The Syndicate

Interesting, who was timmer? Even with bass explaining it to us that roxy was probably captain cold, I didn't believe it and would have never checked there tbh.

wtf

DharmaHelper wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:And there's the proverbial no u from DH.

Linki, I kind of want to call everyone timmer now it's getting to be a thing

I'm supposed to think people who are telling outright lies about my play are civvies?

Give me a fucking break. Just vote for me already dude.

K

And there's the proverbial no u from DH.

Linki, I kind of want to call everyone timmer now it's getting to be a thing

I approve of roxys case on DH.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:DH what do you think of Roxy?

I don't feel great about her waiting so long on the Aces thing.

Thanks. Who are you thinking about voting today?

I'm mulling some things over. If Made were on the poll I might have voted for him.

That's where I was leaning. The thing that I don't get is who woulld take him off the poll or if someone didn't take in off the poll then he might have moved somewhere on the map that took him of the poll.

If something on the map made made removed from the poll, I'd be very suspicious. He hasn't been around in a long time, so if all he's doing is logging in for night actions I'd lynch him in a heartbeat. Though I guess it's also possible he just happened to move to a random location like the rest of us I presume? I saw others hinted at it. It may have just happened to pay off.

FZ. wrote:I'm here and I just read most of it. Went a little crazy there at the end of the day. Not sure how I feel about all of this. I can't stay because it's passed midnight here and I have an early day.

I just want to say this: I don't remember who it was that said it's not Magneta's work. How do we know this?
Also, if it's a lynch stopper, or a day stopper, how many of these do you think the civvies might have? I'm thinking this might be a baddies job.

Was prolly me, don't know for sure. Based it off LCs possibly incorrect role translation.

Roxy wrote:Metalspammer - the more you push Bullz the more my nose twitches about you. If I had to pick oneof you to be bad I would chose you.
The more you and bf go after Bullz the better he looks in my eyes.

Yeah? So does it irritate you when I vote him?

bullz

Re: map, to my secret btsc buddy, I got teleported far away and any hope for regrouping as we had planned is totally shot. Just FYI.

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:I am glad neither got lynched. I feel better about Aces and neutral feeling on Daisy.

Welcome llama I am sure we all will look forward to your fresh take on things.

Expect bloddy revenge on those who killed me.

Wb friend.

So.. Interesting we get a redo. Magentas role doesn't appear to be responsible for that-

I didn't see those hints going very far back. She seems to sway with the wind a lot. Poking questions on the people who have some suspicion cast on them, forget them for a while and question them again when the wind blows again.

The thing that gives me pause is her huge hinting at being an old rogue. I wonder how far back that breadcrumb trail goes. I have some free time so I'm investigating.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:Timmer, can you spell it out for me like I'm stupid, why that changes your perception of roxy? Does it mean she led about being silenced?

Come on. If I can figure it out I know you can.

Rude, not sad about your lynch anymore

Timmer, can you spell it out for me like I'm stupid, why that changes your perception of roxy? Does it mean she led about being silenced?

timmer wrote:With just over two hours left, less than half of the living players have voted. Even taking into account that a few people need replacing, that's pretty sad.

Old habits die hard I guess. Changeable votes really are awesome if people use them appropriately.

Well bullz you said yourself you're tired of talking about the same stuff. Me too. I need new content to hound you on. Isn't that what you wanted?

Roxy wrote:

Long Con wrote:Rooooxxyyyyy... Telllllll uuuuuussssssssssss.....

They came to chat after I posted I am trying to guage how I feel. I do know I do not like the way Timer is pushing this. I did not mention any names I just wanted it out there in cse thats where my vote went. as a heads up.

I want to give them a chance to prove them selves since I have time before I vote.

I misunderstood, I thought you meant last day period. Did they post in the thread in that stretch of time they didn't show up in your chat?

Sorry you had additional questions I forgot to answer.

I switched to DH not because he is more suspicious but there isn't enough momentum for a bullz vote. I think he is a good choice though, he was using a really small percentage as one point for suspecting SVS, which I believe was disproven due to bass being allowed to return re: no probable btsc. And I just think his attitude in his responses to me reek, and he's pushing the bass lynch as a reason we should not be suspecting him and ignoring the fact they don't know eachother. I'm not buying what he is selling.

