The Syndicate

In fact, don't even bother to go and check if I've brought Sorsha up at all, because I just did and spoiler alert I totally fucking did. As early as Day 3, I discussed her comments about Golden's culpability in the Fuzz lynch.

So when Wilgy says I "only" discussed Sorsha by agreeing with Jay via clap emojis, he's full of shit.

When he says all my interactions with Draco have been jokey and dismissive, he's full of shit.

Why is he going through all this "effort"*** to present complete fallacies to the thread? Could it have anything to do with Sorsha and him being teammates up shit creeek without a paddle?

Thank you this has been "DharmaHelper brings the civs back from the brink of death and finally wins a GoC"

Buckle up buttercup.

DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Why are people not getting that there are two teams lmao.

There have always been two GOC Mafia teams

A2 was mafia and died N1. Two teams.
DH your scumdoodlyness is leaking. I just looked at your ISO comparing Drac and Sorsha.

You mention Sorsha as bad early game with clapping and nothing else quoting a JJJ read.

You mention Drac, always jokingly or not serious. Even when I ask you your thoughts on him, you go "meh yellow" and move on. When he votes for you, your reaction isn't that of a civ afraid of a lynch, it's neutral.

DH you aren't saving your temmie here. I'll look over Drac now and see if these connections hold true on his end.

I'm going to award you bonus points because I'm fairly certain this isn't just untrue, but it's also fucking irrelevant. Beside the fact that I'm sure I've had at least one interaction with Sorsha before this, every point I've made against Sorsha recently is relevant recently. My Time travel game isn't even out of development. I'm not even sure what you're point here is man. Stuff happens between days. Sorsha hadn't made her completely obvious slip yet. When she did, I called her on it. Go figure.

Again, completely untrue m8. I've mentioned several times how uneasy his buddying has made me, and I've been the one to point out how it completely contradicts his earlier engagement with me.

Did you actually read any of my posts before making this one? Did you read YOUR OWN POST before making it?

Hot damn son. You and Sorsha got straight up ruffled I guess. But wait, you're not defending Sorsha

Because you guys aren't teammates

And that wasn't blatant distancing she tried to pull

I just double checked. Two teams of four both times. Why is everyone making this more complicated than it has to be?

@Dr Wilgy, I'll demolish your bullshit in a second, but that was really fucking sloppy.

Ricochet wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Why are people not getting that there are two teams lmao.

There have always been two GOC Mafia teams

A2 was mafia and died N1. Two teams.
Zebra, the one killed by Fuzz the vigi = two teams? Tell me more.

DharmaHelper wrote:Not to mention simple math, if there was just one team it would have to be 7-8 players, am I wrong? Check the poll, if that's the case and the only mafia to have died are LoRab and A2, we fucking lose.
If that's true, we're just out of luck, because the mafia teams have done shit to remove opposition instead of civ fodder. (Ironically, this reminds me of my first game ever, in which we only managed to clip one baddie via NK in the entire game. The civs got dunked on, of course.)

DharmaHelper wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Not to mention simple math, if there was just one team it would have to be 7-8 players, am I wrong? Check the poll, if that's the case and the only mafia to have died are LoRab and A2, we fucking lose.
By that I mean at best it would be 6 mafia Right now to 5 non mafia. Mafia would have a voting majority, no point in holding lynches anymore.
You're pushing the maximum of 8 mafia. If there are less than that, we're still one or two Days away from being done for.

Why does it have to be 8? Why not 6 in two teams? Why not 7 max in one team?

I'm just going off the model of the two other GOC's. As I remember, it was 2 teams of 4 both times?

DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Why are people not getting that there are two teams lmao.

There have always been two GOC Mafia teams

A2 was mafia and died N1. Two teams.
DH your scumdoodlyness is leaking. I just looked at your ISO comparing Drac and Sorsha.

You mention Sorsha as bad early game with clapping and nothing else quoting a JJJ read.

You mention Drac, always jokingly or not serious. Even when I ask you your thoughts on him, you go "meh yellow" and move on. When he votes for you, your reaction isn't that of a civ afraid of a lynch, it's neutral.

DH you aren't saving your temmie here. I'll look over Drac now and see if these connections hold true on his end.

Are you serious? That is a blatant mischaracterization of literally everything.

