The Syndicate

MovingPictures07 wrote:
LoRab wrote:For what it's worth, I think MP is civ.

I also think he should take a deep breath and come back to the game.

I'm voting A Person. At least for now. If they come back and give a reason for their post advocating for killing high posters, then I may reconsider.
The problem with an A Person lynch is that we're just taking a stab in the dark as to his alignment because there's not anything to judge.

Yep. That and he's gotten lynched for some really shitty reasons before. As well as not posting much.

If he's civ, him being lynched now would fall into both categories.

Epignosis wrote:
triceratopzeuhl wrote:
Epignosis wrote: His Vote Was Rash and Poorly Thought Out, He Knew in Advanced He Wasn't Going to Be Around, and People Are Ganging Up on Him for an Inconsistency I Know Damn Well He Wouldn't Make if He Were In a League with Satan
I take it you don't think there's any merit to the idea I posted earlier that boomslang knows timmer won't get lynched and wants to pretend they aren't teammates?
Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Loss

That thought kills a civvie and may or may not catch a baddie. So unless you think there's some significant chance timmer is bad, I'm not seeing it.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Fuck this game. Seriously. I don't even care if you other townies win anymore.

MovingPictures07
HETHZBEMADWDGFLMCECRSALOKYHNENMTEKTXEJSYVQOPXMHNCKBJRIBNJHBDITEUMGUBXUMD
This curse sucks.

Indeed. Anyone have an idea what the code for it is?

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hey Little Bird, Do You Like Getting Lynched For Stupid Reasons?
No.

Which is why I'm not voting for AP, MP, or JJJ (even if he doesn't have any votes yet, he's certainly garnered suspicion). Or anyone else who has a vote today so far. I just don't see any other good cases outside of the one for Boomslang.

What about it makes it a stupid reason?
His Vote Was Rash and Poorly Thought Out, He Knew in Advanced He Wasn't Going to Be Around, and People Are Ganging Up on Him for an Inconsistency I Know Damn Well He Wouldn't Make if He Were In a League with Satan

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Linki: Then who is a better option? Give me a good reason to look at someone else and I will. I have the time to do so right now.
See, Here's the Thing: I'm Trying This Crazy Idea Where You Find All the Good Guys First and So Far It's Working Like Shit

Spoiler: show

Heck, if you're not going to be around, why go with a rash and poorly thought out reason? I don't get that train of thought.

Maybe you need to try a different methodology for this game then.

Linki: MP, it's better to walk away from games if you start to feel that way. So no hard feelings there. Hoping you can contribute and give a more meaningful vote than a self-vote!

Linki2: I'm still waiting for Epig to suggest better options for today. But no luck there so far.

Linki3: Can we be "special friends" too?

Linkis4-7: Screw it I'm posting first.

Linki8: FUCK OFF! :P

triceratopzeuhl wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Better than AP's vote train, JJJ faking a curse, or voting for MP for his 927391723th explosion. Because I see several really terrible reasons for vote so far today.
MP is the only person who has voted for MP today :P

Oh I know. :P But I've seen MP get lynched after an emotional blow-up in multiple game threads. So it wouldn't surprise me if that got used as a reason down the road again.

Epignosis wrote:Hey Little Bird, Do You Like Getting Lynched For Stupid Reasons?

No.

Which is why I'm not voting for AP, MP, or JJJ (even if he doesn't have any votes yet, he's certainly garnered suspicion). Or anyone else who has a vote today so far. I just don't see any other good cases outside of the one for Boomslang.

What about it makes it a stupid reason?

Linki: Then who is a better option? Give me a good reason to look at someone else and I will. I have the time to do so right now.

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Linki: Casual glance at timmer reads authentic to me as well. The "also" and "also also" construction in his post is more casual than a baddie might use when discussing the finer points of strategy.

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

Boomslang wrote:RIP, INH. Honestly, I hadn't spent much time looking at you or your case. I apologize for not further substantiating my thoughts on MM, but JJJ's explanation is pretty much my train of thought. Using a weak, time-based rationale that would've made the most sense for a timmer vote to vote me. I'll have to look at MM more closely in the next day phase.

Boomslang wrote:Arrrgh, I thought I could catch up tonight. Making a long story short, I have a surprise job interview in middle-of-nowhere North Carolina that will eat up the rest of my day/early evening. Gonna vote Timmer because I disagree with the main wagons and think it would at least yield info on MM. I know this is a drive-by, but I don't have time for more.
Very interesting...very interesting indeed.