SD and Aces.. I recall being pinged by Daisy early. I read timmers case on her just now and I would feel OK putting a vote there. Aces is always so quiet, I don't have a good grasp. I didn't like his vote on me obviously, I think what irks me most was he came in to explain that he voted based on not being caught up but never expanded on why exactly he voted me at the time. I understand something changed his mind, whether he'd misread something or misinterpreted or whatever but didn't try to explain unless I missed it.

FZ. wrote:I'm going to need to decide soon, because I'm leaving for the day and will only be back tomorrow.
Out of those who already have votes Bullz is not someone I plan to vote for, neither are DH and SVS. Though SVS, after voting TH in the last day, I haven't seen you follow that suspicion and do something with it, so it's making me doubt you a little more.

BF, what happened to you wanting to take Bullz down? Why'd you switch to DH? Is he looking more suspicious to you? What do you think of SD and Aces?

Rabbit, who are you going to vote for today?

And then there are Aces and SD. It's mostly between those two, but I can't quite decide who I believe more...

I could be wrong but I think I've mentioned him as suspicious several times already today. But no one is listening, so I'm benching it until we get more content from him so I have more ammunition. Our were you hoping I'd respond regarding my frusyration regarding the bass lynch again so you could get me lynched?

Turnip Head wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:I don't really feel like I've been around less, but it may seem that way because it takes longer for me to catch up on the posts now that we are past fluff and a higher percentage of them are longer.

I think it's fair to say your activity levels have dropped off, but I'm not seeing much of a change in the overall thread activity level. If anything it seems quieter in here now than it did Day 1, back when you were a relatively high poster. I must be missing these long, non-fluff posts of which you speak. But I'll admit, now that I'm experiencing the absolute madness that is the Champs game, my idea of a busy thread might be quite different from yours

Do you have any reads other than Bullz for not helping and Sophie for being OT? What do you think of SVS, Daisy vs LC, Aces etc. ? Do you genuinely suspect DH for going after SVS or was this an "on principle" vote because you don't agree with his methods?

FWIW I agree that Sophie could be trying harder to help when she is here, but I'm taking a wait-and-see approach with her still to see if she turns it around. Same thing with Bullz tbh, I'm feeling okay about him but he needs to step it up.

Yes. I'm not going to repeat them every time I post, but I genuinely suspect DH, I have made it clear I think LC is fishy - Im still waiting to hear anything useful from made. He was ultra confused day 1 after reading the first post and then voted himself.

Bullz obviously, you for having wreak suspicions pre-Champs game. That more or less covers it.

I don't suspect SVS or MM really at all. Timmer I feel OK about but I waffle.

I don't really feel like I've been around less, but it may seem that way because it takes longer for me to catch up on the posts now that we are past fluff and a higher percentage of them are longer. Sorry it seems that way but it's not a vile scheme or something. I think we can agree that my content isn't laying low at least, I speak my mind and it gets me in trouble but I have to be true to me. If someone changing their behavior to be laying low interests you though, I'm wondering what your thoughts on bullz are for the same reason. And I think something may be off with sophie, I realize she is busy but in the time it took her to do some of those OT posts she could have quickly said I suspect x y and z players but instead gave excuses.

MM must be cursed. I'll answer you in the morning I'm trying to get off to bed because boogs is waiting.

I'll just say before I go that it makes me uneasy that DH is trying to push the whole "oh how many baddies have you caught" routine, when in this game since they didn't start with BTSC and don't know each other, it doesn't matter. He's used that theory in his case against SVS and now he's using it again tonight and can't seem to grasp this concept. Sorry, but your lynch of bass = absolutely no civ cred, as much as you want it to, not happening, so don't act like it should.

