The Syndicate

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:38 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:37 am

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:34 amBring it

Oh "now" you're awake.

I’m actually on shift and the equipment is in maintenance so I have some down time. As long as I’m not in the secret areas I can use my phone

Genuinely, good luck man. It was fun playing with you on the doomed criminal team. I'll see you on the other side.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:34 amBring it

Oh "now" you're awake.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:24 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 10:14 am @sprityo @insertnamehere

Just to confirm, you're choosing Sprityo?

Yes.

[mention]sprityo[/mention] [mention]insertnamehere[/mention]

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 12:58 amSame

May the best me win.

Would be whack to pick Lunalee to fight
Would be foolish to pick Golden or Long Con to fight

I basically asked to be put in Death Matches with my swagger attitude, so I don't blame anyone for putting me in if that's what you all decide to do. Past this game, no hard feelings either way and if I can help anyone moving forward just drop me a line. I can promise nobody has yet and my loyalty and skillset are going to be valuable. Even moreso once I become the first person voted into a Death Match to come out the other side

That's kind of him.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 3:24 pm Dispor and Scotty and Chuck have some interesting Garnet counts.

Wait no Dispors is correct.

Dispor and Scotty and Chuck have some interesting Garnet counts.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 2:18 pmLunalee

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 9:10 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 12:06 am To be honest all I saw was that MP/Daisy etc were on it.

bla bla glasses bla bla bla bla

I've had a very long day. A very long week in fact. Not as rough as Epi's stories but evidently rough enough not to read thoroughly.

To be honest all I saw was that MP/Daisy etc were on it.

What the fuck, I'm on the jury?

I'm fine with losing the thing thats starting to grate at me is the kabuki theatre of it can we just shoot Lenny in the back of the head already

Literally why

The Agony is just killing me at this point

[VOTE: Disapprove] aubergine

You can tell I was joking because I said that a public school facility had Air Conditioning.

It's cold in the Teachers Lounge. You won't let us turn off the AC

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 7:18 pm I'm glad I got put out Round One. There would have been no way I would have been able to keep up with this, especially after the week I had.

A used condom discovered in the teacher's facilities early this week was just one of several possible surprises for us.

Look, how many times do I have to apologize?

RIP RUP

Please don't elimination match me.

Two things are univerally true:

DJ Khalid won't go down on his wife

I won't approve a team wih 4/5 people from an already failed mission.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 4:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:52 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:19 pm Scotty pls.

I got you fam

Proposed team:
Golden
Luna
SpaceDaisy
Scotty
MPlusSiete

[VOTE: APPROVE] aubergine

Fam.

4/5 people from a failed mission = A second failed mission.

Am no a crimanal

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:52 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:19 pm Scotty pls.

I got you fam

Proposed team:
Golden
Luna
SpaceDaisy
Scotty
MPlusSiete

To those of you new to The Resistance, this is what's commonly referred to as a "shitty team". Complicated lingo and terminology, but the general idea is that this team is "Bad" or "Awful" or "Not Good".

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:52 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 3:04 pm I'm still confused why everyone's seemingly freezing me out inside and outside of the thread. What's even more confusing is the insistence on putting together a team that will 100% fail.

Slightly less, but still confusing in its own right - the idea that Any strategy I propose at all is pretty bluntly dismissed.

Dunno. Seems like maybe I missed the boat.

I can send you a PM if you want? We could talk about the weather, or the sim?

I DONT WANT TO RUSH YOU

Literally no

[VOTE: Disapprove] aubergine

Scotty pls.

I'm still confused why everyone's seemingly freezing me out inside and outside of the thread. What's even more confusing is the insistence on putting together a team that will 100% fail.

Slightly less, but still confusing in its own right - the idea that Any strategy I propose at all is pretty bluntly dismissed.

Dunno. Seems like maybe I missed the boat.

Well buckle the fuck up lads.

Huh

Two more people approve this and we can have a solid team.

Kinda sketchy that the people that failed the last mission want to get back on the team huh

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

It has three of my favorite people on it.

I'm touched by this and I love and respect you.

Oh shit I didn't even realize I was on this team tbqh.

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:16 pm [VOTE: DISAPPROVE ] aubergine

First off, how dare you.

Ed and DP I see yall goofin' off over there. Approve this team so we can win the game please.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:02 pm It doesn't take two criminals to sink a mission, it only takes one. Let's get a jury proposed so we can vote on it.

You'd know this team needed 2 fails if you didn't rush into things.

sprityo wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:05 pm My team proposition is

Sprityo
Luna
DH
Speedchuck
Disgruntledporcupine

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

Very good team.

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:45 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:27 am Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

Unless they’re all good. Which they mathematically could be, and I believe are

Yeah but no.

For somebody who gives a shit about math and strategy you seem to be really biffing it here man.


Also, glad to see you still have a fixation on putting MP onto your teams. That's not suspicious at all, and you guys are for sure good and not Criminals.

Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:54 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:36 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:13 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Says the guy who thinks putting 3 people from a failed mission on a 5 man team is a good idea.

All we did was add golden. You think 2 people from Mission 1 were floating both the first mission and possibly the 2nd?

Your math doesn’t add up. By not taking anyone on that last mission, you’re assuming all 5 bad guys were on that mission.

Here's math for you:

3 out of 5 is a majority. If you take 3 out of five people from a failed mission, you're more likely to have the Criminal(s) from that group than you are to have the Civilians. so all those 3 people need to do is grab one more Criminal.

Since we KNOW there is at least 1 criminal, possibly more, in that group of 5, removing all 5 from this mission means you need to get 2 criminals cleanly on this mission.

Which you won't be able to do.

No one from the failed mission should go on the next mission. Anyone who votes otherwise, wants this mission to fail.

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:13 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Says the guy who thinks putting 3 people from a failed mission on a 5 man team is a good idea.

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:06 pm DH, your little list about “burned” players makes no sense. Why are we “burned”?

You failed a mission, bud.

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:55 pm Huh. Somehow I expected that.

Was it you, Golden? Or was Edjou hiding in the back for the first team?

It’s possible. I think it’s one of them, but not both of them. I’d suggest a team with me, Daisy and MP

Fuck that, no.

Smoke 'em if ya got 'em

I wouldn't crunch the numbers too hard.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:36 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:32 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:18 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 8:00 pm Entirely unsafe and reckless to put anyone from that mission onto this one. Especially considering two "Not Guilty" verrdicts are gonna sink this one.

Pardon?

I mean, there are 5 scum. Split the game arbitrarily into two groups, just because there's at least one scum on one group, and... odds aren't great. But odds aren't great either way, the advent of BTSC and lack of guilty/not guilty counts means we don't have a whole lot to go on.

So I don't really have a better suggestion either. You do you, Sprit.

These are words.