The Syndicate

Kate wrote:Crickets

so uh

anybody see that ludicrous display last night?

Kate wrote:That is correct, I am neither of those roles. And I never meant to imply that I was. Cuz I'm not. I am a civ, though.

And, {Please pardon the interuption} let me take this opportunity to pimp JC's and my game just posted at Rev. http://forum.revolutionmafia.com/viewto ... =23&t=2151

Why no Mad Men?

Dom wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Oh now you're dissilusioned.

As much as it makes me nervous to agree with a crazed indie DH, which is just a recipe for chaos, I agree. You've been flip flopping around, vaguely hinting and claiming things. I'm not getting that great of a read off of them.

DharmaHelper wrote:It seems to me that Dom is ignoring the other civ BTSC possibility in the Bea/SVS roles. Trying to smudge the facts to fit your case there, Dom ol buddy ol pal?

There's also the DH/Aces team. Don't forget them.

You're playing right into him, me thinks.

Nice deflect

Dom wrote:

insertnamehere wrote: I know that Kate is neither of those roles. I didn't check the link. I took what Dom said at face value, and posted accordingly.

Why wouldn't you check the link? How would I know what you know?

I was in a rush, and I skipped clicking the link. I decided to trust you, which obviously was the wrong decision.

"How would I know what you know?" How would I know what you know? As Mongoose said, you've just been making vague claims thinking that we're all in on it, and picking up on everything you say. I know, for a fact that Kate is neither of those roles. That's all I'm allowed to say without breaking the rules.

DharmaHelper wrote:Oh now you're dissilusioned.

As much as it makes me nervous to agree with a crazed indie DH, which is just a recipe for chaos, I agree. You've been flip flopping around, vaguely hinting and claiming things. I'm not getting that great of a read off of them.

DharmaHelper wrote:It seems to me that Dom is ignoring the other civ BTSC possibility in the Bea/SVS roles. Trying to smudge the facts to fit your case there, Dom ol buddy ol pal?

There's also the DH/Aces team. Don't forget them.

juliets wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote: Kate, why did you, at least to me, try to claim the role of DH?

Now I'm really lost. Where did I do that??

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... t=400#wrap

I interpreted this as you claiming either Aces or DH...

Yeah, I'm definitely going to vote for her on Day 4, right now at least.

inh, I'm curious how you made this decision. As has been pointed out twice now, the link Dom gives here leads to the top of a page, not to a quote of Kates, yet you seem to imply what you saw in the quote convinced you to vote for her.

I know that Kate is neither of those roles. I didn't check the link. I took what Dom said at face value, and posted accordingly.

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote:Kate, i think the best way to deal with the DH situation is to just let him be for a day or two. If you're civ, then you might understand. If you're bad, you want to keep wasting lynches.

I'm not sure i understand. But I'm thinking I believe you.

Kate, why did you, at least to me, try to claim the role of DH?

Now I'm really lost. Where did I do that??

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... t=400#wrap

I interpreted this as you claiming either Aces or DH...

Yeah, I'm definitely going to vote for her on Day 4, right now at least.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:Oh! To DH: you seem to understand how lynch mechanics work a lot better than I do. Who do you recommend we vote tomorrow? I think you said juliets and Dom would both be bad ideas to receive any votes?

And side note: I think there's still a veeery outside chance that DH is a New F.E.B. on the Block, specifically Devin or Nev, but that would mean Dom and juliets are probably his teammates, and right now that scenario just seems very far-fetched to me.

INH would be a good vote Tomorrow.

What happened to "Kate is a baddie"?

Kate wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Kate wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:I'm not liking how dismissive and insulting you are. You obviously feel backed up in a corner, and are desperately trying to claw your way out. Not really coming off very civ.

Who me?

Yes, with accusing everyone else of not caring about the game.

Uh. K. I may have been dismissive but I'm to sure how I was offensive. I Was playing hard and there were like 1o posts in a day. It seems like no one is playing... I also fail to see desperation. I basically said fuck it. How s that clawing?

The reason why there isn't many posts is because the host is stuck in the airport, and unable to post. There isn't much to discuss.
I'm playing, if you haven't noticed.
You aren't being offensive, just needlessly aggressive, and that's making me more then a little suspicious of you.

Kate wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:I'm not liking how dismissive and insulting you are. You obviously feel backed up in a corner, and are desperately trying to claw your way out. Not really coming off very civ.

Who me?

Yes, with accusing everyone else of not caring about the game.

I'm not liking how dismissive and insulting you are. You obviously feel backed up in a corner, and are desperately trying to claw your way out. Not really coming off very civ.

