The Syndicate

Wow... I really am surprised. . . . wow, just wow.... RIP FH

I am going to vote tonight because I'll be moving into school again and I don't want to risk missing the vote!

Just got back from shopping and finished packing. I'm skyping with some freinds, so I'll just vote now so I don't forget.
*vote FH*

Nothing has changed my mind. I find her more suspicious than the case against Epi. Although, I wouldn't mind looking at him later. I just think FH is bad more.

Sorry I've been a little absent guys. I'm packing for school (I leave to go back tomorrow).

I'm still leaning with FH. My suspicon of her has not dwindled since a few days ago.

reywaS wrote:I'd like to put BWT under the microscope...he's seemed off to me this entire game. Every little misstep of his gets overlooked.

I would like to hear about this...

Without Trice, I'm left with FH, who was my second in line for suspicion, but I'm open to other ideas.

I was hoping for a Trice lynch today... :/

S~V~S wrote:BWT also voted for chaindeath, right? And FH said she was going to before the secrets were revealed.

How did FH deal with Bea's lynch?

Got a replacement computer for the time being!

Lol done catching up. Thought there was more!!

S~V~S wrote:

juliets wrote:Wow a lot of things sure do happen here at night in this game.

Illy welcome back, I wasn't here when you left I subbed in for someone whose name started with Ben...And I also hope you are good cause i voted for you.

Kate, Kate, Kate. I had good feelings about you though I can never know for sure or at least until the game ends. :cryingsmilieplease:

Trice, I don't know what to think about your death. RIPIYWG. It almost seemed like Illy's rezz took your life. Dunno though.

Boomslang I don't know whether its good or bad you dodged death

Welcome back accidentally frozen rabbit.

Why do you think Illys rezz took Trices life, but not Kates?

Because it said the dead chose trice. And the living chose illy.

I'm catching up on my phone so lol how even to multiquote and I wanted to say this!

Hey guys so my laptops in the shop and my replacement one is a day or two away. So ill be on the phone. Excuse the shitty way to play. and I just felt with the pluses and minuses around names tht it was likely vote manipulation. Idk. :/ I'm probably gonna vote Dfaraday. I don't remember devin at all and Dfaraday is always fun to have around. His few posts reminded me of civvie Dfaraday so I'm gonna vote him now invade I don't have a chance to get back on my phone

Flyin' High wrote:One thing I noticed is that The Truth and Trice were both part of the rush of votes for DH at the end--maybe they didn't like him going after their teammate, LT?

Well, I've long suspected them to be connected....
Although, somehow I doubt both of them are bad and you are... it's not impossible but it wouldn't make sense given you're bringing this up unless wIFOM ugh

that vote order would mean that it would either be a tie between timmer and dh or dh would be lynched, if that's correct. :P

How the hell did LT end up being lynched? I'm not unhappy about her lynch, I'm just confused on how it happened.

DharmaHelper wrote:Trice and Epig already voted for Chaindeath

Trice? Really? I wans't thinking he was A residnet. . .
Not sure about Eponine.

DharmaHelper wrote:So people asking for chaindeath's rezz then.... thoughts on that?

Well, in light of this, I'm against it.
I think I recall... someone.. who? saying they wanted to bring him back?
But I think that might be something to look at, yes, if that's what you're getting at.

I posted that other post and forgot I had this one! xD

Flyin' High wrote:@Dom: I thought Grey 1 was a resident, not a Ziltodian. Too many roles with colors in their names. But still, the Ziltodian's tried to kill me on Night 3. I am not a Ziltodian, or a Resident, or one of the Indy's.

I don't think your own team tried to kill you on purpose, silly.

Flyin' High wrote:@Dom: Oh, missed your question about who I voted for--I voted for CBK/Timmer.

@rey: I know Dom voted for me, and maybe SVS?

I just finished breakfast and was going to go try to piece together the voting order.

Thanks...

DharmaHelper wrote:So does that mean chaindeath was the Blue Eyeball?

I would assume so... he was the only one to die the night Rabbit was frozen, right?

reywaS wrote:LT's vote for me is hard to understand, for sure. She obviously did not think she was in any real danger of being lynched, and voted for me to try to show that my suspicion of her was totally baseless and that I was just trying to stir the pot. IIRC, Timmer had 6 votes, DH had 4, and LT had 3.