Linki, I am frustrated with the bass lynch lol. Because we lynch someone who says cheat but not the elephant in the room who's using wifom to the extreme

DharmaHelper wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:"I'm DH and I like to use air quotes and jump to hasty conclusions"

How many baddies have you lynched btw :P

None, not like it matters, for all I know you feigned suspicion of bass and were severely disappointed when you realized you painted a target on your teammates back

"I'm DH and I like to use air quotes and jump to hasty conclusions"

My eyes did sort of glaze over tbh it was such a stretch

I sent in a letter

Shame epig is gone, I was beginning to trust him.

I think you will have a hard time selling that bass 1.0 had made contact with his team since the host allowed him to sub in DH.

I'm suspicious of DH tbh,he based that entire case on that small possibility.

Anyway, I still don't feel good about LC. Bullz either but you let me know when y'all are ready, since we will lynch people for saying "cheat" but not for blatantly refusing to help the civs, trying to push an obvious agenda that I was a detective so his pals could off me, etc

Now that I mention it, maybe I can get DH lynched for using "non air quote" air quotes, since our last two lynches have been hectic, unpredictable and for lack of a better word, dumb.

DH

You're "suspicious". Look I can use air quotes too

It feels just as ingenuine as bullz suspecting llama because I defended him. It's so irrelevant because even if she was bass' teammate she didn't know it.

Interesting result.

DH considering the baddies don't have btsc why are you relentlessly attacking SVS?

FZ. wrote:Just to add, the fact that people keep saying: "let's lynch Bullz already" just reminds me of last game I played here where llama and Epig kept pushing like crazy day after day for my lynch...and were wrong. llama suspected Bullz, that's great. He didn't have information on him, so while I respect llama's opinions, I didn't see his case as any less "crappy" than the case on him (as people called it). It doesn't mean Bullz can't be bad, and I am not as sure of his alignment as before, but I'm still not feeling what you allegedly are. So be incredulous as you wish, and I'll vote as I see fit.

This makes me nervous. You're acting like bullz was a main contender for lynch day 1,which isn't true. It was between epi and llama.

I'm going to call shenanigans though, where do these oddball left field lynches keep coming from? The majority of mentions for bass have been in like the last 30 mins.

FZ. wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:

FZ. wrote:I need to go to sleep in a few minutes. At this point, it's between Sophie and Bass for me. I don't know if I agree with you Timmer, regarding Bass' response

What do people think about Sophie?

I feel like her latest post was rather lacking in content for civ sophie. I'm not convinced enough to vote her yet, but I think there's a decent chance she is bad.

Thanks for answering. In light of the fact you were the one looking for people signalling to others, can you also say what you thought about Timmer's theory on Bass?

I could see his theory being true. Though, bass posts so far and few between sometimes, I almost wonder how he noticed the repeated use of the word cheat. I almost wonder if he pointed it out because he's the one who cursed bass.

FZ. wrote:I need to go to sleep in a few minutes. At this point, it's between Sophie and Bass for me. I don't know if I agree with you Timmer, regarding Bass' response

What do people think about Sophie?

I feel like her latest post was rather lacking in content for civ sophie. I'm not convinced enough to vote her yet, but I think there's a decent chance she is bad.

I like the recent posts from epi and feel a lot better about him. Epi, I know you're still digesting your findings, but gut feel-which of the llama voters are you not trusting?

FZ brought up a decent point but I felt OK with epis response. I know, I know, pigs are flying

I wonder if there is a possibility rabbit is cursed too.

Th, you seem to be a bundle full of non suspicions. I get that you say you suspect roxy, but she's silenced. And you're looking at ika and soneji, but they are lower posters and also new to our forum and unfamiliar with our customs. I have a hard time believing you can't come up with something more convincing. These three are an easy out for coming up with suspects on day 2.

Rabbit, you're full of it. How am I acting too civvie? I even adopted the "there's no civvie act" from you last game. Do I need to request that tiara pic from fs again for my new avatar?

Why do you always suspect me and why are you always wrong lol. If you have a case, bring it, but I can't defend against acting civvie. I act how I want and pursue the people I think are bad. Which are bullz, Epi, made, LC and maybe TH.

I like how you didn't respond to my question earlier btw turnip head, it's only making me more certain I'm right

Turnip Head wrote:Do you still think Epi is bad, SVS? Is anyone else jockeying for your vote right now?

