The Syndicate

blindfaeth wrote:Although to add to my previous thought, given that there is only one mafia team, and given that they also want the rogue dead because its one of their goals in order to win the game, I personally think they would probably be more concerned with getting rid of the really "good" players. Don't get me wrong, every person is valuable, whether you post a lot or a little. I'm just saying that MP has been playing a long time, posts often and has a lot of content. How accurately he perceives things as a civvie, I don't know. But he does put a lot of time and effort into the game. In general, you don't like having that type of person as an enemy, so I don't necessarily see eliminating him when they had the chance as being very outrageous. I hope that makes some sense.

Makes a lot of sense. As a baddie you want to get rid of the most analytical civs.

linki

Flyin' High wrote:Thank you indi for looking back and seeing that it was S~V~S that first suggested the idea that Epignosis was framed. Coupled with what BF is saying about them doing that in a past game is interesting and something to keep in mind.

Snow Dog wrote:@Roxy, that's no problem. I hope we can put any misunderstandings behind us.

@reywaS....why do you think I am a baddie or rogue?

@everyone else. I want to believe Epignosis is civ which is why I think he is framed, but of course that solely relies on that belief. Certainly it was a gamble if was the baddies trying to frame him. But maybe worthwhile to get two civvies in a row down.
Why do you want to believe Epignosis is civvie?

Just a feeling. From his posting. His manner. Just seems civ to me. I still find these things hard to tell though.

@Roxy, that's no problem. I hope we can put any misunderstandings behind us.

@reywaS....why do you think I am a baddie or rogue?

@everyone else. I want to believe Epignosis is civ which is why I think he is framed, but of course that solely relies on that belief. Certainly it was a gamble if was the baddies trying to frame him. But maybe worthwhile to get two civvies in a row down.

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:You just sound like you are taking events of the past and changing them however you want to fit into your narrative. I really, really think you are bad.....if not on the bad team, then you are the rouge.

linki w/ llama:
I don't admit it was hyperbole. It seemed vehement at the time. It might be a slight exageration but I have created no narrative. the evidence is all posted. And because of my personal style I cannot be a civ? Interesting mister baddie.
It has nothing to do with your style of play.

So the first part and second part of your post are not related? Ok. Well you are more than welcome to vote for me next lynch.

Perhaps I was the one being vehement?

reywaS wrote:You just sound like you are taking events of the past and changing them however you want to fit into your narrative. I really, really think you are bad.....if not on the bad team, then you are the rouge.

linki w/ llama:

I don't admit it was hyperbole. It seemed vehement at the time. It might be a slight exageration but I have created no narrative. the evidence is all posted. And because of my personal style I cannot be a civ? Interesting mister baddie.

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Going to bed now but I wasn't really here at the end i was watching The Dark Night. Amazed I wasn't lynched but glad I'm not.

Never thought MP or Epignosis were bad but hard to tell. Not convinced Llama is bad either. Had to decide between voting He Man and reywaS and chose the latter.
Snow Dog, my gut is still slightly civ on you, but things like this in the thread look really bad to me. Really, you weren't here at the end despite being the last vote? And I understand you not seeing llama or Epi as particularly bad, but it is strange to me that your top 2 candidates were both players you had had personal arguments with before. I know you were very busy with them, but none of the other discussions going on gave you any ideas whatsoever? Beware tunnel vision when things get personal.

He-Man, the vote order is on page 11, I believe. Roxy posted it. Do you have any suspicions besides Epi at the moment? I know you're convinced he's bad, and he may well be, but I'm a bit worried about tunnel vision there as well.

Linki with snowie: that's fair about your vote. I sympathize with wanting to protect yourself. Anything about rey's behavior (votes etc) ping you besides the fact that he was suspicious of you?
His vehement attack on me in defence of Roxy seemed like he was likely bad to me, but He-Man even more so. His case against Epi seems to me to be a bit crazy. Comparing his playing this game to hoew he mod's another? Come on.
vehement attacks? You mean the posts where I was suspicious of you? At what point did they become vehement attacks? You speak in hyperbole, much? LOL

You do realize that this is the very first time in this entire game that you've called me suspicious, right?

Yes, what of it?

Vehement is how I remember it. But maybe replace that with continuous, harrasing and tedious? I kept answering from my point and you wouldn't accept it. To me that is suspicious.

