Search found 277 matches
Return to “[GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3”
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
what year is this
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:57 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
So, you can essentially design any bizarre reason for murdering us, and as long as we don't explicitly ask you about this possibility existing,G-Man wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:40 amAND NO ONE BOTHERED TO ASK FOR CLARIFICATION EITHER. DID YOU ASSUME I WOULD HOLD YOUR HANDS AND TELL YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEEDED TO KNOW RIGHT OUT OF THE GATE? YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ASSUME.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:30 am
Sure, now that the ramifications are patently clear, we know what you were implying. But, literally none of the players guessed that what you meant was that once a player goes ka-blooey, the person who previously posted was then in danger. No one guessed that it was a possibility.
INFORMATION FLOWS QUITE FREELY IN THIS SIMULATION. THERE ARE VERY FEW RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT YOU MAY SHARE WITH EACH OTHER. YOU HAVE THOUGHT TO ASK EACH OTHER MANY QUESTIONS. WHY, THEN, HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO MOST OF YOU THAT I AM PREPARED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION YOU ASK OF ME?
you won't tell us about it.
Good to know.
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:30 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Alright, so these are It Follows rules. Fine. I'd happily accept that if you said that daisy-chaining deaths was a possibility when you explained the event.
Sure, now that the ramifications are patently clear, we know what you were implying. But, literally none of the players guessed that what you meant was that once a player goes ka-blooey, the person who previously posted was then in danger. No one guessed that it was a possibility.
Now, if you were around, and posted an hour after Sloonei did, saying that Nutella was now in danger, there wouldn't be an issue. But, you yourself weren't around when you wanted to force the entire player base to be around. And you didn't state in any of your "ka-boom" posts that the person who posted before the current victim was now in danger.
You knew that, odds are, most of us have better things to do than post nonsense in the thread from 2 to 5 AM. Yet, you failed to properly disclose the dangerous ramifications that you knew would occur.
TL;DR:
"THE LAST PLAYER TO POST."G-Man wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:00 pmTICK TOCK
CAN YOU FEEL IT? THAT SENSE OF IMPENDING DOOM? THE NERVOUS TWITCH OF YOUR BROW AND A SINGLE BEAD OF SWEAT TRICKLING DOWN YOUR TEMPLE? OR PERHAPS YOU ARE TORN BY THE CURIOSITY OF STANDING BY AND WATCHING SOMEONE DIE? CAN YOU STOMACH IT? WILL IT HAUNT YOU? REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU FEEL, THAT FEELING IS VERY, VERY REAL.
BEGINNING RIGHT NOW, THE CLOCK STARTS. IF 60 MINUTES GO BY WITHOUT ANYONE POSTING, THE LAST PLAYER TO POST WILL DIE. MORE SPECIFICALLY, HIS OR HER HEAD WILL EXPLODE. IT'S QUITE A MESSY PHENOMENON BUT I ALWAYS GET A GIGGLE OUT OF IT.
PLAYERS WHOSE HEADS EXPLODE WILL NOT HAVE THEIR ROLES REVEALED AND THEY WILL REANIMATE ON DAY 6. BECAUSE THEY JUST REANIMATED, DRWILGY, EPIGNOSIS, GOLDEN, AND NACHOMAMMA8 ARE IMMUNE FROM THIS DANGER UNTIL AFTER THE LYNCH POST GOES UP.
TIME'S A WASTING! HA-HA! HA! HA!
Sure, now that the ramifications are patently clear, we know what you were implying. But, literally none of the players guessed that what you meant was that once a player goes ka-blooey, the person who previously posted was then in danger. No one guessed that it was a possibility.
Now, if you were around, and posted an hour after Sloonei did, saying that Nutella was now in danger, there wouldn't be an issue. But, you yourself weren't around when you wanted to force the entire player base to be around. And you didn't state in any of your "ka-boom" posts that the person who posted before the current victim was now in danger.
