The Syndicate

That's not true...the only people I suspected wrongly were th and Dom. I renounced my suspicion of th. I argued with SVS but made it clear I thought she was misguided.

blindfaeth wrote:Oh well, if people are interested in lynching me I suppose I'll share what I know. At least if I die, SVS won't be able to lie to you about whose will it is. It is Zomberellas will. The reason I did not come after her in the thread as many of you suggested is because she was literally absent for so long. Which I think is oddly convenient, but whatever. Final thoughts, I think dom is bad, he's only analytical like this when he has a team. I think epi and bills are bad. Think SVS is misguided. Good luck

Not too shabby for day one. Called out zomba, bullz and epig. Wrong about Dom but right that SVS wasn't bad. I'm proud of myself, I'm sure the baddies were happy to lynch me.

Congrats!

Oh look, I was right again

rezz pls

rezz please

I love being right

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:
No, go away, I want it.

no u!

Turnip Head wrote:BF I don't understand why you suddenly just give up because people aren't agreeing with you or playing the way you want them to. I understand that sometimes it's hard to work with people but that's like 83% of mafia, working blindly with your fellow civs to figure things out and catch the bad guys. You are giving up first chance you get instead of pushing through. Makes no sense to me.

I'm going to vote Dom because he's still my top suspicion and I don't think you're bad, but frankly I'm okay with you being lynched because it seems you don't want to play anymore, and people giving up because they're being suspected is frankly getting old.

Yeah right TH. I had 77 posts before I gave up. I got tired of talking in circles. And frankly it's day one, not worth it. Rather start fresh in flash tbh. Don't act like I didn't try because I did. 77 posts of trying.

Dom wrote:Very civilian like of you.

LOL I'll pull a rabbit. There is no civilian behavior.

Don't care enough

Don't be sorry, please pile on the votes, I would rather die than talk to walls

And by the way, the fact they can expire makes me think zomb is bullshitting about her item being worthless. Why bother making a role that can make items expire if they don't do anything.

Golden wrote: @dom - Do you read mine? Because, the starting point of my suspicion of you was when you didn't, and tried to stir up more heat on me (when I already had it from other sources) without reading my posts properly. I find you suspicious for the call you made on JC. I can keep saying it all day if you like. I didn't find it overly suspicious, but I never said I did. Nothing you can possibly ever say will make me take back that I found it suspicious. The only thing you can do is to continue to make me think your overdefensiveness is the sign of someone who didn't like to be called out for something they don't feel they did, but know that the ultimate truth is still the same - the Aces defence, if you want a recent example.

This.

He's already made two posts calling me nonsensical and saying I don't know his game at all, even though I'm basically refusing to respond directly to "brick wall number 2" - or is it 3? Anyway, why is he so worried about my opinion? I think it could be because he knows I'll flip civ.

Linki, you should lynch me. I will die soon anyway. And I'm not interested in helping past day one.

You're making a way illogical jump in conclusion. I am neither of those roles. I didn't pick my item based off my role at all.

You'd think I would have noticed Oliver Oliver. But I also didn't notice Sato on my first read through, if I had I wouldn't have picked an item that could so easily expire.

Also, vote for Epi #campaigning

S~V~S wrote:
LizKeen wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I don't think a baddie would create such a spectacle around themselves.
This is why I'd have a hard time putting a vote on bf because I'm thinking the same thing. I need to vote as I won't be back around before the day ends and I'm in a quandry as to what to do. I don't know if I'm completely misunderstanding the situation or if Zomberella outed herself but if that's the way to take it I guess I'm going to put my vote on her today. I'm not feeling confident enough about voting a self-voter yet even though I still find it odd. I really wish I had more time to see how this plays out for the next 10 hours.
I don't think he expected a spectacle. Where we used to play, there was a higher tolerance for the wink wink nudge nudge usage of info.

And there are two roles that could be ruined by this, one a civ, one bad. Regardless of which she is, her game is ruined through no fault of her own.

I appreciate that you're sticking to your guns, but this actually makes no sense to me. The fact you believe this should make you have more doubt. No I did not expect a spectacle. But wouldnt a theoretical team warn me about how ridiculous this sites "info" policy is? And I put it in quotes because it's still not fucking info.

Golden wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Ugh, all this BF/Golden/SVS/Bullz/Zomberella/Whoever Else stuff is mind boggling. As it stands to me though, I think BF was probably an overexcited civ who made a bad decision. I don't think a baddie would create such a spectacle around themselves. I don't really see anyone in this conflict as particularly suspicious, just a whole lot of butting heads.
This, frankly...

And I'd been waiting for bf to make the call I expected him to make if he was civ... which was to name the person on the will before it could be passed on and lied about.