Oh, wonderful host, MP: Was the lynch a tie?

I think it's safe to assume that Timmer is not on LT's team and that LT was fine with having Timmer lynched yesterday. How many votes did FH have yesterday? I think Dom brought up that LT didn't want to vote for FH because they are potentially team mates? That's an interesting idea...that's why I would like to know how many votes FH ended up with. The problem here, of course, is role secrets. There are so many of them, and we have no idea what most of them are. We do know for sure that one of the non civvie roles starts each lynch with -3 votes. It's possible that other baddies have vote manipulations in their role.

I think she had two. I could EASILY be wrong, but I think FH had two votes.
If LT had voted here that would've made it three... which could force a tie if something is up with Timmer's votes (clearly SOMETHING happened) because of DH's -1 he had next to his name.

Flyin' High wrote:
@Dom: Are you saying LT defended me? Because she most certainly did not.

LittleTiger wrote:

Kate wrote:I think she was just hoping I wouldn't be able to figure it or have the balls to call her on it in the thread.

That whole exchange was excellent! I am actually pretty shocked that FH confessed in the way she did - you are a good lawyer I find it very odd that FH would choose to read the green book vs the purple book.

I then called her out for this post because the second I read that it screamed baddie LT because she doesn't usually get "pinged" by me for things like this.

Flyin' High wrote:And I want to add, DH may be onto something with LT. Like Kate and SVS can read each other, LittleTiger and I can read each other very well. And the fact that she is immediately jumping on the "FH is sketchy--let's kill her, rawr!" bandwagon pings me a ton.

Then LT follows up with this which to me felt like she was backing down because she knew I was right and didn't want to push it any farther:

LittleTiger wrote:My eye is still on FH, tbh. Although, I am not ready to vote her atm. Her explanations about the books rang true to me.

I trimmed the quotes to save space--but yeah, I definitely wasn't seeing a civvie LT yesterday. I had 3 suspicions CBK/Timmer, Trice and possibly The Truth by potential connection to Trice, and then the LittleTiger ping which I called her out on. Of those, two I'd personally taken the time to build cases on and rather than jumping on someone else's case and ignoring my own, I went with my own.

Not to mention I voted for Bea (also a resident) and have been going hard after CBK/Timmer who I think is a Resident. I'm not entirely sure what happened with the lynch and I still need to go back through the thread to obtain the voting order since it appears no one got a screencap this time.

I don't think you're a Resident...
FH, who did you vote for, I can't remember.
And I don't recall LT voting for you either. I found the way she reacted to you very strange once I caught up after going to work and such (Am I wrong on the timing of that, I just remember going, "Lt, you believe that story?!"). I think your story is bogus and I think you slipped up by reading from the wrong book, the one that is NOT your team's. I think that the way LT reacted to you was feigned. Trying to distance herself. I don't think she was EVER going to really vote you. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am. Her BS vote for Rey kind of did it in for me, now that I'm thinking about it. Her vote for Rey was SO weird. She just threw *suspicion* anywhere, but if my rough counts in my head are roughly correct ( ), LT didn't have very many votes in the poll. Unless she somehow knew there'd been some sort of manipulation, which just from my feeling of the thread as a caught up, there must of been because I thought Timmer had gotten the most votes, followed by DH (but DH had that minus symbol next to his name, right?) why wouldn't she just vote for one of them? She instead threw her vote onto someone with no votes (I think he had no votes, I'm no good with keeping SS and such, I'm going off of memory of reading at 2 AM here ) when she already had established suspicions of other people.
Now why would baddie LT do that?
Well, voting for DH would've been an even bigger NO U. Voting for Timmer? I don't know? I don't get why she didn't just do that. But why did't she vote for you, FH?
Because I think you're on the same team.

Kate wrote:

The Truth wrote:I sense some tension.

Tension, indeed.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Look people, the 2 times I've said "us" or "we" or whatever this game, both of them I was referring to every single player in the game. That's all there is to it, but I understand that when you keep lynching civs it's hard for you to tell what's actually worth being suspicious of. Like maybe Dom arbitrarily trying to make cases that won't stick off semantics.