DharmaHelper wrote:Not to mention simple math, if there was just one team it would have to be 7-8 players, am I wrong? Check the poll, if that's the case and the only mafia to have died are LoRab and A2, we fucking lose.

By that I mean at best it would be 6 mafia Right now to 5 non mafia. Mafia would have a voting majority, no point in holding lynches anymore.

Not to mention simple math, if there was just one team it would have to be 7-8 players, am I wrong? Check the poll, if that's the case and the only mafia to have died are LoRab and A2, we fucking lose.

Why are people not getting that there are two teams lmao.

There have always been two GOC Mafia teams

A2 was mafia and died N1. Two teams.

Also as a side note, apparently "iterate" means to perform or utter repeatedly. So is the word "reiterate" redundant?

MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:What has FZ done exactly to make you feel she is a civ since you had a scum read of her?

Why are you so sure that Marsh is telling the truth about being independent, when his last minute vote shenanigans indicate his care factor is far greater than he is leading on?
Most people seem to think FZ is civ. Am I wrong? For me it comes down to understanding that because I disagree with her doesn't mean she's bad.

I believe MM.
No I think most people who have shared their opinion are civ reading FZ but she's coasted on that power for a while now. She's stopped making waves entirely. Earlier though you were right after her as mafia weren't you? I'm not sure that it's a civvie mentality to just stop going after someone because other people have public civ reads on them. What would you say to Sorsha is Sorsha had been going after FZ earlier in the game only to say what you just said?

I dunno what to tell you. Reads change, and I'm not above considering my initial reads are misguided. If FZ pricks my ears up again I'll revisit her as a suspect but I just don't have enough to go on right now. And if Sorsha had said what I said I wouldn't hold it against her. Everything I've already iterated about my suspicion of Sorsha on the other hand I do hold against her.

MacDougall wrote:What has FZ done exactly to make you feel she is a civ since you had a scum read of her?

Why are you so sure that Marsh is telling the truth about being independent, when his last minute vote shenanigans indicate his care factor is far greater than he is leading on?

Most people seem to think FZ is civ. Am I wrong? For me it comes down to understanding that because I disagree with her doesn't mean she's bad.

I believe MM.

Also RE: my reputation, I'd like to start getting a reputation of being a civ that wins games thanks pls lets go.

MacDougall wrote:@DH I get you are taking initiative and if you are civ then it's timely as fuck ... but your reputation does come before you and what you are doing right now doesn't feel right. This sorsha case seems reckless and ill-conceived. Especially when there are players like FZ, Wilgy and Metalmarsh who you had documented scum reads on from much earlier in the game. If it was mafia play though ... that'd be quite inspired and befitting of your reputation.

@Wilgy then vote Draco.

I don't think it's ill conceived at all. FZ I think is generally agreed as being a civ read overall at this point, and MM is neutral (i.e lynching him does nothing to tick down mafia numbers, which we fucking need ASAP). Wilgy I'll grant you I do still suspect, but of the two, Sorsha is the stronger read and her flip could effect Wilgy's stance.

Does that make sense?

MacDougall wrote:This whole sorsha movement seems very contrived. I don't like how she has inherited all the assurety of the Wilgy wagon and I appear to be the only one struggling to be totally convinced of it. It's like you're just quoting her posts and calling them bad without thinking about it. That interaction with her and Wilgy doesn't sound like scum talking to scum to me and I thought her "saving" Wilgy was central to the case against her.

Scumslips and panic? Why wouldn't she be panicking as a civ? We're just about fucked here and if she is a civ you are pushing a crucial perhaps game ending mislynch. Your indiscriminate play right now is bugging me big time DH. You have Draconus who you said yourself you were wary of him buddying you and Metalmarsh who for the lions share of the game you were raining hell down on, jump immediately on it while cackling and hi-fiving each other.

Aren't you a little bit worried you're wrong here? You seem way to sure of yourself. I am nervous as fuck that we're about to lose.

I'm nervous we're about to lose as well. I'm quite tired of laying in wait and watching civs get lynched. I see before me a opportunity to turn the tide and I'm taking it, whether that bugs you or not.

MM's vote doesn't concern me. He's not mafia. Draconus' hardcore buddying of me is noteworthy, but while it does raise him in terms of suspicion it doesn't diminish the suspicion I have of Sorsha.

The seven stages of a trapped baddie

MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Yo I swear once I sweep these mafia I'm gonna be the new supatown
Who aside from Wilgy and Sorsha are Mafia?