Boomslang
Very Interesting and Very Foolish

How so? It's the most substantive reasoning I've seen for anyone so far today.

Better than AP's vote train, JJJ faking a curse, or voting for MP for his 927391723th explosion. Because I see several really terrible reasons for vote so far today.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:so sloonei isn't mafia (unless it's a double bluff, less likely)

I think someone faking silence as a baddie is just as risky/likely as someone faking a curse as a baddie. So not very likely.

But then again, MP admitted that he's done it before so what do I know?

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:The Golden Curse is Specific, While the Jagged Curse Would Require Wording That I Don't Believe Someone With Such a Power Would Use
What's the motivation for mafia!Jay to fake it?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Mafia-aligned players have to literally manufacture every post they make.
Well There's That
Why would JJJ take the trouble to manufacture a day of fake curse posts? Not to mention I don't remember him being a prime suspect during Day 0 or 1 at any point.
Sloonei Suspected Him Plenty and Sloonei Ain't Talkin'

If you think that is the case, then I will be curious to see how Sloonei responds to this when he is able to talk again.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have to leave to take a final, but do you guys need any more than this?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Linki: Casual glance at timmer reads authentic to me as well. The "also" and "also also" construction in his post is more casual than a baddie might use when discussing the finer points of strategy.

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

Boomslang wrote:RIP, INH. Honestly, I hadn't spent much time looking at you or your case. I apologize for not further substantiating my thoughts on MM, but JJJ's explanation is pretty much my train of thought. Using a weak, time-based rationale that would've made the most sense for a timmer vote to vote me. I'll have to look at MM more closely in the next day phase.

Boomslang wrote:Arrrgh, I thought I could catch up tonight. Making a long story short, I have a surprise job interview in middle-of-nowhere North Carolina that will eat up the rest of my day/early evening. Gonna vote Timmer because I disagree with the main wagons and think it would at least yield info on MM. I know this is a drive-by, but I don't have time for more.
He read timmer as town yesterday and voted for me. Then today he voted for timmer, with the hope of getting information about me.

Jay can't talk, but he can pull quotes with the best of them.

Okay fair enough. Same reason I'm voting for him.

Also, this may be the best content I've seen from you so far. And idk if that's good or bad...

Metalmarsh89 wrote:#lynchepi

Unvote Boomslang and Vote Epignosis

I honestly cannot read you in this game anymore other than Chaotic Neutral...

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Linki: Casual glance at timmer reads authentic to me as well. The "also" and "also also" construction in his post is more casual than a baddie might use when discussing the finer points of strategy.

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

Boomslang wrote:RIP, INH. Honestly, I hadn't spent much time looking at you or your case. I apologize for not further substantiating my thoughts on MM, but JJJ's explanation is pretty much my train of thought. Using a weak, time-based rationale that would've made the most sense for a timmer vote to vote me. I'll have to look at MM more closely in the next day phase.

Boomslang wrote:Arrrgh, I thought I could catch up tonight. Making a long story short, I have a surprise job interview in middle-of-nowhere North Carolina that will eat up the rest of my day/early evening. Gonna vote Timmer because I disagree with the main wagons and think it would at least yield info on MM. I know this is a drive-by, but I don't have time for more.
I'm more than happy to lynch Boomslang.

Ummmm...why?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Linki: Casual glance at timmer reads authentic to me as well. The "also" and "also also" construction in his post is more casual than a baddie might use when discussing the finer points of strategy.

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

Boomslang wrote:RIP, INH. Honestly, I hadn't spent much time looking at you or your case. I apologize for not further substantiating my thoughts on MM, but JJJ's explanation is pretty much my train of thought. Using a weak, time-based rationale that would've made the most sense for a timmer vote to vote me. I'll have to look at MM more closely in the next day phase.

Boomslang wrote:Arrrgh, I thought I could catch up tonight. Making a long story short, I have a surprise job interview in middle-of-nowhere North Carolina that will eat up the rest of my day/early evening. Gonna vote Timmer because I disagree with the main wagons and think it would at least yield info on MM. I know this is a drive-by, but I don't have time for more.

Very interesting...very interesting indeed.

Boomslang

Boomslang wrote:Arrrgh, I thought I could catch up tonight. Making a long story short, I have a surprise job interview in middle-of-nowhere North Carolina that will eat up the rest of my day/early evening. Gonna vote Timmer because I disagree with the main wagons and think it would at least yield info on MM. I know this is a drive-by, but I don't have time for more.

