The Syndicate

timmer wrote:You know what I see in all of those votes? A baddie bandwagon.

votes INH

Every single person voted for you last lynch and then the person you voted for gets lynched. Care to explain?

timmer wrote:Ya for no deaths! Now, to find some baddies.

Get a mirror

Voting timmer again

MOTHERFUCKER

Dear god, I hope we're right.

Going with my gut and voting timmer.

Oh, presents again. I wonder if they're just like last time or if everyone who doesn't choose a present dies.

Looking through the last two pages, I still believe that something's up with timmer, but I can't seem to put my finger on it. Yes, his points made against DH are valid, but I still feel that as aggressive as he is, that he's a civ. And so, I feel that timmer knows this as well and is trying to rile up DH to make us vote for him. I dunno.

I agree with Epignosis on DH; he seems aggressive and closed-minded, but I do feel that he is a civ. I've got my suspicions on timmer right now and I'll try to provide evidence soon.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:

I'll vote option 1 since that is where I would be if it were to be in alpha order. And if it is, then I will laugh.

Oh wow

Dom wrote:I'm thinking MP may have modkilled the rest of Ziltoid's team because of non-participation.

Seems to be the case. At least we have one baddie team defeated now.

Uh, yay?

DharmaHelper wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Also it says Johnny Cage silenced Epig...not Herman as indicated in the post.
Noob DH, Epig was silenced twice!

True, it seems both Civs and Herman don't want to allow Rob to defend himself. The part about Herman having a use for Epignosis implies that he is/would have been a recruited civ, but I don't know whether or not it's already happened.

Voting portal 4

RIP SVS, Rest in wherever rabbit.

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:I'm thinking of voting Porcupine at the moment. Maybe it's just from Rob's posts, but he seems the best vote out of the remaining players (excluding Rob).
So why aren't you voting Rob then???

Because if he is indeed Herman and isn't killed, he would be mad at me for voting for him and I just realized that logic is bad and I'm voting for him now.

I'm thinking of voting Porcupine at the moment. Maybe it's just from Rob's posts, but he seems the best vote out of the remaining players (excluding Rob).

Epignosis wrote:
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote: OK, this post kinda does it for me. It sounds kind of like Epi really, really loves this role. A few things.
I'm not Herman.
Oh thanks, I was pretty doubtful before, but this convinced me.
Very well. I give up reasoning with you bandwagon people. If you've the balls, go on and vote for me. I'm done, yeah? Then you'll see I was telling the truth.

I didn't mean to actually imply that I believed you were Herman, but the retort every time it's mentioned with nothing more than a denial kinda gets old. I understand that you have to defend yourself, but I do wonder why you simply end it at that.

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote: OK, this post kinda does it for me. It sounds kind of like Epi really, really loves this role. A few things.
I'm not Herman.

Oh thanks, I was pretty doubtful before, but this convinced me.

I'll vote for 3 for no reason.

Yay, nothing bad happened. Portal 4 is a perfect square, which is cool. But it'll probably be the death of me anyway.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I think out of the 3 people I mentioned, the one that seems the most attractive to me is SVS, so she is getting my vote.

Votes SVS

Voting SVS as well. She hasn't come up with any insane theories, so that's good in my book.

DharmaHelper wrote:Ziltoid can search for a recruit, and who better to recruit than a confirmed civ? So thats one possibility. Possibility two is that either A) Frank Zappa got BTSC with Droopy and BTSC with the residents, recruiting Droopy by proxy, or B) Beefheart's secret is similar to Zappas and Beefheart is recruited by himself.

Thank you for actually explaining. Yes, I can see him being a recruit, but I'm still not sure either way.

S~V~S wrote:Right, so its subjective.

He could have another BS chart. I'd like to see that, even though I don't agree with what he's saying.

DharmaHelper wrote:Probably.

Explaininations would be helpful

Self-voting may work, but it almost seems too easy. Bringing up that those who vote or fail to vote for X will be killed brings up an interesting point.That being said, voting Droopy seems a good choice since it was revealed that he was actually a civ during the lynch/resurrection.

(I've played EMM and Avant Mafia 1)

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Okay, whoever's voted for will die, I'm pretty sure of this. What I'm not sure of is who to vote for.
Why are you sure?

Because it is a very Socky thing to do.

Okay, whoever's voted for will die, I'm pretty sure of this. What I'm not sure of is who to vote for.

Damn, RIP FH

I'm voting for Devin's resurrection as he seems the safest bet.

DharmaHelper wrote:I'm quite frightened about picking someone to rezz.