Ask again later.

Yo I swear once I sweep these mafia I'm gonna be the new supatown

Is this you also agreeing DH?

That's me pontificating that a baddie Boomslang on the opposite team of Long Con would fuck him over if he thought Long Con was bad.

Check this post, Sorsha sounds like she knows this lynch isn't going to end well. It also sounds like a pretty nifty out/excuse she can draw back to later.

Sorsha wrote:I voted boomslang... This is a messed up lynch

Then she's super sad about Boom's flip, may he RIP in the arms of the angels.

Sorsha wrote:Ugh.. Sorry boom

But then he's suddenly a seemer and can fuck off lol

Sorsha wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:As a side note, Boomslang didn't have a BTSC checker role, so whatever the fuck he was doing to Long Con was doubly hilarious.
Or he want actually the role he flipped as

Sorsha wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Wilgy confirmed mafia RIP
Why does this confirm me as mafia DH?

Also... Boomslang why?
M
Because it does. RIP.

Pretty massive fucking coincidence the Boomtrain came out of nowhere to save ya aint it RIP tell your team I said RIP
DH, you realize what you are saying don't you? If the boomtrain is a thing, then it consisted of two players trying to lynch a baddie and survive, Sorsha, and someone who left his vote there for a half day.
Wow... I believed you were civ and tried to help you and now you're going to try to flip this on me?

The tone of this post is so fake you could stuff it in a Hollywood Starlet's boobs, butt, and face. Wilgy wasn't flipping anything on anyone. Panicked post is uber panicked.

Sorsha wrote:So... I'm not bad you guys. I believed wilgy was good and I thought mm was telling the truth about being neutral. I still think something weird is up with booms flip, even if I'm wrong about it and that was his role it doesn't make me bad, just wrong about him. I've been wrong about a lot of players this game and none of you civs can say that you haven't been either. We have lynched one baddie, at least I was right about that one

Today I'm not so sure about wilgy or mm.... the way wilgy pounced on the boom vote after me and then turned on me after the lynch I had just tried helping him in makes me feel like trusting him was wrong. If he wanted to save himself he could have just kept his vote on mm. I'll have to go back and see what his reasoning was for switching there.

More panic, this time in the form of a poorly composed "don't lynch me ok" post. Also the language slip of "all you civs".

Signed sealed delivered RIPSYWB

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think that JaggedJimmyJay and Dom were killed by the same baddie team.

Linki: what's a sywb?

SINCE
YOU
WERE
BAD

Sywb

Sorsha wrote:I'm not bad so... I'll take your RIP but you can keep the sywb part. And I'm not panicky nor do I care if I get lynched, I'd just like to see the civs win and I can help with that so I'd like to not get lynched.

Panicked as fuck.

MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:RIP Niju

Taking a look and her only suspicion that isn't now dead seemed to be on Wilgous. Put another checkmark in the Wilgy is bad column.
So is Wilgy in a different position than your previous assessment?
I have to consider that Wilgy misled LC yeah.

Points for Wilgy:

LC and myself weren't/aren't night killed
LC didn't come out seriously against him at any stage
Could have saved Lorab

Points against him:

See thread.

As days go by and we aren't nailing bad guys I obviously need to question whether he just kept LC alive to cast doubt on his alignment.

Mass linki:

That is some pile up on sorsha out of the blocks. I'm worried that we might be at end game and the scum are trying to railroad an easy mislynch here. If there is one scum team that means there's what? Anywhere from 4 to 6 scum left? What is the most likely number? If it's 6 then only voter shenanigans can stop them from winning???!!! Why is nobody panicking about this?

I think the best lynch today is from Matt, Metalmarsh or Draconus but I think we need to vote in a bloc because if we split our votes I fancy that the scum have the numbers to just drive a mislynch by voting together. I'm going to need some serious fucking convincing to pile on to Sorsha with Metalmarsh and Draconus on that wagon and the case on her amounting to "lolslip" and "she saved Wilgy", who I still think is most likely a civ...

I think if there is one team, then Matt, Metalmarsh and Draconus all being on the same team together with Zebra and Lorab makes loads of sense from what I can see in terms of where votes where on Lorab lynch day and subsequent actions.

DH consider that you came out against Sorsha and two of the guys I just mentioned jumped on her. What if you're wrong about her?

