Goodbye JJJ
JJJ has been killed.
It is now Night 3.2. You have 24 hours to get your PMs in.
Return to “[ENDGAME] The Office Mafia”
Meredith's power is null in this situation.indiglo wrote:Yowza! Death-a-palooza over here. RIP both Eloh and leetic.
RIP also Quin! Mafia either knew exactly what they were doing (my guess, would they have started off with a role list, even though the rest of us did not?) or got extremely lucky. I will be all ears as to wtf SVS has to say about that. Does not look good at all.
Also welcome juliets and TH! Good to play with you both again!
I'm hoping that day poll won't count for Meredith... otherwise if she controls all our votes next day, mafia will have a HUGE advantage regarding the next lynch. They would basically control it, if that's how it works. So I'm hoping that is not how it will work.
Linki~ #PostingThenReading (Yes, I'll keep the hashtags alive for Quin. )
Night was 23 hours long tonight. It ends now.Quin wrote:When does night end?
Serge wrote:Dom, can we open two folders with the most votes?Quin wrote:Is this just a formatting mistake in the poll or are we able to select more than one option?
Epignosis wrote:Dom and Pam are very capable.Dom wrote:I am not answering any more questions about the checkability of statements. I assess them with Pam on a case by case basis. We are very capable.
Check that.
Context matters.LoRab wrote:That is not how LD roles work. And I clarified with the host that it doesn't work that way in this game.
If you post a theory, that is not checkable, because it is not a matter of telling the truth or a lie. If you post a claim, it is either truth or a lie. The LD is not a fact checker--it is exactly what it says it is, a lie detector.
@Drumbeats: That is not what the host told me when I asked, or what he said in his follow up post. Again, it is not fact checking it is LIE detecting.
@Dom: Please clarify in thread.
I am getting further questions via PM, so let me clarify further.LoRab wrote:Thanks for the clarification. I'm finding this confusing, but my brain is fried and I'm exhausted, so I'll trying thinking this through again in the morning.Dom wrote:Because this is predicated on my answer to a question, let me clarify my answer.LoRab wrote:Ugh.
And Creed is listed on the first page under civies, so I'm thinking that's a pretty clear indication that he was civ.
Sorry for missing the vote--I thought I'd be back to my computer in time to vote, but dinner took longer than planned.
I'd have likely voted for Quin, because he is encouraging people to post statements that from my read of Dom's answer, Pam wouldn't be able to check--as they are not based on factual information that the poster has, but on opinion. Theorizing incorrectly and not telling the truth are not at all the same thing.
"The Theme Song is a secret role" is a checkable statement.
"I think The theme Song is a secret role" is not a checkable statement.
Because this is predicated on my answer to a question, let me clarify my answer.LoRab wrote:Ugh.
And Creed is listed on the first page under civies, so I'm thinking that's a pretty clear indication that he was civ.
Sorry for missing the vote--I thought I'd be back to my computer in time to vote, but dinner took longer than planned.
I'd have likely voted for Quin, because he is encouraging people to post statements that from my read of Dom's answer, Pam wouldn't be able to check--as they are not based on factual information that the poster has, but on opinion. Theorizing incorrectly and not telling the truth are not at all the same thing.
I am the suck at spelling/pronouncinginsertnamehere wrote:also it's Creed Bratton
If a statement can be rendered true or false (i.e. Factual not opinion based) and does not break the alignment rule I gave earlier then it is check able.Quin wrote:If Pam is able to detect lies in all statements (excluding the obvious), I wonder whether it matters if the statement is made by someone who knows whether or not its the truth themselves. I'm going to ask Dom about it, and if he says it's right, it might be a good idea to just stockpile a whole bunch of hypotheses so she can gather information.
I would not reccomend roleplaying your role unless you want everyone to know who you are and what those consequences may be.Serge wrote:Let me get this straight, we can't roleplay?
I am going to ignore your question here.S~V~S wrote:Timmer was not in that post Also "Memorandum" sounds more like information than "wild card"; if anything "Management" sounds wild card, since it is harder to correlate to a game mechanic.Elohcin wrote:I was going to vote management until I saw this. It makes sense, so I will vote personnel.
Good to see you timmer!!DFaraday wrote:Maybe personnel will be the player list and management will be abilities or something. But Memo sounds like a wild card option, so I'll go with that. I've never found it helpful (at least to me personally) to hypothesize too much over Day 0 options.Scotty wrote:I'm thinking that voting for Personell will reveal the player list. Which would be a nice place to start. I voted there.
Wonder what Management or Memo will do, if anything. Reveal upper management roles maybe? Memo=win conditions or something?
*votes Memo*
I was leaning Personnel, but then I looked in the original submission thread, and there was no role descriptions, but there was a list of roles. So if Personnel = role list, meh. Although it is possible it changed.Dom wrote:The Office
There's Been A Murder¡
All powers secret.
Civilians (19):
Michael
Jim
Dwight
Pam
Ryan
Stanley
Phyllis
Andy
Angela
Creed
Kelly
Kevin
Darryl
Meredith
Oscar
Erin
Holly
Toby
Nellie
Corporate (5):
David Wallace
Jo
Jan
Gabe
Robert California
Weirdos + Karen (5):
Packer
Karen
Roy
Moze
Nate
The SCRANTON STRANGLER (1)
Are there also episodes named "Management" or "Memorandum"?
@ Dom Does anyone have info on poll options?