The Syndicate

EBWOP: BWT, what I'm saying is, instead of just looking at players who bandwagoned Blooper OR who made jokey posts, why not examine them all?And then decide who you believe is least sincere or most likely to have nefarious intentions?

I'd like to hear what others have to say re: Llama, and others, and I really need to get this lit review done, so this time I'm gone for real.

Literature reviews are seriously the most grotesque endeavor imaginable. (may be an exaggeration... but they suck)

Snow Dog, I don't know where you actually voted, but you said you were voting me (which was obviously a joke), so I saw your behavior as hopping more than once.

Nonetheless, even if you consider it only hopping from Blooper to not, could you not understand why it seems you made a meaningless vote that appears as if you didn't want to take responsibility for a bandwagon vote?

I don't even necessarily believe that to be true, but that's why I listed your name, because I'm unsure as to your intentions.

BWT, here's what I said before:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. So I am now finally caught up. And here's what I have so far.

-Ninja took quite a bit of flak for her post where she questioned why so many people were voting early on Day 1. And from what I gathered, llama got heat for seeming to be jumping on an "easy case". But I thought a lot of people seemed way too eager to vote for ninja, even with it being Day 1 and all. So I will be taking a good look at everyone who voted for her and got her lynched.

- Sabie and LC voted for me because I hadn't shown up. After I did show up, both of them continued to leave their votes on me. I remember sabie actively stating she was leaving her vote on me for missing the Day 0 poll. Honestly, if that's the only poll I miss, that doesn't mean anything at all. I've just been really busy this week and only had enough time/energy to check in once. I do find it odd that LC said he'd leave his vote on me because he "didn't feel the need" with Ninja ahead of me in the votes. But I'm more likely to give him a pass on it than sabie.

Yeah, that's all I've got so far.

What about Made and Boogs that voted for me basically for no reason whatsoever? And all of the llama voters?

You think you should look ONLY at the Ninja voters nonetheless?

See, here's the logical fallacy we always run into as players. Consider this:

Llama is civ. (I'm not saying he is, I have no idea, this is just a scenario). Let's switch the number of votes that struck Llama and Blooper yesterday. Llama gets flipped. Then who would everyone be looking at? Llama's voters. Even though there were plenty of players who voted each, and each were civ, the players who get exclusively eyeballed by the masses are the voters of the lynchee, even though it's possible baddies voted for either player.

That's the problem I always have with looking solely at the "______ voters" for each lynch. Yes, they should be considered, but I think others should get the and be forced to disclose their intentions as well. Because we honestly have no idea what the baddies did last lynch: whether they bandwagoned onto Blooper, bandwagoned onto Llama, or threw off onto me or you or someone else.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Why can't a civvie vote for someone after someone else has voted for them?

Why can't a baddie lead a lynch with a case?

Ambray very well could be bad. I argue the first because I am a civvie and I voted for Blooper because I thought Ambray and FZ.'s observations rang with some content when I revisited Blooper's post.

My problem is you're focusing to groups of votes by players instead of just looking at all of them. We don't know what the baddies would have done. Players bandwagoned onto Blooper and Llama, as well as threw off jokey and meaningless votes.

BWT, to be fair, Boogs voted for me because at that moment in time, I had voted for him, and he's apparently busy. Made just voted for me right off the bat and never moved it. It doesn't help that the game started around a busy time for a lot of people (not faulting anyone for that though).

Why are you not looking at Llama voters?

Anyway, I know you've recently caught up, so I'm just curious to see what you'll find.

I need to work on a bunch of stuff today that I was ignoring yesterday and the day prior, so I'll be back... sometime.

Ambray wrote:Sorry for not voting in the night poll, I did intend to - but I went to a work do last night and got unintentionally very drunk...infront of all my bosses. Please please let me still have a job come Monday!!!

I'm quite interested by all the 'joke votes' on D1 that ended up not being a joke at all because they were never changed. I think overall that led to spread out votes and an easy to manipulate poll. I'm going to have to go look at it again to remember what the end result was.

I agree on the joke votes. I don't understand why we wouldn't examine those as well.

Let me know what you think of Llama and others.

^^^^

That said, I'm not looking at Ambray today.