Wouldn't it make more sense to vote for MM here if that is the case?

Not to mention I still don't get the case on timmer. Seems pretty civ to me including his logic.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm walking away. I have more meetings to attend. You all have fun. I'll be back if I survive the day, which I don't even care to anymore.

I mean, I still think you're civ despite the one thing I brought up from today. And I do hope you calm down and come back to playing later on!

Epignosis wrote:
LoRab wrote:For what it's worth, I think MP is civ.

I also think he should take a deep breath and come back to the game.

I'm voting A Person. At least for now. If they come back and give a reason for their post advocating for killing high posters, then I may reconsider.
A Person Complained About Volume...He Could Have Killed the Source of the Volume (But He Didn't)

That's the one thing holding me back from an AP vote. Not to mention I feel like I've seen him lynched a ton for being a low poster.

His line about high posters being killed just really, really bothers me because it sounds like someone who is okay with limiting discussion.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Boomslang wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Boomslang wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote: Also, I find your two statements contradictory. How can he be pretty much impossible to read and yet you lean town on him?
Did you read my post? I said I leaned town on Epi because I didn't think his gimmick was doing any damage to the town effort. Beyond obfuscating his own alignment, of course.

Sloonei wrote:Why do you like Scotty avoiding the INH vote?
He had a correct read on INH and promoted that read in the thread. Had we followed that advice, it would've been profitable to the town effort. That's more town evidence than we have for most people at this point.

Also, voted the mini-market because food.
I did read it; I just don't understand how you interpret Epi's behavior as obfuscating.

I find your highlighted conclusion dubious. Accuracy does not make alignment.
Epi's posts have gotten much less obtuse as the game has gone on, I'll give you that much. So I'm stepping back from the idea of obfuscation for now. And I agree that accuracy does not make alignment. But he actively pursued other targets (Epi, BWT, JJJ) in thread instead of just saying he disagreed with the inh lynch. He could've done more late in the day, but he did offer some potential alternatives if others would've taken them.

Linki w/Golden: I don't necessarily think both are fake. But I think odds are high one is, given what we know about the roles.
Linki w/MP: Spinning my wheels here, but I'd say a mafia J could be pretending to help temper his high post count from yesterday. He came out swinging, establishing himself as a strong inquisitive force (see Scotty calling him the Spanish Inquisition, for crying out loud), and playing insanified lets him fade back a bit while retaining that impression.

Second linki: Ahh Blooper I want to post tooooo
That's all fair. Thanks for the response. I'll see whether I agree with that claim when ISO Scotty tomorrow (that's what I'm hoping to do anyway).

That's a logical conclusion. I'm not sure what I think of it. I think mafia members faking curses almost never happens, but it's possible. I've done it once before.

No, no, NO. Don't do this to me, man! This is the first notable thing you've said so far that I've disagreed with.

If you wouldn't put it past a mafia member, and you yourself have faked a curse, then why do you think it's a stretch for mafia members to do it?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:So, I suppose what I get from that is Trice's vote looks the most genuine, Wilgy's absolute nonsense (not helpful), and Scotty's disingenuous. Discuss.
I agree with all of that.

Same. Lines up with my feelings on each individual so far.

Albeit I feel slightly better with Scotty lately. But not much yet.

Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:The Golden Curse is Specific, While the Jagged Curse Would Require Wording That I Don't Believe Someone With Such a Power Would Use
What's the motivation for mafia!Jay to fake it?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Mafia-aligned players have to literally manufacture every post they make.
Well There's That

Why would JJJ take the trouble to manufacture a day of fake curse posts? Not to mention I don't remember him being a prime suspect during Day 0 or 1 at any point.

Boomslang wrote:
Boomslang wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Seems both Golden and Jay are cursed or something. Well, that sucks.

^see above. Two curses on the same day, against players who were attracting some heat? And in a game in which of the roles indicated insanifying? I'm skeptical that both of the curses are genuine. It's just too easy to fake something that looks legitimate.

Not if 1 is civ and 1 is a baddie or independent. I could see that being the case for sure.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:
Scotty wrote:I think that some low posters insanified Golden and JJJ
could be, but why would they not target MP if that was the motivation?

Not sure. But JJJ was insanified and he's typically a higher poster. So there's one right there.

I mean, I could see the logic behind a low poster pulling such a strategy. The question becomes how to try and determine motive.

A Person wrote:
Scotty wrote:Thanks G.