He-Man wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
He-Man wrote:Roxy I am precious lol also epig made that comment about making him vote me not snow dog

Epig llama had enough attention you had none he was trying to take heat off of him you made your comment to blend. This is why I aimed my suspicion at you and not llama
I think you and thellama73 are together. I think you wanted to absorb my vote, since he had, in your own words, "enough heat."

If you're bad, there's no such thing as enough heat.
So you think llama is bad but the lynch got switched to MP a civ? Wassup Wid that?

That switch was not one a civvie would use IMO. No way no how!

No one knew MP was a civ. Except the mafia of course, so it could still have been either. Or maybe something else entirely.

^Sorry even I don't quite understand that. Him?

Roxy wrote:While you are answering questions Snow Dog - why did you think that HeMan wanted to be voted for? You missed this question when he asked preciously - and I am curious.

No one asked me this before. That I am aware of anyway. Don't even understand why I would be asked this.

You could be right. I am probably not voting for him.

He-Man wrote:Well snow dog I think you should weigh up the evidence MP dying in place ofthe top two vote getters should solidify your thoughts on the situation I know it has mine.

It is a very good point I admit. Either Epi is bad and did a switch or more likely, imo, he was switched to get him framed. So they get MP and Epi next time. I want to be careful not to fall into that potential trap.

He-Man wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Going to bed now but I wasn't really here at the end i was watching The Dark Night. Amazed I wasn't lynched but glad I'm not.

Never thought MP or Epignosis were bad but hard to tell. Not convinced Llama is bad either. Had to decide between voting He Man and reywaS and chose the latter.
Snow Dog, my gut is still slightly civ on you, but things like this in the thread look really bad to me. Really, you weren't here at the end despite being the last vote? And I understand you not seeing llama or Epi as particularly bad, but it is strange to me that your top 2 candidates were both players you had had personal arguments with before. I know you were very busy with them, but none of the other discussions going on gave you any ideas whatsoever? Beware tunnel vision when things get personal.

He-Man, the vote order is on page 11, I believe. Roxy posted it. Do you have any suspicions besides Epi at the moment? I know you're convinced he's bad, and he may well be, but I'm a bit worried about tunnel vision there as well.

Linki with snowie: that's fair about your vote. I sympathize with wanting to protect yourself. Anything about rey's behavior (votes etc) ping you besides the fact that he was suspicious of you?
His vehement attack on me in defence of Roxy seemed like he was likely bad to me, but He-Man even more so. His case against Epi seems to me to be a bit crazy. Comparing his playing this game to hoew he mod's another? Come on.
Epig was the top voter for many reasons yet you failed to see any of them? I never went after him because he was playing with the idea of low posters I we t after him because with all the other stuff going on he went after low posters in day one seemed a cop out to me and one he likely thought would bring him no trouble. It stuck out as has many of his posts since.

Like why would I want epig to vote me?

He didn't go after them. He was asked what he thought so provided what he thought. I pretty much agreed with his theory. Or not theory, wager if you prefer.

Oh by the way. sad to see you go MP. I always value your contributions to the discussions. A great loss.

Russtifinko wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Going to bed now but I wasn't really here at the end i was watching The Dark Night. Amazed I wasn't lynched but glad I'm not.

Never thought MP or Epignosis were bad but hard to tell. Not convinced Llama is bad either. Had to decide between voting He Man and reywaS and chose the latter.
Snow Dog, my gut is still slightly civ on you, but things like this in the thread look really bad to me. Really, you weren't here at the end despite being the last vote? And I understand you not seeing llama or Epi as particularly bad, but it is strange to me that your top 2 candidates were both players you had had personal arguments with before. I know you were very busy with them, but none of the other discussions going on gave you any ideas whatsoever? Beware tunnel vision when things get personal.

He-Man, the vote order is on page 11, I believe. Roxy posted it. Do you have any suspicions besides Epi at the moment? I know you're convinced he's bad, and he may well be, but I'm a bit worried about tunnel vision there as well.

Linki with snowie: that's fair about your vote. I sympathize with wanting to protect yourself. Anything about rey's behavior (votes etc) ping you besides the fact that he was suspicious of you?

His vehement attack on me in defence of Roxy seemed like he was likely bad to me, but He-Man even more so. His case against Epi seems to me to be a bit crazy. Comparing his playing this game to hoew he mod's another? Come on.

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Going to bed now but I wasn't really here at the end i was watching The Dark Night. Amazed I wasn't lynched but glad I'm not.