I'm just trying to play devil's advocate with you (and everyone else), BWT, and trying to avoid narrow-minded focuses for lynchees today.

Why can't a civvie vote for someone after someone else has voted for them?

Why can't a baddie lead a lynch with a case?

Ambray very well could be bad. I argue the first because I am a civvie and I voted for Blooper because I thought Ambray and FZ.'s observations rang with some content when I revisited Blooper's post.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Who were all the people that voted for Ninja, and then moved their votes away later on?

I think of all the Ninja voters, the only one I'm probably not going to examine closely is Ambray. Since she actually put forth a case of her own for voting Ninja. Everyone else felt like an easy bandwagon to me.

I don't think anyone falls into that category other than Snowy... right? I'm not sure though.

Why not FZ.? Did she not put forth a case?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Also, I keep getting the time-out messages. I'm guessing that is something that still hasn't been fixed yet?

Yes, I will send out a PM when it is fixed. Sorry. I've been working with Bluehost, but they've recently gotten nonresponsive to me. It's certainly something I thought would be fixed by now.

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Having thought about it and looked at the D1 votes again, honestly I'm looking most at Llama today. I'm still not really feeling too sure where to look, though I do have tentatively good vibes from a few players.

Other players that made votes yesterday that struck my attention: Boogs, DFaraday, LC, Made, and Snow Dog. Not sure what to make of them though.

Do tell. What struck your attention in particular?

Well, I'm just not sure what to make of your hopping around and then settling on a single vote candidate. I'm leaning genuine, so I'm not really looking at you today, but it also could have been an easy way to avoid the suspicion that comes with jumping on a bandwagon.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. So I am now finally caught up. And here's what I have so far.

-Ninja took quite a bit of flak for her post where she questioned why so many people were voting early on Day 1. And from what I gathered, llama got heat for seeming to be jumping on an "easy case". But I thought a lot of people seemed way too eager to vote for ninja, even with it being Day 1 and all. So I will be taking a good look at everyone who voted for her and got her lynched.

- Sabie and LC voted for me because I hadn't shown up. After I did show up, both of them continued to leave their votes on me. I remember sabie actively stating she was leaving her vote on me for missing the Day 0 poll. Honestly, if that's the only poll I miss, that doesn't mean anything at all. I've just been really busy this week and only had enough time/energy to check in once. I do find it odd that LC said he'd leave his vote on me because he "didn't feel the need" with Ninja ahead of me in the votes. But I'm more likely to give him a pass on it than sabie.

Yeah, that's all I've got so far.

What about Made and Boogs that voted for me basically for no reason whatsoever? And all of the llama voters?

You think you should look ONLY at the Ninja voters nonetheless?

See, here's the logical fallacy we always run into as players. Consider this:

Llama is civ. (I'm not saying he is, I have no idea, this is just a scenario). Let's switch the number of votes that struck Llama and Blooper yesterday. Llama gets flipped. Then who would everyone be looking at? Llama's voters. Even though there were plenty of players who voted each, and each were civ, the players who get exclusively eyeballed by the masses are the voters of the lynchee, even though it's possible baddies voted for either player.

That's the problem I always have with looking solely at the "______ voters" for each lynch. Yes, they should be considered, but I think others should get the and be forced to disclose their intentions as well. Because we honestly have no idea what the baddies did last lynch: whether they bandwagoned onto Blooper, bandwagoned onto Llama, or threw off onto me or you or someone else.

Having thought about it and looked at the D1 votes again, honestly I'm looking most at Llama today. I'm still not really feeling too sure where to look, though I do have tentatively good vibes from a few players.

Other players that made votes yesterday that struck my attention: Boogs, DFaraday, LC, Made, and Snow Dog. Not sure what to make of them though.

FZ. wrote:Glad no one died. And I wonder what the race results mean. I will barely be here today also, since I'm not around on Fridays.

I still feel like llama isn't contributing anything to the game, no matter how merry he is

I agree.

I am looking for others to contribute more as well though.

Also, I'm very curious what these racers that correspond to our choices in the D0 poll mean.

Really awesome about no death. I suppose the killer was blocked or the target was protected (inherently or by someone else).

Where are players looking today?

It's late, but I intend on revisiting how the lynch went down yesterday to figure out where to go next, personally. I'm not sure yet.

