The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:Golden, I am tired of reproducing your images. Find another engine, or maybe someone else who wants me dead can do it.

I am going to revert to my prior days stance.

If all you guys wanna do is lynch me and not the baddies, let's do it. It will be awesome rubbing this in peoples noses. DH seems to have a history of misjudging me in Arkham games. I am up for it.

S~V~S wrote:

Offhand,no. Are you saying you willonly do what you have done before?

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:It's mad late and I promise I'll do the legwork of this at some point but check this shit out:

I bet if we cross reference the list of players who voted to go to locations other than the ones sabie went to with the list of say, Mac or Sprityo or w/e voter, we will end up with a pretty meaty case for her teammate(s).

I have not listened toany of them since the second. I know little about this theme, and they pretty much went over my head.

DharmaHelper wrote:It's mad late and I promise I'll do the legwork of this at some point but check this shit out:

I bet if we cross reference the list of players who voted to go to locations other than the ones sabie went to with the list of say, Mac or Sprityo or w/e voter, we will end up with a pretty meaty case for her teammate(s).

S~V~S wrote:Good Luck with that

You, Golden & Glorfindel, I presume?

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant moreso my points not Goldens.

Anyones points linking me to Sabie are untrue. Because I was not linked to Sabie. Since this is a game of hidden knowledge, it is easy to take almost any supposition and find a way to find evidence for it. But That does not make the case correct. Other people apparently judged it based on the content, and as the person who knows the truth of it, I judged it based on that truth.

And there is no truth in it. And that is really all I can say about it. I can go through it point by point and say "Nope" to all of them if you like.

Typhoony wrote:Hello nubs.
I am okay with a Mac, Glor or Golden vote from the top of my head.

S~V~S wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:OK, thanks for the consideration of allowing me to address my technical issues. I'm afraid Dom that I could not reply to you earlier. My keyboard gave up the ghost and would only work intermittently and it took ages to type anything. I was at work on a break when I sent that last message and as much as I'd have wanted to reply to you, it simply wasn't going to happen - I appreciate your patience.

Basically, I agree with what's been said already - the well of newer players being Mafia has dried up. On the law of averages, you'd have to assume that there are one or two more experienced players involved as part of the Mafia families.

On that note, some time ago I was playing a Mafia game where (as Town) I'd concocted this theory on the guilt of one of my fellow players based on their use of certain punctuation in their posts. I was absolutely convinced of their guilt and put my case to the rest of the players in that game. Needless to say I got laughed out of town and rightly so, I was completely wrong. Now please don't misunderstand me here - I fully respect the ability of each and everyone of you, my fellow players and in particular S-V-S. I know we had that run-in early on over my post that you thought was too carefully worded. I think that case was pretty thin (more so than the one I described above) and what's more, it was wrong.

I found your argument with Golden interesting and for better or worse, I think his judgement is pretty good from all accounts (after all, you don't win all those Socky's for nothing). And then, in the dying shadows of dawn, you started accusing me again. You said that you would vote for me because I am not direct in answering questions - and that may be true. I do the best I can to contribute fully and respect each and everyone of you in the face (sometimes) of some considerable provocation. You would do well not to misjudge me for that.

In terms of my vote right now, I think it will be S-V-S. I have an open mind and if someone comes up with a better case before tomorrow morning, I'll happily consider it.

Um hm. Golden has been defending you most of the game on a more or less overt level.

Can you tell me why you are going to vote for me without quoting his case? Or paraphrasing it?

@GLORFINDEL~

I see you were here long enough to reply to Dom, can you please reply to me?

Thanks

MacDougall wrote:Nah you know what I ain't about to punk Dharma like that. I've got nothing on him except deduction and gut. He's aight.

Dom wrote:So you agree with Mac on that front?

Dom wrote:DH, who do you wanna lynch today?

MacDougall wrote:There's got to be a couple of grizzled mafia vets left after the lurkpurge. Surely Epi has teamed the kids up with vets.

I say we lynch DharmaHelper.

Enrique wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Yeah literally one of the two factions the mafia need to kill are the opposite mafia like why wouldn't they kill each other lmao

Because the civs who outnumber them many times are doing a fine job of getting rid of the opposite teams since, you know, that's what we use the thread for?

Dom wrote:RIP MM


Guys, look at the title of teh poll.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:Also, can anyone shed any light on the acronym A.S.S may represent?

Why

Glorfindel wrote:Also, can anyone shed any light on the acronym A.S.S may represent?

Epignosis wrote:TheFloyd73 was working (working, Jesus, it kills me to even use that verb) for Maroni, in case the post wasn't plain.

Enrique wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Enrique wrote:@Hosts: If a Mafia team is killed off, does the other start killing every night?

No. That's always been a terrible policy. If you eliminate a kill, you eliminate a kill.

Maybe.

I didn't mean that. I meant like, the Don of the same family should inherit it.

Epignosis wrote:

Enrique wrote:@Hosts: If a Mafia team is killed off, does the other start killing every night?

No. That's always been a terrible policy. If you eliminate a kill, you eliminate a kill.

Maybe.

Golden wrote:It doesn't matter how many times SVS pulls the wool over everyones eyes when bad, they will still let her do it again and again. She is amazing like that.

It reminds me of recruitment mafia, where the only thing that happened from chasing SVS was getting myself lynched, even though I was fine and she was baddie don.

Golden wrote:

S~V~S wrote:You have never seen a case made against you that was so wrong that it amused you?

What is 'SO wrong' about my case? Why is it more wrong than any other case, so wrong that its amusing?

Matt wrote:Early on in the comics, Harvey Bullock was a crooked cop

Sorsha wrote:So last I checked there was some cross referencing of sabies night locations to other players. Anything come of that?

Turnip Head wrote:Maybe.

Golden wrote:

Dom wrote:

Golden wrote:

Dom wrote:

Golden wrote:Dom said he was reminded that SVS killed inactives when bad. I reminded him of a game he hosted where that didn't happen.

That's literally all that it was, until you and Enrique expressly questioned it.

....what?

She literally didn't have a chance to kill in that game. She was lynched Day 1. Why are you presenting misleading evidence?

Go read your own game, Dom. SVS convinced me and ninja to vote with her on the last day to ensure her mafia team won the game, after having plenty of opportunities to kill.

Did she replace back in? I'm sorry, but I remember her being your partner.

Yes, I lynched her accidentally on day 1, and then she subbed back into a baddie team, and was their sole survivor who won them the game.

MacDougall wrote:Based on GTH majorities.

Bubbles, Bullzeye, Enrique, Juliets, Mac, MP and Turnip Head all = Good

DH, SVS and Floyd = Bad

The rest there was no clear lean one way or the other.