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:

timmer wrote:I'm voting for juliets. gleam's last post to me sounded a bit genuine whereas juliets feels off. And her vote for DH, leaving Dom dangling, isn't like her.

votes juliets

Really? You are going to be persuaded by a serial killer? I think it's a really bad idea to vote for jc.

Kate, can you just talk to me more about this post?

I think dh Is a caught baddie. In fact he's not even denying it. Suddenly in the middle of his lynch he announces we should all do this and that. One of those things being vote for jc. Why anyone would assume doing what he says is a good idea is beyond me. So I think voting jc is a bad idea now that he's saying I'm mafia I'm sure he's just trying to mess up the civ game. And I'm surprised you listened to him at all.

That's literally impossible. Both baddie teams tried to NK him. Whether he can be trusted or not, I haven't decided yet.

ok

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Seems to me like Rey was a mafia.

Seems to me that you're Vompatti

ture

juliets wrote:Epig said his name,

DharmaHelper wrote:Epig said Gleam, so there's my vote.

DharmaHelper wrote:The bloc should dissolve in favor of actual discussion at this point.

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote: The bloc should dissolve in favor of actual discussion at this point.

this. actually,

I'm worried that the block is going to be no more. People are slowly but surely realizing that this is a permanent game with baddies and civvies. Blocks aren't going to be a thing this time next Day. If Gleam is civ, they are going to say that you were to blame, and the block will be completely gone. Note that they are all mentioning you by name. Classic mafia tactic, when you go with an assumption, make sure that you clearly state it isn't your idea. So, if it fails, you can't be held accountable.

I'm going to go with the block par-tay on this one.

Seriously, BDH, if you are going to spam the thread, as least do it with hot photos of Evangeline Lily. Jesus.

HEY! BigDamnHero! Spamming the thread as a deadie is MY thing, capeesh?

Found MP

juliets wrote:So those numbers by the L and the N must not be the number of times we can survive that method of death, because the Daisy role had a 1 by L.

That's what I've been saying for the past 3 days.

Dom wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:or Kate

Would we be better to lynch you?

no u

or Kate

Kate wrote:Hey Rey remember the time I won a contest in your game because I sent you a picture of Kate in a lake with photoshopped enormous boobies?!?!

Good times!

pics or gtfo

thellama73 wrote:

juliets wrote:I don't mean to be a squeaky wheel here, but MP went to all the trouble to build these roles, doesn't that mean we should be playing this as a straight game? Or are you guys thinking he wanted us to do it in blocs because that's what happened in INH's game? I just have a slight ping that we are disrespecting his hosting. If you guys are sure though I won't bring it up again.

I'm not interested in what MP wants. Red Room anarchy!

except for MP, he's really quite nice...

I'm going to go with BDH, just to see, if he dies, what happens to him.

To join the Silver Gold Executive Platinum club, you have to send in an application with the standard stuff. Past jobs, any health issues, your sexual histories. And the Silver Gold Executive Platinum Club Official Waiver!

juliets wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:Remember that certain roles have to be lynched more the once to be eliminated. That's what the "D" stood for. We aren't going to get much from lynching BDH.

I'm so confused - I don't see a D, just and L and an N which I think everyone agrees means Lynch and Nightkill. What do you mean that we won't gain much from lynching BDH? Are you just saying we're likely going to have to lynch him again? I didnt notice if any of the roles said L-0 but probably not. If not, I agree we're probably going to have to lynch him at least one more time. I'm a little uneasy that he might be a civv but he obviously wants out and I like him so I'll probably vote him.

Whoops, Freudian slip, I meant "L" for lynch. The role descriptions make me think that the numbers mean how many lives someone has. So the number next to the L is how many times they can be lynched. The one next to the N means how many times they can be NK'd. My guess is that BDH knows that, and has more then one lynch life. So, nothing will happen if he's lynched today. That's why he's being so flippant. He knows it doesn't matter.

Remember that certain roles have to be lynched more the once to be eliminated. That's what the "D" stood for. We aren't going to get much from lynching BDH.

I'm going to reread the thread, and update my long list on this thread, if you haven't already, please read my earlier post on what is going on with this thread.

Looks like Vomps did a fly-by.

So, does anyone have a response to my breakdown of the game?

• Epignosis – Epignosis doesn't take shit from anyone and he can be as aggressive as they come, if he wants to be (which seems to be all of the time). As an English teacher, he emphasizes diction, and he is truly a manipulative master of words. He is married to Elohcin and knows her playstyle incredibly well, making a point to emphasize this fact; as such, he knows which player is assigned to the Elohcin role. As an aggressive, talkative powerhouse, he gathers everybody's attention! Nonetheless, he may be difficult to lynch, as he never lets anyone push him around.

Don't see the word asshole.

I do love how everyone else's role has things like "nicest person", "master mafia player", and I get "somewhat of an enigma".

