The Syndicate

Going to put my vote on slang for now. I may change it. Probably will knowing me.

In answer to timmer. I still don't know who my number 1 lynch target is. Might go for boomslang again.

So many people not posting. Has hedgie posted at all this game? And where is Mongoose or Lizzy?

In fact MP. I really am not sure who to vote and that worries me.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
zeek wrote:What I mean is you speculated on the possiblities surrounding Made but really seemed set on dismissing him lying. The way you addressed that possibility was not the same as you addressed the others. Whether you thought it was weak or not, you didn't not give them an even look, which I found very un-MP-like.

You're right about the wand actually. Don't say anything, better you don't discuss it.
Seemed set on dismissing? Yeah, I suppose you could say that, because I didn't comprehend any logical reason that he would lie as a baddie.

I don't understand how it was very un-MP-like, but if you think that, then I don't know what else to say about it.

Where are you looking right now?

Snow Dog wrote:Any point I make in any game seems often the contrived or forced to you MP. I just can't win. Maybe I'll start calling your ideas forced and contrived. At least I checked how many how many times this phrase has been used. Ok no one agrees that it's important. Let's move on. I get it. If rey and SVs turn up bad i won't even say a thing.

Anyway I am wary of you Mp always. I want to trust you though. You've done nothing to warrant suspicion yet.
I had no intention of offending you, so I apologize if I did.

Anyway, I just was curious what you thought about everyone, and I just found it odd you were concentrating on the slip since I just don't see it -- especially since you haven't been discussing as many players as I'm used to doing. I recall now that you mentioned Made, but considering he wasn't lying I was wondering what you thought of him now.

You still haven't said anything about DH. What do you think of him?

I apologise for being tetchy. It's me not you.

I am having difficulty as usual on finding anything really to latch on to. My fault again as I should be reading more thoroughly. I will try and get down to rereading some stuff.

About DH. Well i don't really know much about his playstyle. I guess you'll go and show me how many games played with him now, but for my part I don't remember. But what i read sounds believable. Do you think he is bad? If so can you concisely explain why?

Made is civ. That's what I think anyway.
Elo's vote for zeek pinged me a bit.

addedndum. I said plenty about Made, MP. don't go making things up now.

Any point I make in any game seems often the contrived or forced to you MP. I just can't win. Maybe I'll start calling your ideas forced and contrived. At least I checked how many how many times this phrase has been used. Ok no one agrees that it's important. Let's move on. I get it. If rey and SVs turn up bad i won't even say a thing.

Anyway I am wary of you Mp always. I want to trust you though. You've done nothing to warrant suspicion yet.

zeek wrote:Snowy, I can see what you're saying but I just don't know in what context they would use that in a chatroom.

No, I don't either. But...it is a possibility. Not worth a vote in itself. But add that to other rey suspicions I've seen floating around and may add up to something.

And now you keep using it as a joke to solidify the fact of it's common usage.

S~V~S wrote:So we are back to this? Two people several hours apart using the same not uncommon (in the USA) phrase must have BTSC? I don't have BTSC with Rey, nor do I have it with anyone else.

Maybe Rey thinks I am brilliant and awesome (not an unlikely supposition) and wants to emulate me in all things Or maybe it was a coincidence.

I'm not back to this. I never stopped thinking about it. Maybe your maybe is correct or maybe it was a coincidence. Or maybe not. But it is evidence.

S~V~S wrote:Waiting for me to make a Federal Case out of it, aren't you?

Talking of Federal cases, you have used this phrase twice before in Syndicate history, but reywaS has never used it before. This is his first time saying it.

I love this bit. Thanks Rob.

Epignosis wrote:
“Awareness is expensive in Finald,” said Vompatti.

I just did.

Sorry I meant bea.

FZ. wrote:Since MP is the winner anyway, I'm going to give my vote to a person I suspect less. That would be....Bea. She's asking questions that seem very perceptive in my eyes, and I like the way she's acting. Let's hope I'm not wrong

linki. Maybe you should vote yourself and some people will move their vote. Not that I know of any reason not to vote MP, but the last thing zeek mentioned made me a bit worried

I'd vote SVS

Keeping my vote on MP. Although i have no feeling one way or another about LC yet.

S~V~S wrote:Snowy, LC has the same # of votes as Dom. Why not include him in your contenders?

I didn't even notice that. Let me think if I'll change

Seems it's between MP and Dom. Voted MP. I feel a little better about him than Dom. I might be biased because of PA.

I think FZ makes very good points. I didn't vote Made simply because I don't see the logic of his actions if he was bad. Plus he seems to be a player that people are always suspicious of. Having said that I don't know who to vote the wand to.

Sorry Llama. I never voted for you early till now. I really thought you were shifty. I guess I'll never work you out.

Ok before times runs out. I am trusting Made but I am going back to Llama. He just seems wrong to me. Not super confident with this vote but it's the best I got at the ppresent.

Votes LLama

Ok Llama. i think I am satisfied for now.

Made still not sure about. damn. Made is so easy to suspect but that don't make him bad.

MP. Logan worries me because of his earlier claim about his playstyle. Something about he only jokes around when civ and is more serious when baddie. I really don't think this is true but maybe you know better?

