The Syndicate

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Ricochet wrote:This is the first time that I can record llama fully explaining his read on vomps and his reason to vote him, which took some time, but I wholeheartedly applaud. Some parts (the being more on-topic thing) still sound more like "I'll just feeling it this way" obstinate reasoning, especially given others having pointed out the opposite (or nothing that is entirely concludent) from past experience, but other points are actually interesting. I think this deserves a defence from Vompatti.

I think I'm out for the day (midnight here).

I believe that if Llama were to count my posts he would find that most of them are indeed OFF-topic, and, if I survive the lynch, will be increasingly so due to the thread already being tl;dr at this point.

You may embed only 7 quotes within each other.

I'm taking a leaf from llama's mafiabook.

Are you bad k?

I am if you want me to be

hot

I get the feeling you only come here for le sex.

you read me like an open book

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Ricochet wrote:This is the first time that I can record llama fully explaining his read on vomps and his reason to vote him, which took some time, but I wholeheartedly applaud. Some parts (the being more on-topic thing) still sound more like "I'll just feeling it this way" obstinate reasoning, especially given others having pointed out the opposite (or nothing that is entirely concludent) from past experience, but other points are actually interesting. I think this deserves a defence from Vompatti.

I think I'm out for the day (midnight here).

I believe that if Llama were to count my posts he would find that most of them are indeed OFF-topic, and, if I survive the lynch, will be increasingly so due to the thread already being tl;dr at this point.

You may embed only 7 quotes within each other.

I'm taking a leaf from llama's mafiabook.

Are you bad k?

I am if you want me to be

Ricochet wrote:This is the first time that I can record llama fully explaining his read on vomps and his reason to vote him, which took some time, but I wholeheartedly applaud. Some parts (the being more on-topic thing) still sound more like "I'll just feeling it this way" obstinate reasoning, especially given others having pointed out the opposite (or nothing that is entirely concludent) from past experience, but other points are actually interesting. I think this deserves a defence from Vompatti.

I think I'm out for the day (midnight here).

I believe that if Llama were to count my posts he would find that most of them are indeed OFF-topic, and, if I survive the lynch, will be increasingly so due to the thread already being tl;dr at this point.

You may embed only 7 quotes within each other.

Metalmarsh89 wrote: I fear that llama has just set himself up to be the brunt of many funnies.

i read furries

thellama73 wrote:

Made wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Don't bother reading Ulysses. I did it last year and it was deffo not worth it.

linki Made: Lol

It's sitting on my desk right now I'm gonna at least give it a shot, and if it's really dumb, i'm just gonna throw it across the room mid sentence,

That won't be hard, since half the sentences in there are fifty pages long. To me it's one of the most blatant cases of the emperor not having any clothes.

I'm on page 730 and probably haven't understood most of what's going on, which is slightly worrying because I wrongly assumed reading this first would make Finnegans Wake easier.

thellama73 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I'm definitely going to vote for Vompatti today unless someone changes my mind.

That seems slightly obstinate. Could you perhaps elaborate on why do you (still) think him being active was something suspicious and why other member's counterarguments aren't satisfactory for you?

Because I have played many games with him and I think I can read him. I realize this will not be persuasive to other people, but I don't expect him to be so concerned about being lynched unless he has a team to support. I am an obstinate person, but I did say I was open to having my mind changed.

What makes you think I'm concerned about getting lynched?

Voted MM to assure I won't miss the vote.

S~V~S wrote:

Vompatti wrote:Mongoose do you recognize all of the quotes/references in Histoire(s) du cinéma? I used to know someone who had written (or was going to write?) a book that listed and analized all of them but I don't think it ever got published.

Also of the current lynch candidates I'm strongly leaning towards MM as MP always plays like a baddie and Llama currently seems like the epitome of a helpful civ to me.

Why do you think MM is bad? Did I miss this?

He could be either good or bad, but since he already voted for himself it seems he wouldn't mind being lynched so I think it's slightly more fair to vote for him than to randomize. I don't have any particular suspicions towards anyone yet, although I do disagree with the llama votes.

Mongoose do you recognize all of the quotes/references in Histoire(s) du cinéma? I used to know someone who had written (or was going to write?) a book that listed and analized all of them but I don't think it ever got published.

Also of the current lynch candidates I'm strongly leaning towards MM as MP always plays like a baddie and Llama currently seems like the epitome of a helpful civ to me.

Mongoose wrote:FYI - I no longer need a replacement. Thanks!

