The Syndicate

I can't imagine Lizzy playing such an obvious game.

Lizzy wrote:

@ MR - Oh! I'm terribly sorry! I did not realise... *turns away*

I decided to go with Lizzy's judgement and vote with her today, although there are an unusual amount of people who are suspicious in this game.

you can't prove it

Elohcin wrote: I think we ought to vote A Person.

A Person wrote:I like Llama's idea so in an effort to further it (and to make the poll graphs look more even) I vote for him.
First ping. I believe it was pointed out several times that llama's plan was not beneficial for civies.

A Person wrote:I agree, appearing/claiming to be civ only restricts what you can do and paints a target on your head. I also agree with Lizzy, though. :P
Second ping. How does this paint a target on your head when the baddies already know you are civ.

The third reason I would vote AP is is overall tone. He gives me baddie vibes . And, after rereading him, I am thinking he is a little too buddy buddy with llama for my liking. Maybe llama has pulled the wool over my eyes. Maybe he really meant it when he came up with the idea to spread out the votes...then when most people jumped on him for it, he claimed to have said it only to get a reaction. I know I seem to be flip-flopping, but after the reread, I am thinking both AP and Llama are not so good.

1. I was obviously not really agreeing with him, I even voted for him due to his plan.
2. Llama already explained this one, appearing too good or bad can get you either lynched or nk'd and only serves to hurt the civs.
3. I'm not sure "baddie vibes" is a reason to do anything, you give off "evasive vibes" calling my actions into questioning without responding to lizzy's post concerning yours.

Rose wrote:
A Person wrote:The problem with coordination is that the vote takes place privately, so it's impossible to tell who's lying about where they chose to look and it's next to impossible to get cooperation out of everyone in any case.
That's a very good point, and of course people will lie. Certain players have to. So neither idea will truly work. :/

ture, but a player is in control of the level they search (as far as I'm aware), so choosing a different level each night seems to me to be the most a player can do.

Epignosis wrote: This makes no sense to me. There are three factions. One faction knows its members, so you presumably wouldn't want to look like a villain. If you don't want to look like a civilian, then do you mean that you want people to believe you're the turd?

It means I don't want to be killed because I'm "obviously" a civ, and it makes no sense to assume a player is civ anyway.

thellama73 wrote:
A Person wrote:The problem with coordination is that the vote takes place privately, so it's impossible to tell who's lying about where they chose to look and it's next to impossible to get cooperation out of everyone in any case.
Matt is being most logical here. That seems atypical for him.

Does that mean I'm up to no good? :O

The problem with coordination is that the vote takes place privately, so it's impossible to tell who's lying about where they chose to look and it's next to impossible to get cooperation out of everyone in any case.

thellama73 wrote:
Devin the Omniscient wrote:IDr. Unbornbaby
You mean Dr.

Fixed.

Oops, I forgot to vote.

Vompatti wrote:
A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'll vote for myself for personal reasons.
Would you mind telling us what they are q.m.
I wouldn't, but it might be against the rules, and it might even be against the rules to tell you if it would, in fact, be against the rules.

Since it may be against the rules I'll pretend I'm not trying to deduce anything from this post.

But not wrong?

Vompatti wrote:I'll vote for myself for personal reasons.

Would you mind telling us what they are q.m.

Mister Rearranger wrote: Yeah, I'm fairly certain that any vote for him would affect my lives, as his replacement. Wouldn't seem likely that I'd come into the game totally unlynchable.

This is the tough aspect of coming back to mafia after such a long break. So many unfamiliar faces and playstyles, but it's a great thing too!

In some games replacements are unlynchable/un-nkable for the first day or two so that they have time to get caught up. Since I didn't explicitly ask Alex what would happen I probably won't do that now.

I agree, appearing/claiming to be civ only restricts what you can do and paints a target on your head. I also agree with Lizzy, though. :P

Mister Rearranger wrote:
A Person wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote:Linki-you know rose or mr subbed in for him right?
I do, but I'm hoping a vote for them won't be redirected to their subs.
I missed this, but que?

Even if it wasn't, where would you hope that the vote would go?

Nowhere hopefully, if it doesn't affect anyone I can't accidentally hurt a civ.

Hedgeowl wrote:Linki-you know rose or mr subbed in for him right?

I do, but I'm hoping a vote for them won't be redirected to their subs.

Since wrathofgod isn't playing anymore, I am tempted to throw my vote that way.

Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:
Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt
Awwww Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A
ture, i will k. I'm glad you could get rid of your migraine
I'm eating dark chocolate which has a tiny bit of caffeine in it so it should theoretically be therapeutic.
:A Nais. I almost bought chocolate with Earl Grey yesterday. Also, the Earl Grey Royal is decent, butt the jasmine flavour is too strong. :\ So still the Twinings loose leaf is the best thus far. And if you want brilliant carbonara, apparently you should boil the pasta in lapsang. :A

I've never made carbonara but cooking with lapsang is something I want to do (when i have lots of excess lapsang ddks)

Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt
Awwww Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A

ture, i will k. I'm glad you could get rid of your migraine

I'm eating dark chocolate which has a tiny bit of caffeine in it so it should theoretically be therapeutic.

I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt

thellama73 wrote:
A Person wrote:I am pretty sure she only said that after she was unsilenced, so she is theoretically one of the people who chose/could not post for some reason. I'm not sure why it makes a difference though, as blaming silent people is just as likely to make you bad as being silent is.

I wasn't blaming her. I was pointing out that her being silenced could explain her low post count, since Mongoose suggested we look at low posters hiding behind the wall of silly. That is sort of the opposite of blaming.

I was just confused because the only way she could mention being silenced is if it had already happened and was over. She's been fairly quiet since then so could still be a part of the list. My other comment concerned the entire idea of looking at silent people.

I am pretty sure she only said that after she was unsilenced, so she is theoretically one of the people who chose/could not post for some reason. I'm not sure why it makes a difference though, as blaming silent people is just as likely to make you bad as being silent is.

thellama73 wrote:
Mongoose wrote: Where's Zany Dex when ya need 'im.
On the moooooooooooooooooooooooon!

Degobunny wrote:You seemed really agitated by the level 2 thing, I do not even know what this randomizing level things is to be honest. I am also confused that are apparently allowed to say things we do in regards to our role apparently? or that we were suppose to vote on Sunday...I was working all day Sunday, I had no time to check in let alone vote.

Llama is not being serious about the level 2 thing, although he could have some hidden motive behind it. It apparently seems ok to discuss any effect the first poll may have had on you, but it's entirely possible people are lying.

Degobunny wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:If anybody cares, I randomized Level 2 to search.
Why level 2?
Why not level 2? Do you have something against it being randomized?

why not not level 2?

Vompatti wrote:I woudln't have minded a 16-way tie, if you know what I mean.

You can tie me up if you want

thellama73 wrote:
A Person wrote:I like Llama's idea so in an effort to further it (and to make the poll graphs look more even) I vote for him.
Finally someone thinking sensibly.

I'm known for my sensible nature.

I like Llama's idea so in an effort to further it (and to make the poll graphs look more even) I vote for him.

pretty sure it's a beatles reference

head cheese boy is hte cutest so i choose him

The Syndicate

Search found 82 matches

Re: [NIGHT 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 1] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 1] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 1] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 1] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 1] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 0] Super Meat Boy Mafia

Re: [DAY 0] Super Meat Boy Mafia