
And Russ, you should have gone with your original instincts about me possibly being bad. But oh well.

Return to “MacGyver Mafia~It's NOT Night 5”
Then why not vote for LT or at least spend a little more time to consider it?thellama73 wrote:Although I voted for He-Man, I would like to go on record as fully supporting another LT vote as well.
Yeah, I can definitely see how that would seem odd. Honestly though, when I first read through it was all kind of a blue and I was trying to post my thoughts while trying to absorb everything (kind of a stream-of-consciousness issue), so I'm honestly not sure why I said it. I mean, I agreed with Dex's list at the time, but I'm not sure why I make it sound like I agreed with MP when I thought he was bad.Russtifinko wrote:Yeah your posts are pretty readable to me, Dex.
This is what I was referring to, BWT. Now, MP didn't flip civ, which I think helps your case some, and since I posted this you have contributed more to the discussion. I still think it was very weird that you basically seemed to accept MP's opinion of Dex's list while simultaneously suspecting MP of baddieism. I'm still not sure why you'd want to lynch him but trust his opinion of other players.Russtifinko wrote: I'm not totally convinced BWT is bad; but since he's come back he hasn't impressed me. I definitely buy that RL got in the way at the beginning, but since then his contributions have been 1) defending himself 2) agreeing with MP about Dex's list of names and 3) pulling a 180 and deciding he needs to lynch MP (whose opinion he somehow trusts anyway regarding the list?). So this vote is mainly a heads up: BWT, you will probably have earned my suspicion if MP flips civ, and I really hope you start contributing more of your own thoughts because we seem to need all the help we can get to find these baddies.
Sorry! I completely forgot about that. What was it you wanted me to respond to again?Russtifinko wrote:RIPIYWG rey. Pretty sure you were. Now I'll really be frustrated if what you were trying to say was important.
BWT, I think I gave a pretty solid list of reasons to vote you 2 days ago when I voted you. Feel free to disagree on that, but I am still waiting for a satisfactory response from you on the points I made back then.birdwithteeth11 wrote:I asked why I was on your list earlier, and you didn't respond why before. Would you mind answering me as to why I'm still on your list?boo wrote:I would sub LT2 with BWT. Kate is off the poll, but she was someone I was considering for today, guess that's off the table. At this point I don't see snow dog being bad.The A Team wrote:Poor Reywas RIP my friend -odd choice for the kill no one could understand the poor kid!
Looks like Dex won't be a problem to understand. His words are are just jumbled almost easy as pie compared to Reywas.
So hope we are looking at llama, FH, LT2 and possibly HeMan.
What do we think about Snow Dog and Kate?
Thoughts?
So ya, my list for today (in no particular order) is BWT, FH, llama and HeMan.
I asked why I was on your list earlier, and you didn't respond why before. Would you mind answering me as to why I'm still on your list?boo wrote:I would sub LT2 with BWT. Kate is off the poll, but she was someone I was considering for today, guess that's off the table. At this point I don't see snow dog being bad.The A Team wrote:Poor Reywas RIP my friend -odd choice for the kill no one could understand the poor kid!
Looks like Dex won't be a problem to understand. His words are are just jumbled almost easy as pie compared to Reywas.
So hope we are looking at llama, FH, LT2 and possibly HeMan.
What do we think about Snow Dog and Kate?
Thoughts?
So ya, my list for today (in no particular order) is BWT, FH, llama and HeMan.
Yeah, I figured that. I just think you're off the mark in this instance is all.thellama73 wrote:Yes, I just reread that. It was a very well put together argument, which is why I am much less suspicious of you than I used to be.birdwithteeth11 wrote: Llama, the main reason I am suspicious of Vomps can be found back in the giant post I made a few pages back (it's the very last one on the bottom of the page, so it shouldn't be too hard to find). Basically, me re-reading him and pulling all those quotes is why I am so suspicious of him and think he is bad.
I'm hoping this is indeed the case, and that Vomps voting for himself is just making me unnecessarily paranoid.juliets wrote:Every time I come in it seems like something strange has happened! This time vomps voted for himself, which for me kind of clinches it. I can't think of a lynch switch action that the person knows about before it occurs so I think Vompatti is just dancing around on those questions. Anyway, I'm going to go ahead and vote Vompatti based on the reasons I talked about earlier and what has happened since.
Here is where he claims he "randomized" for boo, but could have gone for MP again. No explanation on why he would have voted for MP really, other than "gut feeling".Vompatti wrote:Whoops, almost missed it. Voted for MP for randomizing.
Vomps asks MP why he is on his list, and MP later says it's because Vomps didn't give any reason for voting for him or boo other than randomizing. Definitely strikes me as really odd. Did MP actually agree with Dex's list or not? I don't remember what happened there.Vompatti wrote:Browsed through the thread and would still vote the same way because gut feeling.boo wrote:Well this is the worst vote yet. Clearly someone is paying zero attention to what's going on or is a liar.Vompatti wrote:Voted for boo in a hurry, could just as well have voted for MP.