You knew that, odds are, most of us have better things to do than post nonsense in the thread from 2 to 5 AM. Yet, you failed to properly disclose the dangerous ramifications that you knew would occur.
TL;DR:
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:00 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
So, I'm dead because Sloonei, JoH, and Nutella failed to realize that they were dead?
And because G-Man didn't make the parameters of the event all that clear.
And because G-Man didn't make the parameters of the event all that clear.
- Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:56 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
i legitimately have no idea why i died.
fun.
fun.
- Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 5] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I'm actually not number one, for the record. Not sure heliogram that got started.
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:39 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [NIGHT 4] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
You were unvarying first one Rooter be insanified, right tippler?juliets wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:16 am I will before is somethink think there is somethink that has not been beginning t there is something t thing t there is something t that happen play. I'm before also afflicted tonight. Inh what happen be free.Inh what do you there also afflicted? My first game back and I will it looks lifted to has to. I'm been play. Well it looks like my curse has tonight. I'm bef
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:33 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [NIGHT 4] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I'm in lackwit same boat as you, Juliets. I don't know how to cure myself, and I'm stuck like this until some Dark Leprechaun something happens. It'll be interesting to see if more people get insanified as the game progresses.juliets wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:16 am I will before is somethink think there is somethink that has not been beginning t there is something t thing t there is something t that happen play. I'm before also afflicted tonight. Inh what happen be free.Inh what do you there also afflicted? My first game back and I will it looks lifted to has to. I'm been play. Well it looks like my curse has tonight. I'm bef
Someone hermitage to be responsible for this.
Also, Malkovich.
- Mon Sep 04, 2017 1:14 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 4] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
We're piquet Nick G-Man necessitous otherwise. Killing us unwarmed details it.colonialbob wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:03 pmSo you have to post like this until you die, is what you're saying? Do you want to be lynched?juliets wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:57 pm I don't know when I happy again. Maybe never. I have to talk like to talk like until normanent this game didn't know if it's again. Maybe never. I can speak not have this until this game. So I have to fail furthe game. So I don't know when I don't make that ally again. Maybe never. So I can speak notice. I am notice. I feel like that all. I am notice. I am not have to talk like someones want this until furthe game. So I don't know when I don't.
(Can you respond in emoji?)
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 2] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Going with DDL, because spam is a garbage excuse for a meat product.
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 2] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
KOYAANISQATSI
- Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:57 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
- Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 2] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I'm back
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [NIGHT 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
like jesus or kevin garvey, I will rise from the dead in the morning.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 5:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Yes, I missed the one other role with the passive limitation. Bully for me.
However, 72 does get three teams, which as Colonialbob pointed out, is an advantage/ability in and of itself.
However, 72 does get three teams, which as Colonialbob pointed out, is an advantage/ability in and of itself.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
# 72
Alias: Achilles
Source: The number 72 is considered an Achilles Number.
Member Of: Sinister 6’s, Crazy 8’s, Nasty 9's
Power Type: Passive Limitation
Role Description: You may be on three teams at once but you have a weakness. You can only cast the second or seventh vote for any player. Trying to vote any other way will result in punishment.
# 44
Alias: Father Charles O’Malley
Source: O’Malley is the main character of the Oscar-winning film Going My Way, which was released in 1944
Member Of: Evil Evens
Power Type: Passive Limitation
Role Description: Holy and righteous, you cannot cast the first vote for any player nor can your vote break a tie between two players at the time of your vote. If you violate either of these rules, your vote will not count and you will be punished.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I'll spell it out for you fine folks.
#72 is a member of three teams.
#44 is only a member of one team.
I am #44, not #72.
#72 is a member of three teams.
#44 is only a member of one team.
I am #44, not #72.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 3:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Lemme quote my original post.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:34 pm Fuck it, I'll say what role I am.