Never thought MP or Epignosis were bad but hard to tell. Not convinced Llama is bad either. Had to decide between voting He Man and reywaS and chose the latter.
Yeah, about that vote....

Since all you did in your vote post was vote for me and not offer any reason for it....and the fact that you never mentioned that you thought I was suspicious during this day....leads me to believe that your vote for me was nothing more than a big No U.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you are bad here.

Yeah well, no surprise there.

Russtifinko wrote:Oh and I wanted to ask Snow Dog, why such a late vote for rey? If what he posted is correct you hadn't mentioned him before. Furthermore, it was pretty clearly a throwaway. Did you feel strongly that the top 2 candidates, Epi and llama, were civ, did something rey said make you absolutely certain he was bad, or were you just reluctant to possibly be the deciding vote in the lynch?

I voted late to protect myself from being lynched. At one stage Epi and MP were even but ahead. I didn't want to vote either of them because I had no reason to suspect them. As I seemed safe and Epi was ahead by now I put my vote on someone I found suspicious, but also where my vote made no difference.

Going to bed now but I wasn't really here at the end i was watching The Dark Night. Amazed I wasn't lynched but glad I'm not.

Never thought MP or Epignosis were bad but hard to tell. Not convinced Llama is bad either. Had to decide between voting He Man and reywaS and chose the latter.

Voted reywaS

Roxy wrote:Whatever Snow Dog - too bad you will not answer b/c it looks like this is leading to your lynch. Being helpful is different from being pushy and you were pushy with misinformation about my posts.

I answered already many times. I am sick of it. To me it seemed you implied you never knew we had a house already. No misinformation there. My interpretation.

@Llama. You have got it spot on. Which you will find out if I'm lynched.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Roxy wrote:Then do it again.
I don't think so. Who do you think you are? Just vote for me and get it over with!
I was really trying to give Snowie the BOTD, but do comments like these read as baddie to anyone else or is it just me?

I'm starting to think my paranoia yesterday regarding house was misplaced and we might have found a baddie option in ship. I'll go back to studying and think on it. Thoughts from others that don't contribute to the back and forths would be welcome because I'm getting tired of reading those. No offense to any of those people, they're just clouding my thought process largely and I think they're mostly due to personality clashes and unfamiliarity with each other.

And does anyone else think that SE's vote for He-Man is weird? Not suspicious, really, but just weird.

Linki with Snowie, so are you going to talk to me or her?

I don't understand.

But I would be an awfully bad baddie to get myself in this situation. So let's hope I'm not.

Roxy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Roxy wrote:Then do it again.
I don't think so. Who do you think you are? Just vote for me and get it over with!
I think I am me, is that ok?
You won't answer the quote b/c then you will have to admit you went after me for no reason.

I didn't "go for you", we had an argument. I was trying to be helpful. It backfired. Lesson learned.

Roxy wrote:Then do it again.

I don't think so. Who do you think you are? Just vote for me and get it over with!

Boogs wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Boogs wrote:I'm sticking with what I said originally and I still feel uneasy about SnowDog. I feel he had some info on the poll and kept pushing Ship.

Votes Snow Dog
I never once pushed ship. Never. Ever!
Sorry Snow, I re read and you pushed House, but said you voted Ship. But I still feel you had some kind of inside info pushing the poll so hard so I cast my vote for you. I could be wrong, but I guess we will find out if you are bad or not soon.

I had no info. You just voted for a civ. Congrats.

Roxy wrote:Srsly tried dropping this shit yesterday but if they keep it up so will I. I apoloogize to the other players. But if someone was totes misquoting you wouldn't you do the same?

Answer the quote Snow Dog. I will never let it go. There was no implication that I thought we did not have a home when I clearly say "yah we have a home ship and bank what is your point?"

Already answered this.

Boogs wrote:I'm sticking with what I said originally and I still feel uneasy about SnowDog. I feel he had some info on the poll and kept pushing Ship.

Votes Snow Dog

I never once pushed ship. Never. Ever!

Roxy this whole thing is from that first post. A misunderstanding from that post. Any subsequent post is irrelevant. All our arguing is irrellevant. I obviously misunderstood that post. I see an implication there. I still do. But you say you always knew the house was completely built. Ok fair enough. Can we drop it now?

Roxy wrote:
Roxy wrote:If the ship and bank aren't finished (the Home isn't finished either) and I pick one of those then I wouldn't be protected would I?