DFaraday wrote:Is there any particular reason people think Roxy is civ?

Just her behavior so far. Seems civvie Rox to me. Of course, I don't know for sure.

fingersplints wrote:I like some changing votes, but I feel like some ownership of votes is lost when you can just change them all the time. It does make it nice if you really change your mind, but that's generally why I save my vote to as late as possible anyways.

I'm ok with voting Rox. I feel better about myself but I <3 her too.

Yeah, I don't plan on voting early anymore unless I really feel it's warranted.

Ambray wrote:Oosh ignore me, found it.

Wow, this changing vote around business is going to confuse me big time - haha. Is this a new game mechanic for all games?

It was never dictated... someone I can't remember who used changeable votes, and it appears it's just gotten more popular in the last few games run here. It's at the host's discretion.

Personally, all of my games that I host have nonchangeable votes and I don't plan on changing that. Just a host preference.

Ambray wrote:Wow - unexpected.

I'm a little bit O.O at some people following my vote of ninjuu.

My vote was one of the first few that was non-joke - or at least I think because I don't know who's friends here with who so unsure of the 'joke votes' - and I still refuse to random vote. I woke up early, remembered the game, had 10minutes before I had to be in my car and out the door and voted accordingly on a post that just felt out of place.
I'm amazed that it was so easily followed.

Where do you keep previous polls on this site so I can see what the final vote count was??

Previous polls are under The Current Job #2 subforum in their own thread designated [POLLS]. Typically anyway.

Linki, haha

Certainly beats everyone voting for themselves only.

FZ. wrote:Bummer. RIP Niju.

I feel like Roxy is someone I feel relatively good about, so if it's something that is supposed to benefit the person chosen, I'll probably vote for her

You know, I think I could get behind that. I feel better about Roxy than most others as well.

Well, that sucks. RIP Blooper.

Kate wrote:I was going to say the same thing about Mp the fz said about him. By the time I read through the thread she had changed her mind on him. Not sure I have though.

I was surprised how easily he changed his vote off rox and seemed to do so following a trend of people doing the same.

Have my thoughts not been transparent regarding my level of confidence in my assessments?

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:That said, I have no real reason to suspect you just yet, FZ., and I've found your attempts to baddie hunt genuine.

Okay, what do you think of llama so far?

I'm not sure yet. He's pinged me a bit, but I feel I've been extra bad about reading him anymore.

What do you think of him?

Something about his reactions seems too cheerful or merry, as he calls it, to feel genuine. But I know he gets lynched often on day 1, so I wonder if it's one of those instances

Good point re: baddies on D1. Never thought of it that way before.

Regarding this, yeah, I don't know. I haven't seen enough actual baddie hunting from him yet, but I'm not sure as to his alignment really at all right now. I wouldn't say his behavior so far is out of character for his personality, so I'm hesitant to let him seeming too careless as indicative of baddieness.

I don't know. When I talk about baddies pushing a little too much, the line where he explains why he's voting Nunju strikes me as a good example for that. I'm kind of torn between those two. No one else caught my attention other than that so far.

Hmmm... that's an interesting point. I didn't think of that. Something to consider.

fingersplints wrote:

FZ. wrote:How about MP? He seems a bit eager to please. He keeps seeing my point of view, and explains things. Not sure I've ever seen civvie MP do that. Can anyone share their thoughts about MP? Does it feel genuine to you?

He seems pretty normal to me.

Yay!

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:That said, I have no real reason to suspect you just yet, FZ., and I've found your attempts to baddie hunt genuine.

Okay, what do you think of llama so far?

I'm not sure yet. He's pinged me a bit, but I feel I've been extra bad about reading him anymore.

What do you think of him?

Something about his reactions seems too cheerful or merry, as he calls it, to feel genuine. But I know he gets lynched often on day 1, so I wonder if it's one of those instances

Good point re: baddies on D1. Never thought of it that way before.

Regarding this, yeah, I don't know. I haven't seen enough actual baddie hunting from him yet, but I'm not sure as to his alignment really at all right now. I wouldn't say his behavior so far is out of character for his personality, so I'm hesitant to let him seeming too careless as indicative of baddieness.

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:That said, I have no real reason to suspect you just yet, FZ., and I've found your attempts to baddie hunt genuine.

