The Syndicate

Wow. There is definite techiness and bad feeling around this site at the moment. I hope it passes.

OK I appologise to the host and everyone here. I did not see the new thread. Sorry again

S~V~S wrote:I believe Snow is in Europe as well.

Not at the moment. Bright, breezy, chance of showers.

Yeah...I'm in the UK

Kate wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:One of us is going to die soon.
How do you know? I hope not.

I don't know Kate. I fear it. I feel it will be me too.

IDK just feeling a bit pesimistic at the moment.

One of us is going to die soon.

How'd that happen?

thellama73 wrote:
Matahari wrote:Also, who has been pushing the idea that no one has btsc? Its hard to control a lynch when you dont have btsc, isnt it?
It specifically states in the roles that BOB's minions have BTSC. They can control the lynch if they want to and if the civvies don't stick together.

To be exact it says "Minions can still use their NP, and even have BTSC." Which suggests to me they can keep any BTSC that they already have!

thellama73 wrote:
Matahari wrote:Also, who has been pushing the idea that no one has btsc? Its hard to control a lynch when you dont have btsc, isnt it?
It specifically states in the roles that BOB's minions have BTSC. They can control the lynch if they want to and if the civvies don't stick together.

To be exact it says "Minions can still use their NP, and even have BTSC." Which suggests to me they can keep any BTSC that they already have!

thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote:If I am Bob then why was there no kill when I was left all the poll last time?
Because BOB doesn't kill, his minions do. This is another example of you trying to mislead us by misstating the way the game works, IMO.

Wow, i just made exactly the same point.

Roxy wrote:If I am Bob then why was there no kill when I was left all the poll last time?

Because Bob cannot kill. Have you read the roles? Or is this pretend ignorance?

It is definitely possible. She could have been the second recruit. Anything is possible in this game though.

thellama73 wrote:EBWOP: FALSE theories.

I also think that if BOB and his recruits all have BTSC it would be massively overpowered and unbalanced.

Are you saying Roxy may be Bob?

I must have missed that Vomps thread evidence but i will try to study it again.

And what about Rusti? He seems to blend in perfectly. Nobody seems to doubt him. An ideal recruit?

I am still strongly feeling Vompatti and BWT as recruited or one of them Bob. Anyone care to comment on this?

Roxy wrote:Sorry if you feel insulted Snow Dog as that is never my intention. The derp comes from the 4EW site and has been used ever since.

Kate - we will have to agree to disagree as I don't want to detract from finding a suitable lynch candidate that we can all agree on.

Who do you think is Bob? Then who has he recruited?

As far as I know derp means stupid. But for the sake of the game I will drop it.

I think we should stop trying to work out who has btsc and work out who is Bob. What about Matahari? Could she have survived because she is Bob do you think?

Roxy wrote:The recruits would have to know who Bob is. They all have to know who each other are so they don't lynch tgheir own teammates derpdederp

There is no need to be insulting. I am not even gonna talk to you anymore.

Kate wrote:
Roxy wrote:What I don't get is why people don't think that Bob and his recruits can't talk?? Why? Would be awfully hard as a baddie to not have btsc. I have never seen a recruiter NOT be able to communicate with their recruits.
Because the role says that the recruits have BTSC it does not say that Bob does.

I agree. I am sure Bob sends a PM via the host saying "Kill Whatshisname", and that the recruit doesn't even know who Bob is.

I just want to explain why, to any doubters, why there are now two recruits and there must have been a recruit made on day 0. This is from the hosts Day 1 lynch poll.

insertnamehere wrote:

It is now Day 1. You have 24 hours to vote out who you think is BOB, and whoever he is possessing. Remember, if whoever BOB's possessing get's a single vote, everybody lives through the night.

thellama73 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
thellama73 wrote:So no one is bothered by the fact that if we cover seven people, there will be three votes left, all of which could be baddie and could be used to direct the lynch? If we let the baddies control the lynch, we will never kill a single one of them.
If anyone doesn't follow our plan (if we can actually agree who to lynch) then they will reveal themselves as baddie.
Will it matter at that point? There will be four of them and 5 of us (making the rather large assumption that there are no NKs tonight or tomorrow night.)

It's night 3 now so for tomorrows lynch still remains 7 - 3. But assuming one NK 6 - 3. I am fearing 2 nks though. I jusst hope I am totally wrong. If so we know where to look either way.

thellama73 wrote:So no one is bothered by the fact that if we cover seven people, there will be three votes left, all of which could be baddie and could be used to direct the lynch? If we let the baddies control the lynch, we will never kill a single one of them.

If anyone doesn't follow our plan (if we can actually agree who to lynch) then they will reveal themselves as baddie.

Roxy wrote:Llama - I am not advocating any plan of my own. I do not have one. I am asking people what they think of your plan even though I don't like it.
I hate the part about leaving 7 people uncovered.

Mati - lol please pull any or all quotes where I talk about a smilie code b/c the only person who has been talking about it is you tbqh.
You are also talking about why you wouldn't be worth killing but you also say you don't think you are worth keeping around - what did all that mean?