Who is it and who is it replacing? This information is highly relevant to the vote.

Is my mafia clock correct if it says I can still sleep for 18-19 hours before the lynch, q.m.

Lizzy wrote:I'm drunk again and got in fro me loan's

omg how can you vote durnk?! do you think this is some kind of a game?!?!

Llama should remember I was also a relatively active civilian in the relatively recent occult mafia for the very same reason.

If I don't get lynched today I promise to pretend to be silenced tomorrow.

Frankly I'm suspicious of myself myself.

gmomogmogogmogmmogmogom itt'zz teh lizz

Mongoose wrote:I'm staying home sick from work today.

Enjoy yourselves, and try not to trash the place.

i understand, it would make me sick too

thellama73 wrote:

sabie12 wrote:Gahhhhh so hard to chooooose!!!! I guess I am a big fan of Lord of the Rings so I'll go with good ol' Peter Jackson but it was a tough choice.

Have you seen Dead Alive? It is his best work. (hi Sabie!)

ture

i don't know who tyler perry is butt i'm assuming the list is mostly recent/popular american cinema flavoured in order not to intimidate the plebs?

i used to go to the moveis three (3) tiems a wweek butt then they closed all the ddecent cinemas

Roxy wrote:Bump

<3

A Person wrote:

Vompatti wrote:Since polls are part of the game I find all discussion related to polls to also be related to the game regardless of how relevant this particular poll is to the rest of the game.

how do you know how relevant what is said is to the game q.m.

i don't k butt i was once told not to post the word "bump" in a regular colour so i'm assuming everything other than seemingly inductive speculative statements such as "Because of the way A voted in day X poll I believe B is likely to be in the mafia" is widely considered irrelevant by default.

which is silly because mafia is basically random anyway

Ricochet wrote:von Trier's Melancholia opened me to Wagner. No joke. Ironically, though, most wagnerians I've read actually despise his (mis)use of Wagner in that movie. I finally listened to the whole Tristan und Isolde after seeing the movie and I was instantly transfixed. Melancholia, incidentally, is also the type of movie that's totally bonkers, but in a rather good way.

Also, I'm getting confused why some are writing in normal color and others in green on basically the same subject, i.e. talking about movies.

because it's sort of non-game related but also sort of on topic k

Roxy wrote:I <3 Jean-Luc Picard too Vomps!

Oh wait - nevermind

i prefer shatner

Vompatti wrote:

Mongoose wrote:

Vompatti wrote:he's k but not in my personal top 100

What IS your personal top 100?

i might make one k

not in a completely non-random order:

andrei tarkovsky
jean-luc godard
wim wenders
jean eustache
jean vigo
walerian borowczyk
robert bresson
luis bunuel
akira kurosawa
rainer werner fassbinder
john cassavetes
aki kaurismäki
emir kusturica
leos carax
pier paolo pasolini
maya deren
marco ferreri
werner herzog
kenneth anger
gabor body
tommy wiseau
jean cocteau
f. w. murnau
alain resnais
carl theodor dreyer
francois truffaut
alain corneau
frank henenlotter
dusan makavejev
jim jarmusch
krzysztof kieslowski
jean-pierre melville
masaki kobayashi
lucio fulci
rene clair
louis malle
eric rohmer
buster keaton
jan svankmajer
victor sjöström
irving lerner
roman polanski
milos forman
sergio leone
e. elias merhige
michael haneke
david cronenberg
alain robbe-grillet
volker schlöndorff
michelangelo antonioni
lars von trier
hans richter
bela tarr
jean rollin
russ meyer
jean-jacques beineix
robin hardy
david lynch
sergio corbucci
richard brooks
stanley kubrick
otto muehl
sergei eisenstein
ed wood
stuart gordon
alexander dovzhenko
leonard kastle
john ford
matti ijäs
dario argento
francesco rosi
jean renoir
mario bava
teuvo tulio
john hillcoat
luchino visconti
henri-georges clouzot
sam peckinpah
fritz lang
john huston
alexander sokurov
takashi miike
umberto lenzi
orson welles
mikko niskanen
charlie chaplin
federico fellini
martin scorsese
ingmar bergman
fatih akin
michel gondry
robert altman
jacques rivette
ken russell
luc besson
peter greenaway
bernardo bertolucci
ridley scott
tim burton
peter weir

Mongoose wrote:

Vompatti wrote:he's k but not in my personal top 100

What IS your personal top 100?

i might make one k

he's k but not in my personal top 100

tarkovsky k