There must be two mafia teams.I'm not wrong about Sorsha. Look at all her posts. The tone is practically screaming "desperate baddie".

RIPSYWB Sorsha (RIP since you were bad)

Sorsha wrote:
Draconus wrote:Dat slip, though... I was going to vote for Wilgy, but, not anymore.

Linki: It was an okay attempt to recover.
Not a slip. Getting pretty bold now that you're getting close to a win, eh Draco?

Yo real talk Sorsha when you're caught you are so transparently panicked.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Sorsha wrote:So... I'm not bad you guys. I believed wilgy was good and I thought mm was telling the truth about being neutral. I still think something weird is up with booms flip, even if I'm wrong about it and that was his role it doesn't make me bad, just wrong about him. I've been wrong about a lot of players this game and none of you civs can say that you haven't been either. We have lynched one baddie, at least I was right about that one

Today I'm not so sure about wilgy or mm.... the way wilgy pounced on the boom vote after me and then turned on me after the lynch I had just tried helping him in makes me feel like trusting him was wrong. If he wanted to save himself he could have just kept his vote on mm. I'll have to go back and see what his reasoning was for switching there.
What do you suppose Matt has to say about this?

Also, Sorsha.

Probably something about how he's not grilling me followed almost immediately by a post in which he entangles me in an impossibly elaborate scheme.

Sorsha wrote:So... I'm not bad you guys. I believed wilgy was good and I thought mm was telling the truth about being neutral. I still think something weird is up with booms flip, even if I'm wrong about it and that was his role it doesn't make me bad, just wrong about him. I've been wrong about a lot of players this game and none of you civs can say that you haven't been either. We have lynched one baddie, at least I was right about that one

Today I'm not so sure about wilgy or mm.... the way wilgy pounced on the boom vote after me and then turned on me after the lynch I had just tried helping him in makes me feel like trusting him was wrong. If he wanted to save himself he could have just kept his vote on mm. I'll have to go back and see what his reasoning was for switching there.

MacDougall wrote:RIP Niju

Taking a look and her only suspicion that isn't now dead seemed to be on Wilgous. Put another checkmark in the Wilgy is bad column.

So is Wilgy in a different position than your previous assessment?

Well that McBlows.

Glub Glub

MacDougall wrote:Still DH how do you resolve your idea that Sorsha and Wilgy are scum together with the idea that Sorsha voted for Lorab and Wilgy could have saved her? Two teams?

I've always maintained there are two mafia teams.

MacDougall wrote:Going back to the tie vote that resulted in a scum lynch let's see...

Niju and sorsha were both on Lorab...

Every player who voted for metalmarsh is still alive (Matt, FZ, juliets, bea, Wilgy)

Wilgy voted for Metalmarsh to cause the 4 way tie after Golden switched to Lorab to break it. If Wilgy was Lorab's buddy, throwing a vote on Jimmy in that situation would have saved Lorab.

Draco voted early for FZ. What's your stance on FZ right now Draco?

I voted for FZ in an attempt to create a four way tie because lul. I could have saved Lorab myself.

Metalmarsh and DH voted early for JaggedJimmyJay and never changed their vote.

Using the 1 scum team theory, then I think the way the tie played out makes it highly unlikely that Wilgy, Niju, Sorsha are bad. Unless we are to believe that Wilgy as scum favoured putting his teammate into a lynching position rather than switching to Jimmy or FZ. I find it really hard to believe.

DH had votes on him from Jimmy and Llama (dead civs).

Matt voting for Metalmarsh as early as way back then (and again Metalmarsh survived a tie here) is really giving me a hard on for the idea he's been distancing him.

Llama wasn't a civ.

DrWilgy wrote:This paragraph here along with recent events:
Wilgy wrote:Hey DH what do you think about Drac? why is it Sorsha and I that are on a temmie here? Drac's vote was weird enough, he followed Mac ditching credibility, and was here to post only moment's after the Boomslang flip. Also something that's weird, was his response: (I edited because the question mark was driving me bonkers)

Draconus wrote: RIP Boomslang. I regret moving my vote.
It wasn't that he wasn't here to not move his vote, it's that he regretted moving it off of me and onto Boomslang. Why would Drac ditch credibility and go "Hey I'm following Mac" only to take it after the flip? It's a weird flip here. I think Drac knew what he was doing and was content with either result... but I'm reading his actions from the POV of an evil Sith Lord and that should be taken into account.