Thanks for reminding me, how is your newfound BTSC with him going?

I'd really like to hear from made. I can't remember the last time he posted, unless it was his self vote, which was a little awkward, a d before that he was potentially playing the super clueless card pretty hard.

Ty that makes a lot more sense to me

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I was thinking Epi may have been throwing her under the bus for that cred.

Can you explain this thought? I usually see "throwing someone under the bus" as something a baddie does to their teammate for the cred you speak of. I don't really see how it applies to the Epig-Eloh situation.

Can you stop skirting around SVS' question and answer why you think suspecting Epi is suspicious? Why do you seem to be so convinced he's not bad?

Thus *

Bullzeye wrote:Wow. I am actually genuinely surprised. Thanks for not revenge-killing me Wally, that was a smart move

So now that the civ ninja decided not to kill you and you no longer have an excuse to act betrayed and this not contribute, do you have suspicions you care to share?

I voted for Bullzeye.

Bullzeye wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:Let's be real. Bullzeye isn't suspecting me

Correct. What gave that away? Was it all the posts where I've never once called you suspicious?

blindfaeth wrote:he is trying to proclaim to the entire thread that I am undoubtedly a detective and had btsc with llama thus why I defended him.

Aww man, you were on such a role as well. I wasn't trying to proclaim anything. I was being careful to explain myself without stating that. If you think I failed, I'm sorry. If it gets you killed, I'm sorry. But with the way you did defend Llama, the baddies could've come to that conclusion by themselves. Your explanation of how you thought you'd figured out Llama's role seems legit.

Yes, you did fail. If there was any doubt in someone's mind, you made sure it say painfully obvious. And if you were civvie you wouldn't have done so IMO.

Let's be real. Bullzeye isn't suspecting me, he is trying to proclaim to the entire thread that I am undoubtedly a detective and had btsc with llama thus why I defended him. Telling the baddies to kill another detective. I'm very happy to report however that I am not a detective and his plot is a failure. I was defending llama because I could have sworn he was captain cold. The role mentions being obsessed with "the score", and llama first couple posts were about the participation score. Also, one of the points in the host post for old rogues is they want to kill gorilla grodd. Llama obsessively mentioned the monkey. I could have sworn he was signalling to Golden glider, thus drawing so much attention to himself. I would have bet money on it frankly. In any case, because I thought he was the civ searchee, I figured if epig was in fact signalling, he had to be the bad version. Now, it's clear this isn't the case. I still don't trust epig, but I'm less sure of myself.

Thats all to say, the reasons I pushed so hard to defend llama aren't because I had btsc with him, it's because I thought I'd figured out his role.

Bullzeye wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:I have to say, I absolutely abhor the last five votes on llama.

Bullz voted llama in spite of me to try and prove something. Good job cowboy you win a prize

TH, who was Epis sidekick signaler voted next. Soneji was next and didn't even post they were voting in the thread unless I missed it somehow. Then br and LC back to back. I've seen myself mention LC before somewhere... Oh yeah :P and these were all like within the last hour, probably even closer than that. Why the sudden push to lynch llama? You might think the case on Epi was ridiculous, but the non case on llama was 50 times more so.

Yeah I expect my prize will arrive with the night post. I don't ever make RIP posts because I think they're meaningless and fake and it goes without saying that I'm sorry that I was wrong. I didn't vote him to spite you or prove anything. Your influence on my vote was because of the way you defended him in combination with your reaction to my post about joking. If he'd been bad, I'd have voted for you next. I didn't see the point in voting for you this time because it would not have accomplished anything IMO.

I look forward to you receiving your prize, I think that would be a great decision on the civ ninjas part

I have to say, I absolutely abhor the last five votes on llama.

Bullz voted llama in spite of me to try and prove something. Good job cowboy you win a prize

TH, who was Epis sidekick signaler voted next. Soneji was next and didn't even post they were voting in the thread unless I missed it somehow. Then br and LC back to back. I've seen myself mention LC before somewhere... Oh yeah :P and these were all like within the last hour, probably even closer than that. Why the sudden push to lynch llama? You might think the case on Epi was ridiculous, but the non case on llama was 50 times more so.