Laters!
![strumming.. ;airguitar:](./images/smilies/air%20guitar.gif)
Return to “[END] The Syndicate's 2013 Game of Champions”
You know... Now that you mention that, there is an additional [host] role in the Red Room. Someone has the opportunity to become MP. But that would be an additional character when you compare it to all of the original players.Mongoose wrote:That's true. I wonder if there's a secret role, undiscoverable.S~V~S wrote:
And my own experiences in this game tell me there are ways for things to happen not shown in the roles.
Having been in one, I should have guessed that.Mongoose wrote:ContestDevin the Omniscient wrote:From where?Mongoose wrote:Or had items.Nevinera wrote:Really tired, not playing well. DH and timmer both survived NKs, which goodmannered them good odds on civ roles.
From where?Mongoose wrote:Or had items.Nevinera wrote:Really tired, not playing well. DH and timmer both survived NKs, which goodmannered them good odds on civ roles.
Very much this... Where is the logic? It certainly isn't here.DharmaHelper wrote:He wants out so you're willing to pull the trigger because if he is a civ, fuck it?Nevinera wrote:He wants a modkill.
Our risk is lower, because even if he officialism civ, he is suppliant enjoy that locate Mafia killing himself shortly anyway.
Sometimes this thing does not obscure much Living Statue houseofpancakes.
Despite this great lynch result I did not say that it was a lie. llama was 100% telling the truth about this. You jumped on him about lying as soon as I made my post.S~V~S wrote:and according to Devin, it IS a lie. And Devin & I may spar, but I believe him.
I know. I'm very sorry that my post led to that assumption about you.thellama73 wrote:For the record, I didn't lie about my curse.
I wouldn't think so. This is the 2nd time she's been off the pole this game. Someone's protecting her.BigDamnHero wrote:Isn't BEA off cuz she technically died?
DharmaHelper wrote:Making me all worried n shit when I should be doing homework.
Just keep me in neutraljuliets wrote:People I feel neutral about: BF, Boomslang, Devin, Eloh, FH, Mongoose, Timmer, Hedge
I obviously need to clear my neutrals to either an "OK" or "concerned about".
Hedgeowl wrote: People I have no read on are Devin, BWT, Booms, SD and Timmer.
I prefer to keep it this way.bea wrote:Devin is tricky for me. I want to say I'm leaning civ but I'm never good at reading him. He's been pretty insistant with his Teefies suspish, I just can't figure out if it's because he thinks he's on to something and the quick turn around from Teefies between his sheild vote for me and his vote to lynch me the next day was Teefies messing up, or if Devin's trying to keep that in my mind knowing the three of us were all just baddies together and if I'm looking at Teefies, I'm not looking at him, ya know?
I thought of that, too. I can't imagine sock killing off people who aren't able to crack the code. Especially after so many said they suck at it.BigDamnHero wrote:I've been going over it this morning and I can't tell if all the lines are connected to one big riddle or if we have to solve the parts to complete the whole puzzle or what. Then this idea popped into my head: Is it possible that the Sinister Exaggerator put that in there to mess w/ our heads and keep us focused on something other than rooting out his teammates?Nevinera wrote:Does anyone have an opinion about doing the riddle in public?
DH, I thought of Bob when I saw this. But obviously he can't continue to recruit while dead..."When I am born I am one but when I die I am many" -> May refer to a player given a unique role then when they die in the game they are considered many (zombies/deadies)
I agree with this.Lizzy wrote:Nev, if we ignore the killer indies for one or two days, while hunting for baddies, the latter WILL resort to NK'ing the suspected SK's because it's in their interest.
I'm just going to leave this here and hope that it doesn't get ignored AGAIN.Devin the Omniscient wrote:Really?? It was what I said that made you think he was lying. I know he's not lying.S~V~S wrote:I do have to say, this is one of the weasely-est statement i have ever read. Srs weasel, man, props. I really don't think you believed it. I know i don't believe it.thellama73 wrote:You can't be sure that I lied because a lie is all about motive, and you can't know my motive. If I didn't intent to deceive, it was, by definition, not a lie. I stated something that wasn't true, yes, but it was not a lie, because I believed it at the time.S~V~S wrote:Well, people are saying that they know his role (??) and that it would be a waste, so I dunno if you should. I am not 100% sure he is any specific role, I am sure he lied, and then backpedaled about it. It's all in the thread. I do think he did so willfully, and I am not sure why anyone NOT a baddie would do so.
I hope you are seeing what I put out, JC~ you of all people should
I hope you are not bad, lol. If i missed it (I am not fully caught up today, we had Blizzard #7878957 today) did you say your opinion on Bea?
Do I think he's a potential baddie for other reasons? Yes.
But for EXACTLY the same reason he didn't post in orange, I posted off topic. Twice! Did I do it on purpose, or to deceive anyone, or to break the rules? No.
What possible benefit could llama gain by faking insanification and not posting in orange (a contest rule), during the contest?
And that's another thing! It was not a curse! It was an optional contest. We didn't have to do it and we wouldn't have been punished for not doing it (if you don't count losing the contest as a punishment). llama clearly was trying to post using poetry so he clearly was trying just as hard as I was to win the contest.
As unlikely as I find this possibilitybirdwithteeth11 wrote:2) I have no reason to go after Devin. I think he's a terribly misguided civvie.
@Devin: Say I were to be lynched and revealed to be a civvie. Where would you look next?
Really?? It was what I said that made you think he was lying. I know he's not lying.S~V~S wrote:I do have to say, this is one of the weasely-est statement i have ever read. Srs weasel, man, props. I really don't think you believed it. I know i don't believe it.thellama73 wrote:You can't be sure that I lied because a lie is all about motive, and you can't know my motive. If I didn't intent to deceive, it was, by definition, not a lie. I stated something that wasn't true, yes, but it was not a lie, because I believed it at the time.S~V~S wrote:Well, people are saying that they know his role (??) and that it would be a waste, so I dunno if you should. I am not 100% sure he is any specific role, I am sure he lied, and then backpedaled about it. It's all in the thread. I do think he did so willfully, and I am not sure why anyone NOT a baddie would do so.
I hope you are seeing what I put out, JC~ you of all people should
I hope you are not bad, lol. If i missed it (I am not fully caught up today, we had Blizzard #7878957 today) did you say your opinion on Bea?