regard.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:26 pmYes, I missed epi because I was following INH's list. So he is now added to the list I wrote earlier: Epi, INH, timmer, and Wilgy. The reaction INH is having here to lorab is off-putting. Isn't it the point of the game to try and find the baddies, make a good case for them, and then try to get others to follow you in lynching who you think is bad? That's all I think lorab is doing here. And she is right that you are trying to steer us clear of the people I just mentioned. I really think out of the four, timmer ia probably not the curser. He's barely been here. I also don't think it's likely that epi is. I don't think he would incriminate himself like that. Wilgy...maybe. You...maybe. I can see either of you doing something like this, but wilgy's reaction to all this talk compared to your reaction screams at you being it.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:40 pmOn the flip, I think you are trying to steer us toward those people, which isn't making me feel very good about you.LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:33 pmIf you look at the lists I posted above, I already did that.
You missed Epi. To be fair, INH had missed him first, and I assume you were basing off his list.
Also, what do you think about Jack's thought that there could be 2 different players on the team who were each in one of the games?
It seems unlikely, to me, that someone following a game and not playing would know that 2 different self-imposed posts were a thing in 2 different games. I get what you're saying, but I think that it's likely that there are people on that team who were in both games. It's not just that they were both posting restrictions from old games--they were both self imposed restrictions.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:22 pm Is it really not conceivable to anyone other myself that someone who wasn't directly linked to one of those games either read the thread or was aware of the gimmicks from both games?
I mean, come on. The people insisting that it HAS to be someone who played both games are more than a little suspicious to me right now.
Think of it like this: Rico's curse on D2 attracted a crazy amount of heat for people involved with Blue Velvet. By intentionally choosing to do the same thing with Dom and Rot3k, they're essentially designing a Venn Diagram of people they want us to look at.
Odds are seeming higher and higher to me that the Faceless Old Woman was involved with one at most of these games, and researched gimmicks players used in games she wasn't in to mislead the town and cause mislynches.
There are two possible motives FOW has for cursing people with old-game-specific posting restrictions: Sheer fuckery, or to mislead the town.
I believe it to be the latter.
I think you're trying to steer us away from those people, which isn't making me feel very good about you.
I don't think Dom and Eloh were bad together. She went Marcus hunting with Tony.Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:12 pm Dom. I don't like this back and forth you're having with golden. I think golden is civ, and even though this may be civ on civ, I don't think it is. You seem to be tunneling. Yes, you recently started engaging with others, but I think it's only to try to save yourself/make yourself look better. The interactions don't seem very genuine. Golden, on the other hand, has not only been taking part in the back and forth with you, but has also been playing what looks like a genuine and meaningful game, engaging in other conversations. It seems as though you may feel stuck in hole and you're only focused on climbing out of that hole. I've been in that position before as a baddie and know what it's like. I just cannot decide if I ought to vote you or take a chance that Tony may be marcus. It would be great to get any baddie today, but awesome to get the +2 vote guy.
With that in mind... what's the general thoughts on tony being marcus? It was mentioned and talked about a little bit earlier today but I haven't heard a general consensus. I don't stay up late like many of you and I need to vote soon. I'd love some feedback on my thoughts.
Yeah, I don't think Dom is bad with Eloh.Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:28 pmWTF Dom, give a lady time to respond. I may be in the kitchen vacuuming up pepper that my 5 year old spilt all over the floor when reaching for a banana. Seriously. It just happened.Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:11 pm lynch me
i don't want to play if this is how we play now.
watch out for timmer never actually catching up. that's classic baddie timmer.
When I come up civ, remember how wrong Golden was. Remember how I was told repeatedly that I had written nothing when I wrote many posts giving well thought out reasons for him being bad
Watch out for INH hiding behind being *quirky*
Watch out Elo pretending she can't read my posts.
Thank you sprit for your response. I've made up my mind.
dom
This is a question Eloh would ask a teammate. What does she care about unicorns being gay?
This is a defense of Tony.Elohcin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:57 pmI actually like this response to Epi. I think if someone grasps onto this "reason" for why Tony may be mafia, they should be looked at more closely as maybe being mafia themselves.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:36 amOoh. Forgot about how the polls worked. (In case my language gets misconstrued again, forgot here means "I neglected to consider") Back on my home site we do the whole "vote in bold in-post" thing, so I typically play with a pretty trackable record and that influences how I play. Even here it would be easier to check in on the thread, look at votes, and have an idea where we stand, and if I recall correctly from Mass Effect, we would mark votes with orange so we would have that record. I assume that is more or less a standard thing.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:34 amHere's why:
The hedging language here (might, just might) tells me he isn't really invested in his own idea. If TonyStarkPrime were serious about finding a useful way to track votes in the thread, he wouldn't suggest one idea, get thwarted by Eloh, and then just say "It just might be good to come up with a way to do that." He is talking about how to track something that doesn't matter, since even when votes can be changed, it isn't like we can see who voted for whom when.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:19 pmIt might help for searching the thread to check vote patterns. It just might be good to come up with a way to do that.Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:19 pm As long as we keep up with the thread, the unchangeable votes shouldn't be a problem. If you need to take notes as to who is suspecting who throughout the day, then do so. I don't think we need to assifn a specific emoji to that. What if I want to use that emoji for fun?
"But Epi, you don't know TonyStarkPrime! What if this is how he normally is?"
