timmer wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, timmer, you should reconsider your narrow-minded approach to DH and Snowy.
Didn't Rox say she was sick earlier? So how would her vote for Snowy on D6 have anything to do with that?
Are you suggesting that Roxy died of a poisoning or something?
When asked about her death comment, she replied:
"elaborate that I am sick? Ok. I have the flu and been running a high fever there was talk of the hospital but I promised my doc I would take a couple of days off which I have. "
I think Roxy was just sick, and that her vote for Snowy very well may have had something to do with her death. Call me narrow-minded if you want, but everyone knows what you're up to, my man. Snowy is bad fucking news.
I am. I find it odd she said something about death and then commented like that. Maybe she wasn't supposed to talk about it.
But who knows? Maybe you're right.
Everyone knows what I'm up to? You sure about that? I think the opposite, really.
You know, certain people are going to try to antagonize me after that last lynch and say I'm "on the baddies' side", but as I've explained already, that's impossible. The only side I'm on is neutral. And I haven't lied throughout the entire game. If I feel like helping the civilians, I will, just like I tried to this past lynch.
Just because the sudden lynchtrain on LC was shady as fuck doesn't mean LC ISN'T bad.
-------------------------------
Also, I was thinking about this past lynch, and I came up with a theory:
What if timmer and LC are baddie teammates?
Think about it. timmer has been going on and on about LC and Daisy being bad for more than a cycle now. He then drops it and doesn't mention it again once he fears he doesn't have support for it, saying instead he could vote for DH. Then he echoes the indignant rage of LC (justified), saying that we had 48 hours and all these cases were made, but then LC was voted for out of nowhere.
While that may be true, look at how timmer progressed throughout the day:
timmer wrote:I've still got my eye on Long Con and Spacedaisy. I'll have more to say tomorrow, I've got the morning off.
timmer wrote:Okay, so this game is starting to make my head spin, but here goes.
I think LC is bad for many of the reasons DH has set out. the Day 1 vote against rey was very weird, but more weird (and more important) were his responses regarding it all afterwards which DH has just covered. That said, DH is fucking on FIRE right now, and when he's on fire he can pretty much convince me to buy a bridge to nowhere, so I may be getting a bit swayed here, BUT, I've been eyeing Long Con for much of the game so DH's posts are essentially bolstering what I already believed.
As to SpaceDaisy. MP, I would like you to go into DETAIL about why you are thinking civ here. Obviously you have an agenda, and the fact that you are outed and playing an ostensibly pro-civ game doesn't change that. You DO have an agenda to see your recruits survive. So when I see you defend someone as civ at this point in the game, if you want me to listen to you, you will need to DEMONSTRATE your reasons. I don't think anyone, outside of your recruits, will just simply trust you. At least, they shouldn't. So I'm willing to listen, how is SD civ?
As to SVS, she's a brilliant player and I could see her being bad always. Essentially, I've seen her flip bad and had my jaw drop enough that I'm not taking anything for granted. But I would like someone to summarize their case there.
And MP, I'll read back on your Bea case later today, I'll admit I don't think i've read it yet!
timmer wrote:So MP says he thinks Long Con is civ, and Long Con says it's good not to lynch MP. Hmm. And MP also thinks SD is civ, who I think is tied to LC. Hmm. This doesn't help.
Because the next post is pretty long and is the case about Daisy, mostly being linked to LC, I'll just link it:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 18#p107518
timmer wrote:I tend to get blinded by DH being DH. Basically, I look at the now epic-length back and forth between him and Long Con, and I feel like LC is the one who started out in the wrong, all the way back to his Day 1 vote for rey, which I believe DH called him on. And that's where the tie to SD started as well. Since then, DH has been fairly consistent in his posting about LC, and so since I feel like there is a good chance LC is bad, I feel that it makes a bigger chance DH isn't.
That said, I could definitely see an indy DH here. I'm just not seeing a baddie DH, but like I said at the start, I'm not very good at reading through his game.
And I swear I will read up on Bea, I'm going to cover it on my supper break.
Here's his case on bea:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 61#p107661
Most importantly, he says:
timmer wrote:
I can see Bea being bad, and if I don't have support for my ideas re: Daisy and Long Con, I'll pursue a vote in Bea's direction.
Backing off of Daisy and LC, only to...
timmer wrote:And I agree with Zeek, people discussing voting for absent players is not helpful and makes no sense when those of us who ARE posting are discussing suspicions. And in my experience absent players are more often civ or bored indy anyway. Anyone pushing an absent player vote will get an increasing amount of
from me the more they push it.
Linki LC, Im fine with DH today as well at this point.
THEN say he's "fine with DH today" after he made more than a few posts earlier in the same day and throughout the game believing him to be more likely civilian. Where's the logic in that?
Now the full shift:
timmer wrote:I'm only voting Snowy or DH today, Daisy. The you and LC thing has moved more to the mdidle of the spectrum for me, as in there is less meat to that than what I'm seeing in Snowy/DH.
You are hinting at reasons that these lynch ideas are bad but without explaining them. I can't see anyone backing down from their vote without you providing at least a bit of an idea of why people should? I'm at work and certainly don't have time to find a random little thing a million pages ago, etc. But please shout out of you've seen soemthing??
It didn't come out of the blue, at least. He made a case on Snowy and started seeing how everyone was tied to DH, so that it made sense that DH should be lynched:
timmer wrote:Made, DH is at least directly tied to my case on Snowy. I can't very well prove Snowy was bailing DH out if I don't know if DH is bad, right? But every is using DH to add suspicion to their cases, all over the place. It seems clear to me that a TON of people think DH is bad, but that he hasn't stepped out of line directly enough to make an easy case. Well then, my vote is better off on DH than Snowy. But at this point, this day has boggled my mind.
But can't it just be the case that everyone is connected to DH because he has the most posts in the thread and because he almost died D1 due to suspicion AND because he's a very enigmatic player? I believe Made responded and illustrated a point similar to this.
Now although timmer has every right to be upset about the way the lynch occurred, because it WAS without a proper case -- but to be fair, it was the last 30 minutes of the lynch and Daisy had come in with information that could highly suggest that Russ (and DH by association) are civilian roles. So what would you have done in any of our positions?
timmer wrote:Long Con wrote:I can't believe this lynch. This is Champion play? I get barely mentioned, and then bandwagon slammed at the last minute?
This has been really shameful. There's no way in hell I deserved that with so many actual suspects out there.
Last thing: DH, you guys. Open your eyes, even if it's for the first time this game.
I'm with you, buddy. That was awful. All these fucking cases, over 48 fucking hours, and we get a bunch of low posters create a lynch out of nothing.
I'm not really feeling "civ" from you tbh, but I'm not feeling bad either, so I wasn't prepared to vote you no matter what. At least not without a fucking case from SOMEONE>????
But how is that true? He's been going on about voting LC and Daisy for multiple cycles now.
timmer wrote:I don't think the lynch was switched LC, I think Hedge wasn't draining people each night and thus accumulated enough votes to die.
And I'm not even going to get distracted by DH, SNOWY YOU GET MY VOTE FOREVER UNTIL YOU DIE.
Now of course, the thread is going to head in this direction, and I can assure you we will very likely see at least one civilian lynch (DH), and one probably civilian lynch (Snowy), because to be frank I'm not convinced that Snowy is acting anything other than genuine, and that he's getting burned for his indecisiveness like he has in the past. I could be wrong there, but that's just me.
I will seriously consider voting for timmer tomorrow, honestly.