Hahahaha, Indi this thread began because of an all out war we had in discord about what constitutes a sandwich. I've never laughed so hard!
Search found 12 matches
Return to “The Great Sandwich Debate”
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 8:28 am
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:31 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
Doctor of Sandwich EtymologySloonei wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:03 pmWhat were the author’s sandwich credentials?juliets wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:00 amI actually recently read an article that said a sandwich - not ice cream sandwich or any other non-conventional sandwich - must have two pieces of bread so I rest my case.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:25 am For dinner last night, I was very lazy and only had some weird food bits lying around. I spread peanut butter over a flour tortilla and ate it.
Sandwich?
- Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:00 am
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
I actually recently read an article that said a sandwich - not ice cream sandwich or any other non-conventional sandwich - must have two pieces of bread so I rest my case.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:25 am For dinner last night, I was very lazy and only had some weird food bits lying around. I spread peanut butter over a flour tortilla and ate it.
Sandwich?
- Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:15 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
oh, maybe your hamburger buns are different - mine are always detached.Quin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:00 pm'mostly separate' would be inclusive of rolls. They consider burgers a sandwich, so.juliets wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:46 amI don't think it does @Quin because their first rule is:Quin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:24 pmgood article except it says that a roll is a sandwich which it absolutely is notjuliets wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:34 pm Ok, I just found this article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainme ... ch/414352/
To qualify as “a sandwich,” a given food product must, structurally, consist of two (2) exterior pieces that are either separate or mostly separate;
Isn't your roll attached?
- Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:46 am
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
I don't think it does [mention]Quin[/mention] because their first rule is:Quin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:24 pmgood article except it says that a roll is a sandwich which it absolutely is notjuliets wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:34 pm Ok, I just found this article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainme ... ch/414352/
To qualify as “a sandwich,” a given food product must, structurally, consist of two (2) exterior pieces that are either separate or mostly separate;
Isn't your roll attached?
- Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:34 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
- Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:49 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
That is truly one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen.
- Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:06 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
Oh god I just found it: The Double Down contains "bacon, two different kinds of melted cheese, the Colonel's secret sauce... pinched in between two pieces of Original Recipe chicken fillets." See even they don't call it a sandwich - "pinched between".
- Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:55 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
What the heck is a KFC double down?
- Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:39 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
I like the category pseudo sandwiches because I can put things that aren't between bread in that category. Also open faced sandwiches would go there.
- Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:36 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
I would otherwise be a structural purist, ingredient neutral but the chart defines bread as "bread/baked product" and I accept only bread per the definition of sandwich, thus I am other.
- Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:51 pm
- Forum: The Speakeasy
- Topic: The Great Sandwich Debate
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8131
Re: The Great Sandwich Debate
I think it is important that some definitions be presented otherwise people won't understand why we're talking about leavened bread, even though JJJ doesn't want to talk about definitions.
First a sandwich, from the oed: An item of food consisting of two pieces of bread with a filling between them, eaten as a light meal. 'a ham sandwich'
Then bread, also from the oed: Food made of flour, water, and yeast mixed together and baked. Merriam Webster says "leavening agent" instead of yeast.
So all my answers come from those definitions, specifically two pieces of bread and bread being made with a leavening agent.
First a sandwich, from the oed: An item of food consisting of two pieces of bread with a filling between them, eaten as a light meal. 'a ham sandwich'
Then bread, also from the oed: Food made of flour, water, and yeast mixed together and baked. Merriam Webster says "leavening agent" instead of yeast.
So all my answers come from those definitions, specifically two pieces of bread and bread being made with a leavening agent.