Lastly, he claims to be happy about getting a baddie, but then subtly pushes boo again. This time he says he doesn't get civ vibes from boo, but again, no explanation why.Vompatti wrote:Here is Kate's opinion on it and Vomps' response. I didn't think of it before, but it's entirely possible MP and Vomps could be throwing each other under the bus here, and trying to distance themselves. Any opinions on this one?Kate wrote:MP? I think it's a bit odd that he agreed without any argument with Dex's random list of names above and that he wouldn't say why he has his eye on me particularly. Besides that and the randomization thing at the beginning of the game I don't find him particularly suspicious, although I can't say I trust him either.Vompatti wrote:What do you think of the person making the accusation?MovingPictures07 wrote:
Why me?
This one is definitely REALLY odd. I almost feel like there's some subliminal message or something hinting BTSC here.Vompatti wrote:Assuming he's bad I don't think that would be a good strategy this early in the game, especially since it seems he'll probably be lynched soon.Kate wrote:
A little bus throwing possibly? He loves to do that in games where you win with your team, dead or alive.
I had to cut a post out, too many to allow me to repost.
Then we have these 2 posts:Vompatti wrote:What if I told you I "randomized" between the two of you? ;DMovingPictures07 wrote: Because you came in here and voted for either me or boo and you didn't seem to have a good reason for either. Care to elaborate at all?
Also, I did not agree with Dex's list at all. I said I have my eye on all of them. Very different story.
Vompatti wrote:To be honest I'm inclined to vote for MP at this point as his tl;dr defence didn't convince me, but I'd also like to hear how Dex came up with his list of names.They're practically back-to-back. So you lean toward MP the most, but you aren't willing to vote him yet? I mean, I understand him wanting to hear Dex out, but you already voted for him once for no reason, so wouldn't it make it easier to vote him again if you honestly believe he is bad?Vompatti wrote:I didn't vote yet in case something comes up. No, I'm not sure, but he seems the most suspicious to me at the moment.![]()
So you have no suspicions whatsoever, except for the 2 people you "randomized" for. And you can't even back either of those 2 up?Vompatti wrote:I didn't think about that, I just thought that it would be useless to vote for someone other than boo or MP and since missing the vote seems to be generally frowned upon I picked one of the two which happened to break the tie.Kate wrote:You didn't think that voting to break a tie would be subject to scrutiny?
Also, he immediately votes for MP again. Jumping on the bandwagon here, are we?
Vompatti wrote:How would voting for MP have made more sense? Obviously he turned out to be bad but I'm not exactly getting civ vibes out of boo either.Kate wrote:I agree wholeheartedly.boo wrote:I'm fairly confident vomp is his teammate, and that's probably where my vote is going tomorrow. It was pretty well clinched by the time he voted MP, and his D2 vote made ZERO sense as he said it was either me or MP (a split decision which made no sense), and it was the deciding vote in that lynch.Dex wrote:One down, three to go!(Sorry MP, some day I'll get to see you play civ.) I was wrong about the affiliation but I'm OK with that.
As for his associate, of the four I'm suspecting Kate and Vomp voted for him and He-Man and Rusty Finko voted elsewise, making the latter two more suspect to my way of thinking.
Yes, I can see where you're going with that. But I'm not. I ended up coming back of my own accord when I happened to check up on what I had missed in the MotU game. That's how I noticed the PMs that this game had started. If you don't believe me, feel free to ask SVS about it and she can confirm it. Also where we were staying, there was very poor internet access on my phone (to put it mildly). But we were on a naval base that was out in the middle of nowhere so that's understandable.Snow Dog wrote:Theoretically you could be on a team I suppose.birdwithteeth11 wrote:And to add to that last post, I remember MP mentioning that I was out of town when the game started, so the fact that you're looking at me as suspicious seems a bit-worthy to me.
From last Wednesday until very late last Sunday night, I was out of town. When I got back, I was really busy with work and I'd completely forgotten I had signed up for this game. Heck, I didn't even know it had started so that should tell you something.thellama73 wrote:I want to ask what people are thinking about BWT. I know I came down on Boo for calling him out early, but after that he missed four votes in a row and has been almost entirely absentee until very recently, when he ducked in for only a moment. I understand that real life gets in the way, but the extent of his silence is starting to ping me.
I can understand him getting peeved for the vote for not participating that much. The part that bothers me is more him "laying low" as you described it and being really overdefensive from today's lynch.MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry for so much posting, but does anyone have reads on He Man or Vompatti as well? I'm not sure what to make of either of them at all.
Linki with BWT: His vote on Day 1 was a vote for juliets after she voted for him (switcheroo) and he seemed pretty peeved that he even got a vote for little participation, which I found just a bit strange since it hardly made him a lynch candidate (comparable to Boomslang in MOTU how he seemed a bit too overdefensive). Not sold on that, but it did strike me a bit odd. Additionally, he is still laying a bit low and no one is mentioning him at all, and he still seems a bit overdefensive with what he posted after today's lynch to llama. I don't know.
I feel least strong about him of the five I listed, honestly, but I can't help but shake those couple of gut pings. Knowing that we both know him IRL as well, what do you think of him?
Either he is admitting defeat or he knew something was going down last lynch. That's my guess.MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, meant to include this as well in my last post, but any thoughts?AllAlongTheBoardwalk wrote:I literally logged on 5mins ago. But, whatever, lynch me if you like.thellama73 wrote:Bah, a likely story! How convenient for you to avoid accountability.AllAlongTheBoardwalk wrote:Did the poll just end? If so I missed it...my bad everyone. Catching up now.