"But Epi, didn't he die Day 1 in Pokemon? Wouldn't it be cruel to lynch him Day 1 here?"Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
I don't quite understand the whole hedging thing. I had an idea, someone said "I don't like that idea" and then I said "well maybe there is another way". Which to me would suggest that I'm still invested in the general idea. The word "might" is more of a "I'm not going to force an idea through if people don't want it" than a "well, I don't really care about what I'm saying".
@jack - do you really believe epi believes his theory or donyou think he made it up to see who would latch onto it? I'm thinking the latter.
In reply to Tony. Why doesn't my suggestion work?
Read thread. Take notes on who voted for whom or who suggested voting for whom at what time. Read over notes before voting.
This seems like a fine solution and you don't have to scroll through the thread over and over.
Lorab, who is FEB based on?
I'm going to post this and keep reading. I know his annoys some. Don't like my style, oh well.
speedchuck isn't bad with Eloh.Elohcin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:34 pmI may be being picky in this but I have to vote and it has to go on someone. I don't like the whole smiley chart that chuck laid out for us. Above you see his explanation to Lorab about her specific smiley. But why not just say that in the post. It's day 1. Why not get real. Day 0 is behind us and we are supposed to get a little more serious now. If he were civ, I think he would have given a small description as well so we knew exactly how he felt. Instead he remained vague with smiles. Sorry chuck, but at this moment, I think there is a better possibility of you being bad this game than any other player. I must vote. And you're it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 4:47 pmIt means you have a decent amount of content and none of it makes me think you're town. Which makes me uneasy.
But for D1, my reads are all as ill-defined as that, so the smilies sum them up pretty good.
I need to gather my thoughts, and I am not sure tonight is the night to do that.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:57 pm
I am super interesting and not a mean person and I have seen a couple naked women.
Why would you care if you seemed inconsistent because of a typo? Why would a civilian worry about that?
I have never seen anybody off the poll. Neverwhere is never there.
I thought your vote on Made sucked, so your vote on Long Con looked like more of the same- voting first out of the blue to escape accountability.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:01 pmThis bit.
Granted, that was before he flipped. But it was never really followed up on.
Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:56 pmHuh. I thought you thought I was bad, and were just not pursuing it for some reason.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:53 pmYou aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pmPerhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.
Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?That would have been atypical play for you, I think.
You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pmPerhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.
Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?
I will admit the evidence against you is circumstantial.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:46 pmOh that lovable contrarian epigonsis
what a card
But seriously, you still think I'm the Faceless Old Woman?
Do you want me to repost my rebuttals so you can read and maybe respond to them?
Or would you just like to continue to ignore every point I make in favor of sitting in silence instead of engaging people about your suspicions?
You suspect me. Great, whoop-de-doo. Would you like to talk about it, and maybe be constructive?
I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:34 pmI am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear
no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something
Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP
this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well
mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO![]()
I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear
no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something
Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP
this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well
mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO
I'm sure you can guess my concern. A Day 1 missed vote, fine- but missing the Day 2 vote when LC got lynched just because you hadn't read everything looks like hiding to me.timmer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:19 pm Yeah, conversation is def. good, I had forgotten howfast these speed games move.
@Epi, I don't think I covered it, but I wasn't present in the game for the first vote, and the second vote I hadn't yet caught up, so I didn't see how randomly throwing out a vote would help. As for the night poll, it seemed like a typical night poll, so I just grabbed a spot, I don't even remember what my opition was.
Reading back, day 1 I would have essentially randomed my vote if I were here, there was nothing in my read that would have caught my attention. As for yesterday? I'm not sure. I don't think I'd have voted LC, so good on those who did.
For today, I'm still unsure. I ended up reading damn fast, and I'm at work. I won't be leading any charges today, for sure, but once others do, I'll find the time to ISO their suspicions and make a udgment.
Dom parodied Trump in a game. What game was that?Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:50 pmWas the point.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:46 pm*Sad!*Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:39 pm That's an outright lie considering I've tried to engage with INH (he all but ignored me), have made multiple points of contact with Tony, and just probed Eloh.
But cute.
You can't say you were suspicious of me since day 1 AND also say that my Night 1 rebuke of you is teh source of your suspicion, Golden. Which is it? I've asked this question before, and you've ignored it because you have no answer. Sad !:cheeky:
But you also didn't play the game where I parodied Donald Trump for most of it.
How does that happen? Your name is five places below his.Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:45 pmDom meant to vote for me.Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:29 pmI considered this, but I don't think Dom is Long Con's teammate. Dom voted for himself. Do you think Dom is Long Con's teammate?Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:24 pmWhat if Dom is also lcs teammate? I don't like this straw man. The idea that some inh voters were aiming to save lc is a fundamentally sound line of enquiry, whether it's ultimately right or wrong. I don't believe jack is lying about it being a genuine hunt.Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:17 pm Hopefully people are taking notice of how Jack is on this little crusade to lynch INH voters. Lynch me, lynch Tony, lynch Ricochet. Maybe by then, people will wake up.
Jack still can't explain his theory that one or two of us were trying to save LC, when all Long Con's teammate had to do was vote Dom. I could have easily voted Dom because I voted Dom Day 1. He's going with this because it helps him set the agenda for Day 3. Don't let it happen.
I'm leaning town on Dom, so no I don't particularly, but if he is bad I think it more likely he is lcs teammate than him being a politician based on their interactions with each other and me and the Nutella kill.