To be entirely fair, the role reveals from the book do force me to re-evaluate you at least to some degree. Yes, I agree with people saying this is your civ game, but like I explained early you (everybody) play(s) civ game as an indy. That's the only way you can win.

It's almost like I'm smart or something. Not like I'm an electrical engineer or anything.

For the 3rd time, nobody is actually stupid enough to copy-paste things from a btsc chat room. Anybody who did that, would be doing 10000 other nooby mistakes and it would be obvious they are bad. You can even copy-paste that, if you want.

Now, if we look alll the way back at that Bea lynch, the one successful one we've had, there was an idea floating about that her teammates voted rabbit to save her. If we work on my personal belief that if the baddies were actually morons they'd be dead by now, I think maybe 1 person and no more on the team would have done that. I don't know whether that one person is CBK (or whoever replacement was) or FH. But I also think FH let slip her role, and it's a civ one. I will find the quote in a sec here.

Where the hell do I start with this?
First of all, thank you for being condescending. As if anyone who has ever made a mistake like that is SO below you. It happens. Often enough that semantics are often a pretty good tip off in Mafia. I don't see you arguing with the BWT suspicion over the "probably" (which was weird for the record ). Sounds like it's only an invalid motivation for suspicion if it's directed at you.
Secondly, I could care less what you're fucking job is. Your profession does not make you smarter than me or anyone else here and I won't have you pretend like it does.
Third, interestingly enough, you seem to be following in-line with FH and LT. . . interestingly enough, I think they are on the same team. I did not see the LT suspicion (until her vote for rey which was totally random)
Have a nice day, electrical engineer.

Thank you DH. Really. I'm sorry I've given you such a hard time. You're not completely off the hook yet! But you're looking better to me.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:@Trice if you think FH let slip which civvie role she is, requoting it so all the baddies know what you're talking about might not be the best course of action.

Good point.

If you're such a not-noob why didn't you already realize this?

LittleTiger wrote:
So then why did he slip in the "I am going to vote LT"?

Again, I was not the first to comment that his analyses served no purpose at this point in the game. Later, maybe it will help. So, I comment.... and BOOM! DH says THAT is his case... the fact that I commented. Something that others have also done.

Now, here you are joining him. I am sorry, but you cannot tell me that his analyses has any bearing on shit right at this point.

Maybe there is something to the fact that YOU are jumping on DH's bogus case. I mean, how convenient, right? Easy vote. DH has even said that he is trying to stop "sheeple votes" - so clearly he is just stirring the pot. Yet you jump on it.

Except that all it has done is distract from actual discussion of the actual possible baddies. But, maybe that is the plan.

My eye is still on FH, tbh. Although, I am not ready to vote her atm. Her explanations about the books rang true to me.

Instead, I am now very interested in reywaS. I think he has played this game long enough that him jumping on DH's "case" makes me very suspicious of him.

*vote reywaS*

This is when I *saw* the LT suspicion... like WTF , but I have been proven wrong about that.

S~V~S wrote:YES~!!!!

Bye LT, BIH Grey 1

And i would feel best about Faraday or Devin coming back. They went on Night One which doesn't make them more likely to be civ, but i did not have a good feeling about a few of the others.

I agree. Maybe Illy, maybe chaindeath (less likely on chaindeath, I just found his (her?) third person charming) <3. I did not get the warm fuzzies from Rabs.



Good job guys. I think we're on the right track with these lynches... FH wouldn't be bad next IMO, especially seeing as how she defended FH and definitely did not see herself dying as I don't think she even had more than a few votes, right?

Which brings me to Timmer.... do you know how you didn't die? If I'm not mistaken you had the most votes at the end of the poll (I was keeping a rough count in my head... I could be wrong)

So, I have to go to work now. See y'all at night time when I'm out

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:FH, I'd like to see how close together those two posts were about the reverse psychology. Gonna go look.

I also agree that the chaindeath was a civvie was a slip.

They're consecutive...

I meant timewise. I was expecting it to be like 10-15 minutes between posts, but 3 minutes??? I'm baffled now.

That's what I tried saying when I brought it up when I first caught up...

Kate wrote:FH, I'd like to see how close together those two posts were about the reverse psychology. Gonna go look.

