The Syndicate

DharmaHelper wrote:So forget Trice, that means Rabbit is also in a voting group with The Truth on both votes..

Ignore that. I'm wrong.

So forget Trice, that means Rabbit is also in a voting group with The Truth on both votes..

From that, I guess this is the most interesting bit: 7 minutes between FH and BWT 2 minutes between FH and Rabbit Even though all 6 votes are less than 2 hours apart, FH votes within minutes of both Rabbit and BWT (on two separate occasions, I'll grant you.) So the link is there I guess. Again, I'm ...

Vomp Vote: Vomp, for personal reaons, those being I've not had time to catch up at all. I have meetings till later this week. I will be sporadic at best till then. I've gone back and re-read on DH, rabbit, and INH. Of those 3, INH strikes me as the most suspicious one, but my suspicions of Vomps wil...

Actually, bumping Trice out of the equation means the new group is "BWT, FH, Rabbit" 6. BWT (3rd Vote for Droopy) 8. Rabbit (5th Vote For Droopy) 10. FH (6th Vote For Droopy) 13. Rabbit (11th Vote for Vomp) 16. FH (13th Vote for Vomp) 17. BWT (14th Vote for Vomp) Dunno. Discuss? Linki@ Dom...

So Kate/Boats/Aces is still legit. And LT is still legit. So, uhm. Sure.

I was going to say "Just read back and cross referenced Day 3/Day 4 with the lists FH provided and they seem legit"

But MP said that.

Nobody gave a shit when I thought this voting order was right, coming up with a different theory for nobody to give a shit about is not going to change anything.

Thought about it, Don't see the point in going back and getting the right voting order.

I might recheck the voting order when I have a chance. Probably not though, nobody seems to care. @SVS I'm voting for LT this lynch unless someone confesses to being a baddie. Do I think INH might be bad, maybe. Do I think I can wait on that until something else comes up, yes. Do I think LT is bad, ...

So if you want my opinion, LT's "OMGWTFNOWAI" response to my posts pinged me. There, you have my opinion.

Also FH is a noob.

Fuck it. I try to come up with a legitimate case against INH and Rabbit because they ping me and because I don't want to vote the way everyone else is voting and it changes jack. I try to help out and give insightful analysis as to the bandwagons and it does jack. I really do not have the energy to ...

Wait no you're not an outlier, Truth is.

Well in that case the Kate/Boats/Aces connection is the most interesting assuming that it's still accurate.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Yeah except all your "groups" are still based upon the "fact" that I voted for droopy, when I voted vompatti on day 3 and 4

Take it up with FH, it's her voting order. Given that you voted Vomp for 3 and 4, It really does not change much as you are one of the outliers.

Jesus Tap Dancing Christ on a Cracker. You're right dom, that makes no fucking sense whatsoever. If only someone had put a title with an explanation on the part of the analysis I took that from and OH WAIT HOLD THE PHONE STOP THE PRESS I FUCKING DID THAT. Groupings (within 1 Vote of each other each ...

Because I can, and because I recognize some people are visual learners, I've converted my "vote groups" portion of my analysis into image form. http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/7022/readmyposts.png What conclusions can be drawn from the above image? Littletiger, The Truth and FH are outl...

DH - my response was not the only one that was wondering why you did what you did..... But never mind. I am sure you are going to make much more out of it than was there anyway. :D Oh, and welcome Timmer, bye CBK! And the Defenseive No U Snarkfest begins :) :drums: Your response WAS however, the on...

It's also interesting that a civv wants to shut DP up, and the Residents want to kill him. I guess in addition to re-reading FH's posts I'll be re-reading DP's posts to see what that could be about. DP, do you know how you survived? Don't hold your breath for a response. Linki: Dom, did I pee in yo...

LittleTiger wrote:DH - my response was not the only one that was wondering why you did what you did.....

But never mind. I am sure you are going to make much more out of it than was there anyway.

Oh, and welcome Timmer, bye CBK!

And the Defenseive No U Snarkfest begins

It's also interesting that a civv wants to shut DP up, and the Residents want to kill him. I guess in addition to re-reading FH's posts I'll be re-reading DP's posts to see what that could be about. DP, do you know how you survived? Don't hold your breath for a response. Linki: Dom, did I pee in yo...

It's also interesting that a civv wants to shut DP up, and the Residents want to kill him. I guess in addition to re-reading FH's posts I'll be re-reading DP's posts to see what that could be about. DP, do you know how you survived? Don't hold your breath for a response. Linki: Dom, did I pee in yo...