Oh, also his buddying of you going into this phase seems odd as well. It's almost as if he has what he wants and is willing to just let you go bonkers with it.

His buddying of me as I said earlier is in direct contrast to his earlier interactions with me, which I don't like. I also don't understand the "I unintentionally left my vote on Boomslang" thing. I'd put him in the middle of my list right now. I want to lynch Sorsha first.

DrWilgy wrote:
Draconus wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Linki: Drac, so why then... were you back in 20 min and your response was "WHOOPS! shouldn't have changed my vote!" instead of "Sorry I was l8 fam." I don't really think you regret not moving your vote, especially when that vote was placed on the pretense of "Mac told me so." Also, doesn't that make that a pretty weak theory?
You're trying really hard to make me a lynch candidate. I see you Wilgy. Timing was coincidental. I had just gotten settled in at home and was exhausted when I opened the thread to read the result. "Whoops" completely belittles the tone and attitude behind my post. I'm getting a bit too irritated to focus right now (not to mention I'm typing this post from the bathroom stall) So I'll end on this note: the one I really wanted to lynch, was you, Wilgy. My vote staying on Boom was unintentional. End of discussion for me.

Linki Rico: cool Sorry to leave you hanging with that.
Drac... You missed something. I can't make you a lynch candidate.

Also, that's some shit. Your response wasn't "I should've been there" it was "whoops" I can't belittle something that had little content. If you really wanted to lynch me, why didn't you? Why did you follow Mac?

Also also, please acknowledge the fact that your theory is weak if you aren't going to respond to that.

Also also also, DH did you respond to my questions about Drac?

Which one was this? I've had a bunch of shit to respond to recently.

Draconus wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Linki: Drac, so why then... were you back in 20 min and your response was "WHOOPS! shouldn't have changed my vote!" instead of "Sorry I was l8 fam." I don't really think you regret not moving your vote, especially when that vote was placed on the pretense of "Mac told me so." Also, doesn't that make that a pretty weak theory?
You're trying really hard to make me a lynch candidate. I see you Wilgy. Timing was coincidental. I had just gotten settled in at home and was exhausted when I opened the thread to read the result. "Whoops" completely belittles the tone and attitude behind my post. I'm getting a bit too irritated to focus right now (not to mention I'm typing this post from the bathroom stall) So I'll end on this note: the one I really wanted to lynch, was you, Wilgy. My vote staying on Boom was unintentional. End of discussion for me.

Linki Rico: cool Sorry to leave you hanging with that.

juliets wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:I think it's obvious that Sorsha is bad.
Can you point out anything specific that makes it obvious she is bad?

I already....have?

I think it's obvious that Sorsha is bad.

Ricochet wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Matt wrote:You don't care about Dom's quote? Is that really what you just said?

Yup, let's lynch MM tomorrow, followed by a swift lynch of DH please. Thank you.
Why are you advocating we lynch a neutral m8.
He's advocating lynching a baddie whose neutral claim he feels Dom broke apart.
Oh.

Well I think MM is neutral and would rather lynch Sorsha.
What do you make of MM claiming chocolate-addict man?

I don't care.

Matt wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Matt wrote:You don't care about Dom's quote? Is that really what you just said?

Yup, let's lynch MM tomorrow, followed by a swift lynch of DH please. Thank you.
Why are you advocating we lynch a baddie and his partner m8.
Fixed

Linki - Sweet Rico. If MM flips indy/neutral, lynch me. If MM flips bad, I must be distancing so lynch me. Or shit, wait, I'm Wilgy/Sorsha's teamie. Better lynch me.

Either way, can we lynch MM tomorrow? Thanks!

Linki - Yah DH because you "don't care" about what the role checker had to say.

I don't care about that specific quote, no. I don't think it has any relevance.

Ricochet wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Matt wrote:You don't care about Dom's quote? Is that really what you just said?

Yup, let's lynch MM tomorrow, followed by a swift lynch of DH please. Thank you.
Why are you advocating we lynch a neutral m8.
He's advocating lynching a baddie whose neutral claim he feels Dom broke apart.

Oh.

Well I think MM is neutral and would rather lynch Sorsha.

Matt wrote:You don't care about Dom's quote? Is that really what you just said?

Yup, let's lynch MM tomorrow, followed by a swift lynch of DH please. Thank you.

Why are you advocating we lynch a neutral m8.