As far as low posters go, A Person has only posted twice, but I must preface that I dot tag on low posters for not posting frequently, but for not posting quality posts.
A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Over 1000 posts before Day 2. Way to go, team.
Would you believe me if I told you I wouldn't mind the mafia and/or serial killer killing all the high posters so the rest of us can keep up?
same tbh
This is his 4th of 4 posts. It was last night. It tells me he doesn't want to read the thread, and he doesn't really care what's going on. Civ behavior? I think not.
I don't have the time or energy to read all the nonsense people spew, a few well placed kills would improve the quality of the game.

I honestly cannot think of any world where a civvie would feel this way. Curious if you ever stated your reasoning for this.

Because this sounds very much like you're wanting to quash discussion.

I just got home from work, and have less than 2 hours to catch up over 1 1/2 days' worth of posts. I will do as much as I can but my vote may be a bit rushed if I don't catch up in time.

Quick note, my most opportune times to be active in this phase are tonight and tomorrow morning. After that I probably won't be back until really close to EOD for Day 2. So if I'm a bit quieter this time around that is why.

But really, who are you planning on hurting?

Epignosis wrote:I Will Make You Hurt

Hurt so good?

Dom wrote:you asked abotu the cases not the people but w.e.

It was a poor word choice on my part. But that was what I was referring to.

Dom wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:These are the questions I have asked Epig so far:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:This Includes Content
I get your whole schtick for this game, but are you planning on incorporating any actual content in at some point?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:It's a Sin to Kill a Bird With Teeth on the First Day.

What do you feel about the cases against me so far?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.
How was it a dumb question? I'm curious.
Dom, which of these are you saying he had answered previously? Because I went back and I'm not seeing it.
The second one.
Because the post you responded to is an answer to that question.

Not really. I was asking him what he thought about the people who had made cases and/or voted for me on Day 1.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Question for the masses.

I make arbitrary and nonsensical votes, and nobody gives a shit.

I catch something I find suspicious and vote based on that, and people do give a shit.

For those of you whose read of me matches up with these statements, why is it so? I don't understand.
I think because the first few votes from you were arbitrary and nonsensical. Whenever someone changes their vote that often on Day 1, it always pings me really hard.

Doesn't mean I think you're bad, but it will make me put an eye on you.
Looking back, I remember now that you did give a shit before.

I don't know how much everyone else changed their votes. But I'm sure I was one of the few to consistently state my vote changes in thread.

It's also a way of generating content (even if I haven't had any time to observe it), and one of the reasons I prefer changeable votes to unchangeable.

Well given it is for Day 1, I can understand that. Especially if you're having a hard time catching up.

Still don't feel great about you, but we have another full day period for you to change my mind.

Also, RIPIYWG Voopy!

These are the questions I have asked Epig so far:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:This Includes Content
I get your whole schtick for this game, but are you planning on incorporating any actual content in at some point?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:It's a Sin to Kill a Bird With Teeth on the First Day.

What do you feel about the cases against me so far?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.
How was it a dumb question? I'm curious.

Dom, which of these are you saying he had answered previously? Because I went back and I'm not seeing it.

Linki: Interesting there on Lorab. I will reflect on that one.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Question for the masses.

I make arbitrary and nonsensical votes, and nobody gives a shit.

I catch something I find suspicious and vote based on that, and people do give a shit.

For those of you whose read of me matches up with these statements, why is it so? I don't understand.

I think because the first few votes from you were arbitrary and nonsensical. Whenever someone changes their vote that often on Day 1, it always pings me really hard.

Doesn't mean I think you're bad, but it will make me put an eye on you.

Dom wrote:BWT why did you ask Epi that question when he had already answered it?

He answered it before I asked? When did he do that?

Sloonei wrote:That's twice people have agreed with me saying Metalmarsh is bad. I don't even think that. I don't not think it either. But I was just throwing a pair of names at A Person to give them something to work with.

Why throw it out there if you don't think it? Because to me, A Person is the type of player who might take that and run with it.

FWIW, I've previously stated why I think MM might be bad.

Boomslang wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Why do you like Scotty avoiding the INH vote?
He had a correct read on INH and promoted that read in the thread. Had we followed that advice, it would've been profitable to the town effort. That's more town evidence than we have for most people at this point.

Also, voted the mini-market because food.

I know this wasn't a response to a question I asked. But your response has me wondering.

1) Scotty lambasted MP for his PoE methodology, and ignored a direct question from MP 3 times.