I'm literally the only role with a power type of "Passive Limitation." No one else is set up for failure like I am.# 44
Alias: Father Charles O’Malley
Source: O’Malley is the main character of the Oscar-winning film Going My Way, which was released in 1944
Member Of: Evil Evens
Power Type: Passive Limitation
Role Description: Holy and righteous, you cannot cast the first vote for any player nor can your vote break a tie between two players at the time of your vote. If you violate either of these rules, your vote will not count and you will be punished.
This does jive with my past experience getting the most frustrating goddamn roles in G-Man games.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:44 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Not factual. I'm honestly not at all sure why you came to this conclusion. Do you think everyone's on 3 different teams?colonialbob wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:48 am Which speaking of, I'm not voting for inh. Your role has a limitation because you're on 3 different teams. *That's* your real power - get creative and use it.
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:00 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Who would you like to lynch, Epignosis?Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:53 am I do have an observation though:
Some are worried about "powerful" roles coming in and doing harm. So naturally people want to remove those roles.
INH just told everyone he has a role that isn't going to harm anybody in any way.
So why is he getting all these votes? If it's so he can have more fun, fine. Cool. But it's weird to me that people are ready to shove a benign role out the door on Day 1.
Are people wanting to discard a benign role and give INH the chance to have a crazy or dangerous role?
Personally, I like INH having a boring role. He can't screw anybody with it.
- Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I CAN WHINE ABOUT MY ROLE IF I WANT TO GODDAMN IT
I don't see any other names being put forward for today's lynch other than the arbitrary "rico's doing a dumbass gimmick to assert his cleverness, so let's lynch him to get him to actually play the game, oh wait, that'll only annoy him more, and make him commit to dumbass gimmicks even further."
I'm allowed to campaign against myself. Yes, I may be playing the tiniest violin in the world, but it's the only bit of music in the room.
- Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
It's more like a step below a vanilla civ.
The "me getting the only role like this" part is what irks me the most. If there were like ten "whammy" roles, that'd be one thing, but one in a hundred just feels like G-Man's RNG urinating on my head.
- Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
Fuck it, I'll say what role I am.
This does jive with my past experience getting the most frustrating goddamn roles in G-Man games.
I'm literally the only role with a power type of "Passive Limitation." No one else is set up for failure like I am.# 44
Alias: Father Charles O’Malley
Source: O’Malley is the main character of the Oscar-winning film Going My Way, which was released in 1944
Member Of: Evil Evens
Power Type: Passive Limitation
Role Description: Holy and righteous, you cannot cast the first vote for any player nor can your vote break a tie between two players at the time of your vote. If you violate either of these rules, your vote will not count and you will be punished.
This does jive with my past experience getting the most frustrating goddamn roles in G-Man games.
- Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 1] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
TBH, my role fucking blows, so I wouldn't mind being lynched today.
But seeing how me saying that I want to be lynched means that I probably won't be lynched (unless people think I'm double-bluffing), I'm probably going to vote for Ricochet, who I think is in the same boat as me role-wise, and is trying to get lynched himself.
Ricochet, if you don't want to be lynched, quote this post and call me a wolf. It'll bring back fuzzy Night Vale memories.
If you don't do that, I'm voting for you.
But seeing how me saying that I want to be lynched means that I probably won't be lynched (unless people think I'm double-bluffing), I'm probably going to vote for Ricochet, who I think is in the same boat as me role-wise, and is trying to get lynched himself.
Ricochet, if you don't want to be lynched, quote this post and call me a wolf. It'll bring back fuzzy Night Vale memories.
If you don't do that, I'm voting for you.
- Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:18 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 0] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
We got a bunch of cycles before we start knocking people out of the game for real, so this part of the game is basically arbitrary.
I propose that our priority should be knocking out power roles and folks with tons of whiz-bang abilities, so they can't hurt us in the end game.
I propose that our priority should be knocking out power roles and folks with tons of whiz-bang abilities, so they can't hurt us in the end game.
- Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: [GAME OVER] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
- Replies: 5170
- Views: 133081
Re: [DAY 0] Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3
I am ready for some crazy bonkers shit.