The Syndicate

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

I misread "Omerta" as "Misfits".

Anyway, I wouldn't categorize Omerta as me being "top civvie" I just happened to be playing a game that most people weren't.

Lol, I was just ready to go pull the "Lies! Lies!" Arcade Fire song.

It doesn't matter how you would categorize yourself, it matters how it comes off looking. You took the reins, you bussed a teammate at the right time for safe measure and, as far as I detected, you only had a few doubters (like LC, I think) which were somehow removed without spreading the doubt further.

Anyway, it's all subjective rather then set in stone - but for me, despite (in your own words) "having done dick" in that game (intentionally), I really thought you were genuine whilst spectating and was shocked to see the outcome and have had issues trusting your good intentions since. You and boo probably the most, but boo's apparently not playing (or able to?).

DharmaHelper wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

That was a specific set of circumstances that are, I could argue, unrepeatable. I started as a civ in that game and was recruited having already accrued the civ cred.

No meta. Metaless

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I don't believe I have a meta. I am metaless.

Are you serious, you blew any "top civvie"- / "lead hunter"-like credibility with Omerta. (As far as I'm concerned at least...)

anyway this will all be totally incomplete meta, because I'm only reviewing what players did in their winning games. It all depends whether players will seek to bring their best again, depending on alignment, or totally evade such a thing for this special occasion.

Dom wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

S~V~S wrote:
PLAYERS

bcornett24
DharmaHelper
Dom
Elohcin
Epignosis
Golden
Long Con
LoRab
MacDougall
Matt
Metalmarsh
nijuukyugou
RadicalFuzz
Ricochet

That's 13, let's roll it.

If any of these fellas are given baddie cards, abandon hope, all ye sign up.

You flatter me, sir.


And your flattery will get you nowhere.

Turnip Head wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Long Con wrote:BR and I generously allowed lorab to join us in our glorious win in Monopoly.

Hi there Gollum

Hello Mello... wait, shit

Long Con wrote:BR and I generously allowed lorab to join us in our glorious win in Monopoly.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:My goal this year is to not get lynched Day 1.

Golden wrote:My goal this year is to lynch Marmot on day 1.

Yes, let's take our eyes off Dharma for a second GoC in a row...