Did I miss something that said I was protected from Zombies?
Here is another quote from that ill fated morning - another you completely ignored. You quoted every other post of mine except for the last 2 which are the 2 that prove my point. I never implied we did not have a house.

I quoted one post of yours. Only one. Didn't ignore the others. This is really a mountain out of a molehill.

reywaS wrote:No, but he certainly "implied" it.

Touche!

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote: Well I did admit my mistake.

And you are correct. A lot of people who voted house seemed to assume we didnt have one. That was my whole point all along. I was trying to be helpful to everyone. saying "Hey don't worry, we do have a house, don't let THAT be the reason to vote for it.

But pulling up Roxy's quote again proves she did imply that she didn't think she had a house and needed to build one to be able to stay indoors safely. And I say again, by this time house was certain to win anyway, so where do I gain if I am a mafia?
Another thing. If everyone else was "implying" the same thing as Roxy, why in the world did you call her out on it??? You jumped onto her because of her back and forth with llama.

I didn't call her out on it. I posted the same sort of thing a few times. Nothing to do with Llama at all.

reywaS wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
reywaS wrote:Does anyone else see this implication in the above sentence?
I do, but I don't think it matters.

Implication is subjective. Just because it doesn't imply something to you doesn't mean it doesn't imply something to others. I am tired of this same argument about one line of Roxy's though, because I don't think it is relevant and I don't think we are gaining any new information out of it, just annoying people.
well, then I take great pride in knowing that I am annoying you. Aren't you the one that made the comment that SVS talked about where you are trying to squash discussion? I will always say what's on my mind whether it annoys people or not.

Great pride? A bit over the top isn't it? He didn't say YOU were annoying him. And why did you expect him to agree with me? What does that mean? Is this still the game or are we now having an argument?

thellama73 wrote:
reywaS wrote:Does anyone else see this implication in the above sentence?
I do, but I don't think it matters.

Implication is subjective. Just because it doesn't imply something to you doesn't mean it doesn't imply something to others. I am tired of this same argument about one line of Roxy's though, because I don't think it is relevant and I don't think we are gaining any new information out of it, just annoying people.

Totally agree. I am so sick of it I am letting reywaS have the last word if he wants it. It is finished.

reywaS wrote:I seriously do not understand where you are getting that from. Nowhere in that post does she imply that we don't have a house.

"I DO NOT WANT TO BE OUTSIDE FOR THE ZOMBIES TO FIND."

To me that says that shes voting for house....not because there isn't one to be had...but because she wants to be inside of it.

I'll let it go for now, but I do find it very strange that you can't admit you are wrong about any implication that she did not make.

It does imply it. You just refuse to accept it.

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:I'm sorry. I think I got Snow Dog confused with llama there about twisting Roxy's words as they were both a part of that convo. Nevertheless, as I was suspicious of them both, I'd still vote for llama for the DP vote and reason for it.
I'd like to know how I twisted her words.
You said that she said something that she did not. Then you came back and said that she simply implied it....which she did not.
Yes but I admitted it at the time she did not say it, it was my mistake. But she definitely implied it as you can see for yourself.

But anyway why is this relevant? I am mafia because I argue with someone? At this stage House was going to win anyway so I had absolutely nothing to gain. And even though house won Stevie died..so you are totally sure it was the correct choice still?
No, what makes me suspicious of you is you continuing to say that Roxy "implied" something that she clearly did not. You can't just say, "hey, guys, I made a mistake.'' Well, you did do that, but then you said that she didn't say it but implied it. HEre, let me pull the quote one more time.

Snow Dog wrote:
Roxy wrote:Got a busy day ahead of me at The National Zoo so I need to vote now.

Glad there was some discussion and I am picking Home. I do not want to be outside for the Zombies to find. Nothing better than being home and sleeping in your own bed.

Happy Monday all! <3
"I do not want to be outside for the zombies to find."

That is where you said she implied that we had no house. I DO NOT WANT TO BE OUTSIDE FOR THE ZOMBIES TO FIND. By your logic every single person that voted for the house was "implying" that we didn't have a house. She voted for the house because she wnated to be inside of it.

I think you are suspicious because in my experience baddies are a lot less likely to admit that they misinterpreted something. Civvies are much more likely to admit mistakes.

Well I did admit my mistake.

