
Apparently we both have emoticons too:Metalmarsh89 wrote:Weren't those the same guys that had baddie teams named after them in the GoC?


Return to “Zodiac Mafia [GAME OVER]”
Apparently we both have emoticons too:Metalmarsh89 wrote:Weren't those the same guys that had baddie teams named after them in the GoC?
I did have fun, but no, I don't like the game setup. This was essentially last man standing with three players at an impossible disadvantage.Golden wrote:I'm sorry if you don't like the game setup or didn't find it fun. We did our best to make the experience fun and fair for all, and I hope at least that most people did enjoy it. We certainly went for whimsy as a focus in preference to serious mafia. The game was always going to play out in confusion given the existence of three night kills and all the personal win cons that drove many of the lynch behaviours.Epignosis wrote:I didn't understand it. What was the point of having civilians? They had no chance of winning.Golden wrote:I hope lots of you enjoyed the game. It was certainly more than a little unorthodox, but we really wanted to give it a go, and from my perspective it was really fun to watch you all try your best to get to grips with it.
Congrats also to the winning team on all meeting your personal win cons... it was touch and go there for a bit.
I didn't understand it. What was the point of having civilians? They had no chance of winning.Golden wrote:I hope lots of you enjoyed the game. It was certainly more than a little unorthodox, but we really wanted to give it a go, and from my perspective it was really fun to watch you all try your best to get to grips with it.
Congrats also to the winning team on all meeting your personal win cons... it was touch and go there for a bit.
Almost everybody was bad, apparently.Spacedaisy wrote:I knew you were bad Epi. You know why? You didn't once suspect me. Come on man, you can call me as bad better than anyone else, so I knew you were off.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:At least I didn't fall asleep at my keyboard.thellama73 wrote:No. Unacceptable.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sorry folks! I got a little busy with other things. The night post will be coming shortly.
thellama73 wrote:Epi, thoughts on the above?
sig wrote:Daisy and Epi both sound good to me. Why do you think Wilgy is a civ?
Confirmed Mafia. I'm not voting for spacedaisy on account of this and that I think there's more to work with. It's Nerolunar for me.sig wrote: Today I'd like to lynch either Epi or SD as I believe one or more likely both of them are mafia members.
sig wrote:A few pings from Nero, but not enough to lynch on keep I'll keep my eye on him.
sig wrote:I don't think Llama's reasoning is right in regards to Nero. While I've never hosted I don't think the hosts would be in a bigger rush to replace a mafia member then a civ.
I've got a slight ping from nero, and I am feeling good about Epi's posts directed at him, but he won't be getting my vote today for a few reasons. I don't like what Llama said about him, as off right know Nero seems like an easy lynch button.
I don't like Daisy's response to G-man's ISO. It came off as very defensive and pingy.
Let's summarize, shall we?sig wrote:Wilgy always claims doctor regardless of the game and alignment. The other would be Nero he has made a few posts and I think your voting for him already? I've got a slight ping but not vote worthy.
DrWilgy wrote:;__;
You could be on fire if you don't prefer the rope.thellama73 wrote:Oh man, I was right about WIlgy too! I am on fire this game.
Wow sig. Thank you for this enlightening lega-sig wrote:Okay so some quick thoughts before the night ends. Right know I'm reading Llama as a civ he shouldn't be lynched. After reading everything over Bull's does look better though I still dislike his votes. He isn't a good lynch candidate. I've got a slight ping on Sorsha for her vote, but besides that she is null. A few pings from Nero, but not enough to lynch on keep I'll keep my eye on him.
Wilgy is a slight civ lean, again I wouldn't lynch him today.
I've got a slight mafia ping on Quin. Today I'd like to lynch either Epi or SD as I believe one or more likely both of them are mafia members.
If only.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Epignosis fucked
S~V~S wrote:Do you get drunk with dead girls?Epignosis wrote:
I wish a girl get drunk with me.
I would have much rather kept my vote on Nero, who is being cautious with his words and lazy with his vote, but noooooooo, someone decided to go get drunk and wouldn't let me so that.thellama73 wrote:I don't trust Nero. I was pretty happy when the lynch was tied between Epi and Nero yesterday. I thought we had a good chance of finding a baddie, which is why I was so dismayed to come back and see the votes all moved to C-Man.DrWilgy wrote:Quiet night...
Llama, what are your thoughts on Nero oustide of your theory.
