The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

DH was annoyed. He also expressed dissatisfaction with llama not refuting speculation. In a later post, DH said he would pull some quotes after his reread, but he did not do this. He spent the rest of the time making fun of me.

Well, that's certainly a well put lie.

I pulled a quote, as I promised I would. I didn't pull every single quote, but I didn't need to.

DH, who was this a quote from? On phone and I can't find it. Thanks

Linki, Magenta can gain BTS with them, so they would seem to have BTS

Dharma also raised some flags with how I never really saw anything all that contributive from her while shes doing a fair deal of joking/mocking, that post where she mocked Epig's use of math is what set off that flag the most.

DH was annoyed. He also expressed dissatisfaction with llama not refuting speculation. In a later post, DH said he would pull some quotes after his reread, but he did not do this. He spent the rest of the time making fun of me.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Whoevers curse that is, that curse sucks.

Not in like a "Daw man that would suck to have that curse" way. In a "The quality of that curse is terrible" way.

What curse? I didn't know anyone was cursed.

If you are talking about the one I used on Epignosis in the other game, my role allowed me to pick the curse of my choice.

I even cursed myself to post a minimum of 50 posts in one day to avoid being silenced.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Thanks SVS for pointing that out about roxy. I feel like lynching Roxy is a bad idea I also feel liike it would be cheating if people try and lynch her when she can't speak in the thread.

S~V~S wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.

Turnip Head wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.

He was Professor X, a civilian.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.

For some reason, people thought my not being interested in anything besides being King of the Morlocks was somehow sinister and they lynched me for it.

History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of man.

This was how the Llama/X Men thing started, DH. Not exactly "leading a train". YOU started that train, iirc. After this I made two posts where I was wishy washy. Like how Llama does this to amuse himself when he has no BTS, which does not mean much in this game. Personally he looked exactly like he did in that game to me. But it is possible as well that he was doing it on purpose as some thought, which is pretty much all I said about the situation.

Don;t be blaming me for this one, the five people who voted him at the end, when Epi was clearly in the lead, are where the fingers should be pointing (not even at you, tbh). If finger pointing needs to be done.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:@ Long Con. Well then let's hope there is a rezz for him this time around too.

I do recall the situation in that game. Actually, I don't think anyone would have drawn any comparisons if llama hadn't specifically said that he wanted to be King of the Morlocks again. In hindsight, it seems clear that he was just being funny.

timmer wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Timmer I already did the math on an Epi lynch.

LOL yes you did. Maybe consider my numbers as a backup for your own very clearly stronger ones!

Epignosis wrote:I always fret the details, like, why did I take the votes I did? Why did llama? People are more eager to defend low-posters than the ones who make shit interesting. I don't get it. It's the Syndicate Syndrome.

Now I can guess why two people may have voted for me, but some of those votes on me are horseshit attempts to get me out of the way. Right S~V~S? You were looking for any reason to vote for me, and I can sniff it out when you are.

And timmer? Welcome. Glad you could take the burden off my wife. There's a good pal. I'm sorry you probably did not get an Old Rogue role, and, since you didn't vote to save llama, you didn't get a detective role.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry DH I was busy today but I willl be around tonight if you would like me to explain my vote some more.

Turnip Head wrote:

reywaS wrote:I've voted for DharmaHelper. It's a random placeholder at the moment. Maybe I can find a reason to vote someone else in the next 18 minutes.

This was a weird post from rey. It was made exactly 1 hour and 18 minutes before lynch deadline, so I think Rey was one hour off on when he thought it ended. But he didn't come back to change his vote or explain it in the next 18 minutes all the same

Epignosis wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I voted epi. I agree with what everyone is saying.

How is that even possible?

Epignosis wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:No no, I did the math you guys.

Ohm doesn't want to have children, does he?

Epignosis wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I know my role, and I assume everyone here knows theirs as well (Depending on whether or not Made has opened his PM yet.)

So, I know Epi is not my role.

If you are a civvie or a non-baddie, you also know that Epi is not that role as well.

It is then mathematically 100% certain that Epi is a baddie, since he can't be my role and (see above) he can't be any of your roles.

DharmaHelper wrote:That is literally the first and last time I will address anything Epignosis related.

You lying sack.

Epignosis wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Epi, has anything other than Elo caught your eye so far?

There's always something about Eloh that catches my eye. I'd not have married her otherwise.

In context of this, though? No. Nothing else.

Black Rock wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:Did Epig speak about Eloh's likely behaviour when she has potential for BTSC? My recollection is that he's really pushing how unlikely it is that she's one of those Old Rogues, while simultaneously pushing the idea that she's a New Rogue... but those roles have a very similar potential for BTSC.

And there seems to be seven roles that have no potential for BTSC, and four of them are ones we don't want to lynch.

And it's probably not worth mentioning that EVERYONE has potential for BTSC via the Map, since that's kind of random and fleeting for the most part.

I've said that I don't think she's read any of the role descriptions but her own.

As a fellow Mafia wife I don't like your assumptions here. Maybe she's playing it cool. LC can't always read me and certainly couldn't make assumptions this early in a game. Quite possibly she's out playing you here.