For once we agree

I'm not too sure, Devin seems to be the one who seems least bad.

I didn't vote for the last poll because I really couldn't choose anyone. DH sprang to mind, but it's possible he's just trying to help. I'm just as clueless as ever.

DharmaHelper wrote:
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:I'm not planning anything Boats. I just feel very strongly that LT tangled herself up in her reaction to my voting analysis and her reactions since.
I'm more concerned about your analysis posts.

What about it?

It's got an agenda.

DharmaHelper wrote:I'm not planning anything Boats. I just feel very strongly that LT tangled herself up in her reaction to my voting analysis and her reactions since.

I'm more concerned about your analysis posts.

S~V~S wrote:I just read back a bit, but i have not changed my opinion on Trice~ i think the case is yet another example of blowing "cultural differences" out of proportion. i am not voting for Trice~ i probably would alreadhy have voted for FH, but this one post got my eye:

DharmaHelper wrote:If LT flips civ this game, I will eat everybody's hat.
This really got my eye. I think DH has been trying to get peoples attention the WHOLE GAME. And I have kept saying, I am listening, DH. But maybe it is time to put my money where my mouth is and give him some trust. I think he makes some good points on LT, so maybe i will take a leap of faith I have to reread a bit more, and specifically reread LT, DH & FH (AGAIN), lol

Can't believe it took me this long to realize that. I've really got no clue what he's up to, and I'm not sure if he's planning anything (bad).

timmer wrote: @Boats, buddy, I'm hoping to see a little more from you. Just saying you are going to "trust people" now is an empty-sounding statement that just sounds like you are posting to post. Who are your suspects? Why? Who do you feel is civvie?

I've been studying for finals, so I guess that's my only excuse. At this point, I really see everyone as a civ until proven otherwise. I've been doing this ever since Vomps was lynched and I was absolutely convinced that he was a baddie.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Actually, given that Zappa can switch allegiances, I can understand why she would choose to make such info public. Technically, it helps the civvie cause more to know that Zappa could turn on them (or be killed in the process) and turn traitor. I guess my main confusion was over her making the mistake of reading from the green book instead of the purple book.

I think I'll believe her story for now. I think at this point in the game, I'll trust people, simply because not trusting people had led to all these civ lynches.

DharmaHelper wrote:Wait no you're not an outlier, Truth is.

Well in that case the Kate/Boats/Aces connection is the most interesting assuming that it's still accurate.

I would suggest that you try a different method. You have data, data that in the future could become important, but this early in the game, there can't be much that can be interpreted from 3 or 4 votes where nearly everyone voted the same way.

I fail to see how the closeness of when players vote (for the same player or not) has much to do with what team they're on. In theory: yes, it should make sense. But take me for example; I have a relatively busy schedule, and I try to log in/vote at the specific times I have free. Just because my free time overlaps with others' doesn't mean that we're together. You could say that I vote similarly as other people, and yes, but most of the votes have been nearly everyone voting for one or two people. Especially this early in the game, it means nothing.

Epignosis wrote:I'm starting to think I would just be better off voting randomly. Close my eyes and point. Sorry for leading the angry mob, Vomp.

I'm in the same boat (ha) as you are. But I still can't/won't believe that Vomps is a civ. Even after seeing all of his posts, it just screams baddie. I know that Vomps will be Vomps, but I dunno.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Vomps also made no effort even a single time to defend himself against accusations

He did towards the end by voting for me, but even that didn't catch much attention or change any opinions.

howdoesthisevenhappenwtfomg

I fail to see how I should vote for anyone but Vomps at this point.

Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote:I still have a Vompatii suspicion. I guess a vote force could be in one of the secrets but as people pointed out voting for rabbit again doesn't make sense in the context of a force for the first vote. So I'm going to ask Vomps again, will you share with us what your personal reasons were for your rabbit vote? Also, SVS makes a good point about why bea's team didnt push more for Vomps.
I most certainly will NOT.

wtf that's rude

Awesome, no deaths! And welcome back, Droopy!
I probably won't sign up for poker since I don't know how to play.

While Vomps is most likely a baddie, it's really a given at this point. What I'm having trouble with is the next step; finding out who is bad after Vomps is out of the picture. There are some who I am suspicious of, but they could just as easily be civs.

Epignosis wrote:Ooo- almost edited my post (habit).

This may be reaching, but all the tracks on Addicted (the DT album) have exclamation marks at the end. An upside-down exclamation mark is a lowercase "i," and the only one among us with that mark at the end is Vompatti.

Probably talking out of my ass though.

That's actually pretty interesting. Though I don't think that means anything.

Search found 66 matches