Sorsha, Daisy what do you think of Llama's comment about you two from earlier?
That's right. I was on Bullzeye's team Day 1. For Day 2, I was on spacedaisy's team. Maybe Day 3 I'll be on your team.sig wrote:One of our most active players who was almost certainly a civ was lynched, because Epi voted for them. Epi would then be able to defend himself using the self preservation argument. However, he could have easily voted for SD and tied it that way but, he didn't. He also waited until the very last second to vote, which is suspicious seeing who he voted for.
I think SD and Epi are both mafia members, this explains why Epi didn't vote for her, but for G-Man instead.
I do love it when you look foolish. So come get some llama.thellama73 wrote:Epi is still my top suspect. I think he is counting on us loosing focus and second guess ourselves if he just continues to play it cool and use the sigh smiley in every post. I don't intend to let that happen.
Meanwhile I take crap for breaking ties.thellama73 wrote:I'm extremely disappointed in Sorsha and Daisy for casting such foolish votes. Nero had at least a possibility of being bad. One of you at least had better be mafia, or else there is no excuse for what you have done.
My rainbow list continues to be 100% accurate.
Okay.sig wrote:So right know I'd be good with an Epi lynch tomorrow.
I didn't suspect G-Man after the lynch. Either you're asking me to be repetitive or lie.DrWilgy wrote:Epi it really isn't that, It's that you didn't have opinions on anyone else and when I tried to pull opinions out of you again and again I got nothing from you. Had you answered question 3 by saying G-Man, I would've at least been able to believe you. That would've, at the bare minimum, seemed genuine.Epignosis wrote:Wilgy's vote for G-Man:
My vote for G-Man:DrWilgy wrote:G-Man wrote:My favorite professor's advice: past performances are not indicative of future results.DrWilgy wrote:Looking over this, I actually really don't like this post G-Man. 1st of all, you can go back and compare to Daisy's other games. 2nd, you just finished Arrested Development with her.G-Man wrote:I am changing my vote because I've got bigger fish to fry. Spacedaisy has been AWOL and has contributed nothing of substance thus far. It may very well just be that I've forgotten how Spacedaisy plays. Something just seems wrong about her soft posts and general absence though.
Reading this post and the portion that I've bolded either means you aren't willing to double check a Meta that you are willing to base a vote on, or you are prepping yourself for an easy "oops, I guess I just forgot" when/if she's lynched as a civvie. Both of which screams bad sauce.
Linki - *Wilgy gives Sorsha a big hug! Now they both smell like tomatoes*
Then why even mention the part that I bolded if you aren't trying to use that "forgotten" memory as a reference?
G-Man
I fail to see why my vote is more important in the scheme of things than his. I said I was going to break ties. Did he think I was joking?Epignosis wrote:My initial inclination is to vote G-Man. That rundown of what, three-and-half pages...what was the point of that? It reminds me of that time in Star Wars (OMG I love Star Wars. Maybe you could come check out my light saber some time!!!) where a2thezebra posted commentary of everybody early on. It was premature and gave the appearance of looking good.
I worry about being premature.
I wish my sex life wasn't a joke.
My vote for G-Man:DrWilgy wrote:G-Man wrote:My favorite professor's advice: past performances are not indicative of future results.DrWilgy wrote:Looking over this, I actually really don't like this post G-Man. 1st of all, you can go back and compare to Daisy's other games. 2nd, you just finished Arrested Development with her.G-Man wrote:I am changing my vote because I've got bigger fish to fry. Spacedaisy has been AWOL and has contributed nothing of substance thus far. It may very well just be that I've forgotten how Spacedaisy plays. Something just seems wrong about her soft posts and general absence though.
Reading this post and the portion that I've bolded either means you aren't willing to double check a Meta that you are willing to base a vote on, or you are prepping yourself for an easy "oops, I guess I just forgot" when/if she's lynched as a civvie. Both of which screams bad sauce.
Linki - *Wilgy gives Sorsha a big hug! Now they both smell like tomatoes*
Then why even mention the part that I bolded if you aren't trying to use that "forgotten" memory as a reference?
G-Man
I fail to see why my vote is more important in the scheme of things than his. I said I was going to break ties. Did he think I was joking?Epignosis wrote:My initial inclination is to vote G-Man. That rundown of what, three-and-half pages...what was the point of that? It reminds me of that time in Star Wars (OMG I love Star Wars. Maybe you could come check out my light saber some time!!!) where a2thezebra posted commentary of everybody early on. It was premature and gave the appearance of looking good.
