The Syndicate

Long Con wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Earlier while compiling ISOs, MP accidentally deleted the one he'd done for Wilgy. Well if he was bad one must ask if this an accident. Or was it a way to avoid that analasys? Would MP do this though? Does it border on unfair play?

There is absolutely no way that it was intentional.

Absolutely? Why?

Because there is absolutely no way that MP07 of any alignment would intentionally abuse his power and cheat, especially in such a flagrant fashion. No more discussion on the topic is needed, case closed.

I don't feel like I was buddying Epi.

Quin wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Earlier while compiling ISOs, MP accidentally deleted the one he'd done for Wilgy. Well if he was bad one must ask if this an accident. Or was it a way to avoid that analasys? Would MP do this though? Does it border on unfair play?

There is absolutely no way that it was intentional.

Epignosis wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:What does "I miss Made" mean?

Made, as far as I know, holds the distinction of being the only black player The Syndicate has ever known, and he was the first one I ever saw use that gif before. His birthday was the other day. Dude was funny as hell and fun to play Mafia with.

a2thezebra wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:So now I state I'll probably not vote zebra I see that now votes are coming in for her! Sheesh!

Well aren't you the contrarian. If you actually suspect me and want me to be lynched, shouldn't you be happy about those votes?

a2thezebra wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Y'know what...

I still think mp was bad.

I do too.

Nachomamma8 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I'm sorry I missed the vote. The last day of work before break was hectic. Will catch up later today. I'm voting to learn more because more information is likely a good thing.

I have my eye on DFaraday in particular; I find it odd that he popped up and had input on the night vote (which isn't indicative of alignment in any way at all) and yet hasn't really given input on anything else.

Snow Dog wrote:I sense you are trying to rile me. I'll ignore for now.

I agree. And considering Mafia's main motivation is to stay in the spotlight instead of thrust themselves into it, Zebra gets a small townlean.

Scotty wrote:@HOST Are you at liberty to say the exact number of PMs that were missing last night? And if so, how many?

Question for the thread: so I'm never fully sure of what makes a NK a good one when it comes to the victims' suspicions.
Does it help the killer look more civ if the killer was a suspect of the victims? How about if they were defending? There may not be a correct answer, I'm just curious.

I liked this question to llama, even though it's not the type of question I can imagine being answered.
And, a bit of strange reasoning here, but I don't think it's likely that an entire scumteam missed submitting a kill; these things are rare in general (since it takes 3-4 people to miss actions), but I don't think that Llama would mention that a bunch of PMs were missing if a scumteam was missing a kill; call it gut, but it seems weird to draw focus on the mafia team like that.

motel room wrote:Where's the supertown that was campaigning for poor motel room [1]'s lynch? Is he still supertowning?

He took a break for a little bit, but he's back now.
I'm sorry for mislynching you

Vompatti wrote:I'd be surprised if either Zebra or Mac turns out bad.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

I don't understand. What is wrong with my voting record? I have been consistent. Explain please!

I meant to address this a while ago, but I haven't had more than a few minutes to check in, or I was on my phone.

You posted this on Day 1.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Scotty wrote:Why is no one talking about me? This is odd for me for a day 1.

I like dog's entrance. (Note that my phone routinely likes to change his name to "dog" or "sog"). I don't like zebra's entrance. And motel room is playing very minimally and I don't mind the case against him, but zebra will be getting my vote if she doesn't check in today.

I was thinking of voting zebra too. Reason 1, he has only posted a bunch of emoticons which in itself is annoying. Reason 2, he is the first name on the list.

Your reason for voting zebra then. It isn't very strong, but you immediately followed up with this.
I disagree, my reason is strong enough on Day 1

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:i don't understand this motel room vote. He's has posted drunk most of the time and he didn't come back after a question. That's it! (better than nothing I suppose, and I don't know him anyway so....urgh)

You questioned the motives for the motel room votes. Neither reason is great, but I didn't like that you came up with a poor one for a Day 1 zebra vote, only to question another poor Day 1 vote (or rather multiple votes).

I didn't come up with a poor reason for zebra. I had already said I may vote for low poster and she had only posted emoticons.


