Posted before catching up. Oh well.Snow Dog wrote:You are decommissioned you better get RED!birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry everyone! I wasn't around at all yesterday. Catching up now.

RIP me!



Return to “Thomas the Tank Engine [Night 9]”
Posted before catching up. Oh well.Snow Dog wrote:You are decommissioned you better get RED!birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry everyone! I wasn't around at all yesterday. Catching up now.
I'm probably confused here, but what does random voting have to do with this?A Person wrote:People seem to be against random voting, and Llama was acting quite strange, so I decided to try my luck and see what happened. In the end the exact thing I feared happened and he turned out to be innocent and just conducting a strange experiment. Now I'm more lost than I ever was before. :SHedgeowl wrote:A Person, claimed to not be good at decision making when the vote was missed the first day, also didn't like any of the theories going around, and then less than an hour after DP gets 2 more votes, 3 votes for llama roll-in with hours left till the poll ends. I don't currently suspect Andrew, because he voted for llama the previous day, but this may be worth noting too.
Just think its all worth considering more.
Also, I completely forgot to vote yesterday.
None of them are questions from me. I simply pointed out that I had felt you were ignoring things being said about you from other players. Some were comments and some I thought were direct questions. I have to run out for a bit but I'll find my original post when I get back.McViper wrote:I'm sorry, what questions do you want me to answer...I will testify before you.
While that definitely made me laugh, it doesn't change the fact you still won't answer questions directed at you. And hence why you are under my suspicions.McViper wrote:It would be a terrible mistake to vote for me. My Fez would be blown off.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. I would have come back with a bit more sooner, but I ended up having lunch with my grandparents. So I finished my re-read a bit ago.
I'll start with the idea of looking at pig voters (probably because I'm in this group). I already explained why I voted the way I did, as well as why I missed the vote. I don't see someone pushing the idea of voting for pig voters this early on to be a good course of action. In fact, I have my eye on Llama on Hedgeowl because I would say they were the main proponents of looking at the pig voters. Maybe later on, with more votes under our belts, it might be something to consider with other evidence. But it seems a bit too early to be pushing for pig voters at this point.
I'm still suspicious of Nev and Viper for the same reasons I mentioned before. That hasn't changed much. So more than likely, my vote will be going to one of those 4 today.
We've had all this discussion, and you can't find anything that would be useful in here?A Person wrote:I still have no leads and don't think the poll results have any useable information. Maybe I random again.
That is true. But I was referring to whether they could influence/change multiple votes or not. Although looking back at it, I'm thinking that is not the case.thellama73 wrote:They can influence the result with their votes. If two or three people are tied with the most number of votes, all one baddie has to do is wait until late in the day and vote for whichever one is not on his team. Bing bang boom, another dead civ.birdwithteeth11 wrote:How much vote manipulation do the baddies honestly have? I see they have one vote block, but that's about it. So unless someone can point it out to me, I don't see how the baddies have significant influence on this vote.
That's exactly why I'm looking at llama for this vote as well.Bullzeye wrote:You really think Llama has info? I think that if he did he's a good enough player to find real stuff to back his points up with rather than joking about the letters in someone's username making them bad. I'm considering a vote on Llama myself as I find the whole pig theory weird and didn't think it was actually a serious thing until he based a vote on it.Nevinera wrote:No kidding.thellama73 wrote:S~V~S wrote:Nice way to spread the vote even further~ the baddies can swoop in and lynch a civ with just one vote with such a spread, especially if the lurkers dont vote
It's hard to come to consensus this early, but we can't afford to leave everyone with 1-2 votes again.
I'm favoring DP, on the logic that llama must have some kind of info from that last survey,
but I could see Bullz or maybe McViper - he went oddly silent after that initial flurry of suspicion.
We've had all this discussion, and you can't find anything that would be useful in here?A Person wrote:I still have no leads and don't think the poll results have any useable information. Maybe I random again.
And this one:McViper wrote:
The best thing to do is not vote for me. I'm very good. Very good. But new to the game. Have mercy please.
These struck me as a bit odd, since it seems a bit pushy for Day 1. Although I could be reading it wrong if it's coming from a player I'm pretty sure is new. The part I'm not happy about is that I have to vote within the next hour or so because of work. But most likely my vote will be coming down to either Nev or McViper.McViper wrote:you can tell I'm good because my avatar is smiling. I'm a very happy, very good train.
I completely agree with our almighty Sockian overlord.MovingPictures07 wrote:This should be your theme song. Lol.McViper wrote:I do have a cute Fez, though.
McViper wrote:I do have a cute Fez, though.