I also agree that the chaindeath was a civvie was a slip.

They're consecutive...

FH, I definitely agree with your analysis on Trice and Truth. I pointed out that they seemed connected a couple of days ago (as yuo brought up in your post), and I can't shake that they seem buddy buddy

But you're likely bad too.

Flyin' High wrote:@Dom: I am currently making a large post about Trice--I'm about half-way through rereading the entire thread and think there is a good chance he's a baddie for various reasons.

I wouldn't disagree. You know I voted you so early because I didn't think I'd be around now, right? I mean, I highly suspect you, but yeah.

The root canal was much easier than expected, so yay for htat. So I have some time to mafia.

Flyin' High wrote:If I sounded at all like I contradicted myself, I'm sorry. My mistake was this: MP asked me which book I'd like to read from last night. I immediately responded "Green!" while thinking to myself green=alien.

Then I received my PM response from MP telling me Frank Zappa's role and I was confused because I thought I'd be getting one of Ziltoid's Army's roles. So I went to look at the roles and did a major facepalm because I realized I'd mixed up the civvie color with Ziltoid's army color.

It was a dumb mistake. But I owned up to it because it's honestly what happened.

And then as for choosing whether or not to reveal what I learned, based on the one role I learned about, I made the decision that the Frank Zappa and the civvies as a whole would benefit from knowing that by him using his power at night, he can be recruited to the Residents or worse, killed.

I thought that was helpful to share. If it wasn't then I honestly apologize. I was trying to do good not bad.

Linki: As for Trice, he's on my list of people to read through today. I think it's strange that he's been going after SVS for so long for something that I do not think had evil intentions (her expressing the concern over DF being the target for a kill as opposed to someone else). SVS has been playing her civvie game so far from what I can tell (even if I bristle at some of her accusations I don't think they're coming from a place of bad intentions).

FH, what do you think of Trice's use of the word, "us"?

juliets wrote:

Dom wrote:Who is Rob?

Dom, I had to ask the same thing. It is Epignosis.

@Kate - i think my longer post boils down to the same thing you said. For once I have too many suspects.

Oh, Eponine...

Who is Rob?

OK I'm going to bed, and I doubt anything will change my mind and I don't want to miss the vote from dentist and work and such so I'll vote FH now.

Anyone else think Trice's use of teh word "us" is a little ofF?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:

Flyin' High wrote:

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:*Votes DH*

Why did you vote for DH? You've been pretty focused on rabbit for so long that I didn't even realize you really voted for DH until I saw DH's post.

Should I write this in third person so you'll read it?

FH wants to know why Mr. Droopy Cash chose to vote for DH so early in the day phase and with no discussion on the matter. FH hopes Mr. Droopy Cash comes back to explain his decision.

You just gained an instant like from me! Honestly, my explanation is bologna. Between work, school, and the little bit of life I have, that leaves me with about 15 minutes of Mafia time before the lynch ends. I didn't want to miss it so I went ahead and voted. I chose DH because I'm tired of seeing 13,000 word posts explaining diagrams and statistics as to why people are good and bad. This is a game, not homework. I'll be sleeping if anyone needs me.

"Do more DH!"

"Do less, DH!"

Oh and I have a dentist appointment tomorrow morning and work in the afternoon and then I'm going to my aunt's.
So I'll be sparse.
So I'll likely vote tonight.
And I'll likely vote FH.

S~V~S wrote:

reywaS wrote:You don't think it's strange that bwt said he won a prize in the poker tourney for finishing 3rd when I finished 2nd and didn't win anything?

Maybe, but the point was that he won a prize. Maybe he misunderstood where he won it, or misstated. But Kate says he won a prize, and so does FH. He won one. The issue I thought was what was done with the prize. BWT won a prize and revealed a baddie secret.

As opposed to FH who revealed a civvie secret.

This appears to just be a distraction to me. He won a prize, obviously. I am sure the source will be determined at some point.

@MP~ Mr Sox, will you tell us how BWT won a prize?

Gee, I wonder why, when given the choice between the purple, (it was the purple one, right? WHATEVER COLOR IT WAS) and green book why Kate chose Green...
Because she has the purple book already.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:In regards to Damo Suzuki, my initial interpretation of his role definitely didn't involve a night kill. The impression I got was that giving people objects from the bag is supposed to be a good thing, and yet somebody just got killed by it. Like I said earlier, Damo might have had no control over it.