And you are correct. A lot of people who voted house seemed to assume we didnt have one. That was my whole point all along. I was trying to be helpful to everyone. saying "Hey don't worry, we do have a house, don't let THAT be the reason to vote for it.

But pulling up Roxy's quote again proves she did imply that she didn't think she had a house and needed to build one to be able to stay indoors safely. And I say again, by this time house was certain to win anyway, so where do I gain if I am a mafia?

thellama73 wrote:
indiglo wrote:
Kate wrote: no reproduction of host PMs
We do not discuss prizes!

I am assuming this means we can't discuss what happened due to the Day 0 poll one way or the other.
Now this is interesting. Indiglo seems to have gotten a PM from Kate after the Day 0 poll. I certainly did not get one.

Hmm.

Possibly some of them got btsc like in MacGyver?

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:I'm sorry. I think I got Snow Dog confused with llama there about twisting Roxy's words as they were both a part of that convo. Nevertheless, as I was suspicious of them both, I'd still vote for llama for the DP vote and reason for it.
I'd like to know how I twisted her words.
You said that she said something that she did not. Then you came back and said that she simply implied it....which she did not.

Yes but I admitted it at the time she did not say it, it was my mistake. But she definitely implied it as you can see for yourself.

But anyway why is this relevant? I am mafia because I argue with someone? At this stage House was going to win anyway so I had absolutely nothing to gain. And even though house won Stevie died..so you are totally sure it was the correct choice still?

reywaS wrote:I'm sorry. I think I got Snow Dog confused with llama there about twisting Roxy's words as they were both a part of that convo. Nevertheless, as I was suspicious of them both, I'd still vote for llama for the DP vote and reason for it.

I'd like to know how I twisted her words.

LittleTiger wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
LittleTiger wrote:I have just read through Day 0 and what struck me was Snow Dog pushing for Ship and twisting Roxy into a pretzel. Epignosis voted Ship early. Then, FH who really DID push for ship and made all kinds of logical reasons why. Next was BWT who made a remarkably similar post as he did in the MOTU game wherein he calls someone OOT. MP wanted to vote for Bank but "slipped" in the poll and voted House.

Now I will read today's posts....
I don't know how many times I will have to say this. I didn't push for ship. Never. I voted ship. That's all.
Yes, you did vote for ship. But your conversation afterwards with Roxy seemed to be about you trying to persuade people that House was not a good choice and twisting her words. Just stating my impression as I read through, that is all. Doesn't mean I am ready to vote you at the moment.

That wasn't it at all. I was just challenging voters views that we had no house. I wasn't trying to persuade anyone of anything. But I see now what people are thinking. No...I did not give a damn who voted what.

LittleTiger wrote:I have just read through Day 0 and what struck me was Snow Dog pushing for Ship and twisting Roxy into a pretzel. Epignosis voted Ship early. Then, FH who really DID push for ship and made all kinds of logical reasons why. Next was BWT who made a remarkably similar post as he did in the MOTU game wherein he calls someone OOT. MP wanted to vote for Bank but "slipped" in the poll and voted House.

Now I will read today's posts....

I don't know how many times I will have to say this. I didn't push for ship. Never. I voted ship. That's all.

Epignosis wrote:
He-Man wrote:
First you go after low posters

Then pulled on it you pull a switcheroo.

Not cool.

What?

First you try to pin suspicion on low posters

Then I (he Man) questioned you about it and you blamed LLama

Not OK

I think

Ambray wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Ambray wrote:
So nobody at all that has been posting has given you pings??
Well, He Man had exactly one post in the forty-eight hours of Day 0 and the First half of Day 1. Then I mentioned looking at low posters and now he has 13. Combined with the general incoherence of his posts, this worries me a bit.

You could say the exact same for me.

Still no one wants to weigh in on BWT.
THAT is speaking volumes to me.

Everyone else is just talking in circles and accusing any and everything that even dares to breathe in here.

Yes..interesting isn't it?

Yes He man is coming on strong here.

He-Man wrote:
>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:
He-Man wrote:
>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:He-Man, I dont think anybody has really been specifically targeting anybody for the lynch yet, and i cant see anybody as of right now that looks like theyre tied to epi in any way. i dont think its fair to go throwing out conclusions of any sort yet. we need to talk about all of this first before we jump to "youre suspicious and bad, so die" kind of thing. in fact, I think epi's post actually makes a lot of sense, but so does the point made of quality over quantity.
Fair enough spaghetti, it's just my observation, you are free to dismiss them.