Later on you posted this, and I only just now realize I'm uncertain what you meant.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Eight minutes to go.

Yeah I'm toying with an MP vote but part of me wants to see how motel turns out.

You toyed with an MP vote near the end of the day. Per this post, did you mean that you want to see how many votes motel room got, or that you were considering voting for him to see his lynch-flip?


Still, you wound up voting zebra anyway.
I never considerdd motel as a vote. Mp I was unsure on. I don't actually remember what i meant

You also voted zebra Day 2. Yes it's consistent, but is it sincere? Additionally, you placed a vote that put zebra and Black Rock closer together in the lynch, which considering BR flipped bad doesn't look good for you.



I'm torn on you overall Snow Dog. I see one part of your playstyle that I remember from playing long ago. The fact that that pattern has carried over to now (what almost 2 years later?) suggests that you're playing your "normal" game, and looks good for you. There's also another post you made this game which to me screams civ (or potentially the opposite). I know that's an ambiguous comment, but that's how I feel.

Who are you looking at today?



I've gotta run, but I'm going to look at MP's ISO of sig when I get back.

Linki: NO U

motel room wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

I don't understand. What is wrong with my voting record? I have been consistent. Explain please!

Consistent is bad though. Especially on Day 1 and 2.

Nachomamma8 wrote:I will avenge them

MacDougall wrote:Lynch Peter Andre

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

MovingPictures07 wrote:This game is like a patient in the ICU. Where is everyone? Where is the baddie hunting?

Seriously folks, why should I even try if the rest of you aren't going to do shit? Honest question because I'm feeling a bit frustrated with this entire day cycle's wasted potential right now.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:This day period is pretty lame, folks. There has not been enough discussion or attempts to uncover members of the mafia at all. I anticipate much of the player list will vote in a similar to d1 fashion (including low poster policy lynch votes and unsubstantiated votes), which is unacceptable.

true.

I might vote the zebra again, I seem to have touched a nerve there. trouble is I just don't know her game. can anyone help here?

Well, I looked at her post history already, and unfortunately I don't think I'll be any help. I've seen her mislynched for playing really detached, chaotic, gut-based games like she is right now, but her MO is to go aggressive supertown. I've seen enough of the former (and her behavior here) to feel hesitant. I don't really see anything illuminating in her post history. What would compel you to vote for her again over any of the other low content posters?

MovingPictures07 wrote:This day period is pretty lame, folks. There has not been enough discussion or attempts to uncover members of the mafia at all. I anticipate much of the player list will vote in a similar to d1 fashion (including low poster policy lynch votes and unsubstantiated votes), which is unacceptable.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Snowy, why did you vote for zebra?

i didn't like the vote for motel or you. i had already announced I'd probably go for a low poster and zebra was top of the list.

Why did you vote early?

Soneji wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Soneji wrote:Not fully caught up but Epi and MP would be my top suspects at the moment. MP's vote on motel room can certainly be attributed to self preservation, yet with all the time he spent making posts d1, he didn't make any push against anyone. No courage of conviction. More then that, his response to Epi's rainbow analysis was pretty blown out of proportion, a tl;dr defense against what was a pretty ridiculous analysis by Epi.

That ridiculous analysis plus him going after an inactive at this point in the game is why I suspect Epignosis. The analysis seems more like a premeditated move than having an epiphany and pursuing it with fervor, by the way in which it was written and it being on a day one that was noticeably barebones in terms of reads. Even if his general findings were true and he did happen to notice this pattern specifically, hinging on it D1 is folly. Better to let MP continue what hes doing and get him with more concrete evidence later, then let him weasel out of your weak reasoning and straighten his act.

It is possible they are both scum, one pirate, one cannibal. MP's high volume of posts certainly lend itself towards a larger chance of slipping.

[VOTE: ] aubergine

[VOTE:



Your attributing "rainbow analysis" to me troubles me more than your vote.] aubergine

[VOTE:
I am quite sure you know I was referring to you analyzing MP' s rainbow lists and not you making one. It is called context.] aubergine

Soneji wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Soneji wrote:Not fully caught up but Epi and MP would be my top suspects at the moment. MP's vote on motel room can certainly be attributed to self preservation, yet with all the time he spent making posts d1, he didn't make any push against anyone. No courage of conviction. More then that, his response to Epi's rainbow analysis was pretty blown out of proportion, a tl;dr defense against what was a pretty ridiculous analysis by Epi.

