The Syndicate

DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?
Ok I'm not sure I am allowed to answer that.
In this case, I'm to assume that you are Stan, Toothrot or a cannibal with Toothrot's Banana picker.

Makes no sense for me to be a cannibal. Why would I save LC?

DrWilgy wrote:@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?

Ok I'm not sure I am allowed to answer that.

DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:There's a reason why I don't trust Snow Dog.

Bananas are more valuable to baddies than civvies.

Snow Dog. Why bananas over grog? Why not grog someone twice instead of banana lc twice?
Doesn't that have the same net result? Remove votes from one dude, or put votes on the other dude.
Nope, it's a survivalist vs activist mindset. A baddie normally takes measures to save themself rather lynch others.

Bananas are more valuable than that to a baddie because they know who to trust and who to save when shit goes bad.

Now I ask, would a civ get bananas and save them for themself or would a civ get grog and nuke who they found suspect?

I don't have grog and never have. The bananas were to save my own ass if needed, I took a risk on saving LC. Now I am defenceless. If LC flips bad at any time, well, I was obviously a fool and maybe I am anyway. It is done now.

a2thezebra wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:I use vote analasys all the time. Every game.
I'm not surprised.

Rude again

Anyway, it would be ludicrous for me to vote LC now. If I made a mistake I will pay for it I guess. With that in mind and using my (and LC's) vote analysis I have to vote Scotty.

Votes Scotty

I use vote analasys all the time. Every game.

a2thezebra wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Anyway not trhat post. Later posts.
I don't follow.
It's not that post that cast doubt but his later ones when he had time to post properly.
And these later ones were only after you had already given him bananas?

No. I don't think so.

Are you voting Scotty?

a2thezebra wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Anyway not trhat post. Later posts.
I don't follow.

It's not that post that cast doubt but his later ones when he had time to post properly.

Anyway not trhat post. Later posts.

If it had, I mean.

a2thezebra wrote:You're telling me this post didn't seem at all desperate or disingenuous to you? Especially considering that it was published at a point in the day where Long Con had very little heat on him and in fact me and DrWilgy were pushing for you or Scotty to be lynched instead?
Long Con wrote:Please do not lynch me. There is not even a single good case against me, why the hell are you putting my name out there like I'm a baddie? I can't talk much now because I'm currently driving, and I'm working until another 5 hours are up. Take off your blinders and stop tunnelling me, I'm a Civ goddammit!

If they had I wouldn't have saved him.

a2thezebra wrote:The only justification I can think of is that you had info on Mac, otherwise I can't fathom why you would help a player who was being so overtly desperate and disingenuous as Long Con was being yesterday.

I didn't read him that way I'm afraid.

a2thezebra wrote:A better question would be why did you banana him?

Because I changed my mind and was fearfuk we were lynching a civ. It was rash. I was keeping them for my own use

DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Y didn't you say so from the start?
Say what?
That you were bananaing him?
When did you exactly banana him?

Why would I have to say it? I did it about an hour or two before lynch time. I don't remember the exact time. Acyually it would be just before my message that he might survive.

DrWilgy wrote:Y didn't you say so from the start?

Say what?

DrWilgy wrote:Not sure.

Snow Pupper infodumping skews my read and I'm frustrated due to this.

Why vote for you LC if he's just going to throw bananas onto you?

Opposite end is why infodump about saving someone unless they are your teammate or the savior is civ?

Due to this I can no longer make an accurate read that isn't impacted by the skewing of game rules. Assuming game rules are followed, I'm to assume what snow dog said is a lie and shpuld vote both him and you. Assuming game rules are broken I'm inclined to believe that Scotty and Zebra are bad.

I checked with our genial host if I could talk about my bananas and where I used them. He had no problem with it.

Read between the lines......READ BETWEEN THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!

Long Con wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:What the hell I'll tell you know. I chucked two bananas on you to reduce your lynch vote by two.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!

Dude... you just couldn't keep it in, could you? You are too hilarious. I'm still physically laughing over here.

I thought that it was probably you. When I said "that's not exactly my most vote-influencing thought about you", that is what I was referring to. I just didn't want to put a target on your back, so I acted like I saved myself. I have/had no bananas, grog, or anything.

Anyway... thanks for the bananas, Snow Dog. I swear to you that you will not regret it when this game ends and all is revealed, because I am Civ.

I AM such a dumbass...

The only annoying thing about that is that it appears you did too. What a shocking waste! How many did you use?

What the hell I'll tell you know. I chucked two bananas on you to reduce your lynch vote by two.

Long Con wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:I'm a bit hurt I am so high on your voting list after all my efforts to save you.
You really shouldn't feel that way. The only people above you are Wilgy and Vompatti... and they both earned their spots with tangible voting records. Who they voted for, AND the timing of those votes, are really big indicators to me. Baddies can vote for their teammates, but both these guys cast their votes for the doomed baddie when it mattered most.

I don't think it would be sensible of me to just assume you're Civ just because you (kind of?) trust me now. You could easily be a baddie who is saying all the right things to make me like you, and it's not really reassuring to me that you brought it up like that. Was that your plan, to be not so "high on my voting list" due to your "efforts to save me"? I haven't forgotten that you cast a killer vote against me last lynch, and then changed your mind after the vote was locked in. Think about that. If I had been lynched, then you'd be all "I trusted him in the end and hoped he'd be saved!" when all the while you held a good share of the responsibility for my death.