For future reference, I am not defending Eloh here, I'm just sticking it to the man.

She's not my Mafia wife. That would be DharmaHelper.

blindfaeth wrote:

Made wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:

ika wrote:Picked mine, tell me when day 1 begins and we can actually do stuff.

We can do stuff now. Namely, day 0 is a period of time we can use to get a feel for players before day 1 so were less likely to mislynch. You're not trying to hide are you?

Regardless, welcome to our forum. Did you have a reason for voting L?

Hello friend, I don't think we've met before!


Oh, Comic nerd people, any clue what the letters might mean? How many Gems are there? 5? could that possibly be what the poll determines?

Hello!

Personally, I like the inferred theory from LC that the voted letter may be revealed to us from the secrets in roles. Ie, if you believe that theory, you don't want to vote for the less commonly occurring letters in the alphabet.

Also, did you see anything interesting in the roles to point out, since that was your self-assigned task from your first post?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:Did you want to?

I don't think he's a civvie. I don't like his whole Day 0 schtick, it got annoying very quickly. Also, I noticed he didn't berate anyone for any logical fallacies throughout the entire duration of Day 0. People were jumping to conclusions all over the place and Llama did not voice any opposition to it.

To be fair, he spent most of his Day 0 talking about monkeys and in OT banter about the game's theme in a joking manner. Like most people did.

Which logical fallacies are you referring to?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:DH, how do you feel about llama now?

Linki: I stand corrected.

Epignosis wrote:Since votes are changeable, I'm putting this here for future reference:


Epignosis
3
Metalmarsh89 (1), blindfaeth (5), S~V~S (6)
43%

thellama73 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I AM THE MAP

What happens if we lynch the map?

fingersplints wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

llama seems crazy even for him. My only thoughts about that is he would probably be less likely to be this out there if he had bts and someone else to consider.

What's your point here? As far as I'm aware BTSC is not in full swing across the board quite yet.

I thought my point was pretty clear. He seems to be drawing a lot of attention to himself. I think he would be less likely to do so if he had btsc or potential btsc partners to worry about. Because it isn't in full swing yet doesn't mean that all those with the potential to gain btsc won't worry about their partners.

llama seems crazy even for him. My only thoughts about that is he would probably be less likely to be this out there if he had bts and someone else to consider.

blindfaeth wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:Did you want to?

I don't think he's a civvie. I don't like his whole Day 0 schtick, it got annoying very quickly. Also, I noticed he didn't berate anyone for any logical fallacies throughout the entire duration of Day 0. People were jumping to conclusions all over the place and Llama did not voice any opposition to it.

I don't know that I've ever seen llama voice opposition to logical fallacies? Can you give examples?

Spacedaisy wrote:Did you want to?

Spacedaisy wrote:DH, did you say why llama?

Epignosis wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

After game after game of people depending on me to read Eloh for them, I decided I would quit doing it. It got to the point that my alignment was predicated on Eloh's, and that if I was ever wrong about her, I must be bad. Earlier on I had no qualms about it, but the novelty has worn off, and as I said, I think Elohcin is a better player now. By now, if she has a team made up of certain people, they might devise a way to exploit my read of her. It doesn't mean I won't notice certain things, but, as I said, I'm retiring as the Elohcin expert because the pressure is annoying, prone to abuse, and at times, unfair. I figured that if I stopped doing it, people would quit asking me about it.

And...so that means I'm never going to try to get her lynched ever?

You wouldn't happen to have a vested interest in keeping someone who probably isn't an old rogue around, would you?

After game after game of people depending on me to read Eloh for them, I decided I would quit doing it. It got to the point that my alignment was predicated on Eloh's, and that if I was ever wrong about her, I must be bad. Earlier on I had no qualms about it, but the novelty has worn off, and as I said, I think Elohcin is a better player now. By now, if she has a team made up of certain people, they might devise a way to exploit my read of her. It doesn't mean I won't notice certain things, but, as I said, I'm retiring as the Elohcin expert because the pressure is annoying, prone to abuse, and at times, unfair. I figured that if I stopped doing it, people would quit asking me about it.

Epignosis wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:I don't think I've ever seen Epi call Elo out this early in the game. It has my attention. She's said two words so far. Which word did you find more suspicious, Epi?

All the ones she didn't say.

She strikes me as disinterested. She is never disinterested if she has BTSC. That means she isn't Captain Cold or Heat Wave. The possibility of BTSC would also keep her interested, so she isn't Golden Glider or Blacksmith. That means if she is an old rogue, she has to be Mirror Master, Weather Wizard, or The Trickster.

And if any of you are those roles, then it reduces her chances of being an old rogue even further for you.

reywaS wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

reywaS wrote:So so sorry. Not use to mafia been so long since I played. I'm here now. Won't miss anything else

Hi reywaS. Convince me why I shouldn't lynch you without using the letter "e", please.

You shouldn't lynch this guy cuz you don't got anything to cast a voto on.

Epignosis wrote:I voted L.

Suguru Shimura - Epignosis