BF - You do look confused about SVS - if she is misguided, why would she lie about the will?

And Zombs reaction was basically what I'd expect from her, good or bad, and what bullz predicted in the first place.

@dom - Do you read mine? Because, the starting point of my suspicion of you was when you didn't, and tried to stir up more heat on me (when I already had it from other sources) without reading my posts properly. I find you suspicious for the call you made on JC. I can keep saying it all day if you like. I didn't find it overly suspicious, but I never said I did. Nothing you can possibly ever say will make me take back that I found it suspicious. The only thing you can do is to continue to make me think your overdefensiveness is the sign of someone who didn't like to be called out for something they don't feel they did, but know that the ultimate truth is still the same - the Aces defence, if you want a recent example.

Golden, I already said I would divulge the info before I died. I don't care if it was the most trustworthy person on earth that voted me first. I wanted to ensure she couldn't lie about the will. Just because I think she is misguided doesn't make it true.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm so confused.

If BF and Golden are both mindful, logical players, then why did they each make a rash decision on Day 1?

Because talking to this group of civs is like talking to a wall.

Let me be clear. I do wish everyone the best. But don't rezz me. I'm not interested in helping anymore. I argued my heart out more than I ever have on a day one. I think it is ridiculous.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:Oh well, if people are interested in lynching me I suppose I'll share what I know. At least if I die, SVS won't be able to lie to you about whose will it is. It is Zomberellas will. The reason I did not come after her in the thread as many of you suggested is because she was literally absent for so long. Which I think is oddly convenient, but whatever. Final thoughts, I think dom is bad, he's only analytical like this when he has a team. I think epi and bills are bad. Think SVS is misguided. Good luck
So do you think she is the millionaire, or even a baddie at all?

I think she is bad. It is awfully convenient she was completely absent a LONG time when I was talking about a stranger who could be the millionaire. And her posts until that silent period ended were complete fluff.

Yes I meant bullz, must have been a phone autocorrect.

Epignosis wrote: That's cute.

Epignosis wrote: Now that's interesting, right there.

Epignosis wrote:Is that all?

Epignosis wrote:
To whom is this post addressed?

:P

Oh well, if people are interested in lynching me I suppose I'll share what I know. At least if I die, SVS won't be able to lie to you about whose will it is. It is Zomberellas will. The reason I did not come after her in the thread as many of you suggested is because she was literally absent for so long. Which I think is oddly convenient, but whatever. Final thoughts, I think dom is bad, he's only analytical like this when he has a team. I think epi and bills are bad. Think SVS is misguided. Good luck

Is the vote ending today?

Golden wrote:Dom got my eye for it too... it's a big stretch.

That and he posted like three times in the other current game day 1. "hi everyone" "raise ur hand if ur bad", why is this dom so drastically different?

Long Con wrote:
Still looking mainly at BF for the lynch, my team and I want his item before he spills the beans.

It's actually neither of those options tbh

Zomberella12 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm asking to be replaced.

What?! Don't do that. Just take a break.

Analysis pls. What have you learned and who are you suspicious of. I

blindfaeth wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:I will likely vote for one of BF or Golden so I don't have to read this buddy cop shit all game. Frankly, it's annoying.
Hey FS, you still have that photo of rabbit with a tiara? I'd like it please. #newavatar

Hi splintsy,

If you thought I was kidding about this, you are mistaken.

Black Rock wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:You know, the way certain other players are acting every game is getting passe too but I never say that to them. I'm insulted, frankly.
You should call Epignosis on it.

If he does, will you vote for Epi? #campaigning

blindfaeth wrote:OK, I think I understand. I know you play from your gut too SVS, Excel is for squares. To put it simply, I expected opposition, but not to the degree that actually came to fruition. Regardless of others opinions, I still don't think it was a bad idea, I don't regret mentioning it. When multiple people oppose ideas I set forth, I get the hunch I'm onto something. All it takes is a couple mafia throwing in some doubt and letting the rest of the players ride the wave. So that is why I believe I am still likely to be correct if I had to guess. Does that explain better?

Linki with br, will read in a sec

SVS, why have you not responded to/acknowledged this?

S~V~S wrote:I thought it was excessive initially, and BFs reactions to suspicion have led me to believe it was calculated. I am not sure what to make of Golden's opinion. He has been under some pretty intense scrutiny, and I need to retrad last night more carefully. But he has said a few waffly things re BF. So

And JC, what does any baddie have to gain by buddying up? I am fairly sure I have seen you suspect people for similar things. Buddying up to someone you know well may make them lower their defenses a bit and make them less likely to be suspicious.

IMO, Juliets is right, I have nothing to gain from "buddying up" to Golden - good or bad. I still disagree I was buddying up, but whatever.