And whilst no one has been pushed to the lynch with just 8 or so hours to go, it's only a matter of time

And again, linki

But also spaghetti, a few have said that snow dog is suspicious and llama and whilst I don't agree with those I would say the people that have said such things will most likely vote them as a 'weak suspicion' it's how day one always goes down, so spaghetti I think it's fair to say that epig could be trying to get some distance between snow dog etc

In fact I will be shocked if those two don't receive any votes.

Linki again
Yes people have said things that can qualify as a weak suspicion, even for me, but I will not be making any conclusions until I absolutely have to on the first day vote.
i would prefer to speculate conclusions to avoid civvie death, if epig was snow dogs or llamas partner the last thing he is gonna do now is buddy up to them.

Linki in maguyver mafia there was NO low posters and the mafia won.

Linkin x 2 snow dog if makes you feel any better I think it would be wrong to vote you out so soon, I won't give you my vote yet

It would be wrong at any time because I am not mafia.

Oh well. Looks like I will be first out this game. Go ahead and lynch me folks.

>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:He-Man, I dont think anybody has really been specifically targeting anybody for the lynch yet, and i cant see anybody as of right now that looks like theyre tied to epi in any way. i dont think its fair to go throwing out conclusions of any sort yet. we need to talk about all of this first before we jump to "youre suspicious and bad, so die" kind of thing. in fact, I think epi's post actually makes a lot of sense, but so does the point made of quality over quantity.
I don't understand this quality over quantity thing. If one has something to say regarding the game or another poster, post it. Anything off topic...in green.
Its more to do with what is said in the post. A post can be relevant whether its meaningful or not. such as:

A quality post would be one that has a lot of analyzing and meaningful and insightful opinions, versus somebody that spends a lot of their posts quoting people and saying something barely to the extent of "I agree with this person"

I agree with you.

@He Man. So why do you think I will get votes? For the cardinal sin of arguing with Roxy? For posting "too much"? Any other reasons? Low quality post maybe?

>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:He-Man, I dont think anybody has really been specifically targeting anybody for the lynch yet, and i cant see anybody as of right now that looks like theyre tied to epi in any way. i dont think its fair to go throwing out conclusions of any sort yet. we need to talk about all of this first before we jump to "youre suspicious and bad, so die" kind of thing. in fact, I think epi's post actually makes a lot of sense, but so does the point made of quality over quantity.

I don't understand this quality over quantity thing. If one has something to say regarding the game or another poster, post it. Anything off topic...in green.

Russtifinko wrote:
He-Man wrote:Also look my post count is going up.

It's not about quantity it's about quality. I could spam the thread and get a 100 posts hmm I'm sure I did that in MOTU and I was bad.

Anyways looking at the low posters russ IMO has been making some sense and his posts seem ok with me albeit a few.

I can't account for LT but the others are notorious low posters, maybe LT just wants a bit of a break, she plays loads of mafia and never seen her play an extreme because of allegiance.

Epic has my eye now. That's for sure.
I agree that voting low posters on day 1 is bad form. Really DP, llama? He's posted once to say hi and missed the poll. Dull, sure, but reeking of evil? Maybe by day 3 or so.

And wanted to say He-Man is spot on here with his point on quality over quality. This is the second game in which I've been mentioned among low posters, a categorization to which I object. True, I post seldom, but when I do I (in my perhaps not-so-humble opinion) almost always add something original and valuable to the discussion. Many top posters get high counts because they post a sentence at a time (eg Snowie). There's nothing wrong with that, it's purely a stylistic difference. However, I object to the idea that I'm a less valuable player because I don't write that way.

A sentence at a time? What the hell are you talking about?

He-Man wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.
Well I know what I am saying.

The point is I think you are being hypocritical.

I don't think low posters are nessersary lt bad,

I do think you are/could be trying to steer away from one of the top posters who have some heat to avoid their lynching.

I hope you understand now.

How can he be being hypocritical?

Boogs wrote:I'm still leaning towards Snow Dog and feeling uneasy even though this is my first mafia. I kind of leaning towards him considering how hard he pushed Ship and someone did have inside info on the poll as Kate told us. Llama does also throw me as a bit suspicious, so I would like to say one of them seems a little off and should be voted for. What do others think who haven't posted concerns about the lynch yet think?

I am getting sick of these lies. I did not push ship at all...not once. Show me your evidence!!!

Search found 185 matches