The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Don't get what's confusing about that, S~V~S. Self-preservation goal implies to prevent something for your own good. What better way to counter the odds of Mac being bad and getting even to Night 1 and try to make his team eliminate me, because I'm one of the players he doesn't like playing against?

And that Day Zero comment of mine was by far the jokey one, due to context of G-Man calling out to those who haven't even read their PMs. I would have started Day One the same way, regardless of any Day Zero chatter or banter.

Do you have any reason to actually think he is bad?

Both you & Mac posted after me, yet neither of you addressed the "throwing each other under a bus" aspect of my post, which tbh is the thing I most expected a reaction to. The main thing that is making me think I could be seriously wrong is that everyone else is sitting back and letting me run with this wacky theory.

What do you think of MP?

Linki, I am a very nice lady

Scotty wrote:What dingbat planned a show with a 6:30p curtain? I have 5 min before we start, but I appreciate Rico': approach.

I also get a tonal read of Mp as a "non-offensive poser with a capital P.
SVS, while I appreciate her soft defending of me, comes off as too nice right now.

I'd still be down to vote someone like bwt though... unless he posts more

and I'm sorry to hear that Glorf!!

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
What's the profile exactly? I must have missed something here.

"I'm killing the people who I hate playing against.'

motel room wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

motel room wrote:*growl*
Im here

Hello, motel room! What's up?

Reading the rules and characters. I see this is the first mad max so i better stow away my bondage gear.

Why is neil hartley here?

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:
It was arbitrary in that it was an asinine reason to kill on a night that I didn't think much. My ultimate rationale was 'cannot deal with Rico' which is both arbitrary and profiling.

Even if I have a policy kill Rico Mafia strategy, which I don't. Trying to policy lynch me on day 1 because of it is gung ho bordering on stupid since nobody else would care. So I must ask why you think anyone else would agree to your request? Or whether you actually do think they would. In which case why are you doing it?

It was not arbitrary. Go back and read what your statements were regarding your kills throughout that entire game. It was clear profiling based on the same factor. That is the definition of not arbitrary.

You say you don't, but nothing can stop me believing that, the next time you'd be Mafia, you'd get into the same mood to remove me or anyone else fitting the pattern. So I'm entitled to not be in the mood to risk getting killed just for that.

It's stupid because it won't end up in a lynch? Are policy lynches that successful? Anyway, it's my policy and it's well-founded, that's what mattered when I enabled it.

If anything, yes, I'd like the other players who might fit the profile to think of what I wrote in the second paragraph.

motel room wrote:*growl*
Im here

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Eh? I don't think we're seeing eye to eye here. I was merely expressing agreement that it seemed like you were trying to generate content.

...

Yes, that's the hypothesis. Based on the implication that all I'd need to do to hunt Mac is just that, given a good history of "reading him well". But that implication is false.

So how can you merely express agreement at something not backed up by its logic?

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:As an expert in the subject of Macdougall. Ricochet reads me well anyway so why he needs to lynch me before he can read me I do not know. I fancy he is just making content.

At this point I'd agree with that assessment.

At this point you are clearly just throwing out sentences. There is no solid history evidence to back up that assessment.

linki: except I wasn't an arbitrary target. You've profiled me quite specifically. And it was that very specificity, not the kill itself nor anything else, that "hurt my feelings", if anything.

It is exactly this that lead me to the current policy lynch. Not my fault you've accidentally locked yourself into it.

Explain this please. I'm entitled to my perspective.

Well you should also back it up, since it's based on something the player has implied to be accurate from past games.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:As an expert in the subject of Macdougall. Ricochet reads me well anyway so why he needs to lynch me before he can read me I do not know. I fancy he is just making content.

At this point I'd agree with that assessment.

At this point you are clearly just throwing out sentences. There is no solid history evidence to back up that assessment.

linki: except I wasn't an arbitrary target. You've profiled me quite specifically. And it was that very specificity, not the kill itself nor anything else, that "hurt my feelings", if anything.

It is exactly this that lead me to the current policy lynch. Not my fault you've accidentally locked yourself into it.

MacDougall wrote:As an expert in the subject of Macdougall. Ricochet reads me well anyway so why he needs to lynch me before he can read me I do not know. I fancy he is just making content.

Elohcin wrote:I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

I'll let the others. Mac is top priority afaic.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

OK, this was the best response imaginable. INH is not getting my vote today.

Did you sigh audibly when G-Man sent you a Mafia rolecard?

MacDougall wrote:MP if you are voting for me for shits and giggles or to see a reaction from me then posting it kind of nullifies any pointed post I could make. Yet again you are bad in a game I am in.

Ricochet's "policy lynch" is based on the fact that I policy night killed him in the previous game. That won't be happening here by virtue of the fact that I do not have the power of night kills.

Glorfindel is probably also voting for me because I night killed him last game.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

Uhm, no sir. That's the vote intention. You explicitly said you'd hop on the policy lynch that was underway (moi, Glorfindel). I certainly voted with a policy in mind. Glorfindel appears to have done so, in his own way. So how is your vote based on policy, then?

LEME POST.

insertnamehere wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't mind seeing how Mac feels when he joins the game buried in votes though. That should be a hoot.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:OMG Neil Hartley is here! I was wondering when he'd enter a mafia game.

You're right on the money, kid. Neil Hartley is present and accounted for, and this one is gonna be a doozy. Just sit back, enjoy your chardonnay, and let me croon the evening away for you and yours.

Tell me, buddy. What do you think of this thing? What do you think of all these people in the audience?

sprityo wrote:I didnt fall asleep before 9 pm. I swear.

Hello all! It's good to see you again