2) His vote for Epig looks incredibly weak, given from what I've gathered, the main case against Epig was "He is being gimmicky and isn't posting substance." I found it a bit odd as well, but I still didn't think it was a good enough reason to vote someone Day 1.

You say you think Scotty looks good because of his correct read on INH. Do either of the 2 points I brought up affect your opinion on him or not?

Sloonei wrote:
A Person wrote:so who are the good guys and who are the bad guys
MetalMarsh is a bad guy, Epignosis is a good guy.

Agree with the first. Starting to get closer to agreeing with the second.

A Person wrote:so who are the good guys and who are the bad guys

Do you have any thoughts on the game so far?

As to answer trice's question, not sure if Rico has ever seen the mechanic of night poll info being given to certain players. But I didn't get anything, so I can't say for sure if it's in play or not.

@Host: Did anyone receive info on the night poll?

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.
How was it a dumb question? I'm curious.
The Reasons People Use to Justify Killing You on the First Day are Frequent and Almost Always Terrible, and This Was No Exception

Oh okay. Well, it's what I had to go with at the time for Day 1. If I had felt that strongly about it, I would have voted for you.

But I didn't. I do feel you are starting to contribute more so it's making me feel better about you.

Scotty wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?
I would not k.

What makes you think that?
Why else would they have voted for a civilian?
In hindsight, I still think he was the best choice for a Day 1 vote. Nobody else convinced me otherwise, but Scotty came close for me.

I think I would have liked to leave my vote on bwt.

How come? I was just admitting that hindsight was 20/20, and that I felt INH, at the time, was the best Day 1 vote option.

You still seem awfully defensive, but given how wrong I was about the INH lynch, I am willing to re-assess my options for Day 2. So I could be wrong about you.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Looks like I missed a lot.

Hopefully you guys are right! I have no idea why inh is being lynched tbh.
You can't give us any more than this? Because you've certainly been really substantive so far.
Are you trying to provoke me? I don't feel I deserve this attitude.

I'm trying to keep up here. Instead of just remaining silent, I opted to post my thoughts and status. You got a problem with that?

You changed your vote multiple times yesterday for seemingly arbitrary reasons or reasons that don't seem logical to me. I understand you're having a hard time keeping up, but I don't feel like the posts I've seen from you have much in terms of actual quality.

So in terms of what I've seen so far, yes, I do have a problem with it. Because you don't have a lot of substance. And the bit I've seen doesn't make me feel good about you.

Also I'm going to Arco AM/PM Mini Market. I promise I am not here to pump gas, wash windows, or solicit products not from the facility though.

Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.

How was it a dumb question? I'm curious.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.
Where are you going for Night 1?
I have things to do and time to spend with the wife.

And I'm super burnt out with this game at the moment.

Understandable. Well I hope you come back refreshed and ready to tackle some baddies!

And say hi to SD for me!

Vompatti wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?
I would not k.

What makes you think that?
Why else would they have voted for a civilian?

In hindsight, I still think he was the best choice for a Day 1 vote. Nobody else convinced me otherwise, but Scotty came close for me.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Looks like I missed a lot.

Hopefully you guys are right! I have no idea why inh is being lynched tbh.

You can't give us any more than this? Because you've certainly been really substantive so far.

Scotty wrote:Shit sorry guys I'm like 8 pages behind, but Epi is still hiding behind his crutch and I wanna vote for something that matters.

I've gotta go but I will respond later to those that are on my ass

Epi

Forgot to mention this, but I would like to call bullsuit on this one.

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

This one feels weird to me. Almost like a throwaway vote.

nijuukyugou wrote:My apologies - I've been busier/more tired than I thought the past two days, and am currently out enjoying tasty Mediterranean, so haven't had time to do the insightful investigation I wanted, nor do I have it now. Gonna vote JJJ because he's tricky and reactions to said vote may give me good insight/info. May the reactions commence!

Back to foods now.

This one too. But I look forward to hearing more from the both of you on your reasonings.

Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?

I would not k.

What makes you think that?

Sloonei wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: I think Sloonei said she put a vote on me as a way to remember to read up on me later and to see what else I discussed afterwards.
Spoiler: show
(i'm a boy)

Oops! Sorry about that one!

MovingPictures07 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:- MP is still my strongest civ read so far which is a bit weird. Dude, when do we get to the point where we start butting heads? :P
It'll happen, I'm sure.

Counting on it.

Also I am now drunk/buzzed mafia-ing. So not sure how this will go.

Search found 197 matches