I felt that DH was trying to link people where very little evidence lay When there's valid disucssion tobe had. I dunno. Would love to hear an explanation as to why voting order/voting analysis for two days of votes is considered invalid to discuss, or "little evidence" btw. Perhaps if yo...

DharmaHelper thinks the Night post should have been written in chaindeath's fashion. As tribute.

Uh may want to Un-yay SVS.

Dom wrote:I felt that DH was trying to link people where very little evidence lay
When there's valid disucssion tobe had.
I dunno.

So vote analysis is not valid discussion.

Check.

Thanks for that, DH. And I agree that he wasn't drawing any conclusions as LT said he was with the stretch comment. I took it as DH looking for similarities in the two lynches. Based on the sheer number of baddies in this game, there had to be baddies in there, and it stands to reason that the last...

linki: DharmaHelper, if you're going to "present facts" can you at least adjust your charts so they show who I actually voted for on day 2? Image If they're incorrect it's because it was FH's voting order. And if it's showing an incorrect day 2 vote it's because they are the voting orders...

I was presenting facts, I made no attempt to draw a conclusion from those facts. Though yes, it is possible that people consistently voting together might be working together. Again, in this case I was only presenting factual information and some added observations and analysis, because I figured R...

Thanks for that, DH. And I agree that he wasn't drawing any conclusions as LT said he was with the stretch comment. I took it as DH looking for similarities in the two lynches. Based on the sheer number of baddies in this game, there had to be baddies in there, and it stands to reason that the last...

Well, if you read back my initial response was "a bit of a leap is an understatement." Basically all it says is that trying to avoid host punishment - I think INH said he wasn't sure if he'd be around later - is worth writing 3 paragraphs about. Anecdotal evidence will help me appeal to m...

triceratopzeuhl wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:I'll wait to ask Trice what s/he is on about RE: Me :P
this one (hopes links to posts work properly on this site)

What about it?

I did read it. It explains a lot. And no, it isn't the same. You have been beating us over the head with following your suspicion because everyone elses is just bandwagons, ets, etc. I don't recall trying to make anyone feel dumb or like a lemming if they did not follow my suspicions. Sadly, my sus...

I'll wait to ask Trice what s/he is on about RE: Me :P

Having said that, I would like to cross reference everyone that voted for both Droopy and Vomp and look at the timing of their votes. Specifically those that didn't put much thought into their votes. I think that would be a good place to look. Here, Rey says he'd like to cross reference the Droopy/...

Alot to catch up on and reply to. I'm going to have to pick how I reply very carefully as I don't want to come off as rude or anything, and I might :P

I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply? Umm... It implies what it says, those people in the groups voted within one vote of each other both for the Droopy and for the Vomp votes. I dunno what was confusing about that but there you go. While I'm talking about it, here is ...

Big ass post incoming. 5. The Truth (Mr. Droopy) 2 12. The Truth (Vompatti) 10 6. birdwithteeth (Mr. Droopy) 3 17. birdwithteeth (Vompatti) 14 7. triceratops (Mr. Droopy) 4 15. triceratops (Vompatti) 12 8. rabbit (Mr. Droopy) 5 13. rabbit (Vompatti) 11 10. Flyin' High (Mr. Droopy) 6 16. Flyin' High ...

I'm sure someone has a spreadsheet with the voting order. I don't.

INH. Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though. I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think...

INH. Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though. I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think...

I mean, what else have you accused him of besides just being overly aggressive? I'm referring to this bit specifically: Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, whic...

Any reason other than the fact that he wanted to avoid a penalty? Don;t make other people do all the work, man~ You know, sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all :P As I said 1. Rabbit defended his contest behavior while bringing up Epig as suspect for posting and not voting. (Even if it ...

Any reason other than the fact that he wanted to avoid a penalty? Don;t make other people do all the work, man~ You know, sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all :P As I said 1. Rabbit defended his contest behavior while bringing up Epig as suspect for posting and not voting. (Even if it ...

I'm really getting tired of the "Start reading my posts" schtick everybody, I promise. I'm not doing it on purpose. It's just as frustrating for me to type as it is for you to read.

INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.

After this last lynch and the comments immediately afterward, I'm getting a little suspicious of a few people.... I'm getting more and more suspicious of DH because of what Dom pointed out and the fact that he's been acting so sure of himself about these "bandwagons". Another shitty bandw...

Another shitty bandwagon ended in a civvie lynch?

Well... I *am* really quite good.

I've *been* statement voting and nobody seems to be caring about the statement.

Whatever. Once again I don't care if I'm the only one who doesn't flock to the group vote. Hope that Kool Aid tastes great guys :P

Vote=INH

Search found 14971 matches