I worry about being premature.
I didn't call it quiet. I didn't have opinions on anyone except G-Man.DrWilgy wrote:Yes little provable reason. Epi are we going back to Bullzeye calling it a quiet Day 1? That was most definitely not the case and there was plenty to form opinions around and judge players.Epignosis wrote:If I have opinions on people, I state them. If I don't have opinions on people, I don't say anything.DrWilgy wrote:Answer 3 is what I'm reffering to being sass. You could've stated your opinions regarding players but you didn't. You also could have answered 3 before results were posted from the night.
Because I hate pointless communication.![]()
And being single.
Epignosis wrote:Your vote on the other hand, was super heavy, had little provable reason behind it, and when asked about your vote I got non-genuine answers.
Little provable reason behind it. On Day 1. All right mate.
Wish I had a mate.
If I have opinions on people, I state them. If I don't have opinions on people, I don't say anything.DrWilgy wrote:Answer 3 is what I'm reffering to being sass. You could've stated your opinions regarding players but you didn't. You also could have answered 3 before results were posted from the night.
Little provable reason behind it. On Day 1. All right mate.Epignosis wrote:Your vote on the other hand, was super heavy, had little provable reason behind it, and when asked about your vote I got non-genuine answers.
Turning down questions? You've directed three at me. Let's count them.DrWilgy wrote:
Epi has been turning down questions that I've been asking. Simple questions too, just opinions.
I am almost never under fire. I've been lynched six times ever. So you know nothing.thellama73 wrote:I'm out at a bar, so I need to decide now. I think I'm going to keep my vote on Epi. He is keeping a cool head under fire, which I know is a core tenet of his baddie strategy.
Deborah was bad news. I believe he was calling you bad.Sorsha wrote:Linki- I didn't play biblical g-man so I don't get your reference
I guess it depends on the kind of toys you had to offer her.G-Man wrote:There's only a niche group of girls who squee for toy collectors.
No. It doesn't apply to us both. For three reasons:Nerolunar wrote: I have suspected you a bit since people started mentioning your fluff, since I agree with that. You are doing better now, albeit only now when people called you out for it. I guess the same arguments apply to both of us to an extent.
You're "honestly" reading me as bad, eh? Why the superfluous adverb? Why are you sorry for it?Nerolunar wrote:Hey guys. Im honestly reading you as bad Epi, sorry about that. It goes the other way around too - don´t accuse me of posting fluff earlier this gameIts like you are passing on your accusations to me when I did in fact post some reads as soon as I joined.
Im getting pinged by Quin and Sig too. Im going to look at them very closely![]()
Ugh, Im gojng to bed soon, and I have to vote. Im giving it 30 minutes.
I would, but I'm going to hold my vote for the last minute in case someone needs saving.DrWilgy wrote:You do, and I thought about that. Nero is right behind you in my head when I think about lynch candidates for today. G-Man's thoughts about Nero reflect my own currently.
Nero come elaborate on or share your thoughts. Who wants to join me in Nero pressuring?
Linki - oh hai Nero
I wasn't concerned about there being fluff and role-playing before your post. What I'm pointing out was that after this post, you haven't had much more to say than your predecessor. Since Day 2 started, you haven't named one person you think is Mafia, even in light of S~V~S and Sloonei getting killed, and despite your post says you wonder "why people don't [...] try to get some thoughts circulating."Nerolunar wrote:At the moment of this post there had been almost nothing but fluff and roleplaying. The three posts about G-man are responses to people who wondered about what I meant.Epignosis wrote:Wonders why people don't try to get some thoughts circulating.Nerolunar wrote:Okay I have read the thread and here are some thoughts:
C-man is almost the only one trying to engage discussion. I wonder why people don´t follow up on it and try to get some thoughts circulating.
Has seven posts.![]()
And three of those call G-Man's alignment into question, essentially restating the same idea without considering fresh evidence. That last one sounds bitter that G-Man didn't get lynched and could possibly come out looking good for it.
You know what else I noticed? Take this how you want, but Bubbles never popped in saying how good she was, which is like, her trademark. I realize she didn't post at all, but that's a minor thing to consider.
A major thing to consider is how I'm gonna get a girlfriend.
