This whole post reminds me of Donald Trump denying and lying his [expletive] off during the debates, and getting away with it scot-free because the moderators and Hillary simply don't have time to fact check each ridiculous statement they say, only glossing over it with a "that's false."
It's 9:40, I've already been banging my head against my computer to the point where I'm beginning to see bone. I honestly wasn't supposed to be posting for hours and hours, I had actual stuff to do this evening, but instead I've been desperately trying to respond to all of the fecal matter people have been throwing at me, all the while, people just keep chucking more fecal matter.
It's like this game has evolved into a massive conveyer belt that everyone but me is defecating onto and expecting me to eat every morsel. Me being the too-easily-invested chump that I am, I keep scarfing it down. But the defecation just keeps coming and coming, and at this point, I've got to slow down or else it's going to cause me physical harm.
Naturally this is when Lorab decides the drops a post which reads like a fucking scavenger hunt. The things that Lorab wants me to quote for her are in orange.
LoRab wrote:insertnamehere wrote:LoRab wrote:So, you still suspect me, but you can't go after me why, exactly?
I have mixed feelings about you. You run hot and cold for me. You aren't my top suspect right now. 
Because it will look bad?
See previous answer. Because you don't think you can get a bandwagon going right now?
You sure do love making me say things I didn't say, don't you?
Why exactly do you think I am bad?
I don't think you're bad. I don't think you're good either. Look up the word ambivalence in the dictionary, why don't you. I'll wait.
This is also the third BS leading question you've asked me, and you've only gotten through four!
Also, you never answered any of my posts where I defended myself. Nor have you answered any of my posts which accused you--other than saying that I suspected you for reasons that had nothing to do with what I suspected you for.
I'm sorry that I haven't responded to every post you've made. If I have time to circle back and address your old suspicions of me after addressing everyone else's new suspicions of me, I'll do so. But I only have so much mafia time in the day, and I already have a ton of BS to sift through.
(1: Time where I said the word "ambivalent") I don't need a dictionary--you hadn't used the word ambivalence before. Nor do I think that ambivalence was your intent--except for the fact that I think you're making a false case against me and know full well that I'm civ--because you're not.
I don't expect a response to every post I make, or every post that mentions you.
Yes, you do. (2: Time where I responded to a quote by Lorab addressing me.) But a response to ANY post addressing you would be nice (prior to this, obviously.
(3: Time when Lorab found my playstyle suspicious and said that she suspected me.)Your posts about me say that I suspected you and had posts about play style, which is patently untrue. Come to think of it, in your responses to Sloonei, that wasn't something you addressed.
(4: It's clear that Lorab's fishing for something, but I have no idea what. Maybe times that I talked about playstyles to Sloonei?)
And even your response to me right here doesn't address the fact that I didn't do what you say I did--nor do I suspect you for the reasons you seem to think I did and do.
(5: Times when Lorab says what I say she did, whatever Lorab seems to think that means.) (6: Times when Lorab suspected me for the reasons I think she did or does?)
With every post, I become less and less hesitant about lynching you.
It must not feel great, being a wrong person all the time.
linkitis: He didn't say that the only reason to suspect you was because you voted for me--nor did anyone else.
(7: Times when Sloonei, or at least I'm assuming "he" is Sloonei, or anyone else found me voting for Lorab suspicious D3.)Again, you are misrepresenting the reasons that people suspect you, trying to paint them as unfounded and silly, when there are many reasons that you are suspicious. That is why you have so many votes.
Wouldn't it be more fun for you if you just admitted you were bad and played with us in the thread for the next 24 hours? Honestly?
Your defenses make you read increasingly mafia, so maybe just admit you're a FEB this game.
linitis 2: Where did I say that anyone's posts had no value. Please quote where I did that.
(8: Times when Lorab stated or implied that my posts were valueless.)And what about my case against you doesn't seem genuine?
I may go through Sloonei's, Lorab's, and my own post history trawling for each and every counterpoint that Lorab must have or else she'll have a [expletive] conniption, but alternatively, fuck that.
Are you aware of any issues with the server, MP? Or is it entirely on my end?
In my eyes, Zebra looks more opportunistic than Mac. Criticizing me for being wishy washy and influencing people in the wrong direction after self-voting and loudly proclaiming her own aggressive ambivalence isn't a good look. Don't get me wrong, I don't think ambivalence isn't some no-fail scumtell, but I consider hypocrisy to be as close as you can get in this game.
