The Syndicate

Just saw floyd watching the thread and I doubt he's silenced during the night phase so

Sketchy and also distracting.

I'll have to go back and re-read the lynch post to see if "See you in court" made the cut.

Long Con wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:LC aside from me who would you feel most confident in lynching?
I thought this was cute. When did I say anything about lynching you, friend?

I only meant to exclude me since I wouldn't vote for myself.

Long Con wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Quin wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?
Was your reason because her post/vote seemed opportunistic and hasty?
I called this a leading question because this was the first time the words "opportunistic" and "hasty" had been used to describe BR's post and vote. When Quin said your reasons were the same, it was clear that those reasons were about her voting Floyd while mentioning only Timmer and Mac.

Do you understand why I called this a leading question?

Yeah, cuz you didn't understand that my reasoning for putting BR's name out there was because I mistakenly thought her post/vote was hasty and opportunistic.

ALSO

Are u bad?

Unless of course I'm lying and it's all a ploy.

Do I ever drop hints ever in the history of ever

No that would be silly.

Long Con wrote:
sig wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:I think I'll take this opportunity to vote LC.
Why?
I sense a disturbance in the force.

This is very very telling.
Is it literally very very telling? Good times.

But seriously, the way I read this is that sig believes that DH is referencing some sort of information. Right? Am I reading that right? It's fucking hard to tell when people are intentionally vague about their meaning. Is that what other people took away from that?

DH, why don't you step up and clarify for sig that you do not have any information, and that your comment was just a flippant and fun toss-out?

I do not have any information, and my comment was just a flippant and fun toss-out.

Long Con wrote:Ok, let's start with what has sig so riled up about me.

Long Con wrote:I'm disappointed with the activity in here. Sig hasn't even posted, I'm thinking maybe we should just do the Main Thread a favour and lynch him today, to end the sig debate and get to start a little fresher on Day 3.
Sig, look at how I started this post. Read that sentence. Then read it again.

The thread was just not happening at the time, and I said this to stir things up. Get some reactions. Get some people talking - get YOU talking. Something. I was fucking tired of coming back to the thread, ready to engage, and seeing that I was still the last poster. I go to bed, get up, come back, and there's one post. It was pathetic.

You are reacting as though I tried to slam-dunk your lynch-lock behind your back. That is not even close to what I was doing. I didn't even expect my vote to be on you by the day's end - this is the benefit of changeable votes, sig. You can use your vote as pressure.

Let me ask you: what would you think of a player who read that post, and agreed with me, and was like "Yeah, let's lynch sig, he's too quiet!" or something. Would that be something you'd like to know about that player? That they are willing to do that? What about a player that says "Uh, LC, that shit is wack. I'm not casting a vote for sig unless I see a real case against him!" Is that something you'd be interested in knowing?

I can tell you're angry about this post, and my vote. If you want to deal with it in a realistic way, then take a step back and look at it again. I wasn't trying to lynch you. I was trying to use you.

....I'll post things in separate posts, but I have more to say.

What's that smell?

sig wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Which of these is most likely:

A) There was a lynch switch
B) Floyd's results were sent to the other thread
C) Soneji was the only lynchee
I'm thinking B, unless we had something weird where it was the player with the most votes period was lynched.

So DH why did you switch? You seemed pretty certain LC was mafia and true Floyd wasn't participating but a civ is a civ in the number game.

I switched because it was a fun idea.

Which of these is most likely:

A) There was a lynch switch
B) Floyd's results were sent to the other thread
C) Soneji was the only lynchee

timmer wrote:Sorry DH, but you just burned whatever trust I had in you. Your actions today were manipulative and suspicious as hell. Quin, as well. Whatever you hoped to achieve, it's frankly made you look bad to me.

Well that's a shame.

Sorsha wrote:Why to both of you?

Simple really. It's only Day 2. The Floyd was either silenced or disinterested in playing. And the best case against LC will be made in the main thread if he is actually bad.

Sorsha wrote:Why to both of you?

I'll tell you, but in a minute

Donald Trump as a civvie

Yeah right good prank.

It's delicious. It's so yummy.

This is going to be interesting. I'll switch my vote to Floyd.

timmer wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
timmer wrote:Hmm... you know, that's actually pretty compelling, and definitely has more meat than Floyd not being here... changing my vote.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Da fuq? Man, I can't keep posting I'm still technically working. Did I misunderstand? I thought the points you linked to re: LC were valid seeming???

You broke the shortlived tie is all.

timmer wrote:Hmm... you know, that's actually pretty compelling, and definitely has more meat than Floyd not being here... changing my vote.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Sorsha wrote:I voted LC

Oh boy a tie.

Its poppin' off now.

Everything I'm seeing RE: Sig is "general vibes from the previous thread " or thereabouts.

DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.

And sig's made a couple rather large posts re: LC but this quote is short and sweet and to the poing

Ah See I really dislike this post, LC literally names the two low posters/inactive players (floyd and BWT) and then the two players who came close to being lynched last phase, Wilgy and myself. He is going after low hanging fruit for sure.

I'll have to fish around for the sig stuff. Or you could.

That seems like a lot of work

But what if Floyd is civ tho

Woukdn't that be a bitch and a half.

oh no fam the lategame savebois

LC aside from me who would you feel most confident in lynching?

vroom vroom

I bet the beach is some boring shit compared to this thread, this here is the bomb.

Long Con wrote:Nice leading question, DH.

What was leading about it?

U H O H

R I P I Y W G

F L O Y D

Quin wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?

Was your reason because her post/vote seemed opportunistic and hasty?

It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.

I feel pretty confident with my LC vote actually.

sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.

Weren't you riding my jock D1? What changed?

Quin and Farnsworth could put BR into the tie.

Sorsha wrote:You think it's LC just to be clear?

I dunno who it could be, but "Here's a post by timmer that doesn't mention Floyd so I suspect Floyd and will vote for him" Doesn't track.

We should bandwagon BR

U H O H

Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.

Surely.

Why are you suspicious of Floyd because of that post? Why not vote timmer?

Professor Farnsworth wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.
What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?

Smells like a bus.

Uh oh I switched to LC so that Floyd/Sig would be tied

U H O H

LoRab wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.
Do you have access to the main thread?

Not yet.

Maybe I'll vote Floyd. At least for now.

I dunno about you, LC. I just don't know.

Sig, not sign.

Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.

Long Con wrote:Aggressively-minded, eh? Ok, let's leave that till we get back, not sure what I did exactly. Unless I get lynched today, then we don't have to wait!

Do you really want to get into it with me? I'm almost tempted, just due to the lack of action currently in the thread.

Or we could focus on someone else.

Or we could focus on you. What are you all about this game? You're carving yourself some sort of unique niche. What's that all about? It's nice and ballsy, the kind of thing I look at and say "Yeah, I should do something like that someday!"

It's essentially Day 1 again for me, since I missed 1/2 of the Day 1 discussion and didn't get the opportunity I thought I would to re-read it.

If you wanna square up, we can.

I just have my vote on you for now, I wouldn't feel more or less comfortable with a sig or a floyd vote. They happen to be suspiciously absent though.

Long Con wrote:Maybe you should reiterate A) a little, I don't specifically remember what you were saying.

Your initial entry into the thread was aggressively minded, even if it was a joke. Its a hoaky psuedo-suspicion but I've got nothing to lose since I'm retired so if I'm right I'm right.

My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.

Search found 75 matches