Anyway I found the post

thellama73 wrote:
Made wrote: Just a thought-- do players conform to their own play style benefit themselves further when they are mafia or just because of predisposition?
Not directed at you in particular Juliet, but also Llama and MP, 3 players who have very unique and recognizable play styles.
Speaking for myself, I think I conform to my own playstyle more when I civilian, whereas when I am bad I am more careful not to come across as suspicious. Having a team that I don't want to let down makes me a more conscientious, and therefore less freewheeling and prone to random antics, sort of player.

Just going to post in case zeek has something further to say. I'm busy at the moment. See ya all.

thellama73 wrote:
bea wrote: llama - you didn't dismiss it - but you didn't exactly point it out as a possibility right? You were pretty quick to jump on the idea that Made obviously took Body's blackmail because he must be hiding something nafarious. I feel like we are approaching the potentially same idea from different sides? Am I wrong?
I have a suspicion and I'm running with it. It seems silly to say "oh gee, maybe my suspicion is wrong." Yeah, maybe it is. But that is true of everyone's suspicions. YOu gotta go with what you have, and play the odds. I think the odds are that Made is bad.

Made always looks bad. I know this from the Cars game.

Thanks zeek.

I was considering a boomslang vote today but what with events I am less sure. Also Logan still has me worried. I will reread DH I think before I make up my mind on him.

And for those attempts to show a picture of Zeek and I, I present our true picture.

For now just posting in case zeek has more to say.

bea wrote:Those are all sound reasons snowy. I would have had zeeky on my list too but the beautiful BR voted me before I got through it all.

Thems he breaks.

Reasons why I picked zeek as a partner.

1. He has cracked a rib and is in much pain.
2. He is on drugs.
3. He is a fellow Britisher. Jawohl!
4. His avatar is David Tennent.

S~V~S wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.
Ok what is AYBS?
Are You Being Served. I was:

Captain Peacock
Inquires of someone, “Are you being served?” His target will be able to use his or her action again the next hour.
Inquires of someone, “Are you free?” If that person is a member of the staff, he will be told “I’m free!”
Whichever question he asks must not be asked again immediately after.
Decides all ties.

Linki, read the card czar role.

Regarding ties:

Send me a list of who should lose and who should win from top to bottom respectively (i.e., put yourself at the bottom). You can update this as you like.

Oh I played that. Got killed early so dont recall that role.

Epignosis wrote:From the Card Czar:

Why do I hurt all over?

Submit your "white cards" by PM by the end of the Night.

Say what?

S~V~S wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.

Ok what is AYBS?

No I didn't. I chose him.

Ok. I hose zeek

S~V~S wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
It was Zodac. And he had it in a game I played, I had the role, lol. I have to go look now.

Oh was that his secret? Funny i remeber many non lynches.

DharmaHelper wrote:Picked my partner.

Also, RIP MM

Damn you, I wanted Llama!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezz please.

Of course!

DharmaHelper wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
S~V~S wrote:He had one in MOTU, i did not play that one, but I modded it.
What's MOTU?
Nothing, whats the MOTU with you?

lolz

Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.

S~V~S wrote:He had one in MOTU, i did not play that one, but I modded it.

What's MOTU?

S~V~S wrote:Epi often has tie deciders. But usually there is a mechanism for him to be able to decide if the Decider is not around.

Never known him to have them before. Besides Cars.

Oh poor Mr Humphries.

So sorry MM

Turnip Head wrote:Stanley has a choice to make.

There is a tie decider? Where is Stanley from?

Good luck to both of you.

i CHANGED to MM. Thought better of it and decided to vote Llama. I'm all over the place. Unfortunately the time was up and my vote is still on MM.
Sorry MM.

vOTED BOOMSLANG IN THE END.

Not much time left and still uncertain, I agree with Rox, day 1 sucks. I quite like the Boomslang case, I questioned his theory myself but didn't get a reply. Didn't really notice MM's treat much until it has been pointed out by other players, so could vote there. DH and LC are possibly two civs arguing imo. Llama still seems off to me.

I don't know.

This "Federal " thing seemed like a legit concern to me. These are the sort of minor details that normally get discussed day 1 as far as I remember. I think it was worth pointing out. The only reason i don't press it further is because i find it hard to understand how that term would crop up in chat.

Well I still don't know who to vote, interesting LC/DH argument but I have seen two civs argue like this so often that i don't think I'll be voting for either.

I am not convinced of llama's reply to me earlier so my vote may go there.

thellama73 wrote:
Made wrote: Just a thought-- do players conform to their own play style benefit themselves further when they are mafia or just because of predisposition?
Not directed at you in particular Juliet, but also Llama and MP, 3 players who have very unique and recognizable play styles.
Speaking for myself, I think I conform to my own playstyle more when I civilian, whereas when I am bad I am more careful not to come across as suspicious. Having a team that I don't want to let down makes me a more conscientious, and therefore less freewheeling and prone to random antics, sort of player.

Is this true? And if it was would you freely admit it and endanger future games? Maybe you are just hiding the fact that you are bad now.

reywaS wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Its an odd mafia phrase that I'm not sure I've seen before. Twice in one game seems funky to me.
The implication is they may have used the phrase in btsc?
BTSC or ya know....maybe I read it earlier and it got stuck in my subconscious mind and when I went to grab a similar phrase from my mind that's the one I went for.

Yeah. I'd thought of that possibility too.

Search found 161 matches