So how do you know that Chaindeath is a civvie, again?
Seriously just confused wehre that came from.

S~V~S wrote:Ha ha, in my experience objects from a bag can be lethal. I have had people with similar roles give me bombs. You never know

Now THAT game... that was an.... interesting... game.

Kate wrote:Don't let her divert your attn timmer.

I typed a post to say this to timmer and you beat me.

Flyin' High wrote:If the secret hadn't been about the potential of Zappa turning to the dark side I'd have kept it to myself. Also, as you can see, there are two different shades of green. The lighter, second shade was a secret that even Zappa himself didn't know. So I decided I'd be doing him a favor by revealing it.

I had the best of civvie intentions in mind.

And sorry for being absent-minded and picking the wrong book. Just like with me making the occasional mistake in voting records, I am not perfect.

@Dom: There was over 48 hours between me choosing the two books I wanted and then deciding which book to read--so yes, me forgetting and making a foolishly hasty decision is totally possible. It's not like I made the connecting then forgot it two minutes later.

Kate wrote:NO, it was optional.

OK, well her decision to publish Zappa doesn't incriminate her as much as reading the Green book in general. It's possible that Zappa could go baddie, so that's kind of good to know.

Kate wrote:the other troublesome part, is that she said first she chose the colors because they were her fav. then said, after I got them I realized the color code, but then forgot again (?) and chose green...?

T H I S

Did you HAVE to reveal the secrets to everyone? (anyone who has read a book)

Flyin' High wrote:Also, to clarify, when given the option of books, I had no idea what they'd be about other than the colors of the books. I chose my two favorite colors out of the options given to me--green and purple. Then I made the connection that those are also the colors used for each alignment in the first page.

I'm not trying to hide anything.

Wait
So, you made the connection after you picked the books... but before you read?

timmer wrote:Hmm.

A baddie FH choosing to read civvie secrets would make perfect sense, but why make them public? Better to keep them secret, I would think? So, make the Zappa secrets public as a way to dodge suspicion? Maybe FH guessed that the other books would go to prize winners etc. and it would come out that she had the civvie secret book?

If FH had kept the knowledge secret, I'd be inclined to call her a baddie on the spot. But choosing to make it public makes things hazy. I've got to think on it some.

Seriously?
I don't think I'd reveal civvie secrets to the thread. Not a very civv thing to do. Although, maybe it isn't as damning because of what was revealed.
Still, I don't like this one bit, FH.

DharmaHelper wrote:So forget Trice, that means Rabbit is also in a voting group with The Truth on both votes..

DharmaHelper wrote:Actually, bumping Trice out of the equation means the new group is

"BWT, FH, Rabbit"

6. BWT (3rd Vote for Droopy)
8. Rabbit (5th Vote For Droopy)
10. FH (6th Vote For Droopy)

13. Rabbit (11th Vote for Vomp)
16. FH (13th Vote for Vomp)
17. BWT (14th Vote for Vomp)

Dunno. Discuss?

Linki@ Dom I think it's certainly a possibility. I think the closeness of their votes each time warrants scrutiny. If Rey is right and looking at the votes will lead to catching a baddie, then looking at the group of votes might lead to catching a group of baddies.

Are these just consecutive votes?
That could be... hours apart?

DharmaHelper wrote:So Kate/Boats/Aces is still legit. And LT is still legit. So, uhm. Sure.

So, are you trying to say tha tyou think Kate/Boats/Aces are on a team togethr?

Kate wrote:

Dom wrote:

Kate wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Yeah except all your "groups" are still based upon the "fact" that I voted for droopy, when I voted vompatti on day 3 and 4

Take it up with FH, it's her voting order. Given that you voted Vomp for 3 and 4, It really does not change much as you are one of the outliers.

If you are going to do a fact based analysis you should do your own fact finding. Fh is probably the last person I'd trust to do that for you.

In this game, at least...

I'm smelling what you're stepping in.

Kate wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Yeah except all your "groups" are still based upon the "fact" that I voted for droopy, when I voted vompatti on day 3 and 4

Take it up with FH, it's her voting order. Given that you voted Vomp for 3 and 4, It really does not change much as you are one of the outliers.