I don't want to think that way. That's not exactly my most vote-influencing thought about you, but it's in there. So, don't be hurt about your place on my voting list - as I'm sure you now see, it's far from the worst place you could be, and it's not an unfair placement.

You are right of course. After the game is over you will see the effort I made to save you. I'm happy. No worries.

I'm a bit hurt I am so high on your voting list after all my efforts to save you.

so you are back to zebra? Remember that Nacho said he was only certain that Zebra and Snow Dog were civ. I don't know how he came to this conclusion but it's worth thinking about.

Vomps voting record looks pretty good.
Dr Wilgy is almost certainly civ.
Zebra I think is civ but her voting for me so many times doesn't help me analyse it.
Scotty I am starting to believe could be bad.
LC, I'm sorry to say am I wrong about you again? Are you bad after all.

Ok this is where I am. I think I will be voting Scotty. It's the only thing that adds up to me now.

Vompatti has pretty much got a free pass the whole game but he could easily be bad. I am going to check some voting records.

Long Con wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:The civ supply is running dry. Did you kill Nacho, LC?
No, it wasn't me.

Who do you think, of the remaining players(including me if you wish) most likely to be bad?

The civ supply is running dry. Did you kill Nacho, LC?

Scotty wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Scotty. You think LC saved himself?
Yes

Long Con wrote:Oops, looks like I had a banana or two in my pocket after all! BIH Macdougall.
I reckon he had help.
i reckon the browns will win a game eventually too

Browns?

What is a policy lynch or whatever?

Scotty wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Scotty. You think LC saved himself?
Yes

Long Con wrote:Oops, looks like I had a banana or two in my pocket after all! BIH Macdougall.

I reckon he had help.

a2thezebra wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Whatever I am glad LS survived as I should have voted for Mac any way.
Why?
I also agree with this, Snow Dog? What has made you switch your mind on LC? Remember there are two baddie teams
I'm a sucker for a sob story I guess. No, seriously, how he behaved after he thought he was lynched swung it for me.
You seem eager to push the idea that LC and Mac couldn't both be bad. Why does Mac flipping bad make you re-read LC as civ?

I changed my mind on LC before the lynch

Scotty. You think LC saved himself?

Scotty wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Whatever I am glad LS survived as I should have voted for Mac any way.
Why?
I also agree with this, Snow Dog? What has made you switch your mind on LC? Remember there are two baddie teams

I'm a sucker for a sob story I guess. No, seriously, how he behaved after he thought he was lynched swung it for me.

Vompatti wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Whatever I am glad LS survived as I should have voted for Mac any way.
Why?

If it isn't obvious from previous posts, I think I got it wrong with LC and he is civ. Mac would have been my other vote anyway so I should have put my vote there. Thankfully somebody corrected that by saving LC.

Whatever I am glad LS survived as I should have voted for Mac any way.

DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Don't worry LC. You may yet survive.

DrWilgy wrote: Snow dog's quote here is the least genuine thing I think I've read.

Nope, I still call bs. You don't tell someone you vote for Don't worry unless you are full of jank and are upto shenanigans.

According to you. I disagree.

Long Con wrote:
thellama73 wrote:And no, that's not an error, despite what I know you're all thinking.
Does Llama know we're all thinking "But Long Con had the most votes, how did Mac get lynched??" Or does Llama know we're all thinking "Important Looking Pirates isn't a role in the list, WTF?"

I hadn't spotted that.

Incidentally, I made a mistake in voting for you. I hope I can trust because if you are bad I may have to tear what remains of my hair out.

Snow Dog wrote:Don't worry LC. You may yet survive.

DrWilgy wrote: Snow dog's quote here is the least genuine thing I think I've read.

Thank goodness!

I regret voting for Long Con now.

I am posting from my phone. Something I haven't done before. This is genuine.

DrWilgy wrote: Snow dog's quote here is the least genuine thing I think I've read.

You should read your own posts.

Don't worry LC. You may yet survive.

thellama73 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Long Con wrote:Haha, how premature of me. I thought the poll ended today but there are 24 more hours.
Yeah, but if Scotty votes now Logan will end it early it seems, unless he is already travelling. Hey Logan when you leaving?
In about 15 hours.

Ok that's a cool.

Long Con wrote:Haha, how premature of me. I thought the poll ended today but there are 24 more hours.

Yeah, but if Scotty votes now Logan will end it early it seems, unless he is already travelling. Hey Logan when you leaving?

It occurs to me that Herman and The Head although civs, could be happy with civ defeat so are not completely civ friendly

Ok thanbks for that. And it ain't over yet.

Long Con wrote:Long Con
Dr. Wilgy
Nachomamma8
a2thezebra
Snow Dog
Vompatti
Scotty
MacDougall

That's roughly how I'd rainbow right now... lots of wiggle room all through the middle though. This is more of a list of who I'd likely vote for, from least likely to most likely.

Can you expand on why you see Scotty as bad. Just the gist.

Long Con wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Do we actually know how many of each team is left? Do you know who was Night killed other than MM?
No, but that's why I said "unaccounted for" and not "still alive".

Fair enough.

Search found 311 matches