That ridiculous analysis plus him going after an inactive at this point in the game is why I suspect Epignosis. The analysis seems more like a premeditated move than having an epiphany and pursuing it with fervor, by the way in which it was written and it being on a day one that was noticeably barebones in terms of reads. Even if his general findings were true and he did happen to notice this pattern specifically, hinging on it D1 is folly. Better to let MP continue what hes doing and get him with more concrete evidence later, then let him weasel out of your weak reasoning and straighten his act.

It is possible they are both scum, one pirate, one cannibal. MP's high volume of posts certainly lend itself towards a larger chance of slipping.

[VOTE: ] aubergine

[VOTE:

I don't know why you call his analysis ridiculous.

Your attributing "rainbow analysis" to me troubles me more than your vote.] aubergine

[VOTE:
I am quite sure you know I was referring to you analyzing MP' s rainbow lists and not you making one. It is called context.] aubergine

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Am I being too harsh on sig? Are there town interpretations of his behavior where I thought he seemed like he was manufacturing his thoughts? Or do you agree with me that he looks bad? Or does he look even worse than I am assessing? What do you all think? This is important, especially if people are going to come in here and just hop on the wagon. Don't do that. Talk to me and the thread.

BBL for now, more ISOs incoming once I return.

i have found your analysis on on sig quite compelling. What are your thought on Quin?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Am I being too harsh on sig? Are there town interpretations of his behavior where I thought he seemed like he was manufacturing his thoughts? Or do you agree with me that he looks bad? Or does he look even worse than I am assessing? What do you all think? This is important, especially if people are going to come in here and just hop on the wagon. Don't do that. Talk to me and the thread.

BBL for now, more ISOs incoming once I return.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Snowy, why did you vote for zebra?

a2thezebra wrote:I want to lynch Quin.

.

motel room wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:But I already voted for Snow Dog who is also bad so #YOLO

Snow Dog wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:I want to lynch Quin.

That's right suckers I can talk.

I never thought otherwise.

Your OMGUS historical revisionism game is on point!

I never once posted an opinion on the matter.

Snow Dog wrote:I sense you are trying to rile me. I'll ignore for now.

How come you're not interested in why she thinks you're bad and put a non-changeable vote down, Snow Dog?

Epignosis wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Classic Epi!

I just want to say it does me good to see you around here. To see you at all, really. I hope things are going well for you buddy. Missed you a lot.

Quin wrote:Mad Max is likely to end today so once that's over I'll properly catch up and probably dish out some kind of bullshit idk. It's not an ideal justification for being lazy, but in all honesty that game's left me all burnt out.

Long Con asked me who I'd have voted - I would answer Soneji. I'll see if I can back that read up later but his argument against my self-vote gives me dem baddie vibes.

Black Rock wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:MP's reactions this night make me think he is civ. Otherwise I don't understand his frustration and anger.

His reactions make him neutral to me, since I've seen him react in such ways civ or bad.

I'm going to make this vote. I just have no idea where it will be, but the day is young. The computer will be moving up from the basement soon and that will make mafiaing easier.

a2thezebra wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:I want to lynch Quin.

That's right suckers I can talk.

I never thought otherwise.

Your OMGUS historical revisionism game is on point!

a2thezebra wrote:I want to lynch Quin.

That's right suckers I can talk.

Snow Dog wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Two people should have died. Only one did.

thellama73 wrote:LeChuck - The infamous ghost pirate. Kills nightly.

The Cannibals (3) - Just want to be left alone on Monkey Island. They kill nightly and win if both other teams are dead (with the exception of Herman Toothrot and the Head of the Navigator, whom they can tolerate.)

There's a blocker, a protector, and the Head of the Navigator, but there's also this:

thellama73 wrote:Night ends in an hour and I am still missing lots of actions.

Yes I was surprised at only one death. There is a role blocker so that could explain that. Probably.