If you are going to do a fact based analysis you should do your own fact finding. Fh is probably the last person I'd trust to do that for you.

In this game, at least...

S~V~S wrote:Yeah except that I don't think at least one, maybe two of them, are bad, based on their posts and such. Like Boats said, maybe they get home from school/work at the same time

I am curious, DH (and I do like the diagrams, there are things in there that interest me), do you still suspect INH? Do you think you might vote for him, or for one of the people you charted? I want to know becasue i was considering following you in a vote for INH, but i got mightlly fishslapped before when I suggested it and it was pointed out that INH does not figure in your analysis.

What's up with that?

Linki

Exactly.
Where does this line up? Where areyou going?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Dom wrote:
I disagree entirely with everything you've said regarding me, the analysis, and just about everything. I don't see how you can logically call two days of voting, and checking for patterns in those votes an "invalid" form of discussion. Nor do I see how it's "hardly anything." Nor do I see how it's "lead nowhere" (as at least LT's LOLOMGNOWAI response is certainly noteworthy.) Nor do I see how I am throwing anything at the wall (as I've only just presented data for interpretation).

So again, I think you're incredibly wrong. on a massive, if not monumental scale.

Maybe I read your post incorrectly
Your analysis to me was a string of unconnected thoughts that others guessed what it meant and then you briefly and vaguely explained. I don't see what you're really trying to say. It seems to me you're saying a lot of nothing in hopes someone will make something of it and run with it.

I don't see how they were unconnected. I labeled them, explained it after I posted, etc etc. I don't see again how two days of vote analysis is nothing. I don't see how I was vague in my explanation, seeing as I took a full big ass post to explain it after my smaller post explaining it. I don't see how presenting information in the hopes that someone will see something strange and create a case with it is odd.

I'm just not seeing how anything you're saying translates to odd.

"LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

LT is in a Group with Aces, and Boats (1 Group Total)
Aces is in a group with Boats, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
Boats is in a Group with Aces, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
The Truth is in a Group with Rabbit and FH (1 Group Total)
Trice is in a group with Rabbit, Truth and FH (2 Groups Total)
FH is in a group with Trice and Rabbit (1 Group Total)
Rabbit is in a group with FH, the Truth, and Trice (2 Groups Total)


Aces and Boats both appear in a group with Kate
Trice and Rabbit appear in 2 groups together (one with FH, one with The Truth)"

Seems pretty unconnected and vague to me
That's literally what yo usaid
That's confusing
DH, this is going no whereI think your post was spaghetti throwing. I had no idea what you were talking about when you posted that but you seemed to think everyone should. That made me think you were hoping that someone would see something and run with it. I still don't really understand what this list was supposed to be.


linki
and istill have no idea what you're talking about with your venn diagrams

LittleTiger wrote:OOps, I forgot to welcome Dom as well... I think I missed who you replaced. In fact, I think I missed a whole page of posts :o

sily:p

DharmaHelper wrote:

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

juliets wrote:It's also interesting that a civv wants to shut DP up, and the Residents want to kill him. I guess in addition to re-reading FH's posts I'll be re-reading DP's posts to see what that could be about. DP, do you know how you survived?

Don't hold your breath for a response.

Linki:

Dom, did I pee in your cereal or something? I'm not quite sure what you're on about or why you seem so pent up at me.

I think I'm in need of a breather.
But I still think you are throwing things at the wall and hoping somethng sticks. Your post truck me as odd.

I disagree entirely with everything you've said regarding me, the analysis, and just about everything. I don't see how you can logically call two days of voting, and checking for patterns in those votes an "invalid" form of discussion. Nor do I see how it's "hardly anything." Nor do I see how it's "lead nowhere" (as at least LT's LOLOMGNOWAI response is certainly noteworthy.) Nor do I see how I am throwing anything at the wall (as I've only just presented data for interpretation).

So again, I think you're incredibly wrong. on a massive, if not monumental scale.

Maybe I read your post incorrectly
Your analysis to me was a string of unconnected thoughts that others guessed what it meant and then you briefly and vaguely explained. I don't see what you're really trying to say. It seems to me you're saying a lot of nothing in hopes someone will make something of it and run with it.