Okay, what do you think of llama so far?

I'm not sure yet. He's pinged me a bit, but I feel I've been extra bad about reading him anymore.

What do you think of him?

sabie12 wrote:I'm just not very good at this game apparently, but my vote for BWT was because he didn't vote in the first poll. I always think that's a bad thing and then everyone jumps on me for thinking its bad to miss a vote. Isn't it? I wanted to make sure I got my vote in because I wasn't sure if I would be too busy to do so later. Sorry I didn't have any wonderfully thought out logic behind it. As far as ninja goes idk I'm seeing it as an I want to post something and be involved in the conversation post rather than anything crazy. I mean no I don't expect anyone to ping or do anything obviously baddie the first day but there's always that possibility I guess.

Lol, don't worry, I wouldn't say you're not good at it. I believe I'm terrible, particularly as a civvie, but that's just me.

Oh, I see. You said D1 but he had posted during D1 so I was confused what you meant.

It is generally considered poor form to miss a vote, yes, but the Day 0 period is really kind of a welcome period that isn't as important as the rest.

That said, I have no real reason to suspect you just yet, FZ., and I've found your attempts to baddie hunt genuine.

FZ. wrote: Okay, I like your answer. But recently, you started out every game suspicious of me, so this agreement thing surprised me. And by explaining, I meant that you went into detail when answering people's questions when no one else did. Could be you're the only polite person in around, though.

Lol, one of the reasons I often get suspicious of you is that I get paranoid most of people I often see eye to eye with. I realize that I can agree with baddies and disagree with civvies, so don't take my agreement with something you've said as a necessary statement of my trust.

Oh, okay. Well, when someone asks me a question, I like to make sure I answer it to the best of my ability, that's all.

Roxy wrote:MP - what do you think of Sabie's vote for teeth saying he is not participating when they both have added the same amount of nothing to the thread?

She only has more posts bc of ot posts.

You know, I'm not sure. I certainly don't like it. But I don't know whether it's just not understanding her logic and she's civvie, or whether she's a baddie trying to find a way to save her teammate or just needed to come up with a reason to vote someone.

FZ. wrote:How about MP? He seems a bit eager to please. He keeps seeing my point of view, and explains things. Not sure I've ever seen civvie MP do that. Can anyone share their thoughts about MP? Does it feel genuine to you?

What?

I'm not sure how I seem eager to please. I'm vocal in expressing agreement and disagreement. God forbid I agree with you because you and I generally see eye to eye on matters (something I believe we've both noted).

What do you mean by "explains things"? I'm confused.

Snow Dog wrote:

FZ. wrote:How about MP? He seems a bit eager to please. He keeps seeing my point of view, and explains things. Not sure I've ever seen civvie MP do that. Can anyone share their thoughts about MP? Does it feel genuine to you?

Yes...

....and no!

What is this supposed to mean?

Why do I not seem genuine? Or is that not what you were saying?

Rox, what do you think of Blooper's post?

sabie12 wrote:So many silly random votes today haha. Craziness! I'm gonna stick with BWT for not participating in day one.

But he has participated.

You don't think anything of Blooper's post?

I'm switching my vote to Ninja. I didn't really see anything in that post the first time through, but FZ.'s observation makes a lot of sense, and upon looking at it again it does seem to take a false-high road-esque vibe.

Boogs wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Switched my vote to Boogs for now since BWT showed up. Here's hoping it gets Boogs to talk.

I've expressed I would be busy this week being out of town already Sockman. I will swap my vote to you also in return

Hey, not cool.

Ambray wrote:

Made wrote:yo, I haven't played with Tink (who's new?), Ambray, Kate, FZ, or Simon. Anyone want to give general quirks about them, or maybe just funny thing's they've tried to pull of as both mafia and civvie? General trends don't matter as much as instances imo.

(also, is anyone else having issues with "Timing out?"

GET IN CHAT!
BLOCK SAWYER BEFORE HE BLOCKS MP AND OUR KILL!

Oh...
wait...

LMAO how could I neglect to mention that?

Good times.

Switched my vote to Boogs for now since BWT showed up. Here's hoping it gets Boogs to talk.