Also, if MP decides to end the game early, we can all agree that I would of won, right?

WHAT I THINK IS GOING ON

MP is currently in the Twin Peaks section of the game.

TWIN PEAKS MAFIA:

That was a game I hosted. In that mafia, roughly halfway through, a second game was created. It contained players who had already died in the first game. The second game was LMS, and when a player was eliminated from the first game, they would join the second. After a team won the first game, they all were sent to the second game, which was the one that really mattered.

CHAMPIONS MAFIA:

In THIS mafia, things seem eerily familiar, but, there was no poll asking us to vote for three other players to join us. There's also 30 roles. MP seems to be deliberately saying the opposite of his actual answer whenever he is asked a question. If we apply this to the rule list, things become a lot clearer.

1. These are not actually rules. No. They don't perfectly meet the definition of rules. The host always lies.
2. The players from the other thread cannot post here without getting punished. And vice versa!
3. You know that saying that "death comes in threes"? It's true. Especially here.
4. This thread and the other Champions thread are completely related. COMPLETELY.
5. That said, your alignment here has nothing to do with your previous alignment in the other Champions thread.
6. "L" stands for lynch and "N" stands for night. And they certainly indicate things.
7. Because you're out, it means it's over.
8. May the best player win.

ASSUMPTIONS WE CAN MAKE: *may or may not be true*

The three people we vote for in this poll will be eliminated from the main game.
If we accept that there is 30 roles, there must be people joining us.
There is a mafia team, so it's not an LMS game.
Because of #5, we can assume our roles here have nothing to do with the first game.
Because of #3, we can assume that 3 people will be eliminated at a time, also we are voting for 3 people to possibly eliminate from the first game. Lot's of threes.

QUESTIONS MP WOULD SHRUG AT: *questions MP won't answer right now*

Is this going to be a permanent game, or is it just for the Twin Peaks section? (It would be hilarious if this was over in 24 hours, and this was a prank.)
Are the people we vote for in the current poll going to be eliminated from the first game?
Does whoever wins this game win the whole game? Or do they get rezzed?
Are all 30 players, barring modkills, going to join the game? Will they join when they get lynched, or will we vote for them though a poll?
How are the roles being assigned? The reason that in Twin Peaks Mafia, the second game was all LMS, was that if people joined halfway through, it would screw up the civvie baddie ratio. How would MP fix this? Is that why people are being eliminated in threes? So could we assume 1 in three new players is going to be assigned a baddie role? 30 roles, 20 civvies, 10 baddies/indies, it makes sense!
Rule #1, MP lies. What lies did MP sprinkle around this situation, if any?

I for one, cannot wait to see how this plays out. If this is permanent, I'm going to be proud that my game turned out to influence the champions game the most.

Taking bets on how many hours until BDH is rezzed. And welcome to the block party Russ. Take off your shoes, and don't forget to sign the waiver.

Russtifinko wrote:but this might be the single coolest concept I've ever seen in mafia.

Thank you!

Let me translate the rules

1. These are not actually rules. No. They don't perfectly meet the definition of rules. The host always lies.
2. The players from the other thread cannot post here without getting punished. And vice versa!
3. You know that saying that "death comes in threes"? It's true. Especially here.
4. This thread and the other Champions thread are completely related. COMPLETELY.
5. That said, your alignment here has nothing to do with your previous alignment in the other Champions thread.
6. "L" stands for lynch and "N" stands for night. And they certainly indicate things.
7. Because you're out, it means it's over.
8. May the best player win.

So, we can take from #5 that the roles from the first game are irrelevant. Of course, MP could be lying. Who the fuck knows.

Also interesting, #3. So, will we have to lynch 3 people every day? Or will 3 people be killed every night? Both?

Not really sure what to make of #6 also.

Okay, I'm taking this to mean that MP will just respond the opposite to what his actual answer is.

MP, what is 1 + 1?

Well, me, Epig, and Llama are the only ones who have showed up which is a bit odd. Nothing has made me think that the roles from the first game are related to the ones in this game.

I was wondering if MP would go all in, and create a second game within a game, which was the main twist in Twin Peaks mafia. In that mafia, the second game was the one that actually mattered. Do you guys think this is a permanent thing? Will it end once the Twin Peaks period is over? Is this for a rez? Does whoever wins this game, actually win the whole game? I'd ask MP, but I think that I'd get a from him.

I'll go with that, I guess.

I admit, I haven't followed the first game as closely as I would have liked to, what the fuck are you guys talking about?

So, I just want to make a point, we all have a different role. I'm not going to be as insane as before, I can ensure you. I want to apologize for just going crazy in that thread. It was fun, but now I'm ready to actually play and catch baddies. MP, I always thought of myself as a mystery wrapped in an enigma. But other then that, I love my role!