DharmaHelper wrote:

juliets wrote:It's also interesting that a civv wants to shut DP up, and the Residents want to kill him. I guess in addition to re-reading FH's posts I'll be re-reading DP's posts to see what that could be about. DP, do you know how you survived?

Don't hold your breath for a response.

Linki:

Dom, did I pee in your cereal or something? I'm not quite sure what you're on about or why you seem so pent up at me.

I think I'm in need of a breather.
But I still think you are throwing things at the wall and hoping somethng sticks. Your post truck me as odd.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Dom wrote:I felt that DH was trying to link people where very little evidence lay
When there's valid disucssion tobe had.
I dunno.

So vote analysis is not valid discussion.


Check.

You were hardly analyzing anything. This discussion has gone no where for multiple reasons. I think you were throwing things around hoping something would stick. Whatever.

I felt that DH was trying to link people where very little evidence lay
When there's valid disucssion tobe had.
I dunno.

THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU SAID. DH. STOP.
"I made no attempt to draw a conclusion from those facts"
F A L S E

DharmaHelper wrote:

I was presenting facts, I made no attempt to draw a conclusion from those facts. Though yes, it is possible that people consistently voting together might be working together. Again, in this case I was only presenting factual information and some added observations and analysis, because I figured Rey, having asked for that information in the thread basically, might benefit from it in some way. In fact, I hope everybody benefits from it.

...
That is not what you were doing.
Analysis, by definition is not a fact. It is an application of facts. It is interpretation. You are trying to say something here. Don't pretend like you're not.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote: No, from the post immediately above mine. It was an attempt at a joke. Nobody else commented on it because it was pretty obviously a joke.

I don't understand why a couple people think anybody would be stupid enough to copy-paste quotes from a btsc chatroom

This one doesn't sound like a slip. The last one did.

Who would be stupid enough? Why do I think it's possible?
Because it's happened before. I've played a LOT of games, and I've seen it more than once.
So that's why I thought it was possible. Calm down.

And I said it was strange. I didn't say I wanted ot lynch you. I thought it was a POSSIBLE slip.

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I did read it. It explains a lot.

And no, it isn't the same. You have been beating us over the head with following your suspicion because everyone elses is just bandwagons, ets, etc. I don't recall trying to make anyone feel dumb or like a lemming if they did not follow my suspicions. Sadly, my suspicions have sucked, lol.

But I see your point.

I am still willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, maybe I see something others are missing.

Hell, at this point whatever suspicion you want to follow, follow it. I'm just considerably tired of the results we've been getting with the current strategy.

...
Bandwagons?
You're still on about bandwagons?
Really?
DH. Lynch one, yes that was a relative bandwagon.
Day two, we lynched a baddie. there was a bandwagon on rabbit, not Bea.
Day three, we followed up on the results of day two. Wasn't Droopy one of the Rabbit voters?
Yeah that's a follow up on a result. Not really a bandwagon
He also looked strange. Or am I getting my days mixed up? Please correct me if I'm wrong, I read it all in a few hours, really.
Then day four, was a realtive bandwagon. Yes. Vomp was acting incredibly strange for days on end, though.
Please, explain to me where people aren't bringing up suspicions and following up on results and facts.
I think you're overdoing the bandwagon stuff. I don't think you're completely wrong (relative bandwagons, bandwagons on people who didn't get lynched when the person lynched was a baddie)

so yeah.

LoRab wrote:

Dom wrote:Hey guys! For those of you who know me: I'm back bitches.

For those of you who don't:
I'm a sassy bitch who don't need no man. mkay?


Does anyone wanna give me a summary. The 29 pages is daunting. :/

Did I give you permission to use my smiley, young man?

Also, welcome.

Probably
Maybe

rabbit8 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:He doesn't have INH in his voting charts? Hard to rread them on phone.

Well, now I am curious too lol. He has been wanting to lynch INH for days, I just assumed that was the point of all this~

Linki@ Rabbit, I said WE as in lynch, lol~ nice try

You did say we, thats true. But you said nothign about a lynch. And we could refer to your team IMO. Baddie slip SVS?

Possible, but I somehow doubt it.