Yes, I'm looking into the time out issue. Sorry for the inconvenience, guys. I had someone from Bluehost come in today and I thought it'd be fixed but no dice. Hopefully tomorrow.

Made wrote:yo, I haven't played with Tink (who's new?), Ambray, Kate, FZ, or Simon. Anyone want to give general quirks about them, or maybe just funny thing's they've tried to pull of as both mafia and civvie? General trends don't matter as much as instances imo.

(also, is anyone else having issues with "Timing out?"

Tink and Simon are surely to be enigmas.

Ambray I haven't played with in forever, so not really anything there.

Kate and FZ. can both be insightful, yet aggressive (in a good way). Scary if they're bad, awesome if they're good. They're also both quick to voice their opinion even if it is the unpopular one.

Black Rock wrote:

nijuukyugou wrote:Hello, everyone! I am pleased to see there aren't 7 pages of reading to catch up on (of course, when I have the time off to read...but no complaints here )

Why are people voting so early? And for hardly any reasoning behind their votes? I see "to make them talk," "because I feel like it," and "as a placeholder." Seems like an easy way to hide your bad vote if you're bad. I'll wait a bit before I make my decision since we have until tomorrow, but these votes ping me something awful.

I thought that at first, then I realized there were more votes than baddies so the civvies have just hidden the baddies intentions for them. I thought, hey might as well. It's already too late to get anything real from the first few pages.

Another time out? Off to the local orphanage with my trusty torch.

Agreed here. For future votes I think the charm will be somewhat lost.

Dom wrote:

Ambray wrote:Maybe I've been away from mafia too long...

stay forever

MovingPictures07 wrote:So, looking over the roles, I just realized there's a Seemer role in this game.

Son of a... car.

/prepares for any time someone "suspicious" to be lynched and pops up civvie for people to crusade that they are the Seemer

le vote

How is that worthy of a vote? My views on people using the Seemer excuse are well known. I hate it. Even in games with a Seemer.

Tink wrote:I am going to vote for Snow Dog. I like him, but I want to lynch him.

Why would you want to do that?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Meh, not really feeling Rox anymore, and it feels weird having my vote on her...

I'm switching to Bass to get him to talk.

Thanks for the vote. But I really have nothing to say. Trust me when I see something I will be sure to bring it up.

Lol, fair enough.

Well, I'm moving to BWT until we hear from him then. Apparently my vote of breaching the silence worked.

Snow Dog wrote:I'm randomising and voting MP

I'm changing your screenname to Snow Troll.

FZ. wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

FZ. wrote: I hope that zinger wasn't meant for me :P I'm kidding.

Personally, I don't get all the early voting. To me, all it does is garner reactions that are allowed to be humorous because no one can really take them serious, hence it helps the baddies blend it.

limki: why do you need a vote on the board? Did I miss something? Do we not have 48 hours?

I don't either, frankly. I missed playing with you over here, FZ.

But it seems the trend in games anymore to have changeable votes (personally, I don't like them, but that's just my preference). I used changeable votes in Doctor Who, especially early on in the game, to vote the person that currently was highest on my , and whether I kept the vote on them was usually specified in my posts.

I don't feel comfortable ending the day period with my Rox vote, but I do think it was odd she was like "WTF with the early votes?" then turned around and made one herself. I just wanted to make her and others aware of that. It also is an easier way to start discussion; players are less apt to ignore suspicions if you've accompanied a vote with them.

I presume something better will come up and I'll change it, but if I don't or if I miss the vote, then at least I have a vote of some ping registered.

It's really a case of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em". Normally I would never vote this early, personally. Can't speak for why everyone else is voting the way they are.

The feeling is mutual
By the looks of it, you're much more vocal then your last few games. Any reason for that?
I get that. We used to do a lot of voting on the first day to start the game rolling, but a. not used to it here, and b. in my opinion, if it's just followed by a joke, it does the opposite of what it's supposed to do

Several reasons for that:

1) My PhD work pretty much dictates the bulk of my schedule, and the times where I am absolutely swamped versus mostly swamped and have some goof time come in waves.

2) Ever since Annie came to visit me and left a couple of weeks ago now, I had a whole week where I was out of commission, and subsequent to her leaving I was feeling sort of down which caused me to not be as enthusiastic about playing mafia as I would otherwise.