S~V~S wrote:I thought he was suspish before any of that. The excessive buddying plus the refusal to mention just who had pinged him until day started even though there were no night powers in play.

SVS, why does my waiting to mention my suspicions alarm you? I was waiting very patiently for specific people to chime in. And as you suspect, I was trying to bait someone, but it wasn't the item stealers, it was the millionaire's teammates to start disagreeing with the idea and to express doubt/worry. And I believe I was successful. You can disagree but my intentions were not vile. And I would be foolish to draw unnecessary attention to myself as a baddie.

But I'm not going to be srs-beans from the very first post - this is supposed to be fun, and to expect me to be a robot is unrealistic.

Sorry, quote fail. Asked if yall are RL friends.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Ugh, I'm sorry, I feel I derailed this game inevitably now.

MM, are you self-voting?
I wasn't planning on it. I'd rather lynch someone whose item I can take.

But... but... SELF-VOTERS UNITE!! and such?

oh are yall RL friends?

blindfaeth wrote:PS where is Zomb?
If she's as mentally and emotionally broken as I was yesterday after that microeconomic theory midterm, then I can understand why she hasn't been around.

That said, that's a good question, and I hope to hear from her.

PS where is Zomb?

Epignosis wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:Not to defend Mp but I would caution anyone to reconsider voting him if you are. You will certainly have my eye. He had a very stressful day one in another game recently and I can tell he's frustrated.

Linki with mp
I'm already on your naughty list. Can I vote MP?

To clarify, not responding. I can't deal with the snark

Not to defend Mp but I would caution anyone to reconsider voting him if you are. You will certainly have my eye. He had a very stressful day one in another game recently and I can tell he's frustrated.

Linki with mp

Ebwop, damning

Mp, come back and calm down. You are overreacting. It's OK we all do it. I know you come back to the thread to play mafia sometimes when you know better and should be studying. You're a mafia addict remember? :P

It was an interesting theory. No one is damping you for it.

I don't see the point, it wouldn't be helpful. Not enough people are on board. If I'm right, they could get some votes but not get lynched, which makes that role stronger. But, I pretty much have to name drop end of night one, in case I do die.

Black Rock wrote:Concerning BF, I do believe BF is looking more civvie at this point. I do understand some of the speculation surrounding BF's posts. There is a tone in his posts that are sometimes rubbing people the wrong way. I think we need to look past some of the tone and favouritism to get an accurate read on BF. BF, maybe you can tone it down a little. Telling people that they need to deal with it is not helping.

I get your point, sorry was frustrated last night. I dislike that others I won't name aren't held to the same standard, though. If it were them someone would say inevitably "that's just so and so".

S~V~S wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:Did I miss this info? I thought you just said you have a name and think you get rich when they die, BF?
You think this leads you to believe you know who the Millionaire is, correct? How come you don't think it could be the The Wealthy Gad-About-Town? Did I miss your explanation on why?
I do think it could be them. Didn't think about it until someone pointed out though. I've mentioned at least twice that it could technically be anyones and not tied to a specific role. I've been very clear it's not info.
[quote[ytubehd][/ytubehd]="blindfaeth"]
S~V~S wrote:That person can also be Oliver Oliver right?
I suppose so. BR also made a good point, it could be someone who picked one of the "valuable" items. It could be completely random. I'm just following my gut, and my gut smells something fishy

This was your reaction to the Oliver Oliver (wealthy gadabout) thing. Despite supposing the will could belong to Oliver, and thinking BR could have a valid point, you still seem more inclined to think its fishy.[/quote]

OK, I think I understand. I know you play from your gut too SVS, Excel is for squares. To put it simply, I expected opposition, but not to the degree that actually came to fruition. Regardless of others opinions, I still don't think it was a bad idea, I don't regret mentioning it. When multiple people oppose ideas I set forth, I get the hunch I'm onto something. All it takes is a couple mafia throwing in some doubt and letting the rest of the players ride the wave. So that is why I believe I am still likely to be correct if I had to guess. Does that explain better?

Linki with br, will read in a sec

Ok, I'm bored too. I'll hit you up later when you post more baddie nonsense :P

Golden, I know you were frustrated with rabbit, but why did you waste your vote on him?

rabbit8 wrote:Did I miss this info? I thought you just said you have a name and think you get rich when they die, BF?
You think this leads you to believe you know who the Millionaire is, correct? How come you don't think it could be the The Wealthy Gad-About-Town? Did I miss your explanation on why?

I do think it could be them. Didn't think about it until someone pointed out though. I've mentioned at least twice that it could technically be anyones and not tied to a specific role. I've been very clear it's not info.

FWIW, I did a quick scan of MP's 9 posts this game, and no, I didn't see him react to my suspicions of TH/Bullz at all.

Search found 103 matches