Why do people think there is more than 2 baddies right now? We have only had ONE even day so that would mean only ONE recruit.

The only person I trust that is uncovered is me.

Snow Dog can you offer a better solution to our lynch quandry?

There are three baddies. Bob, his day two recruit and his day zero recruit.

As for a better solution. I seriously think we need to cover evryone except three at most. And we have to agree on a lynch. I cannot go through that last minute panic again.

Roxy wrote:I feel like we really need some sort of cohesive lynch strategy. Without this will be a game of recruits picking civvies off.

I would like to hear what everyone thinks is the best way to go. I really did not like llama's plan of leaving 7 people uncovered but no one else really talked about it. Does anyone else see merit to his plan? Besides Snow Dog who is sure to agree with it

No I think it is a terrible idea. And I fear we ahve too many uncoverd now. I fear a night kill. There are at least two uncovered I do not trust at all.

Vompatti wrote:
thellama73 wrote:The only role I see that could have stopped a lynch at this point is Josie. So either Mata is Josie, or someone who is on the same team as Mata and knows it is Josie. Of course, any of these people could be recruits, so this tells us nothing.
There are quite a few roles with *secrets* though. Maybe one of them could have stopped the lynch or altered the results somehow?

Yes but I have been only looking at the white roles. Blacks are not active yet as far as I know. So only Josie could have stopped this lynch.

thellama73 wrote:I think Mata is Josie, because she said she used her power when she was the only one with a vote. That doesn't make her civ, though.

Just her saying it don't make it true.

thellama73 wrote:The only role I see that could have stopped a lynch at this point is Josie. So either Mata is Josie, or someone who is on the same team as Mata and knows it is Josie. Of course, any of these people could be recruits, so this tells us nothing.

This is true. Or Mata is anyone else and her team mate is Josie

Kate wrote:Right now all I'm thinking is that its probably good Mata did not die. Now we need to read back and see what we can figure out.

I agree. And i just realised why I and Llama were never confirmed civvies. Because whoever is playing Donna Hayward knows how the move works.

Hmmmm. What is everyone thinking?

insertnamehere wrote:Still not the Day Post.

Do it again.

Kate wrote:I must have refreshed this page about 9000 times today...

LOL....me too!

insertnamehere wrote:PUBLIC NOTICE: In my rush to leave, I forgot to add SVS and Birdwithteeth to the poll, and even more important, I changed the poll end time to tomorrow afternoon, not in two days. I probably will not be able to log on again until tomorrow afternoon.

Kate wrote:Did INH say he was going to be late?

yes I think he did.

I was so close to not voting you Mat. I mean it was really close. If you turn up civ I will be feeling very foolish.

I think it suggests she could be josie...or even Ben?

Matahari wrote:Yes, it didnt matter whether I voted or not, because I used my ability at 4:15. I was the only player with a vote at that time, so I guess you shall see....

Is this what they called role hinting? Or something. I don't know. IF you are civ I hope you survive.

The suspense is killing me.

Russtifinko wrote:Actually, missing a vote could be a baddie tactic. The less votes are out there the less the civs are protected, and missing means avoiding explaining your vote

Good point. BWT, I'm looking at you!

No I'm not..don't kill me!!!

thellama73 wrote:Kate, do you have a winner's banner for Minecraft yet? I noticed your shiny new host badge.

I truly love that masters of the Universe one. I am so sad and down I didn't earn one.

thellama73 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:How do I post a screenshot if I wanted to?
I think you have to find a way to upload it online first. Like photobucket or something.

Thanks. In that case i probably won't bother.

How do I post a screenshot if I wanted to?

thellama73 wrote:Fingers crossed that my suspicion of Mata was right!

She didn't vote so I am having serious doubts now. Wish I'd covered another option.

I panicked. i admit it.

thellama73 wrote:I think Vomps is probably bad too, fwiw.

Wow. just read this too late.

Ok..I feel sick. Voted Matahari. I hope we are right about her. I also hope my fears about Vompatti are unfounded. Fingers crossed here.

MP already voted btw llama.

Ok 4 ppl uncovered. Shall I make it 3? I have a bad feeling about Vomps and don't want to die.

Roxy wrote:Why ask what people think if you are going to vote MP anyway Kate?

We are so fucked

I hope not.

This lynch could be a tipping point I fear.

Kate wrote:Ok I'm going to cover mp. I'm just not sure does anyone object?

I don't. But as an absent player i don't think he would have been recruited by Bob. He could be BOb I suppose.

Kate wrote:Does anyone know who was uncovered last night? I have to make a quick decision here

It was I and roxy

Roxy wrote:So why did SVS vote Snow Dog?

I don't know why. maybe because she voted me before the poll was reset. I am telling you it was a waste of a vote. It is a shame. I wish you could believe me.

Vompatti wrote:Shouldn't the poll have ended already?

Another 32 mins

Search found 172 matches