3) Due to 1 and 2, and other reasons, I wasn't feeling 100% engaged in Monopoly, Zelda, or the Teen Wolf KSite game.

4) The reason I am particularly active today is getting a lot accomplished over the past weekend and because I've been trying to write an essay for my seminar class -- and it's been nice to take breaks in between segments of writing.

Also, it takes a certain amount of time before I become properly engaged in a mafia game, and it's possible for me to even become engaged after a long period of being disengaged or become disengaged after a long period of being engaged, though the latter is less likely. If I feel I have been out of the loop of a game for too long, I feel it's harder to get my bearings.

As I've said in other games, my posting volume never really has anything to do with my alignment; it's pretty much always just outside factors interfering.

Now, regarding your last point, you raise an excellent argument, which is why I'm a bit wary of taking the early voting for granted myself. I feel players should take responsibility for their votes (also why I'm against randomizing).

Kate wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Meh, not really feeling Rox anymore, and it feels weird having my vote on her...

I'm switching to Bass to get him to talk.

What made you change your mind?

Her response made me realize it was more of the dynamic between Rox and Llama specifically (a perspective I didn't consider when reading it the first time) and less to do with Rox placing her vote on someone she thought deserved the vote. And my vote reasoning felt more weak the more I thought about it.

Not sure I plan to vote early in future periods now.

Meh, not really feeling Rox anymore, and it feels weird having my vote on her...

I'm switching to Bass to get him to talk.

So, looking over the roles, I just realized there's a Seemer role in this game.

Son of a... car.

/prepares for any time someone "suspicious" to be lynched and pops up civvie for people to crusade that they are the Seemer

Ambray wrote:Maybe I've been away from mafia too long...

What does this mean?

FZ. wrote:

Roxy wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:I am voting llama. I've got a feeling.

I love you too, Roxy.

I am glad to play with people who know me - its nice srsly <3

I hope that zinger wasn't meant for me :P I'm kidding.

Personally, I don't get all the early voting. To me, all it does is garner reactions that are allowed to be humorous because no one can really take them serious, hence it helps the baddies blend it.

limki: why do you need a vote on the board? Did I miss something? Do we not have 48 hours?

I don't either, frankly. I missed playing with you over here, FZ.

But it seems the trend in games anymore to have changeable votes (personally, I don't like them, but that's just my preference). I used changeable votes in Doctor Who, especially early on in the game, to vote the person that currently was highest on my , and whether I kept the vote on them was usually specified in my posts.

I don't feel comfortable ending the day period with my Rox vote, but I do think it was odd she was like "WTF with the early votes?" then turned around and made one herself. I just wanted to make her and others aware of that. It also is an easier way to start discussion; players are less apt to ignore suspicions if you've accompanied a vote with them.

I presume something better will come up and I'll change it, but if I don't or if I miss the vote, then at least I have a vote of some ping registered.

It's really a case of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em". Normally I would never vote this early, personally. Can't speak for why everyone else is voting the way they are.

fingersplints wrote:I'm voting for Rox for her early vote with little reason after she seemed to take issue with other people's early votes with no reason.

I made the same observation, so I will do the same (for now).

Made wrote:Yo, what exactly is restarting the day do? I've never actually seen it used. Is it like the day didn't happen, votes cleared. Also does it need to be triggered at a certain time or anything like that?

This is a good question, Made; I too await the host's response.

I've only seen it as a role in two other games, and in both circumstances (my Super Meat Boy and llama's The Shining) it didn't get used. The way I intended it when I wrote it for SMB was for the whole day to restart, i.e., the player who died comes back to life and the whole lynch period is repeated, as if it never happened.

Epignosis wrote:Can someone poke birdwithteeth11 and inform him that he is still sitting idle at the starting line?

Either way, we will be moving into Day 1 in a couple of hours.

Yep.

Good to see you around, Ambray!

Looking forward to D1.

thellama73 wrote:Kate! I haven't seen you around much lately. Good to have you back!

I echo this sentiment.

Yay game!

Lol @ Made's "green buttface car".

I picked #7 because I like that number.

I won't be here very often myself; RL has been busy with getting close to wrapping up the semester and now I'm in three games. Lol. But I'll try to be around as often as I can!