Matt wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Matt wrote:DH - No, I'm not joking. Are you asking lame questions in an attempt to get out of being caught?

DH - Answer me, please. Do you believe MM's claim? If so, does that mean you think Dom did not check him? If so, what do you make of Dom's post telling people to get a refund on his claim?
Caught doing what? MM has claimed independent, neutral, w/e, I have bigger mafia fish to fry. What's difficult to believe about that? Do you want to lynch Sorsha and/or Wilgy or what?
Why are you evading my questions?

What do you make of the following quote?

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.
Furthermore, why did you jump all over Sorsha's shit after Boom flipped, but didn't mention MM? Why?

I haven't been.

I don't care.

Because Sorsha is mafia and MM is neutral

Matt wrote:Town - I think MM and DH are baddies together.

Regardless, even if Mac and everyone else thinks I'm distancing, can we PLEASE lynch MM tomorrow?

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.
Ask yourselves. Why has DH barely mentioned MM since Dom's flip? Why is he so against Sorsha voting for Boom, yet doesn't "grill" MM the same way?

Why is MM pretending to not know what questions I had about DH, despite him and myself going back and forth here? Is MM unable to read certain parts of posts?

Blah

Ask yourselves, why has Matt shifted his attentions to me after I began scrutinizing Sorsha and Dr Wilgy?

Ask yourselves.

Matt wrote:DH - No, I'm not joking. Are you asking lame questions in an attempt to get out of being caught?

DH - Answer me, please. Do you believe MM's claim? If so, does that mean you think Dom did not check him? If so, what do you make of Dom's post telling people to get a refund on his claim?

Caught doing what? MM has claimed independent, neutral, w/e, I have bigger mafia fish to fry. What's difficult to believe about that? Do you want to lynch Sorsha and/or Wilgy or what?

Matt wrote:Hmmm. Rereading DH, it's funny.

Votes LC on account of Boom's "info".

When LC flips, immediately calls out Boom for being bad, calls him a liar, asks him to please go and get lynched, yet doesn't vote him yesterday.

When Boom flips, immediately goes after Sorsha for being a baddie because she voted him.

I mean wtf.

To anyone who has DH as a civ read...why?

That being said, I don't want to get distracted. Can we please lynch the fuck out of MM tomorrow? Thankies!

Matt, are you joking?

Matt wrote:I'd like to bring everyone back to this post from 5 days ago, of which nobody ever answered me...

Matt wrote:Question for anyone who plays a lot with Blooper - Is she typically a rule breaker? Weird question, I know, please bare with me, and answer whether she is known to break/bend rules.
When she originally said she was vote blocked, I actually thought that was weird because of the rules. Nobody, not one person, answered me on this.

Now I'm curious. Are niju and juliets players who typically "break rules" ?

I genuinely do not know.

Matt wrote:MM - Why aren't you commenting on Mac's assertion that we're distancing? I guess you're a baddie who just doesn't care who gets caught up with you?

Thanks brah

Linki - So you think niju and juliets are on the level then? Do you consider them "rule breakers" in general?

My question was "Why would they fake that?". If you're going to make an assertion, You should be able to follow it to a logical conclusion. I don't yet have an opinion.

Matt wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Matt wrote:Yeah, I think both niju and Juliets have spoken about being vote blocked. Also, when Boom was "question cursed", he literally thanked SVS in the thread for it being over.

Wtf

DH - What do you make of niju and juliets claiming to be vote blocked, then?
I read this post as you using the examples of JC and Blooper to further question why I wouldn't talk about curses.

Did I read that wrong?
Yup. As you can see, my question at the end there had nothing to do with "why won't you talk about your curse, DH?" and everything to do with if you think niju and juliets were faking.

Why would they fake that?

DrWilgy wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Anything to Add Wiggles? How's Sorsha and your other BTSC pals doin? You guys ready for when yall get steamrolled starting next lynch?
Nope, doing homework. Pressing F5 every few problems or so.

RIP tho since ur bad.

Matt wrote:Yeah, I think both niju and Juliets have spoken about being vote blocked. Also, when Boom was "question cursed", he literally thanked SVS in the thread for it being over.

Wtf

DH - What do you make of niju and juliets claiming to be vote blocked, then?

I read this post as you using the examples of JC and Blooper to further question why I wouldn't talk about curses.

Did I read that wrong?

Search found 686 matches