I've got more content than Nerolunar!DrWilgy wrote:@Epi I'm not voting you for saving Bullzeye, I'm voting you for a mountain of fluff, lack of opinions about players and a sketchy last min vote. For someone to make a vote like that along with what you have provided for the thread, it's extremely hard for me to classify that near "possible civ behavior" at this time.
They say I saved my vote yesterday to save Bullzeye, but the only thing I'm saving is myself for marriage.Spacedaisy wrote:Did I miss how Epi already ended up with 2 votes?
Wonders why people don't try to get some thoughts circulating.Nerolunar wrote:Okay I have read the thread and here are some thoughts:
C-man is almost the only one trying to engage discussion. I wonder why people don´t follow up on it and try to get some thoughts circulating.
While that's true, I won't use it as an excuse. I haven't given this my best effort. Sorry.G-Man wrote:He is very busy with his Batman game but I have concerns. Hosting can be used as a cover for low or fluffy participation. I need to do a lot more thinking and re-do some ISO's.thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Epignosis for now. His game smells awfully fishy to me.
My game always smells bad.thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Epignosis for now. His game smells awfully fishy to me.
Aw man, you're right. I'm sorry. I mean I would vote for S~V~S. But now I can't. I always miss the opportunities with the ladies.DrWilgy wrote:-__-
That's impossible. If everyone was tied at one vote, it would mean I had already voted.DrWilgy wrote:Epi, if everyone was tied at one vote who would've you broken the tie towards?Epignosis wrote:I said I was going to break any tie that came up. It didn't matter who it was between. I don't like leaving things to luck.thellama73 wrote:For me, the random vote is not really suspicious. It's Epi's last minute vote to break the tie that has me worried.
I don't have good luck, especially with the ladies.
I said I was going to break any tie that came up. It didn't matter who it was between. I don't like leaving things to luck.thellama73 wrote:For me, the random vote is not really suspicious. It's Epi's last minute vote to break the tie that has me worried.
Did I have to? No...but that's how it worked out. It was 9:39pm EST when I came back to my computer. I voted, and then I spent the rest of the night at my computer looking at fourteen empty inboxes on various meetup sites.DrWilgy wrote:Re Epi: And you had to hold your vote till the very last minute to break a tie?
DrWilgy wrote:Epi, I won't leave you. That's not what a good friend would do.Epignosis wrote:Did I? I'm so sorry. I won't do it again. Ever.DrWilgy wrote:Epi saved Bullzeye
I just thought I was trying to lynch G-Man, like you, you know, being supportive of you and all that. Please don't break up with me. I can change.
Why did you hold your vote till last min? Your vote was either very aggro... For a reason unknown, or very defensive to save Bullzeye.
*Wilgy begins to cover his kidnapped Quin in A1 sauce*
Epignosis wrote:I'll be breaking any tie that comes up, for sure.
I have a bad experience with ties. A girl once said she was torn between me and this other guy.
She picked the other guy.
Epignosis wrote:G-Man's the best I've got and I almost missed the vote playing my statistical-based game called daily fantasy sports that requires me to analyze individual player stats to obtain a profit.thellama73 wrote:Oh wow, Epi. Interesting.
I try to tell the ladies that I'm pretty good at it, but they don't believe me or something.
Did I? I'm so sorry. I won't do it again. Ever.DrWilgy wrote:Epi saved Bullzeye
thellama73 wrote:Also, I don't know what you're talking about "the potential third power role". What makes you think there are only three power roles? Who said there were Indies? I think you assume a lot.
The kill counts as a power, correct?MovingPictures07 wrote:Heists
- Consist of 13 or fewer players
- Cycles are made up of 48 hour Day Phases and 24 hour Night Phases
- They have no more than three Power Roles
If.thellama73 wrote:Impossible to know at this point.Quin wrote:If you have the same role as him, what do you think about the potential third power role? Do you think it is the same as both of yours? Do you think there would be one for mafia, one for town and one for rogue/independent? When will Wilgy give me back my fish hat?thellama73 wrote:The weird thing is that I apparently have the same power as C-Man, and I am civ. So I have to wonder whether a) he is lying b) there is more than one civ with the same power or c) he is a baddie counterpart to my civvieness.sig wrote:Interesting, though is that more likely a civ role or mafia role?
Here's the thing. If Epi's vote was a save, it was an incredibly transparent one. But in a game like this, where the Day 1 loss of a teammate would be devastating, it might be worth it in the hopes of playing the WIFOM. I think I would be up for a Bullz or Epi lynch tomorrow to test this theory.